Packers Snap Counts: Week 3 Vs. The Titans
The Packers cruise past the Titans to get to 2-1.

The Packers elevated QB Sean Clifford and CB Robert Rochell from the practice squad. The Packers previously signed RB Chris Brooks to the 53-man roster while RB Marshawn Lloyd is out on the injured reserve list. Brooks was waived injured by the Dolphins but reached an injury settlement for his concussion. The Packers initially signed him to their practice squad and then to their 53-man roster. Due to injury, QB Jordan Love (MCL), CB Carrington Valentine (ankle), and Jordan Morgan (shoulder), were inactive. OL Travis Glover, Edge Brenton Cox, DE Colby Wooden, and S Kitan Olapado were healthy scratches. Sean Clifford was active but did not play.
OFFENSIVE LINE:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Walker | 63 | 100 | 7/25% |
| Rhyan | 63 | 100 | 7/25% |
| Tom | 63 | 100 | 7/25% |
| Jenkins | 63 | 100 | |
| Myers | 63 | 100 | |
| Telfort | 7/25% | ||
| Monk | 7/25% | ||
| Dillard | 7/25% |
The Packers rushed for 188 yards on 37 carries, a 5.1-yard average. The running backs gained 96 yards on 29 carries, a 3.3-yard average. In the first half, the Packers slammed Josh Jacobs mostly into the middle of the Titans' defense, where he gained 11 yards on 7 carries. In the 87-degree heat, the Packers had more success running up the middle later in the game as the game (and the Titans' mammoth NT, De'Vondre Sweat) wore on (or out). Malik Willis gained all 73 of his rushing yards on 6 carries in the first half. Still, the Packers were able to work the edges and later settled into an RPO game to provide a creditable running attack. A couple of nice runs were taken off the board due to penalties. I thought Jacobs' nice run wouldn't have gone anywhere but for the hold by Rasheed Walker. Maybe Jacobs could have run through an arm tackle on that play.
The offensive line allowed 3 quarterback hits, all sacks. DE Jefferey Simmons had one sack, and linebacker Kenneth Murray had the other two sacks on some well-designed packages. The line generally gave Willis ample time. Overall, the line had a good day aside from several penalties. Rasheed Walker had committed 4 penalties (3 holding calls and a false start) in two games entering today's contest, and added another hold. Jenkins had a couple of penalties against the Titans.
QUARTERBACK:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Willis | 63 | 100 | |
| Clifford | DNP |
Willis gained 73 yards on 6 carries, all in the first half. He was decisive when he decided to scramble. Willis completed 13 of 19 passes for 202 yards (an excellent 10.63-yards per attempt) with a long of 37 yards. He had some other long completions where he let his receiver do most of the work, but he completed a 37 yard pass to Watson and an 18 yard pass to Doubs. Coach LaFleur lowered the guardrails a bit more and let Willis explore the intermediate and deep areas. It looked like Willis was getting to more second reads. Willis had another very good day. The only worrisome thing is the Packers continuing problems in the red zone. Today, the Packers went 1 vor 3. They had to settle for two 21-yard field goals. Otherwise, when the backup quarterback comes in to start two games and goes 2-0 (each time contributing many positive plays), that is an A+.
RUNNING BACKS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Jacobs | 33 | 53 | |
| Em Wilson | 26 | 41 | |
| Brooks | 4 | 6 | 3/11% |
Emanuel Wilson gained 50 yards on 12 carries, a 4.16-yard average, and Josh Jacobs gained 43 yards on 14 carriers (3.1 average). These are fairly modest number that do not paint a fair picture. Each back had to slam into the middle of the Titans' defense just to keep them honest, even if there was no room to go anywhere. It loosened up a bit in the second half, but there were several runs for no gain or minimal gains. I thought the backs did an excellent job breaking some tackles, and yes, just running through trash, in a nice display by both Jacobs and Wilson of balance and cutting ability. I saw both backs ignore some arm tackles and/or recover their balance after some lineman on the ground tried to grab an ankle, all the while showing some power and speed. Wilson caught both his targets for 35 yards, including taking a short pass to the end zone after he broke the ankles of CB Jarvis Brownlee (#29) and shook off another tackle attempt. Jacobs caught one pass for 5 yards. I am comfortable with the pass protection of both backs. According to PFF, Jacobs had led the league in carries entering the game, so given the comfortable lead, Wilson got quite a fiew snaps. Chris Brooks came in during mop up operations and carried the ball 3 times for 3 yards. He did his job: he did not fumble.
