Will the Packers Extend Defensive Lineman Devonte Wyatt?

The Green Bay Packers picked up the fifth-year option of defensive lineman Devonte Wyatt a year ago. That means the former Georgia star will be playing on a one-year contract worth $12.9 million in 2026. As of now, he will become a free agent next offseason unless the Packers sign him to a new deal. But will the Packers give a long-term contract to Wyatt or will 2026 be his final season in Green Bay?

Wyatt’s career got off to a bit of a slow start. In his first three seasons with the Packers, he started a total of five games with all of them coming in 2023. That was the season he recorded a career-high 5.5 sacks. While Wyatt wasn’t a starter, he did make an impact when he was on the field. He was one of the few defensive tackles who could get pressure on opposing quarterbacks.

In 2025, Wyatt finally became a full-time starter. He started all 10 games he played before suffering a gruesome season-ending injury. The Packers noticed his absence and the pass rush started to fall off when Wyatt was out of the lineup.

Star edge rusher Micah Parsons recognized the impact that Wyatt’s absence had on the defense. After Wyatt’s injury, Parsons described his teammate as “a player you can’t replace. It’s going to be challenging, but we’re going to have to really dial into our details, our fundamentals, to try to replace someone who is irreplaceable.”

He also said, “He makes my life easier. He understands how to rush, how to play, his play style. I just think he brings guys along.”

The Packers have already handed out multiple extensions this offseason. The team gave a new contract to wide receivers Christian Watson and Jayden Reed and to center Sean Rhyan. Multiple reports indicate that tight end Tucker Kraft will be the next player to receive a long-term extension. But then, will Wyatt be next?

There are reasons to extend Wyatt. He adds more pass rush than most defensive tackles and according to his teammates, makes the players around him better.

But there are reasons to choose not to sign Wyatt to a new deal. Gutekunst has a pattern when it comes to handing out third contracts. They are handed out to only a small number of players who are part of the core of the team and usually to players who also have established themselves as elite and have been to multiple Pro Bowls. Recent examples include Kenny Clark, David Bakhtiari, and Aaron Rodgers.

Wyatt was an older prospect when he was drafted in 2022. He will turn 29 in March so he will be over 30 during nearly all of any extension he signs with the Packers. Barring a very strong 2026 season, Wyatt would not fit the typical Packers criteria for another extension.

The Packers also have multiple players on the roster who can replace Wyatt and put pressure on the quarterback from the interior of the defensive line. The team signed veteran free agent Javon Hargrave to a two-year deal. They also traded up to select Chris McClellan in the third round of this year’s draft. If Hargrave proves he still has something left in the tank and McClellan shows he’s ready for a bigger role in 2027 than they would be cheaper alternatives to Wyatt.

The Packers could also add another defensive tackle in the 2027 draft. The Packers don’t have a first-round pick because of the Parsons trade, but they do have multiple picks on day two and three due to other trades and compensatory picks from the loss of free agents like Malik Willis and Romeo Doubs.

Ultimately, a lot will depend on how Wyatt plays in 2026. Gutekunst will likely take a wait and see attitude with Wyatt this season. If Wyatt returns to action and plays very well, he will increase his chances of another deal. But ultimately, he will have to play very well to get the Packers to go against their typical approach to signing players to third contracts.    

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
2 points
 

Comments (23)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
stockholder's picture

June 27, 2026 at 11:50 am

In the 2025 draft everyone thought we needed a DT.
And we had both Wyattt and Clark.

The solution was to draft
Warren Brandon ,Sorrel and Oliver after Golden.
Now minus Clark and the addition of Parsons.
Wyatt must be the answer.????
If Wyatt hasn't been the answer since we drafted him.
Where is the justification in paying him now?
I get it makes Gute look good if he resigns his picks.
But the oft injured is such a big let down.
It can only deprive the rest of the defense
from getting to it's true potential.
Sorry but Gute should trade him too; like clark.
Another parsons hopeful is still better than a Part-Time DT.

+ REPLY
-1 points
3
4
golfpacker61's picture

June 29, 2026 at 10:21 am

After making the mind-boggling decision to pay LVN $14 million for having 8.5 career sacks, I wouldn't be surprised if Wyatt got paid too. But If $15 million was the figure he would get, I would shop for a better veteran as a 2-year bridge and keep looking thru the draft. He will be worth a 4th round comp pick at worst.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

June 27, 2026 at 11:56 am

I think we have to address Kraft first. Then we need to figure out how we stand for cap and where Wyatt is health wise. Ideally yes, but I really don’t know as much about his recovery expectations or our cap leeway after Kraft.

+ REPLY
1 points
2
1
splitpea1's picture

June 27, 2026 at 12:30 pm

It depends not only on how well Wyatt plays, but whether McClellan turns out top be a winner--that is, shows more than the occasional "flash." It looks like a pretty strong draft class for DLs, and the Packers should be able to nab a promising one in the second round should they choose to do so, maybe without using their extra ammunition to trade up a little.

