Packers Player Storylines To Buy, Sell, and Hold
With a few games left in the regular season, what to make of player storylines unfolding for the Packers.

Oh how NFL season comes and goes in the blink of an eye. As it does, new headlines develop, players progress or regress, and visions of the future take hold.
For the Green Bay Packers, in a season destined for yet another playoff birth, a few player developments have started to take hold that have substantial roster implications for this season and beyond.
From a buy, sell, and hold perspective, here's what to make of those player storylines.
Buy: Development of Lukas Van Ness
Maybe one of the more frustrating developmental first-round picks on Brian Gutekunst's resume, which includes a few, is Lukas Van Ness. He started both of his first two campaigns slow out of the gates but has come on strong to close out both years. It's baffling when a player who could size up Godzilla, looks like Hercules, and can chase down 4.4 40-time quarterbacks cannot find his way into quarterbacks' laps more often.
Like Rashan Gary, Van Ness entered the league raw, as a one-trick pony power rusher, and stuck behind established pass rushers. Also similar to Gary is the unwavering motor and flashes that show up in years one and two despite underwhelming sack totals. More encouraging is that Van Ness has been showing off more counter moves as his sophomore year has progressed.
signs of life from van ness!
a counter move! pic.twitter.com/Hok1TeOidh
— Ross Uglem (@RossUglem) November 18, 2024
And ever since the Packers traded Preston Smith at the trade deadline, the Van Ness who bested future Hall of Famer Tyron Smith for a playoff sack has been the Van Ness showing up on tape.
Packers rookie Lukas Van Ness managing to keep his feet and get under Tyron Smith for the sack.
The first-round pick out of Iowa had three sacks over the Packers final six games. pic.twitter.com/WbDLIK4izG
— Seven Rounds in Heaven (@7RoundsInHeaven) January 15, 2024
With Smith gone, Van Ness boasts a commanding 28.6% pass-rush win rate in "true pass sets," an 89.1 PFF pass-rush grade, and two of his three sacks on the year. He's also improved his pressure percentage rate to 9.5%, which, for context, TJ Watt of the Pittsburgh Steelers is at 10%.
There's still a way to go for Van Ness, who is still a relatively raw prospect who hasn't reached his talent ceiling yet, but he's been credited with a hurry in each of the last five games despite sharing snaps with Kingsley Enagbare, Brenton Cox Jr., and Aaron Mosby. It will be difficult for Van Ness to hit stride stuck in a four-way platoon, but he's absolutely making progress toward reaching his ceiling.
While he has played 40% of the defensive snaps this season, his snap share has actually taken a hit since the Smith trade. He's been doing more with less, and it may behoove Jeff Hafley to start feeding the big fella more.
Sell: Extending Josh Myers
Josh Myers is the Darnell Savage situation except on offense. He's simply not a complete player yet, but he's definitely good enough to be starting, and someone is going to pay him to do so.
Myers is pacing to allow his most pressures in a season, with 21 through 14 games, which is currently the third-highest mark among all centers. His 17 hurries are the fourth most among centers, and four quarterback hits allowed are tied for the third-highest. Lastly, he's fallen outside his norms inside the top 10 for pass block win rate among centers after finishing eighth last season.
Regarding run blocking, Myers finished last season as PFF's 22nd-graded run blocker of centers with at least 900 offensive snaps (55.2). He's surprisingly regressed to a 47.0 grade, which is 23rd of centers with at least as many snaps as Myers this season.
Where the Myers conversation still holds water is that he's not been credited for a sack yet this season. It's an area in which he's previously been able to excel, but is it enough to hold up for the Packers to extend him a long-term extension? The Packers may want to see him take that next step on a one-year "prove it" deal, as he's struggled mightily as a run blocker throughout his rookie contract and noticeably regressed this year as a pass blocker.
The Packers will enter the offseason with a generous amount of cap space to work with, but the more significant issue for Myers was the first-round draft pick of Jordan Morgan in 2024. Green Bay could easily transition Elgton Jenkins down to center, freeing up left guard for Morgan and saving money while still fielding a quality offensive line. Sean Rhyan has again shown flashes in his first year as the primary starter at right guard, which may prompt Green Bay to give him another look for next season, barring a late-season collapse.
Nevertheless, if Morgan is ready, letting Myers walk creates a clear path to getting him on the field. A mid-season change at center is not ideal, and either way, by keeping Myers, the Packers introduce a scenario to either have a backup first-round pick or a well-compensated center on the bench.
Someone will value Myers on a multi-year contract, similar to Jon Runyan Jr. with the New York Giants and Savage with the Jaguars. However, signs point to that not being a justifiable case in Green and Gold.