TIGHT ENDS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Kraft | 42 | 67 | 11/39% |
| Musgrave | 35 | 56 | 5/18% |
| Sims | 2 | 3 | 3/11% |
Kraft caught 2 of targets for 24 yards with a long of 21. He dropped the other target for what would have been a sure first down. That is not flashy but the Packers love having a blocking tight end. Kraft's blocking is night and day better than the first half of his rookie season. Musgrave caught his only target for 3 yards. Musgrave gets in the way effectively enough when he blocks. It shows you how much the wide receivers and quarterbacks, indeed the whole offense, has matured when one considers Musgrave has just 2 receptions on 4 targets for 9 receiving yards in the 3 games so far this year, despite getting a substantial number of snaps. Last Year Musgrave had 46 targets in 11 games, with the offense looking if not forcing the ball to him because he was one of the team's best match-ups. Kraft left the game in the third quarter with a shoulder injury but he returned.
WIDE RECEIVERS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Doubs | 43 | 73 | |
| Reed | 36 | 57 | 4/14% |
| Watson | 34 | 54 | |
| Wicks | 29 | 46 | |
| Melton | 17 | 27 | 6/21% |
| Heath | 11 | 17 | 4/14% |
There won't be any flashy statistics when the team only attempts 19 passes. Reed caught 4 of 6 passes for 50 yards with a long of 30. Reed and Kraft are the two players I would least like to be without; I think the Packers would miss Kraft because I don't see a replacement and they would miss Reed for his ability to play in the backfield (and make opposing defenses change their scheme and/or personnel) and his ability to run the ball, catch it, and gain yards after he touches the ball. Maybe Musgrave would respond to such a challenge and perhaps Melton and Watson could do the sorts of things Reed has been bringing to the table.
Christian Watson caught both of his targets for 67 yards. He came down with a 37-yard bomb (all in the air) after high-pointing it (what some called Randy Moss-ing the cornerback). His other reception went for 30 yards. Perhaps as important, Watson was really muscling the opposing secondary all day. Doubs put in another good day at the office, catching one pass on two targets for 18 yards. Wicks did not catch either of his targets. It would be nice to get Wicks back on track as he has only caught 3 of 9 targets for 26 yards so far this year. Heath had no targets, but then, he did not run any routes. According to PFF, Doubs ran 22 routes, Reed 18, Watson 15, Kraft 14, Wicks and Musgrave 13, Melton 2 and Ben Sims had 1.
Reed has yet to play a single snaps when the Packers are use 12 personnel, per PFF. The Packers use Doubs at one spot, with Watson and Wicks splitting the other wide receiver spot, and they use Reed in the slot (or in the backfield). The Packers (the WRs, the RBs, even the TEs) are forcing their opponents to miss quite a few tackles,
DEFENSIVE LINEMEN:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Clark | 34 | 63 | |
| Wyatt | 29 | 54 | |
| Brooks | 26 | 48 | 2/7% |
| Slaton | 15 | 28 | 9/32% |
Yet another game playing just 4 interior defensive linemen. This is the second game in which Wooden was a healthy scratch. This approach is working. After giving up 10 points last week, they held the Titans to 14 points and just 237 total yards. The Titans converted 3 of 10 third and fourth down opportunities. Wyatt stuffed the stat line with 4 tackles (3 solo), 2 sacks, and a total of 3 quarterback hits. Brooks and Clark each had one solo tackle, though Brooks also had 1 quarterback hit. Clark was penalized for offsides. Slaton had no statistics.
The Titans only gained 33 yards on the ground on 11 carries, with most of the yards coming from their quarterback (12 yards on 3 carries). Their running backs gained 19 yards on 8 carries, a 2.37 yard average. Of their 11 running plays, only three would be deemed successful runs, a 4-yard carry by Pollard on a 1st and 10, a 6-yard carry by RB Tyjae Spears and an 8-yard scramble by Levis. The Titans could not run and the line kept the linebackers clean while getting some pressure and a push up the middle.
