The Lass Word: Broncos 27 Packers 2
Reserves overmatched raising questions about team depth.
By KenLass

Well, the Green Bay Packers did accomplish one thing in their second preseason game. They got their starters another week closer to opening day without any new injuries. That’s because all of them watched from the sidelines. Assuming they could bear to watch. Because what took place on the field was a total waste of time.
Minutes before kickoff, the Packers released a list of 31 players who would not take part in this game. That list consisted basically of the team Green Bay will put on the field this season. The unit that remained to actually play this game would have been beaten by many college teams.
Matt LaFleur never expected to win this game. He knew Denver would be playing their starters for a good portion of the contest. But he surely hoped his deep reserves could at least play competitively enough to enable some meaningful evaluation. Unfortunately, they were hopelessly overmatched. So much so that it’s difficult to see what can be gleaned from the tape. Even when the Broncos mercifully unloaded their own reserves on to the field, they remained dominant.
OFFENSE
It really wasn’t a fair fight for either Sean Clifford nor Michael Pratt. Playing behind an offensive line that offered no running game and porous pass protection, they had no chance. Still, you would like to have seen them overcome the adversity and find a way to make a few big plays, but they simply weren’t able. I don’t recall a single player breaking a single tackle. The futility of the offensive line was most obviously exposed on three different fourth and short plays, all of which failed.
This might have been the most important game of Clifford’s pro football career. But he did little to convince the coaching staff he can be a viable back-up quarterback. He fumbled the very first snap, threw a drive-killing interception, and finished with a quarterback rating of 30.4. With a chance to seize the day, Pratt looked nervous and unsure. Given a golden opportunity to put points on the board after a turnover in Denver territory, Pratt missed Grant DuBose on a 4th and 1 pass to kill the drive. On another, he took a sack and fumbled the ball away inside his own 20. Settling down a bit, he finally led the offense to the Bronco 29 yard line, only to see a missed field goal spoil the effort. Green Bay ended up with just 80 passing yards and 88 rushing yards.
DEFENSE
Whatever Jeff Hafley’s vanilla defensive strategy was supposed to be for this game, his reserves did not comprehend it, and certainly could not execute it. They made a Denver team that will be lucky to win seven games this year look like the greatest show on turf. With a few spotty exceptions, there was no pass rush and sloppy coverage on the back end.
It was somehow fitting that the only two big defensive plays of the second half were made by players most fans didn’t even know were on the team. Zach Morton found himself unblocked and blew into the backfield for a safety, providing Green Bay’s only points. On the next series Brevin Allen had a sack. Neither guy is likely to make the final cut.
There was a pass batted in the air by James Ester and picked off by Kristian Welch. Brenton Cox had a powerful sack. Lukas van Ness had a pressure that forced an incompletion. Kingsley Enagbare and Colby Wooden forced Bo Nix to scramble for no gain. But those infrequent bright spots were more than negated by failures, such as Kalen King’s complete whiff on a 3rd and 17 checkdown, allowing the play to rupture for 19 yards. Ralen Goforth then made it an even bigger play by getting a penalty for a helmet to helmet hit.
SPECIAL TEAMS
Daniel Whelan failed to down two first half punts inside the opponent’s twenty yard line, booming both into the end zone. Little was accomplished in the kicker competition because the offense couldn’t get the ball close enough for a field goal try until the fourth quarter. When Greg Joseph finally had the chance to try from 47 yards, he missed it wide right. The snap looked high. Dmitri Stanley muffed a punt. Emanuel Wilson had a decent kickoff return to the thirty. On a night when the Packers surely could have used some sort of big play from the special teams to shake them out of the funk, it never came.
Unnoticed – Rookie Tyron Hopper led the team with eleven tackles. Almost twice as many as the next highest defender. Six of the stops were solo.
