The Passing Chronicles: Doubs TD off a Constraint (aka, Shield Return)

Last week we got to look at a really fun play: a ricochet TD to Romeo Doubs off an RPO with the Shield tag. This week we get to see the counter to that play. I love it when a plan comes together.

The main difference between these plays is that the TD against the Broncos came off an RPO, while this is a straight pass call. So let’s dig in.

We’re looking at the call itself and the responsibilities. As a reminder, this is how the Packers structure their calls:

  1. Motion/Shift
  2. Formation & Strength
  3. Formation Variation
  4. Motion
  5. Run Concept or Pass Pro
  6. Pass Concept

Playcall: Shift Gun Crush RT Z RT 365 Shield Return

Motion/Shift: Shift

Just the initial wording to let everyone know that a shift call is included in the call.

Formation & Strength: Gun Crush RT

This is the same formation we saw last week, but flipped. Crush RT is a 1x3 formation, with the Y in-line as the lone receiver to the right and a bunch on the left.

Shift: Z RT

Informing the Z (Christian Watson [9]) in this case) that he is to shift to the right and end up in the same alignment he was on the other side: off the ball and 3 yards from the end of the line.

Pass Pro: 365

This is a 7 man slide protection. Against this goal line front, the offensive line is sliding away from the strong side of the formation, with the right tackle, right guard and center stepping up to engage the blocker, while the left tackle and left guard fall back into more of a traditional pass block set. The Y blocks the widest man on the line, while the H will pick up inside the Y, reading from the C-to-D gap.

Pass Concept: Shield Return

As I mentioned at the top, the pass concept of this play should look pretty similar to last week. Last week we looked at the Shield concept as an RPO tag: a tight, two-man concept consisting of a clear-out route and a slant behind it. 

When I went through this last week, I mentioned how it’s one of my favorite concepts in the low red zone because it’s so hard to defend. I talked about how one of the ways to defend against this kind of play would be for the defensive backs to play “Banjo”: that is, switch assignments. That’s what the Vikings are doing here, and this concept does a great job playing against that.

(As always, I used Dan Casey’s Play Caller’s Club book as a template for the above image. It’s a really fun book to mess around with.)

When Watson shifts to the right, the corners line up right next to each other over the stack of Jayden Reed [11] and Romeo Doubs [87]. This certainly feels like a, “You’ve been watching film, huh? That’s cool, watch this,” moment. The Packers had just run this last week, so the inside corner steps up and they’re looking to switch off receivers at the line.

That’s exactly what they do. Reed fires off the line and drags the outside corner into the end zone with him, while the inside corner looks to pick up Doubs on the Now Slant. Doubs takes a few small steps to the slant, then breaks back out into open space.

The outside corner falls off Reed and tries to pick up Doubs in the flat, but it’s already too late. The ball is out and the Packers pick up 6.

A really fun play, and a great counter to something they had shown only a week prior.


If you want to go back through the rest of this series, I thought I'd gather all the links up here. Hope you're learning half as much reading this as I am writing them.

Week 1: Gun Trio RT Open 2 Scat H Choice Buffalo
Week 2: Motion Sink LT Zoom Z Fly P19 Waggle Z Dagger
Week 3: Shift Gun Trips RT G Open H D 3 Scram Z Shot Bow
Week 4: Gun Dyno RT 2 Jet Coco Stitch
Week 5: Bunch LT FK 19 Keep LT
Week 6: Shift Crush LT Z Insert 12 Dos Shield


Albums listened to: St. Vincent - All Born Screaming; Iron & Wine - Light Verse; Thom Yorke - Condidenza; Owen - The Falls of Sioux; Newmoon - Temporary Light

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Dusty Evely is a film analyst for Cheesehead TV. He can be heard talking about the Packers on Pack-A-Day Podcast. He can be found on Twitter at @DustyEvely or email at [email protected].

