Roster Battle: Kingsley Enagbare vs. Brenton Cox Jr.

An intriguing roster battle to watch this summer is along the Packers edge rush group. 

One of the biggest roster battles in the history of the Green Bay Packers is about to commence this training camp!

Okay, not really—but it’s still pretty intriguing in my opinion.

Looking at the current state of the Packers’ edge rusher group, I count four locks to make the team. Rashan Gary is still the leader of the group and should remain its most productive member for the foreseeable future—at least, that’s what the Packers are paying him to be. Lukas Van Ness is heading into a critical Year 3, where he really needs to take a step forward for the Packers to even consider a second contract.

Behind them are two 2025 rookies: fourth-rounder Barryn Sorrell, who I think will have the opportunity to play significant snaps right away (and is someone I’m very high on), and fifth-rounder Collin Oliver. Oliver is in a bit of an odd position. At 6’2” and 240 pounds, he doesn’t yet have the frame to hold up at edge on a down-to-down basis. He seems more like a designated pass rusher, at least for his rookie season, until he can add some functional weight and strength. That said, he’ll definitely be a factor on clear passing downs this year.

So, who gets the final spot?

Yes, I do think the Packers will break camp with just five edge defenders. Roster battles at safety, linebacker, corner, wide receiver, and maybe even running back are going to weigh heavily on special teams—likely forcing Jeff Hafley’s DE group to run a little lean. With just five spots and four essentially locked in, who gets the fifth?

Making a Case for Kingsley Enagbare vs. Brenton Cox Jr.

Case for Enagbare:

The case for Enagbare is straightforward. As of today, he’s the Packers’ best third edge rusher. If Green Bay had to play a game tomorrow (gotta love June football talk!), he’d be the best option not named Rashan Gary or Lukas Van Ness to rush the quarterback. Some might even argue he’s a better option than Van Ness right now.

If the Packers truly aim to compete for a championship in 2025, cutting their third-best pass rusher isn’t the best way to go about it. Enagbare is also solid against the run, finishing with a 64.5 PFF grade—77th out of 211 qualifying defensive ends.

Case Against Enagbare:

To start, he likely has the least upside in the entire pass rush group. Entering his fourth NFL season, he probably is what he’s going to be at the professional level: an average pass rusher who makes a few plays here and there but can disappear for stretches. He finished 2024 with a 56.0 overall PFF grade, ranking 140th out of 211 DEs.

He’s also entering the final year of his contract and will count over $3 million against the cap. While the Jaire Alexander move this week gave the Packers some breathing room, $3 million is still a meaningful number—especially with several extensions looming.

And then there’s trade value. Enagbare might be the Packers’ best trade chip at the position. If a team loses a DE to injury late in camp or is unhappy with their depth, the Packers could flip him for help at cornerback or another need.

Case for Brenton Cox Jr.:

Cox played better down the stretch than Enagbare did. While Enagbare started the season clearly ahead on the depth chart, Cox didn’t even suit up until after the Preston Smith trade in Week 10. Yet in the Wild Card loss to the Eagles, there was only a two-snap difference between the two—a sign the Packers see them on a similar level.

Cox finished with above-average PFF grades in both pass rush (72.0) and run defense (65.5), with an overall grade of 72.2—good for 40th among 211 qualifying DEs. The more he’s played, the better he’s looked. He’ll count just over $1 million against the 2025 salary cap and, as a restricted free agent next offseason, can be brought back at a team-friendly price.

Case Against Cox Jr.:

The biggest concern is the small sample size. Though he played well, he was inactive every week until Smith was traded. With only 160 defensive snaps logged in 2024, the question becomes: how will he hold up over a full 17-game NFL season (plus playoffs)?

That’s a gamble a Super Bowl contender may not be willing to take—especially if it means parting ways with a veteran before Cox has proven he can sustain his production. He also brings very little to the table on special teams. He logged just 9% of the team’s ST snaps last season, compared to Enagbare’s 41%. If he makes the team, he’ll have to handle more defensive snaps and likely more special teams work.

Prediction:

If it were up to me, I’d choose Brenton Cox Jr.