LINEBACKERS:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Walker | 54 | 100 | 2/7% |
| McDuffie | 42 | 78 | 8/29% |
| Cooper | 18 | 33 | 6/21% |
| Er Wilson | 8 | 15 | 21/75% |
| Hopper | 13/46% |
McDuffie led the Packers with 9 tackles (6 solo) and a half sack. He made some nice open field stops. Walker had 6 tackles and a half sack. Cooper had 3 assisted tackles and a half sack. I like seeing that Cooper is getting worked into the mix more even if it comes at the expense of Eric Wilson, who had a great game last week. Wilson has an assisted tackle. I have not been able to watch the game again. I would just note that the Titans' running backs caught 7 of 8 passes for 69 yards with a long of 29 yards.
EDGE:
| Player | Snaps | % | ST |
| Gary | 37 | 69 | |
| Smith | 33 | 61 | |
| Van Ness | 22 | 41 | 12/43% |
| Enagbare | 22 | 41 | 11/39% |
| Mosby | 17/61% |
Enagbare had 4 tackles (1 solo), 2 quarterback hits which turned into 1.5 sacks and a forced fumble on a big hit. Preston Smith had solo tackles, 2 of which were sacks. It is nice to see Smith come alive with his first sacks of the season.. It is great for him because he has incentives in his contracts based on the number of sacks he gets. Gary had 2 tackles (1 solo). Gary had a clean sacked wiped out by a neutral zone penalty on Preston Smith. Van Ness had 1 sack. Van Ness always hustles. The team had 8 sacks in the game, 4.5 by the Edge group, 1.5 by the ILBs, and 2 by the defensive line (i.e., Wyatt). Some of these sacks game in the 4th quarter when the team could tee off but 1 game on the Titans 3rd possession and 2 came on their 4th possession.
SECONDARY:
| Player | Snasps | % | ST |
| McKinne | 54 | 100 | 8/29% |
| Alexander | 53 | 98 | 2/7% |
| Stokes | 53 | 98 | |
| Bullard | 49 | 91 | 12/43% |
| Nixon | 40 | 74 | 5/18% |
| Williams | 4 | 7 | 13/46% |
| Ballentine | 1 | 2 | 18/64% |
| Anderson | 19/68% | ||
| Rochell | 12/43% |
McKinney continues his great play with another interception, this time one that he made happen, and sound tackles. He had 4 tackles (3 solo), and took some nice angles. Alexander had 5 tackles (4 solo) and an interception/pick 6. He undercut a little out route and took it to the house. Stokes had 5 solo tackles. It may be that the Titans tried to isolate on Stokes. Williams and Rochell had tackles on special teams. Nixon, Bullard, and Ballentine had no statistics.
SPECIAL TEAMS:
Narveson made all three of his field goals with a long of 48. He had a miss that was wiped out by a penalty. Whelan came back down to earth by kicking 5 punts of a gross average of 48.8 yards, but he had 2 touchbacks and 2 others were returned for 24 yards.
RB: 1.00
TE: 1.25
WR: 2.75
DL: 1.93
ILB: 2.25
Edge: 2.11
DB: 4.70
Photo courtesy of Steve Roberts, Imagn Images
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________




Comments (39)
Thegreatreynoldo
September 23, 2024 at 06:31 am
I suspect that PFF ain't gonna like Stokes. De'Andre Hopkins is so physical while also still being able to break a CB's ankles.
I used to get upset with McCarthy about it but I kind of approved of LaFleur's going into turtle position in the second half. Willis did not run at all and went 4 of 8 for 44 yards (5.5 yards/attempt) in the 2nd half. GB had 112 net yards on the 2nd half after putting up 266 net in the first half.