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
golfpacker61's picture

June 29, 2026 at 10:25 am

Please no tradeups this year. Pick #160 could have got us Nic Singleton-RB-Penn State or another solid OL or TE. And those 2 7ths we gave up could have gotten Dallen Bentley-Y-TE and a OT or a CB.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

June 27, 2026 at 12:32 pm

I don't think the 5th year option really counts as a second contract. If he extends it would be his second.

+ REPLY
9 points
9
0
TKWorldWide's picture

June 27, 2026 at 12:59 pm

I’ve watched him for four years and I still don’t have much idea how good he is.

+ REPLY
8 points
10
2
NFLfan's picture

June 27, 2026 at 03:12 pm

Devonte Wyatt has a considerable injury history which makes him unavailable for lengthy periods.

+ REPLY
-3 points
4
7
dobber's picture

June 27, 2026 at 03:29 pm

Until someone fell on his leg last season, he missed four games across his first 3 years.

+ REPLY
9 points
10
1
Oppy's picture

June 27, 2026 at 10:02 pm

Shhh.. nobody cares about objective fact around here, dobber.
It's all about the narrative.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Bitternotsour's picture

June 28, 2026 at 10:25 am

Objective fact is valued in a corner of this room.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

June 28, 2026 at 03:29 am

dobber is accurate. However, Wyatt has played just 1517 snaps over 4 seasons with a high of 552 snaps. Wyatt was on pace to play 644 snaps in 2025. He turned 28 last March. PFF still hated his run defense but most fans thought he had shored up that part of his game. He can rush the passer. He is coming off a nasty-looking injury but he is supposed to be back in good time for training camp. Hmm. So...

No to a 4-year extension.
No to a 3-year extension.
I don't think a 2-year extension is feasible.

Yeah in principle, maybe yes to tacking on 2 years at $11M with a void year and some escalators in case Wyatt shines, but I don't know how one can write a contract that makes sense for both parties.

Wyatt is due $12.9M in cash in 2026, so the contract would presumably have to get that kind of money to Wyatt in 2026 (year 1). Then, the $12.9M is all guaranteed. He is not going to like a $12.9M signing bonus that gives the Packers 2 option years. Most teams might consider guaranteeing some money in year 2 (2027) but GB does not do that. I don't think they are going to start with Devonte Wyatt.

Two more things: the Tucker Kraft extension is going to eat up most of what little cap space they have in 2026 and 2027 and I don't know which position might need a boost next year, so I don't think pre-determining where to spend scarce 2027 cap dollars is a good idea. They might be fine at IDL in 2027 with guys currently under control.

Maybe GB trades Karl Brooks to save $3.764M on the salary cap. If McClellan and Wyatt look healthy, maybe they go with Hargraves, Wyatt, McClellan, and Brinson. Brooks can rush the passer and isn't quite as bad against the run as PFF indicates. The thing is, that is exactly what Hargraves and Wyatt offer but they are just better pass rushers and much better run defenders.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

June 28, 2026 at 09:59 am

Good to see you back, TGR!

There were questions when Wyatt was drafted about how his age would impact his prospects with the team, longer-term. I think the downside of that is that for a guy like Wyatt whose game is to play upfield, when he starts to hit the wall, he's not much. The fact that the Packers liked to rotate DTs (Wyatt, Slaton, Brooks) next to Kenny Clark through his earlier years means Wyatt doesn't have a huge amount of mileage on his tires.

Until someone fell on his leg and busted it, Wyatt was headed for his best season and highest play rate. PFF has never liked his run game, but the bottom line is that this was a very good defense--and good against the run--until Wyatt went out...and then when Parsons went out. Part of that was that the better and more physical run teams on the schedule were in the second half, too. He was headed toward between 7-9 sacks, too, which would have put him somewhere around 3rd or 4th among pure DTs.

The Packers have talked a good game about wanting to extend Wyatt. Assuming he plays similarly to 2025, if Wyatt makes it to the open market, he's going to get a pretty hefty pay raise...I'd argue that's part of why the Packers drafted McClellan instead of a tree stump (Orange) and signed Hargrave to essentially a 1+1 contract. They're giving themselves the chance to move on.

This story came out on PackersWire last night regarding the Packers DT group...

packerswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2026/06/27/green-bay-packers-defensive-tackle-devonte-wyatt-karl-brooks-contract-nfl-analysis-2026/90723482007/

"Maybe GB trades Karl Brooks to save $3.764M on the salary cap. "

I think Brooks plays out his contract. I wouldn't be surprised if the Packers need Brooks to also be an even-front DE for a few snaps per game on top of rotational DT as they wait for Parsons to return.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

June 29, 2026 at 02:37 am

I agree with you and Mark Oldacres that the Packers have placed themselves in a bit of a pickle. Things might still work out alright for GB at IDL.