His combination of upside and contract controllability is something I think the Packers will value. Despite logging only 160 defensive snaps in 2024, he provided a much-needed spark to a struggling pass rush. His seven QB hits and four sacks were good for fourth on the team.

I’ve always been high on the former five-star recruit who likely would’ve been a relatively high draft pick if not for character concerns in college. I also believe special teams coverage will be helped by the team keeping both Isaiah Simmons (who might also offer help off the edge) and Kristian Welch.

It’s certainly not unreasonable for the Packers to carry both players, interestingly they are the same age even thought it feels like Enagbare has been around so much longer. It’s also not inconceivable for someone like Aaron Mosby, who hasn’t been mentioned yet, to insert himself into the conversation. But I think the Packers will roll with five, and that Brenton Cox Jr. will be the one given the full season to show what he can do.

-Dan Saia

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (26)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Guam's picture

June 12, 2025 at 03:14 pm

I think both Enagbare and Cox are safe bets for the 53. I believe LVN plays a fair number of snaps at DT this season, particularly in pass rushing situations. And I am not as confident as the author that Oliver's roster spot is guaranteed. He is the ultimate tweener and his game may not translate well to the NFL. Time and training camp will tell, but I will be very surprised if either Enagbare or Cox don't make the team.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

June 12, 2025 at 06:41 pm

You are probably right about Enagbare and Cox.

Clark and Wyatt are guys we want on the field for about 40 plays. We'll probably play a fat run plugger on first down. That leaves about 25 snaps for Brooks, Wooden, and anybody else at DT.

VanNess is already playing about 40% of the DE snaps, AND he's playing another 200+ on special teams. I'm not sure the team should put any more on his plate right now. In two seasons, he's had two DCs andswitched position from LB to DL. If it were me, I'd see if Brooks and Wooden can handle things, and I'd let Van Ness focus on playing one position.

Oliver would have to have an all-time horrible camp to not make the 53. The last time a Packers 4th round pick didn't make the 53 was 2006 with Cory Rodgers, and he was facing gun charges for firing off a gun in the proximity of bar. He pled to lesser charges, but I'm sure it didn't help him.

So that's how bad Oliver would have to be in order for him to be the first 4th round pick in 20 years to not make the team.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

June 12, 2025 at 07:45 pm

Oliver was a fifth round pick. Fourth round pick Barryn Sorrell is almost a lock, but Oliver isn't.

Maybe they'll keep six DEs. But if they only keep five, it will come down to Enagbare vs. Oliver--two very different players. Oliver could help make a case for himself by playing well on special teams. I don't see them giving up on Cox after patiently keeping him on the roster for a season and a half without playing, and then seeing him play so well when he finally got his chance.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

June 13, 2025 at 08:37 am

I think you're right in that Oliver will need to embrace STs to be active on a week-to-week basis. He needs to show some affinity for playing off-ball, too. He could slot into Kristian Welch's spot if his STs look good, and that could keep him active for game days where he could garner a handful of snaps early to feature his changeup.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

June 13, 2025 at 04:29 pm

Whether Colin Oliver makes the team AND is given meaningful snaps this season or not, I love the potential he brings even if that takes 2 or 3 years to mature into NFL ready. Of course being able to contribute this season would be preferable and is what camp battles are all about ...

GPG!

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

June 12, 2025 at 08:20 pm

"We'll probably play a fat run plugger on first down."

Every team in the league passed between 58-64% of their 1st downs last year. Having a player like Slaton on the field on 1st down is a liability more often than not.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

June 12, 2025 at 04:38 pm

I really like Cox...He's my sleeper this year and I think he'll take a big jump.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

June 12, 2025 at 05:11 pm

Both are relatively safe this year - although I think that Enagbare may be less safe than BCJr. As Enagbare had a stock-down year in 2024. - so he appears to have established his floor & ceiling. Conversely - BCJr. had a stock-up year - with still an open ceiling.