OTOH, I am very happy that Hafley kept his foot on the gas. Saw a post about TN having protection problems in general and especially when teams send 6. Hafley did that a few times, mostly after the 8 minute mark in the 4th quarter, but sometimes earlier in the game. I thought I saw 3 Edge guys on the field a few times in the 4th. I am pretty sure one 6 man rush was Clark, Wyatt, Gary, Smith, Enagbare, and LVN. Yeah, that got home after it overwhelmed the Titans.
I saw Quay and Mc'Duffie make some nice plays. I was wondering about who was covering TN's RBs and TEs, though. Surprised not to hear Bullard's or Nixon's name for most of the day.
Fun game.
dobber
September 23, 2024 at 07:58 am
"I suspect that PFF ain't gonna like Stokes. De'Andre Hopkins is so physical while also still being able to break a CB's ankles."
I need to see the play again, but it seemed that on the Hopkins TD, he had arms fully extended into Stokes' chest to make room to catch the ball.
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 08:35 am
It was Hopkins doing what he still does well and arguably pushing the boundaries as you suggest. Still, a great cut and, honestly, a perfectly located pass that Charles Woodson in his prime would have had no chance on.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 23, 2024 at 09:24 am
You can check if you want, but your eyes didn't deceive you - physical was my euphemism for pushing off. Hopkins does it particularly well, and he is actually quite strong.
RCPackerFan
September 23, 2024 at 07:17 am
For the snaps in the game overall I thought it was a great break down. I felt that they each played roughly what they should have.
My wish though is that Cooper would start to see more snaps (he did see more), and McDuffie less. I feel like as the season moves along we will start to see Cooper playing more and McDuffie playing less. Cooper is just to fast and has to much playmaking ability to be off the field. That sack of his it was like he shot out of a cannon.
My other little disappointment was at the end of the game I was hoping to see a combo of Cooper and Hopper getting more snaps. When the game was basically out of reach I just felt it would have been a good time to get those guys on the field more and more experience.
But as for snap counts I think they were really well balanced overall.
tobinrote
September 23, 2024 at 07:41 am
i would like to see cooper cut in to Walker's snaps. Macduffie at least does not shy away from contact. but who would have thought we would get such excellent qb play from Willis. of course he will be benched as soon as Love is healthy, but it is good to know we have an able back up, who when his contract comes up in a couple of years is going to earn himself some nice money. We have won two games against very weak teams, but last year we managed to blow games like this early in the season. my only gripe about yesterday was the shoot ourselves in the foot penalties, and the D, it seems, going soft in opponent drives after we score a TD.
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 07:53 am
To me, the salient statistic is not so much the sacks, but how well they contained the run. If we can repeat that it bodes well for the team and likely sets up more sack opportunities as well. The Titans OL is awful. I think we have to accept that it’s bad enough to skew both sacks and run stats somewhat though.
It almost seemed like we were willing to dare Levis to keep passing. The odd stat is the lack of stats for Nixon and Bullard in light of Ridley being their best receiver and limited to just one shortish reception. Unless that was Levi’s not seeking his hitherto favorite receiver, something must have gone right defensively? I can’t say I know what from just watching live.
With the amount of yards Levis got, I’m not sure that daring him to pass wasn’t smart given that led to a pick 6 and a fumble. As noted most of that seemed to be directed at the perimeters, and that was odd for the Titans, with one deep S and isolated corners for the most part as far as I could see. McKinney’s int came on a late game “hail Mary” type throw to the outside too.
Next week, against Darnold and his skill players I think the pass game will have to be a much more central focus than it needed to be here. That will make it harder to be as effective against Jones on the ground. It’s strange to say it, but Darnold is probably the best pure QB we will have faced on current play. Thats something to think about and a new type of challenge for Hafley..
Leatherhead
September 23, 2024 at 09:42 am
It's easy to suppress the run when you're up by two scores. Your opponent will do that for you.
I don't think the Titans will finish at .500, and I do think this is one of the weaker teams we'll face this year. Still, you have to win the games you are supposed to win, and this would fall into that category.
LambeauPlain
September 23, 2024 at 10:49 am
It's easier to suppress the run the you suppress it all game long especially in the first half.
The Defense took that option away because the Titans had no success doing it. On their first TD scoring drive they ran 3 times for 6 yards. Their second drive was one play to Alexander. Their third drive they ran 3 times for nine yards before halftime.