Hold: Onto Hope With Jaire Alexander
Jaire Alexander's injury situation, having missed 16 of the Packers' last 30 games and 30 of the last 64, is far from ideal. Especially off the heels of David Bakhtiari's essentially career-ending injury almost immediately after receiving a massive extension, it's undoubtedly becoming difficult to remain patient with Jaire now battling a similar situation. But no matter how frustrating, it's important to exude patience with Jaire, a former All-Pro, even as he enters the back half of his prime years.
The Packers' cornerback room has looked shaky this season, with Eric Stokes looking like a guarantee not to receive a fifth-year option and Keisean Nixon, while improved, still being a liability at the catch point. Carrington Valentine has provided a jolt, but he continues to oddly be blocked by Stokes for more snaps. All this leads to Jaire's value on the roster again becoming undeniable.
Alexander hasn't looked his best this year after adding a knee injury to his past groin and shoulder concerns. This is certainly less than ideal after a four-year extension in 2022, keeping him in Green Bay through the 2026 season.
Realistically, two leg injuries will take a step off Jaire's game, which won't help. But he remains an asset with his physicality, ability to instinctually read a route, and forcing incompletions at the catch point. Most concerning, though, is his yards per catch this season has jumped to a career-worst 16.2.
It wouldn't be surprising if a restructure was in the future where the Packers could get a clean-out after 2025 if injuries persist. Especially given the roughly $18 million in dead cap money by moving on from Jaire after this season, per Packers salary cap guru Ken Ingalls.
Even on what many have thought to be a down season for Jaire, as injuries have impacted his play, he is currently forcing the second-lowest completion percentage of his career (56%) and third-lowest passer rating against in his seven years (79.9). His passer rating against still makes for the 25th-best among all cornerbacks targeted at least as much as Jaire (25). So, all things considered, and being that Nixon is the next closest at a 103.3 passer rating against, it's safe to say Alexander is still extremely valuable to the Packers defense.
The Packers will likely pursue another cornerback in the early rounds of the 2025 NFL Draft and make a move in free agency that fits their process. But without a team willing to take on a large contract for a player in the back half of his prime for his position, with mounting injury concerns, it's best to remain hopeful for Jaire to get back on track, as it seems most plausible that he will return to Green Bay for his eighth season.
At the very least, when Jaire is healthy, he is still someone the Packers feel confident guarding the Justin Jeffersons of the world, and that can not go understated.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Based in Seattle, Austin's roots are in Wisconsin and he bleeds Green & Gold. He also currently writes for Lombardi Ave and has been featured on various Packers podcasts. Follow him on Twitter at @AustinKrueger_.
__________________________



Comments (39)
NFLfan
December 11, 2024 at 11:23 am
-GB won't be able to off-load Jaire w/his injury history and big contract though I'd be interested in hearing more about a re-structured 2025 'clean-out' contract if injuries persist.
There are so many needs on Defense that GB may only be able to sign 1 CB but 2 would be best as Jaire is only currently available 30% and trending downwards; GB should not live in a fantasy about his availability.
-Agree with letting Myers go.
-LVN needs to improve during the off-season--hire a private DL coach?
Mister Chievous
December 11, 2024 at 08:39 pm
hire a private coach? lol. what is this, middle school? you think he can hire a coach better than an NFL coach? hysterical
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:16 am
The Packers are going to have to go to the Jaire Bank this off-season anyway to try to lower his cap hit in 2025. The question is how they accomplish it and what that means for 2026 cap and beyond.
splitpea1
December 11, 2024 at 11:38 am
My revised version:
Development of Van Ness: Hold, because we have no choice. Great, he's making some progress with some counter moves. Turtles also make progress eventually. Hurries are nice, but you need much more of an impact for a player selected 13th overall. Look at some of the players drafted immediately after Van Ness on both offense and defense, and I guarantee you will cringe on what we passed up.
Myers: I would agree here--no extension. Another bewildering pick by Gute considering who was available next--especially considering he passed all the usual athletic thresholds with flying colors.
Alexander: I don't know, but leaning toward sell more than hold. He's only valuable when he's available, and who knows how all of his collected injuries are going to affect his long-term play as he gets older? I think we'd better be triple-dipping for CBs in the draft. And the first one has to have some technical proficiency in addition to straight line speed.
Stokes: Divest immediately. This is ridiculous.
NFLfan
December 11, 2024 at 11:50 am
@SP-I'd like to sell Alexander as well but realistically, who would take on a huge contract for a player who's often injured and only available 30%, (maybe 40%) of the time? I think GB is stuck, and I agree with you that they have no choice re: keeping (Buying) LVN
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:18 am
Anyone who they would trade him to would likely rework his deal as soon as he's in the door. There's a lot of cash value remaining on his contract and the Packers would eat his guaranteed money as dead cap. The cost to an acquiring team would likely be surprisingly low for a player of his pedigree.
badaxed
December 11, 2024 at 12:06 pm
Van Ness: looks like Tarzan.....plays like Jane.