Unimpressive – Emanuel Wilson showed little of the burst and vision he displayed the previous week against Cleveland. Granted, there were few holes cleared for him, but he also failed to break any tackles and went down easily. He did not take advantage of an opportunity to surpass the inactive AJ Dillon for the number two running back slot.
Unexpected – Receiver Grant DuBose, one of the hottest players in this training camp, was only targeted twice and caught neither of them.
AFTERTHOUGHTS
“We’re gonna have to regroup, take a long, hard look in the mirror. We’ve gotta get better. We need that urgency from everybody. I thought there was more resiliency, more fight in the second half, especially from the defense. All in all, offensively, just want to see more fight from our guys. That was frustrating.” -- Matt LaFleur
JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS
-- If nothing else, this game casts legitimate doubt on the perception that the Packers have a lot of quality depth. This is particularly true on the offensive line. The weakening of the unit from the collective loss of David Bakhtiari, Yosh Nijman and Jonathan Runyan is now being exposed. This team needs first round pick Jordan Morgan to develop sooner than later.
-- Can the Packers really go into the season with Clifford and Pratt as their back-ups? Brian Gutekunst must take a serious look at what’s out there on the street.
-- The fact that the Packers held AJ Dillon out of this game along with Josh Jacobs indicates that Dillon is still solidly in possession of the number two running back job. So much so, that LaFleur didn’t want to risk an injury to him.
-- Sometimes getting your butt handed to you can be turned into a positive motivational tool. It will be a good test for this coaching staff to see if they can make that happen.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Ken Lass is a former Green Bay television sports anchor and 43 year media veteran, a lifelong Packers fan, and a shareholder.
__________________________




Comments (31)
jont
August 19, 2024 at 09:20 am
With Denver playing starters, their goal was to perform as a unit. The Packers played 2nd, 3rd, 4th guys to see what each could do. It was no surprise Denver looked better.
Watching the second half, though, when Denver brought out its subs, I expected to see guys make plays-- and I expected more than three or four of them.
I guess this is where 'breaking down the film' reveals more than watching live. The coaches can score each player on aspects of play not easily seen during live action. I really hope they see some good stuff, but LaFleur's comments about urgency and fire are not reassuring. It's still a young Packer roster and maybe a thin one.
murf7777
August 19, 2024 at 09:57 am
Jont, good comments about breaking down the film. Too many make rush judgements while watching , some influenced by the commentator over one play. IE: Kalen King not making the goal line tackle and his overall play was then called bad. Especially with DB’s you don’t see much of their play live as they are off camera. Also, unless you are focusing on just that player and that player is shown live or replay, it’s also hard to know whether player should make that play or not.
Coldworld
August 19, 2024 at 04:55 pm
King didn’t just have one bad play, unfortunately. He missed two tackles, including the one resulting in a first down on 3rd-and-17, but he also allowed three catches on three targets, for 40 yards and a touchdown. That’s a pretty bad night for anyone. He’s been good up until Sunday. He was not as bad as Tyler Davis. 10 snaps in total, 5 misses on run blocks.
Coldworld
August 19, 2024 at 09:26 am
It’s not the outcome but the effort as a group and individually that was striking and painful. With a few exceptions a lot of players never had an opportunity and others seemed to coast through it. It may be coincidental, but there were a lot of similarities with the performance of the ones in joint practice.
Booner
August 19, 2024 at 09:27 am
STINK,STANK.STUNK! Time for MLF to pull head out of ass and find a backup QB. Because he doesn't have one!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mbpacker
August 19, 2024 at 04:13 pm
The Grinch would have had trouble watching this even in Whovllle.
murf7777
August 19, 2024 at 09:30 am
Comparing What Clifford did to Pratt is unfair. Clifford was going against their #1’s vs Pratt against their 2’s and 3’s. Neither looked very good, but I still think Clifford is the better of the two right now. Pratt might have the bigger upside, but Clifford will win the #2 job unless they bring in another vet QB.