If the Titans would have had success running, like the Colts, they would have kept doing it . They didn't.
Hopefully Hafley's vision is coming in focus now after playing "QB Contain" to start the season.
Darnold is not a threat to hurt you with his legs, so the Pack Attack Defense should be on display for a second week.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 23, 2024 at 09:49 am
I am listening to Andy Herman, who noted Wyatt's 29 snaps to Slaton's 15, and concluded that wyatt is now the starter, and deservedly so. Now, I've been suggesting that Wyatt is a really good pass rushing specialist, which is a back-handed compliment meant to hide what I feel about his run defense. So, I will reserve judgement on who the starter is because of my suspicion that Slaton's talents were not needed against TN. Admittedly, TN has been able to run against Chicago and were so-so against the Jets.
Good point on bullard and Nixon. Tyler boyd is their slot, right? He is a big slot at 6'2" and 203 lbs.
I've been a little down on GB's pass rush in the first two games. I thought it best just to celebrate 8 sacks but I confess I remain a bit skeptical.
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 10:43 am
Boyd is a slot but Ridley plays out of there a lot, and was who I was referencing.
Wyatt is the penetrator. Against Levi’s and Richardson I’m not really surprised to see him get more snaps. Just relieved . My guess is that the reasons differ slightly in that the run wasn’t a priority against the Colts fairly obviously, while the need here was to get pressure up the middle, straight at Levis. Yes sacks, but his melt downs come when he sees it coming. Wyatt did an excellent job.
We will see how things change, but I’m hopeful that what we are seeing is that Hafley actually adjusts personnel as well as tactics. If so, that’s an extremely welcome change.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 23, 2024 at 11:44 am
Agreed.
I saw an article by Paul Eckel, who I do not know, crediting Jaire Alexander with holding Ridley to one reception. I didn't mention it because I have never heard of Paul Eckel.
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 01:55 pm
Ridley moves around, but he’s always been best in the slot.
Leatherhead
September 23, 2024 at 01:03 pm
Slaton is our first down run plugger, and Tennessee only had about a dozen first downs. They only had 11 rushing attempts. The only conclusion I would draw from this is that the coaches didn't think we needed a run plugger on the field very often.
The Titans ran against Chicago because they were ahead. Against us, they were down by two scores at the end of the first quarter.
I have something that might help you feel better about our pass rush. We have so many good defensive linemen that we have healthy guys inactive on gameday, and over the course of the season, I think the Packers pass rush is going to be more resistant to injury, and fresher, than just about any other team in the league. Rushing the passer tires you out, especially in hurry up situations, or when they throw 45 times, but having a deep rotation like we do ensures that we're going to be throwing fresh dogs at the QB all 60 minutes.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 23, 2024 at 11:17 pm
that is my conclusion as well until time tells us differently.
LLCHESTY
September 23, 2024 at 07:56 pm
These are the kind of teams Barry's D would often struggle against so I'll take beating the hell out of a lesser team.
I'll be interested to see how they do against a good team with a top QB. That could gives a glimpse of their chances of holding their own when the playoffs roll around, though Bullard and Williams should be improved by then and Cooper could be starting. A big plus is 7 interceptions in three games vs seventeen. Definitely ups the scoring chances for the offense.
Maybe Leatherhead isn't missing Barry as much as he thought he would.
dobber
September 23, 2024 at 08:04 am
Mostly nickel and 11 personnel in this one. This is looking to be the norm.
LambeauPlain
September 23, 2024 at 11:24 am
Seems so. Makes sense too. Do you sit one of your best playmakers in Reed and replace him with Musgrave in "12"?
After 2 games, 5 players seemed to be under-performing based on last year and expectations: Q. Walker, Watson, Enagbare, R. Walker, Gary, and Musgrave.
Q. Walker played better with 6 tackles and 1/2 a sack. Watson finally contributed with chunk plays. Enagbare had his best game...1 1/2 sacks and caused fumble. R. Walker is hurting the team with his penalties...holding calls are drive killers. Gary is still stuck in neutral.