Bitternotsour
December 11, 2024 at 05:55 pm
badaxed - speaks like a cliche, thinks like a drone.
GregC
December 11, 2024 at 12:15 pm
I'm looking forward to this "playoff birth." Will it be a boy or a girl?
Good to see Van Ness perking up a little toward the end of his second season. I hope it's not a case of too little too late.
I thought Myers was having a better season than these stats suggest, based on allowing no sacks and Josh Jacobs gaining so many yards when running between the tackles. It should still be an easy decision to let Myers go after the season though, based on how much money John Runyan got.
The decision on Alexander may depend on how he finishes the season. If he gets healthy and finishes strong, he will probably be worth keeping.
Eric Stokes has already been denied his 5th year option and is unlikely to return.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 02:13 pm
Many couples exchange wedding vows in Lambeau Field. I guess a "birth" in the playoffs would also be quite an event of remembrance! LOL!
It is curious to me how enamored Stenavich and LaFleur have been playing musical chairs at T and G, but never C. They both claim the competition makes both competing for the starting job better...but apparently not at Center.
Bitternotsour
December 11, 2024 at 05:59 pm
In your world that would mean that they want to put an inferior product on the field, no? That they are intentionally ignoring better players on the roster and playing Myers because, why exactly?
They are running the practices, they know the assignments and see what people can do when they review film. Would it be crazy to assume that there is some possibility that they know better than you?
GregC
December 11, 2024 at 06:19 pm
They probably don't want to switch centers during a game because the ball exchange is different, and it could lead to a fumble. They may not think another player is ready to challenge Myers anyway.
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:19 am
We saw how Jenkins struggled in the rain game against Detroit, and he's supposed to be a good C.
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 12:47 pm
Here's the story line:
Mark Murphy, who has spent his entire life playing football and managing sports organizations retires at the end of the season. The GM he hired, and the coach he hired, are hoisting the Lombardi. The QB that they scouted, drafted, developed, etc. is the Super Bowl MVP. All the haters who've been skating on thin ice get wet.
OK, as far as the individual players, pretty much everyone is under contract. On offense, it would only be Myers. I'd expect the Packers to use a premium pick on an offensive lineman anyway, so I suspect that Myers will be allowed to test FA and the Packers won't match and instead they'll fill that hole in the draft.
Slaton will be a FA, and he'll be allowed to leave in FA, too, and we'll probably use a premium pick to replace him
The CB room is going to have to be rebuilt, I'm afraid. I'd try hard to trade Alexander because he's just not able to stay on the field It would cost us some dead money but actually help us cap-wise. I'd let Stokes leave in FA. Valentine is still under contract, and so is Nixon. Nixon's contract isn't very expensive, and releasing him would create $4M in dead money, so I think he'll be back next year along with Valentine. King is also on a cheap rookie deal, so I think those are the three who'll be back. If they're #4, #5, and #6, that's OK, but if they're our top CBs.......that's not good.
Ballantine is on a one year deal. So is Rochelle. They'll probably both be gone.
I don't know how Gutekunst is going to add 3 quality CBs to our roster. You can use your first round pick to get one and hope, or you can do it in FA, but good corners cost money. Defense in the NFL is pass defense, and pass defense starts with guys who can cover.
crayzpackfan
December 11, 2024 at 01:07 pm
Very good take involving all players you discussed. Question. Would you consider GB offering to pay part of JA's contract if it helps to move him in a trade (hard to move an injury prone, high priced vet on the back side of his career)? We could then at least get something in return for him and just moving on from his unavailability would be something for us all to look forward to.
LLCHESTY
December 11, 2024 at 01:36 pm
They don't have to offer to pay part of Alexander's salary if they decide to trade him, most of his cap hit has already been paid. His actual salary next year is just $7.5 million, over $18 million would stay with the Packers.
I'm waiting to see if/how Alexander plays in the playoffs. Next year will be the best chance they have at a ring for the next couple of years due to the FA losses they face in '26 and '27. They can't afford to take the Alexander hit AND sign a player of his caliber and relying on rookies is a gamble. If their goal is a ring, and it damn well better be next year, keeping him on the roster is a $7.5 million gamble worth taking.
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:21 am
If I'd seen your comment when I'd posted above, I'd just have pointed to this.
LambeauPlain
December 11, 2024 at 02:17 pm
"I don't know how Gutekunst is going to add 3 quality CBs to our roster."
I didn't know how he would do it with the S position either. But here we are.
Bitternotsour
December 11, 2024 at 06:06 pm
LH -you're normally pretty logical but the answer is right in front of you. They aren't under any circumstances allowing Jaire Alexander to leave this team. Now they need 2 corners, true, but Nixon has proven he's up for it, played with some swagger. He's an NFL corner and can play both the slot and outside. They have a stacked safety room and can definitely use one of them as a slot corner. The reload isn't so daunting.
