The Evolution of the Next Man Up
Injuries weren't always filled by the depth chart
By GregMeinholz

Injuries to key players are some of the absolute worst things to happen in professional sports. They can derail a team's season before it even gets started. You're a hot team heading into the middle of the season at 6-2, but then your star left tackle goes down for six weeks. How are you going to protect the blind side of your quarterback now?
Years ago, it wasn't uncommon to see a team immediately look elsewhere for replacements, whether it be free agency, the waiver wire, or to their best trade options at the deadline. They had to, because whoever else was on their depth chart to replace the injured player just wasn't going to cut it as a starter to maintain the high level the team is used to receiving from the position for that many games.
Perhaps one of the best examples in Packers' history is that after Antonio Freeman broke his arm in 1996, the Packers were left with very few threats at receiver outside of Don Beebe for a few games. So, Ron Wolf went out and got Andre Rison off waivers. We all know how Rison impacted the 1996 season, especially his touchdown at the start of Super Bowl XXXI.
Around the league today, you still see that same mentality with other franchises. Once a key player goes down, a new player is brought in. That demonstrates a lack of quality depth. For the Green Bay Packers in the latter half of the last 20 years, this has not been an issue. It's always been the next man up. From Mike McCarthy to Matt LaFleur, whenever they're asked who will replace an injured player, they always look to the next player on the depth chart. And for the most part, that depth player fills in just fine.
Just one game into the 2025 season, the Packers immediately had their offensive line depth tested. With Zach Tom suffering an oblique injury and Aaron Banks dealing with an ankle and groin injury, the team had two holes to fill on its offensive line within a few days. Disaster right? Not for a team that invests in the depth of their roster. Former first-round pick Jordan Morgan filled in nicely at left guard in place of Aaron Banks, and this year's second-round pick, Anthony Belton, filled in fairly well also at right tackle. Across from these two young players was one of the most experienced defensive fronts in the league, and they held their own and then some.
Many fans glued themselves to the fact that Anthony Belton was flagged for offensive holding on the first drive of the game, and had a few struggles early, but overall, he played 28 pass-blocking snaps and didn't allow a single pressure. Many had Darian Kinnard penciled in as the Zach Tom replacement for Thursday night, but it appeared that Matt LaFleur decided that what's the point of drafting a lineman so high if you're not at least going to play him in relief of your starters? Kinnard played 17 total snaps while Belton played 51 at right tackle. I'd say being cast into the fire like Anthony Belton was on Thursday night against a good Washington front seven and holding his own pretty well is enough to hang your hat on.
There's a chance Belton may be called on to play this Sunday if Zach Tom isn't ready to go yet, and if so, he'll be facing possibly one of the biggest tests possible, having to block the Browns' all-pro pass rusher, Myles Garrett.
Belton and Tom may not be the only "next man up" examples we see early this year. With Jayden Reed's injury and obvious future absence for several games, the Packers' wide receiver depth will need to step up. Given all the options they have at the position, Reed probably won't just be replaced by one person, but there is a chance third-round pick Savion Williams could see some extended time on the field with Reed out. In the first two games of the season, Williams was kept more as a situational gadget player than a rotating wide receiver, only seeing 11 offensive snaps, but between him and Malik Heath, we could see an increase in action.
The evolution of the next-man-up mentality in Green Bay has allowed them to keep up their momentum as well as team chemistry. Quickly replacing the next man on the depth chart with an outsider before they truly get a chance does not do well in the locker room. Promoting the next man on the depth chart shows confidence from the coaching staff and front office in those they have in the locker room. It shows players that, despite not starting, they could still have a place on this team should the time come. The team that lifts the Lombardi trophy at season’s end is the one overflowing with confidence and chemistry.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.
__________________________




Comments (11)
Spock
September 17, 2025 at 03:28 pm
Might be a little bit early for this take; so far, so good.
Coldworld
September 17, 2025 at 03:57 pm
We did exactly that when we signed Kinnard really. He was the first tackle up not Belton. It may have been delayed, but essentially a replacement for Glover given injuries and no one stepping up internally.
If a team thinks there’s better out there at a price that can be lived with they are going to go out and sign that player. The Packers are no different. Of course, if there’s an option as good or better on our PS then that’s the likely direction as we know them and they know our scheme.
GregC
September 17, 2025 at 04:01 pm
I've never thought the Packers were different from most other teams in this regard, nor do I think the Packers' approach to replacing injured players has changed much over the years. So I guess I'm skeptical. It would take a lot of work to find evidence to back up this article. I agree that the Packers seem to have good depth at most positions right now, though.
splitpea1
September 17, 2025 at 04:09 pm
Sorry, "next man up" is not unique to the Packers or any particular time period; that's why there's a 53-man roster and a practice squad. Just in terms of backup QBs stepping in to lead their teams to SB victories, we have Brady, Warner, Foles, and Hostetler to name a few.
Getting back to the Packers, one of the most important "next men up" in 1996 was veteran Bruce Wilkerson, who was signed before the season and came through with flying colors in the playoffs. That was one of Wolf's more unheralded signings, but extremely important.
It really all depends on the situation or the scarcity of players able to fill in competently. For example, teams don't have a collection of kickers on their roster, so they have to go get one if the normal guy gets injured. That happened early to the 1990 Giants, so they went out and signed Matt Bahr, who proved to be golden in the playoffs.
Do whatever works; whether the players come from inside or outside the organization is secondary.
GregC
September 17, 2025 at 06:32 pm
Bruce Wilkerson saved our bacon in 1996.
splitpea1
September 17, 2025 at 07:49 pm
Sure did.
TKWorldWide
September 18, 2025 at 06:49 am
THEE Bruce Wilkerson. (Plenty of cowbell.)
LeotisHarris
September 17, 2025 at 05:50 pm
The phrase "next man up' may be a modern creation, but the practice is as old as the league. In the 50s and 60s rosters were 33-40 players so coaches had to have and use versatile backups. Injuries meant position changes rather than external pickups.
Have to give a nod to Zeke Bratkowski in 1965 vs the Colts. 38 year-old Earl Morrall went 9-0 with the 1972 Dolphins after Bob Griese broke his leg in week five. Griese returned for the playoffs, but Morrall was at the helm for nine wins in that perfect season. If we go back to the 50s, Frank Gifford and Charlie Conerly often switched positions or rotated in with backups when starters were banged up.
TKWorldWide
September 18, 2025 at 06:51 am
Good article. But does any team NOT invest in its depth? OR, did you mean other teams are too busy plugging holes in their starting lineups and unable to build depth?
Also, not sure Cincinnati is feeling too good about their next man up at QB, which is another reason not to consider trading Malik this year.
Bearmeat
September 18, 2025 at 08:05 am
Next man up only works when you have quality depth. This team, because of Gute’s drafting habits by volume on day 2 and 3, does.
Most don’t. I am thankful as a Packer fan.
TKWorldWide
September 18, 2025 at 09:46 am
Exactly!
Also, QB is a whole different animal. How many teams would be crippled if their starter is out for a full season?
Heard some discussion recently that maybe GB would extend Willis after this season for like 3 years, 24 million. Not starter money, and if he has a legit shot to compete for that elsewhere, you just gotta wish him well. But that “middle price” extension idea was interesting. But given GB’s desire to extend other guys, it might not be possible. The hazards of good drafting, I guess. ☺️🏈