But what is up with Musgrave? He is playing tentative. Compared to Kraft, he looks of slighter build now too. Did the injuries, especially the lacerated kidney, affect his aggressiveness? Tucker looks like he spent the offseason in the weight room. Not Luke. He's lost snaps to Kraft, for good reason. He better step it up or Sims, who is a good blocker, is going to take plays from him.
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 11:53 pm
I am starting to think Musgrave was more affected by that lacerated kidney than we realized. If he can’t get past it. I don’t see his career blossoming. He’s not been good as a blocking receiver, let alone a true TE. And he’s looked neither fast nor hungry in the passing game.
Watson was good this week, but Wicks was not. Thats 2 out of 3 games where Wicks has disappointed. He’s got too much talent to do that. He needs to get focused and stay so.
T7Steve
September 23, 2024 at 08:06 am
Thanks, TGR.
Would like to figure out why these O-line penalties are happening. Don't normally see Jenkins getting called. Wonder if these teams are seeing something from previous games that they're directing the officials' attention to? I know each team is allowed to voice concerns to officials before games.
Looks like a big matchup next week that we had no idea was going to be so big before the season started. Have to grudgingly give the Viqueens coaches some respect for what they've been able to put on the field so far. I hope our coaching and team can bring them back to earth.
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 11:12 am
The Texans beat the Colts and Chicago. Sure they have Stroud, but have they been good this year? Offensively no. They scored 29 points in the Colts, but that’s less than we did in Willis’s first game. Their offense has never really fired despite Stroud.
The Vikings beat the 49ers, but a heavily depleted version. The Rams just did the same. They beat the Giants. I expect a lot of teams will.
It’s only 3 games, but I’m not convinced that the Vikings record is as impressive as some seem to think based upon how I perceive the teams they have played. At this point in the season we really don’t know what any team is, though I think that it’s pretty clear the 49ers at the moment are a much diluted version offensively.
We have played Jefferson before. He’s the best receiver in the league. Jones we know. It will be the first big test of our passing D and of our D against a balanced attack. It will also be their first real test against a decent balanced O that is remotely healthy if Love plays.
They are going to score points more than the last 2 team we have played, but more than the Eagles? To me it comes down to not making stupid mistakes and giving up penalty yards. I am certainly not daunted by anything that the Vikings have done to date. I think, if Love has a decent day, the offenses will test each others defenses far more thoroughly and Hafley’s D might well surprise them. It should be a good game.
If Willis plays, well I guess we are more up against it, but to win he has to play unfettered and LaFleur has to go for it for a full game not a half. I wonder if McKinney is the difference in the end.
Leatherhead
September 23, 2024 at 09:40 am
63 offensive snaps, 4 targets to the TE. I hope the people who downvoted me when I said before the season that we weren't going to throw to the TE that much are paying attention. Particularly those who said we should change what we do on offense because Musgrave/Kraft were so awesome. In this offense, the TE is a blocker on most plays.
Tennessee was going after our linebackers, Walker and McDuffie. I'd probably do the same thing in their position. And although the Titans had some success with that, I'd say that over the course of 60 minutes, Walker and McDuffie held their own. And we got to see our pass rush when it's focused on pressure more than containment.
Bitternotsour
September 23, 2024 at 09:55 am
lotta ballgame left, and there's a back-up qb. try to take your victory lap in December.
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 11:15 am
We have thrown how many passes in the last two games? So far Kraft has been as big a focus as anyone in the passing game I’d say.
Leatherhead
September 23, 2024 at 12:09 pm
We have thrown 68 passes in 3 games...almost 23 a game. We are averaging 9.1yards/attempt, 5th highest in the league. The TE position has been targeted 12 times in 3 games...4 per game. The WR position has been targeted 42 times.
42 seems like a bigger focus than 12. Yes, on an individual basis, his 8 targets is 4th highest. As a percentage of our total offense, targets to the TE constitute 12 targets in 200 plays. That's 6% of our plays. We'll actually have to target the TE more over the last 14 games if we expect to reach 100 targets.
We're a 3-1-1 team. Musgrave isn't blocking well enough to get more time, Kraft is getting more snaps and more targets. But the TE position isn't gettng thrown to very much, and it never does in Green Bay.