Ferrari-Driver
August 19, 2024 at 09:38 am
Watching offensive and defensive line play is my favorite part of the game. We lost on both sides of the ball without our starting players. I came out of the game with this thought...our backups are no match against Denver's starters.
GregC
August 19, 2024 at 09:55 am
Funny how that works, isn't it? That's why our #1 offense looked so good in last year's preseason.
mbpacker
August 19, 2024 at 04:15 pm
Guess we are not this deep, talent-laden team, at least based on this trip out west.
bjkdad44
August 19, 2024 at 09:49 am
You hit the proverbial nail on the proverbial head… coaching opportunity is there!…
tobinrote
August 19, 2024 at 09:56 am
was there a single keeper on the field for the Packers last night? i question MLF's policy on these games; remember who it took. remember how it took until the second half of the season last year for the team to look prepared to play on sunday? Lombardi took these preseason games more seriously because he felt it was important to develop of culture of WINNING, not resting for an uncertain future.... well all i can say is better hope no starter gets injured this year, because we do not have even remotely qualified backups except at wideout.
GregC
August 19, 2024 at 09:59 am
We are definitely in trouble if our best 31 players can't suit up for a game, as was the case last night.
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2024 at 01:48 pm
There was plenty of trouble when they suited for Friday's practice.
Leatherhead
August 19, 2024 at 10:11 am
A lot has changed in over 50 years since Lombardi. Players became expensive and you don't want big $$ players on the bench with injuries they got in a game that doesn't mean anything.
I get the "culture of winning" stuff, but I would think that by the time he won his second title, in 1962, he had probably already established that culture.
Again, on offense, nothing good is going to happen if you don't get people blocked. Our backups on the offensive line aren't very good right now, consequently, nobody on offense looked good. Put the starters on field and see how different everything looks.
Leatherhead
August 19, 2024 at 10:06 am
Doesn't matter and didn't count. Lots of not-quite-ready players out there. In less than two weeks, some of them will be gone. This game is the one they'll look back on in 30 years....they were playing for the Packers. I don't really have a problem with any of it.
You don't score points if you don't get people blocked, and I've said since February that our Oline backups aren't very good. So, when we played Caleb and Telford and Monk and Newman, how did that work for us?
Prediction: Regardless of what happens this season, we're going to need to add some talent to the Oline in the draft.
Bitternotsour
August 19, 2024 at 10:15 am
My guess is that pro scouting dept is busy. If I were a betting person we add someone from the Seahawks, because we trust Schneider's scouting. I'm not a big enough fan to know who else has a quality line, but I'd be looking at those teams too, as well as teams that play a similar scheme.
Thegreatreynoldo
August 19, 2024 at 08:23 pm
Most teams keep 10 offensive linemen. Is there a team out there whose 11th best offensive lineman could help GB? Not knowingly, by which I mean only if the team misevaluates a player. Somewhat more like, perhaps a cap casualty becomes available.
That said, I agree that the pro personnel scouting department is probably on high alert and working overtime. Gute has found some gems on the waiver wire, that is true.
Thegreatreynoldo
August 20, 2024 at 01:21 am
The Browns suffered some injuries at OT. I found two articles about bringing in outside help this late in the preseason. This one by SB Nation suggests David Bakhtiari, age 32, (the article claims he is healthy), Charles Leno, age 32, or D. J. Humphries, age 30, all street free agents with loads of experience.
A different author suggested cheaper alternatives: GB's Kadeem Telfort (2023 UDFA), Washington's Braeden Daniels (2023 4th round pick), and Chicago's Larry Borom, a 2021 5th round pick as waiver wire claims. As a note, the Packers are 15th in priority for successfully getting their waiver wire claims, so trading a 7th or swapping picks to make sure is an option.
I am sure these six guys are not the only possibilities. That said, we can get Telfort for nothing.
PeteK
August 19, 2024 at 11:13 am
Yes, even before looking for a backup QB, we need to find a solid backup dual T.