I was for picking up Wyatt's 5th year option even though I did not think he was worth quite $12.98M. And he became a more complete player, as he was adequate against the run in 2025 and he continued to be a pretty good pass rusher (9.99% pressure rate). Assuming an 8% increase in the cap, $12.98M becomes $14.0M in 2027. If he plays well and stays healthy, Wyatt gets north of $14M and if he gets hurt or regresses, he will get less. I think GB keeps one of Wyatt/Hargraves (not 2 of the 3 players we're discussing).

I liked Brooks the first time I watched him in training camp in 2023. I like being right as much as the next person. The first step was there but I mistook a rookie trying to prove his toughness back then with the makings of a run defender. Never happened. Brooks is a pass rush specialist, and he slipped to a 6.4% pressure rate in 2025. During the last 4 games not counting the JV game in week 18 against MN, when GB could not make Brooks was the main guy rather than a rotational guy who they would try to hide, the Packers gave up 138 yards, 89, 150, and 307 rushing yards. My ceiling for Brooks is $5M AAV. FYI: Hargraves had a 10.5% pressure rate for MN and a great DC.

BTW, Hargraves, Wyatt, Brooks, and Brinson are all the same player, same type of player, though they vary in productivity. The Packers have a type.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

June 29, 2026 at 02:48 am

For fun, I looked up Tederall Slaton (6.85 pressure rate for Cincy), Kenny Clark (9.52% in his usual 746 snaps), Stackhouse (5.88%), Wooden (3.79%), and Brinson (7.52% - 11 total pressures per PFF in 152 pass rushing snaps but 5 came in one game, IIRC). I think the house opinion is that McClellan has a little more juice the Orange. GB has a type and they can't help themselves.

I don't think Brooks' 6.4% pressure rate is elevated enough to be special. [Am I already regretting writing $5M AAV for Brooks up above? Not too much. His pass rush win rate was an excellent 12% in 2024 - 11th among DTs and it dropped a bit but only to 10%, still top 12 for DTs. I don't like the PRWR stat that much but it does highlight something useful.]

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

June 29, 2026 at 10:54 am

"Two more things: the Tucker Kraft extension is going to eat up most of what little cap space they have in 2026 and 2027 and I don't know which position might need a boost next year, so I don't think pre-determining where to spend scarce 2027 cap dollars is a good idea."

I am thrilled we are projected to have 11 picks in a very strong 2027 draft, but if we make all 11, paying them will be a significant chunk of money even with no first round pick. I haven't done any 2027 draft research so I don't know how strong the DL group will be. We will have 3 Day 2 picks so a DT, CB, and OL could be the 3 biggest needs in that draft.

Wyatt doesn't deserve a $14 million a year contract but we just gave that to LVN for less production, who would be surprised? Personally, for $14-15 million I think we could sign an above average DT who is good against Pass & run. And then keep drafting and developing DTs.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

June 29, 2026 at 12:33 pm

"paying them will be a significant chunk of money even with no first round pick."

Most of those picks will essentially be making around the minimum especially in their first two years, so you're replacing a minimum salary vet with a minimum salary rookie under the rule of 51. Shouldn't be an issue.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

June 29, 2026 at 04:02 pm

Just figuring this Dobber and if GB has 1-2nd round pick, 2-3rd round picks, 3-4th round picks, 2-5th round picks, 2-6th round picks, and 1-7th round pick, 11 picks in all figured at average salaries for mid to late round, comes to-drum roll please.............................
about $15.5 million dollars in the first year!!! Give or take a few dollars.

To me that is a significant amount of cap space which we won't have as much of next year.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

June 27, 2026 at 04:30 pm

Pass on extension. Basically offering a full time salary to a part time player. This would be inefficient economics.

+ REPLY
0 points
2
2
GregC's picture

June 27, 2026 at 05:02 pm

He started last year, and he will start again this year. He is our best defensive lineman. I think he played quite a lot in his first three years anyway, even though he wasn't out there on first down.

+ REPLY
4 points
5
1
Alberta_Packer's picture

June 27, 2026 at 06:21 pm

Generally the prime of an NFL DT is between 25-28 years. Wyatt is 28 - so still in his late prime. Also in 2024 he missed 3 games due to injury. And in 2025 - 7 games. Agree that he is the Packers best DT. However if utilizing trend(s) analysis - the cost of an extension is likely to be greater than his future level of production.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
vin0770's picture

June 28, 2026 at 05:59 pm

I swallowed hard when you posted his $12.9 million dollar salary this year 😲 Seems generous right now for what he’s done but that was the going rate for a fifth year when he signed. So if he’s healthy this year and is good but not off the charts great, what does he get per year with an extension?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

June 29, 2026 at 10:58 am

I wouldn't pay Wyatt that much money. And also Hargraves might be our best DT, we'll see I guess.

Maybe Calais Campbell has another great year and comes to GB for his last year for $5 million. He is also still better than Wyatt and plays about as many snaps, with more productivity.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.