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 01:57 pm
IThe majority of those passes were in game one. Wasn’t Kraft dinged up then too?
LambeauPlain
September 23, 2024 at 01:59 pm
"But the TE position isn't gettng thrown to very much, and it never does in Green Bay."
It hasn't during the LaFluer years. Prior to Kraft and Musgrave, the targets were Graham, Lewis, Tonyan, and Sternberger. So you can see why TE was not in the bullseye.
Kraft is finally going to change that. The last two weeks he was assigned to block for Willis's game plan. He loves the work! But with the ball in his hands, he's a tough tackle. He continues to show up.
Musgrave may still make this the best TE tandem the Pack has had in many years...but he's going in a different direction right now. Seems tentative. Doesn't look stronger. Isn't blocking any better.
LLCHESTY
September 23, 2024 at 08:01 pm
I think LaFleur would be wise to devise some plays with Reed on the field in 12 personnel. Maybe a two slot look or Musgrave line up as an H and immediately heads upfield before he can get knocked on his butt. The blowup on him yesterday was harsh. Keep him away from the big guys for awhile.
Bitternotsour
September 23, 2024 at 11:12 pm
that's a bogus comparison, there are often three receivers per play, sometimes four, and the running backs have had targets as well. the point we've been making with you is that the tight ends are receivers, not just blockers, and the same is true with the wide-outs. They too block. So far this season, Reed leads the team with 10 catches, Kraft has 6, outpacing Watson and Wicks. Does that make them tight ends?
Slow your roll.
Ferrari-Driver
September 23, 2024 at 09:56 am
TGR,
Enjoyed the summary...thanks for the details.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 23, 2024 at 11:04 am
Defense
1. Kingsley Enagbare: 92.9 (Elite)
2. Jaire Alexander: 89.2 (Elite)
3. Devonte Wyatt: 78.7 (Above Avg)
4. Preston Smith: 77.3 (Above Avg)
5. Xavier McKinney: 76.2 (Above Avg)
Alexander allowed just 45 yards on 7 targets. Enagbare added 3 stops to his 3 pressures.
Worst defense:
1. LB Quay Walker: 35.9
2. LB Eric Wilson: 39.2
3. DL Kenny Clark: 44.5
4. S Javon Bullard: 52.5
5. DL TJ Slaton: 57.7
Walker was horrible in coverage. Eric Wilson gave up 2 receptions for 33 yards in only 8 sacks. Clark led the DL in snaps but had no pressures and was "inconsistent" against the run. (That bad?) Bullard allowed 2 catches for 27 yards. (IDK - doesn't sound that terrible to me since he played 49 snaps.) Slaton had 1 hurry but was poor against the run. [These grades seem harsh.]
Offense
1. Josh Jacobs: 77.0 (Above Avg)
2. Emmanuel Wilson: 76.7 (Above Avg)
3. Christian Watson: 76.0 (Above Avg)
4. Malik Willis: 75.9 (Above Avg)
5. Zach Tom: 72.9 (Above Avg)
PFF said Jacobs forced 2 missed tackles and Wilson forced 3.
Worst:
1. WR Dontayvion Wicks: 47.4
2. LG Elgton Jenkins: 51.6
3. TE Tucker Kraft: 52.4
4. TE Luke Musgrave: 53.0
5. LT Rasheed Walker: 53.3
Jenkins gave up 2 pressures, had 2 penalties and had a poor run blocking grade. Musgrave missed 2 blocks in the run game and lost his only pass blocking rep.
Willis got threw the ball in 2.07 seconds. That is fast.
Total Pressures Vs. TN per
@PFF
Preston Smith: 4
Kingsley Enagbare: 3
Devonte Wyatt: 3
Rashan Gary: 3
Karl Brooks: 2
LVN, Cooper, Walker, Mcduffie, Slaton: 1
20 total
Levis was under pressure on 15 of his 44 dropbacks.