Also - Enagbare is due to make 3.4M vs. 1.03M for B.C.Jr. - which may not be a factor this year. Unless Enagbare is out-shone by other prospects at training camp. If so, then he may be more likely to become a trade or practice squad candidate than B.C.Jr.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

June 12, 2025 at 06:25 pm

Enagbare was 3rd in QB hits and 7th in tackles for loss. He's been superavailable and he's actually done the job for three seasons. The author says that Cox played better than Enagbare did down the stretch. I'm not sure what that's based on, but I'm sure it's some important PFF measure. Down the stretch, the coaches had Enagbare on the field more often than Cox. Cox was inactive for the season finale and the playoff loss. I'm questioning the validity of the claim that Cox was outplaying Enagbare down the stretch. He was inactive for two of our last 6 games. That doesn't add up. 8 tackles in 7 games.

Cox is going to get a chance to show what he can do in the exhibition games against 3rd string talent. If he can make it through training camp and the exhibition games, then we can talk about Cox being ahead of Enagbare. Right now, it's nonsense.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

June 12, 2025 at 08:05 pm

The only reason Enagbare has been super available is that he suffered his serious knee injury in the playoffs against Dallas, so he only missed the game at San Francisco. Had that happened earlier in the season, he would've missed a bunch of games and possibly been shut down for the remainder of the season.

Cox was inactive for the season finale because of an injury, but he was very much active for the playoff loss. He played 27 snaps in that game compared to 29 for Enagbare.

The claim that Cox played better than Enagbare down the stretch is not based on PFF metrics, it's based on sacks. Cox had 4 sacks in 7 games while Enagbare had 4.5 sacks in 17 games. Total pressures was 17 for Cox and 25 for Enagbare--again that's with Cox playing in less than half as many games as Enagbare.

Tackles is the one stat where Enagbare outshone Cox--he had 26 to Cox's 7. That holds up even if you project Cox's stats to a full season by multiplying them by about two and a half. I don't know if Enagbare got all those tackles because of superior play against the run or because opposing teams ran the ball in his direction more often. The coaches have probably figured that out.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

June 12, 2025 at 08:29 pm

You can see an even bigger difference on a per snaps basis. Cox had 4 sacks and 17 pressures in 97 pass rush snaps. Enagbare had 4½ sacks and 25 pressures in 293 pass rush snaps. Cox also had a higher run stop percentage 14% to 11% for Enagbare. Cox also had 5 TFLs in 61 Run D snaps, Enagbare had 6 in 186 Run D snaps.

If Cox can maintain that kind of production it's pretty clear who should get more playing time. The Packers aren't in the habit of cutting 5th round rookies so the odd man out most likely come from Enagbare and Cox. I think there's a chance they could get something for either one in a trade. Not much but maybe a 6th for 7th round pick swap. It's also possible they keep 11 DL instead of 10 but not probable unless they really like a younger guy and plan on moving on from a guy like Clark after the season.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

June 13, 2025 at 05:37 pm

And in those 27 snaps, he registered 0 sacks, 0 pressures, 0 hits, 0 tackles and 0 assists. He does not appear in the boxscore. He had the same impact in that game as Stokes, Alexander, and Watson, except he was actually on the field.

Go back and watch those 4 sacks. Two of them came when the offensive player simply chose not to block him, not because of any exceptional play on his part.

Whether teams ran at, or away from, Enagbare, they were still the #3 Defense against the run.

We'll see in a few months. I think the Packers would be nuts to pass over a guy who played 51 straight games in favor of a guy who has accomplished so little. Cox will get a chance against some 3rd stringers in the preseason.....if he makes it through that, we'll talk about this again.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

June 14, 2025 at 10:12 am

You understand he was hurt right? Even when you're proven wrong you can't admit it. It's kind of sad. I'm sure in a few months you'll change the goalposts.

You should really look into this issue.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

June 14, 2025 at 12:40 pm

Did the Eagles run at Cox for big gains because he failed to make the tackle? Or did he just not have any opportunities to make tackles? We would have to watch every defensive snap to check on that.

I don't remember the easy sacks for Cox. He did have a lot of pressures to go along with his sacks, though, so I'd say he did a pretty good job rushing the passer.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

June 14, 2025 at 01:45 pm

This isn't the 1st time he can't admit being wrong. 2nd or 3rd time either. Enagbare finished 60th out 61 in pressure rate at 5.3% but they should keep him because he's played a lot of games.