__________________________

5 points
 

Comments (9)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
GB@Germany's picture

May 09, 2024 at 07:44 am

Nice play again. I
f Musgrave would have pushed in the end zone, he would bave been another receiving option, and with better blocking, the run option for Jordan would have beee possible as well.
So a lot opportunities to further develop the red zone plays and stress defenses coming season.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2024 at 08:43 am

Dusty, "Hope you're learning half as much reading this as I am writing them."

I'm learning, but I don't know if I can retain half as much as I think I'm learning. Wait! What? HA!

Thanks for putting up the links to go back to. It's hard work to keep these plays in my head and be able to tell them apart in real time.

Took me a second to understand the play breakdown. You describe 6 parts to a Packer play call and then only show 5 with this call.

Is it number 3 (formation variation) or part of number 5 that's missing because it's strictly a pass play and not a run or a run/pass option, so you don't need that part?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
DustyEvely's picture

May 09, 2024 at 09:37 am

Good question! I probably should be more clear. There are 6 potential parts of the playcall, but they're not all used on every call. I keep that section the same for every article, because it kind of helps me stay in a rhythm and remind myself of the structure, even if not all the sections are used.
For this call, #3 - Formation Variation - isn't used. Their core list of formations is pretty small, so the variations are a way to make small changes to those instead of having a different formation call for every variation. If they wanted to split the TE out from the Crush formation instead of having him in-line, the variation modifier would be "Open," so the formation would read Gun Crush RT Open.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2024 at 10:16 am

Thanks, that clears it up for me.

If you believe that, how would you like to buy a piece of Lombardi Avenue that I have running through my back yard?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 09, 2024 at 09:58 am

It's a pretty simple play. There's nothing real tricky or complicated there. Not even much of an illusion. We protect with 7 (remember, in GB, the TE is an offensive lineman on about 80% of the plays. and put 3 in the pattern. One of those guys is Watson, on the other side of the field with the TE, which pretty much guarantees three defenders. The other two receivers just rub out a defender, Doubs breaks to the outside with kind of an ankle breaker cut, Reed breaks to the back and middle of the endzone. Doubs is more open and Love throws a soft pass to a wide open area. Doubs does the rest.

It's execution and timing. It's max protection, which I like. How are you going to stop that with only 11 guys? You're still going to end up covering two really good receivers one on one and you aren't going to be able to put enough pressure on the QB. This should be candy from a baby.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Did anybody notice what the "weak links" on the offensive line were doing? Did anybody notice what Tom's guy was doing?

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
Bitternotsour's picture

May 09, 2024 at 10:27 am

but, but, those guys suck. right?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

May 09, 2024 at 10:29 am

I keep trying to watch these over and over again till I get the play down. He shows an example of the play being run correctly, so everyone mostly looks good.

On most of these do you notice (as I've commented previously) that there always seems to be someone else wide open besides the receiver who makes the catch? I couldn't see Watson on this play but Love still might have had the receiver in back open enough to throw to him.

Early last season when we watched Dusty's plays, Love took the obvious easy completions and later (protection more reliable?) he wasn't afraid to take the player who could get the most out of the play not just dump it off for a sure thing.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 09, 2024 at 12:21 pm

I also wanted to comment on this because it was a TD. In 2022, the Packers were successful on 50% of goal-to-to situations, the lowest rate in the league. In 2023, the Packers were 95% in goal-to-go, the highest since they've been keeping track of this, since 2000. What could have possibly accounted for the change?

We have an offense that doesn't turn it over very much and which is good at producing touchdown passes. Both of those correlate strongly with making the playoffs.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
DustyEvely's picture

May 11, 2024 at 09:04 pm

It's a completely unscientific answer, but scoring touchdowns in the red zone is not something that is overly consistent from year-to-year. It's a relatively small sample size, and small sample sizes can see a lot of variation. The #1 team at scoring TDs in the red zone this past year was the 49ers at 68%, but they were middle of the pack in 2022 (52.8%).

There are always factors that you can point to that can contribute one way or the other, particularly in goal-to-go - offensive line, good running back, passing plays that play off the condensed space, simply having better players, etc. - but it's one of those that can be tough to nail down, and it's certainly something that is hard to predict from one year to the next.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.