Pressures Allowed Vs. Ten per
@pff
LT: Rasheed Walker: 1
LG: Elgton Jenkins: 2
C: Josh Myers: 0
RG: Sean Rhyan: 0
RT: Zach Tom: 0
I thought this was interesting:
LG Peter Skoronski: 4 pressures, 2 sacks (Grade: 52.9)
RT Jaelyn Duncan: 2 pressures, 1 sack (Grade: 36.9)
RT Nicholas Petit-Frere: 2 pressures, 1 sack (Grade: 48.3)
C Lloyd Cushenberry: 2 pressures (Grade: 39.5)
RG Dillon Radunz: 1 pressure (Grade: 75.1)
LT JC Latham: 1 pressure (Grade: 81.8)
WR Tyler Boyd: 1 pressure, 1 sack
3 sacks were the responsibility of Levis, per PFF.
Best PFF grades for Minny: Season long
1. Justin Jefferson 78.8
2 Aaron Jones 78.5
3 David Quessenberry 74.7
4 Jonathan Greenard 73.6
5 Sam Darnold 73.5
Mn worst grades vs. Houston
OT Brian O’Neill 60.8
OCGarret Bradbury 61.7
CB Byron Murphy Jr 32.6
DL Harrison Phillips 50.5
OLB Pat Jones 50.9
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 11:22 am
I take PFF’s allocation of pressures to OL over the last couple of years with a very large pinch of salt. However, I do think the positive is that I didn’t see Rhyan give up one live.
I’m not going to debate responsibility between Myers/Jenkins/Walker, I’m just going to say that I think that was clearly Rhyan’s best game. Fingers crossed that he can keep that up, as opposed to it being due to the weak Titans rush. Maybe it helped not being platooned too? Rhyan ascending would be a big plus.
LambeauPlain
September 23, 2024 at 11:37 am
Rhyan was solid. And Myers played OK too, I have to say.
On Wilson's TD catch in the flat, both Myers and Rhyan pulled left to great effect. Both set up walls for Wilson to cut behind.
If Rhyan keeps this up, when Morgan returns it may be time to split reps with Walker.
Leatherhead
September 23, 2024 at 11:53 am
I take everything PFF says with a grain of salt. Hell, I take everything with a grain of salt. I'm a skeptic, by nature.
I watch the games. I rewatch the games, sometimes. I have a simple method of evaluating Olinemen, which is how often does their man make a tackle behind, at, or near the LOS? Out of 62 snaps, how many did your opponent win? And consistently, all of our linemen are winning a very high percentage of their snaps.
The line has to play like a unit, especially on the zone blocking schemes. Since the Philadelphia game, the Packers have had another dozen practices, film studies, meetings, etc. This is why it often takes a while for an Oline to gel. Additionally, sometimes, you get to line up across from a big strong guy on the defensive line, and sometimes you have to line up across from a monster that you're going to need some help with. All this takes timing, communication, and practice. All these penalties we're taking on the offensive line right now? Those will go away with practice. Mid-season is still a month away, 20 practices away.
If we can keep our top 6 guys healthy, we're going to have a very good offensive line this year, although I still believe our Achilles Heel is our lack of depth, and it's the most likely thing to derail our Super Bowl run.
T7Steve
September 23, 2024 at 01:56 pm
I think this line should be in midseason form by now. We gave them the "inexperienced together" excuse last season and these're all the same guys now.
Almost every team in the NFL has an O-line. Some like the Vikings are newer working together and NOT committing these penalties. We've committed more than any team we faced. All those teams have only played in about the same amount of game as the Packers.
These coaches better get a hold of this problem quick.
LLCHESTY
September 23, 2024 at 12:29 pm
I'm pretty sure Clark had a hit on Levis late in the game.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 23, 2024 at 12:40 pm
I just checked NFLgsis about Clark. No QB hits.
LLCHESTY
September 23, 2024 at 07:36 pm
It would be interesting to see the all 22 from the last couple weeks to see if Clark and Gary are drawing attention and freeing up the others or just aren't playing very well. I saw Clark blow up a couple running plays that should have been TFLs but Walker tried to run around and OL and gave the RB a free lane. Pollard did not help my fantasy team like I thought he would so they were doing something right. Having a big lead didn't hurt.
Coldworld
September 23, 2024 at 11:56 pm
Wahle seems to think Clark is really struggling to adapt to the change in emphasis.