Here's what the others where at in late December. I'm sure those numbers dipped a little, there wasn't much pressure in those last two games but the other three doubled Enagbare in pressure rate.

https://x.com/packers_access/status/1871652126713389099?t=mtGPhSC2sSxgZo...

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

June 14, 2025 at 03:45 pm

Oh, I didn't realize his pressure rate was so low. That's amazing. It obviously outweighs all other considerations.

I know you don't think experience matters much, probably because you don't have much experience. There's a reason that the experienced professionals keep putting him on the field, game after game, for 51 straight games. I can see why. The people paying him over $3M this year can see why. The coaches can see why. The GM can see why. But you can't see why.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

June 14, 2025 at 08:03 pm

Leatherhead-Smartest man on the site!

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

June 14, 2025 at 03:50 pm

That's a good idea. We have 3 months before Enagbare is even going to be on the field, so Cox has all this time to state his case. We can use that time to watch the Eagles game and see.

Here's the pecking order at DE, just like last season: Gary, VanNess, Enagbare, Cox, and the rookies. That's not going to change until they put on the pads.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

June 13, 2025 at 08:20 am

It’s based on results. I am not sure what you struggle with on that visible as well as metrical conclusion—it’s not just PFF but the universal conclusion.

It’s legitimate to question whether Cox can maintain that level or near it (if he did that over a season he’d be be a major news story and have made his name in the league). However, your oft rehearsed take is just bizarre as to his performance in the weeks prior to his injury that kept him out versus Chicago.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

June 13, 2025 at 10:49 pm

And here I thought the point of rotating players at high demand positions like DE and WR was to keep guys fresh so they wouldn't have to pretend like they're Maxx Crosby. I'd be fine with Cox playing a little more, as well as LVN maybe playing no more than he has been, if both can be hyper productive over a small sample size and bringing in other guys who are also fresh.

Seems like a winning strategy to me ...

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

June 14, 2025 at 03:56 pm

It is. It's a good idea.

If you play a guy who is a pass rusher...like Cox....in situations that aren't obvious passing downs, it's an incentive to run at him, particularly if he's a little undersized. That's the problem.

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

June 12, 2025 at 08:35 pm

I don't care who gets job as long as one can do the job. What pass rush last year. It sucked. Trade Gary.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

June 12, 2025 at 08:43 pm

"What pass rush last year. It sucked."

Like the Vikings in the playoffs?

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

June 13, 2025 at 08:06 am

While I'm rooting for him ,I don't have much confidence in LVN as he regressed a bit last season. However, because of his 10 mill cap hit for the next two seasons he will be our OLB/DT run stopper.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

June 13, 2025 at 08:51 am

Enagbare is a steady, consistent--if unspectacular--DE and a core ST player. These are guys you need in your depth chart, even if he's not the kind guy you prefer to start. Cox made a splash after the P. Smith deal and he's earned snaps on defense. There are couple years of affordable team control with Cox, yet.

I'm guessing the 5 DE they keep will be Gary, LVN, Cox, Enagbare, and Sorrell. Brooks can slide out and play DE, and Oliver will need to fit as a ST/DE/LB.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

June 13, 2025 at 02:02 pm

Giving LVN snaps at DT tells me the Packers are seeing if they can create more value from him. Being able to be effective in the rotations between DE and DT would be very helpful for his career.

I know the narrative is it will be Enagbare vs Cox, Jr. I believe the depth chart position will be between Enagbare, Cox and LVN.

Cox was a High School 5 Star sensation and showed it quickly as a college freshman at Georgia. Then his off field attitude got him kicked off Georgia during the summer. He went to Florida and had to sit out a his sophomore season per NCAA. As a redshirt sophomore in 2022 he was named a starter but got kicked off the Gators that October for the same confrontational attitude with teammates and strength coaches.

He really only played 1 1/2 season of college football! Due to his attitude, his development was greatly stalled due to self inflicted wounds. Gutey took a chance on him and it seems to be paying off. He's tended to business...no word of any "issues".

If he continues to focus on making plays on the field and continue to be a dependable teammate, Cox, Jr. may be starting at DE opposite Gary. He seems to be more explosive and efficient than Enagbare and LVN.

0 points
0
0