Finding NFL corners is a problem, but they're out there.
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:23 am
I agree: I think the Packers are going to need to choose where they use their limited resources and how...meaning where do they buy a player and where do they draft players.
They need at least one impact body in the front 4.
They need more guys who can cover.
I wonder if the Packers had been nursing Jonathan Ford along on the PS as a 2025 stopgap replacement for Slaton on run downs. Well, Ford's gone, now, but will likely be a FA after the season's up.
Mister Chievous
December 11, 2024 at 08:45 pm
pass defense starts with getting to the qb
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:23 am
Yup...you can only cover NFL receivers for so long.
stockholder
December 11, 2024 at 01:05 pm
Myers is not worth 13 to 18 mil. Sell.
Honor Alexanders contract. - Hold.
(Even if Carpenter and Nixon are your corners.)
Stokes - Sell.
Va Ess - Hold. But he'll never be Garrett.
Shop Gary instead.
The pass rush must improve.
We need LBs that can Blitz.
More than another CB Bust.
NFLfan
December 11, 2024 at 01:16 pm
Doesn't Gary have a big contract which another team would have to absorb?
Alexander has the same huge contract.
stockholder
December 11, 2024 at 01:40 pm
They are already trying back-ups for Gary.
And that says something is up.
Not to mention trading P. Smith.
You will see on draft mocks, that
the packers need to find a "viable replacement"
for CAMPBELL.
Which tells me; Walker or Cooper should
be moved outside.
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:25 am
The contract moves with the player, but the guarantees stay with the Packers.
It makes guys a little more tradeable assuming you can absorb the accelerated cap hits.
LLCHESTY
December 11, 2024 at 01:38 pm
They have two LBs that can blitz. 🙄
stockholder
December 11, 2024 at 01:44 pm
Yes - if Walker and Cooper go to OLB.
Because the LBs you want can't defend the pass.
LLCHESTY
December 11, 2024 at 07:34 pm
Your word salads is next to incomprehensible. Cooper hasn't played inside all year and Walker blitzes plenty from the middle. Walker has really crapped the bed on pass coverage this year after being decent his 1st two years and rookie LBs are notoriously bad in coverage so who knows how good Cooper will be there. Walker is still soft as Charmin taking on O linemen so I'd be looking for his eventual replacement in next year's draft but they'll probably wait a year and see what the have in Hopper.
stockholder
December 11, 2024 at 07:54 pm
COOPER HAS.
HOPPER - NO HAPPENING.
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:27 am
This is the equivalent of traveling over seas and yelling English at locals who only speak Romanian.
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:29 am
The Packers play so much nickel that there's really no true "MLB"/"OLB" anyway.
NFLfan
December 11, 2024 at 01:22 pm
GB will likely only be able to draft 2-3 top level impact players and sign 2 or 3 in FA-they are expensive.
Hafley was a DB coach so I trust him to evaluate DB talent.
I would like Saleh/Hafley to evaluate the other D player prospects.
GB has 8 immediate needs on D, IMO
Leatherhead
December 11, 2024 at 03:44 pm
That's quite a few. 8 out of 21. Especially considering that all year long we've been average or better and right now we're 9th in scoring defense.
Under Contract for 2025: Alexander, McKinney, Williams, Bullard, Nixon, Valentine, King, Gary, Van Ness, Enagbare, Clark, Wyatt, Brooks, Wooden, Walker, McDuffie, Cooper, Hopper, ...some that I'm forgetting. I don't really see the room for 8 more guys on the active roster, unless you just want to throw players away that you have under contract.
We'll probably have to replace Slaton, and given Clark's age, etc., we might want to use a premium pick there.
NFLfan
December 11, 2024 at 07:41 pm
There are very few of those players who should be starters-I don't feel like arguing with you...
T7Steve
December 11, 2024 at 01:38 pm
We lost to the Lions last Thursday and sit at 9 and 4. The Packers have things to straighten out for sure.
This conversation is sounding like the long offseason has started already. Too soon!
I'm stubborn, I know, but I'm not giving up on this season yet. We'll have plenty of time to talk about this stuff after February.
Bitternotsour
December 11, 2024 at 06:09 pm
amen. these people have (sorry) a polluted mindset. this team is headed to the playoffs and that's how you get to the super bowl.
NFLfan
December 11, 2024 at 03:36 pm
I'm fine with GB as a top 5-6 team. But if they talk as though they are at a SB level, then I get annoyed. There is tremendous work to undergo to reach that level.
dobber
December 12, 2024 at 08:28 am
...and 4 more games--a whole month--to try to work it out.