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2024 at 10:29 am
That was a Rocky Mountain Low! Starters get ground pounded on Friday in Practice. Backup depth was clueless Sunday about the game plans, if there were any. Maybe Matt and his coaches benched those too.
Even worse, play was uninspired from too many players almost begging to be cut next Tuesday.
About the only thing Matt can glean from the Denver whippings is his depth is pathetically unprepared for NFL football. Look in the mirror? Start with your coaching staff, Matt!
And the one unit you MUST have playing together and completing assignments to even have a chance, the Offensive line...was offensive. Newman continues to be the disastrous favorite of Butkus and Stenovich for some reason. After Tom and Walker, which of the lumbering, passive, giant backup Tackles WON'T allow Love to get buried? Most of them have been exposed to NFL coaching for a few years now. It isn't working.
Spock
August 19, 2024 at 10:35 am
Disagree with Ken's assessment of Emanuel Wilson as "unimpressive". I thought Wilson was one of the few bright spots out there last night. Otherwise, yeah, our reserves looked very bad against Denver's ones. As painful as it was to watch it was just a preseason "game". As I recall the Lions won all of their preseason games the year they lost every single regular season game. Hopefully, next week's exhibition game will be less painful to watch. GPG!
Thegreatreynoldo
August 19, 2024 at 08:30 pm
I agree. There was a nice jump cut to a make a nose tackle type who should have had Wilson dead to rights whiff completely, and enough burst to turn it into a sizable gain. Nice one-handed catch, which should have turned into a big gain since Newman and Ryhan were beautifully set up in front of Wilson. But Newman got crushed by a linebacker and Rhyan never located anyone he thought worthy of blocking and ended up running down the field blocking no one. [Rhyan has had some issues locating defenders in space. Rhyan might be a plus run blocker, but it is more in-line than in space. I thought he was a curious choice to try at center given GB's scheme, but I suspect he was just the only decent candidate for such a move.]
Leatherhead
August 20, 2024 at 08:55 am
Do you remember Scott Wells? He would run down the field and not block anybody. Over and over. You'd think that occasionally he might hit somebody, but it never happened.
Way back, before the draft, I was worried that Newman was going to be on the team. And here he is, less than two weeks from our opener, and he's one injury away from starting.
I like the guys we got in the draft, but I wish we'd done more to improve the line.
NFLfan
August 19, 2024 at 10:58 am
I hope someone (MLF) is looking @ and comprehending Eagles tape right about now.
fireball
August 19, 2024 at 11:05 am
" We're gonna have to regroup. " No shit about that.
LambeauPlain
August 19, 2024 at 02:06 pm
31 starters/key backups didn't suit up last night...but they did for Friday's practice and played like backups then too.
Going to be interesting to see if Matt and his coaches can rekindle effort and "want to" momentum. This is now mission critical timing. Time is draining away.
Matt will likely give the 31 starters/key backups another day off on Saturday. If so, I will be very concerned about the Eagles game. No need to panic, but this is a very big week for the team.
asmith1969
August 19, 2024 at 03:09 pm
A colossal disaster. Painful. Where in the alleged depth to this roster??
lpirlot
August 19, 2024 at 05:15 pm
The altitude and the heat helped Denver, as it's meant to.
Thegreatreynoldo
August 19, 2024 at 08:34 pm
It was indeed 91 degrees at the start of the game, falling to the upper 70s by the end of the game. Must have been very humid since it rained at times.
Boneman
August 20, 2024 at 05:30 am
The attitude of the leader is always translated to his team. If MLF doesn't care about the preseason games then neither will his players. Through his words and his action he definitely minimalized this game and I'm not sure why. Winning is a culture and players have to be conditioned to it through consistent messaging backed up with consistent and logical actions. You can't turn it off and on when you like. This is only preseason so it's time to take a collective breath but I don't agree with the leadership direction here.