Packers Need in Draft is On Defense, Again
Florida State cornerback Azareye'h Thomas is a very popular pick in mock drafts for the Packers in next month's draft.
Packers Need in Draft is On Defense, Again
In this century, which is 25 NFL drafts, the Green Bay Packers have had a tendency to draft one side of the ball much more often than the other in the first round of the draft.
Including both Jordy Nelson and Kevin King, who were the team's first draft picks, both early in the second round in 2008 and 2017, respectively, the Packers have drafted 19 defensive players compared to just eight offensive players.
The list on defense since 2000: Jamal Reynolds, Nick Barnett, Ahmad Carroll, AJ Hawk, Justin Harrell, Clay Matthews, BJ Raji, Nick Perry, Datone Jones, Haha Clinton-Dix, Demarious Randall, Kevin King, Jaire Alexander, Darnell Savage, Rashan Gary, Eric Stokes, Quay Walker, Devonte Wyatt, and Lukas Van Ness.
The list on defense since 2000: Bubba Franks, Javon Walker, Aaron Rodgers, Jordy Nelson, Derek Sherrod, Bryan Bulaga, Jordan Love and Jordan Morgan.
For this upcoming draft, the team’s two biggest needs are on the defensive side of the ball, which means it would not be surprising if, once again, Brian Gutekunst used the team’s first pick on defense. Those needs are cornerback and the defensive line.
Last month, I focused on some of the prospects on the defensive line, which is a strength of this year’s draft. Specifically at defensive tackle where there’s likely to be at least 10 drafted in the first two rounds.
Packers Have Draft Need on the Defensive Line https://t.co/7Dgy4Gmj1V #Packers #GoPackGo pic.twitter.com/yVeU8vMQxb
— CheeseheadTV 🧀 (@cheeseheadtv) February 16, 2025
Right now, the Packers have an urgent need at the cornerback position, even with the free agent signing of former Raiders corner Nate Hobbs. Currently, the only corners on the roster with game experience are Hobbs, Alexander, Keisan Nixon, Carrington Valentine and Kamal Hadden. Last year’s 7th round pick Kalen King did not play in 2024.
| # | Player | H/W | College |
| 1 | Will Johnson | 6-1.5, 195 | Michigan |
| 2 | Jahdae Barron | 5-10.5, 195 | Texas |
| 3 | Max Hairston | 5-11, 183 | Kentucky |
| 4 | Azareye'h Thomas | 6-1.5, 197 | Florida State |
| 5 | Trey Amos | 6-0.5, 195 | Mississippi |
| 6 | Shavon Revel | 6-1.5, 195 | East Carolina |
| 7 | Benjamin Morrison | 6-0, 193 | Notre Dame |
There are several cornerbacks the Packers could target at pick No. 23. The consensus top cornerback is Will Johnson is from Michigan and it is likely he is long gone by Green Bay’s first pick. A few realistic options could be Jahdae Barron of Texas, Azareye'h Thomas of Florida State, Trey Amos of Ole Miss, Shavon Revel of East Carolina and Benjamin Morrison of Notre Dame.
Best Schemes for Top CBs...
Zone Coverage - Travis Hunter
Man/Man - Azareye'h Thomas
Off Coverage - Will Johnson
Base CB/Sub NB - Jahdae Barron— Ben Fennell (@BenFennell_NFL) March 22, 2025
A player like Thomas has been a popular pick for the Packers in either Round 1 or Round 2 in mock drafts because of his size (6-1, 197 pounds) and his ability to play in man coverage. As well as being a Senior Bowl player, which is very attractive to Gutekunst.
Azareyeh Thomas/Will Johnson almost identical height/weights and playtime/snaps...
Thomas is 15 months younger than Will Johnson... with +2" longer arms (32 3/8" vs 30 1/8")
Johnson more impact plays on ball/production... Higher level game experience.
— Ben Fennell (@BenFennell_NFL) March 22, 2025
If the Packers were to draft Thomas next month, he would be the first defensive back from Florida State drafted by the Packers since 1992 when Ron Wolf used his first selection as the team’s general manager on Terrell Buckley. Buckley did go on to finish with 50 career interceptions, but his best seasons were after being traded away by Wolf in 1995.
Buckley was the college teammate of LeRoy Butler, who was a very successful draft pick in 1990 out of Florida State. The former 2nd round pick went into the Hall of Fame in 2022 and was a four-time All Pro at the safety position.
The only explosives allowed in man coverage in Azareyeh Thomas career. 4 Total. Can barely fit sheet of paper between him and WR on 3 of them…
Dude might be best man/man CB in the Draft. pic.twitter.com/YKCQt4P6JS
— Ben Fennell (@BenFennell_NFL) March 22, 2025
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Mitch McLaughlin is a Packers fan and shareholder residing in Sacramento, California. He will be writing Packers stories each week on Cheesehead TV. He can be found on Twitter: @McLaughlinMitch
__________________________
Comments (56)
TKWorldWide
March 23, 2025 at 10:46 am
1. If he’s really, really good, let’s take him.
2. Are the Packers a “man to man/press man” team? Or are they zone? Or do they adjust to what their guys can do? Pretty foolish to play a lot of man if you’ve got a bunch of weaknesses to exploit.
Coldworld
March 23, 2025 at 01:07 pm
They were heavily zone and less press than expected as well. If the Hobbs acquisition suggests anything, it’s that that appears to be a path that we will be continuing to follow.
Cheezehead72
March 24, 2025 at 06:09 am
Hafley likes to use a bump zone. He wants the DBs to bump the receiver off the line and then fall into a zone but he does mix in man so the DB will need to be good at both.
LLCHESTY
March 24, 2025 at 08:21 am
I think he still liked man on 3rd downs, just not at the rate he played it at BC. Hobbs is a pretty physical corner so maybe he'll play man a little more this year.
Coldworld
March 24, 2025 at 12:39 pm
The vast majority of our blitzing was on third down. That tends to force man coverage. We were among the teams that blitzed least on first and second downs and one of the teams that blitzed most on third. I wonder if that is just the Hafley way, or forced on third down by struggles getting to the passer?
Even then, man coverage represented only about a 5th of snaps. If we do get better cresting disruption from the line consistently, that conceivably go down further.
LLCHESTY
March 24, 2025 at 08:11 am
I think they would have played more man if Alexander had stayed healthy. He just didn't have the faith in the other three.
Coldworld
March 24, 2025 at 09:19 am
Or was it the rush? Man without consistent QB pressure is a dicey business. According to Rich Madrid over at acme, the Packers defense played zone 78.2% of the time (9th highest in the NFL) and man coverage 21.8% of the time (24th in the NFL).
It would be interesting to know to whether the 21% of the time man coverage was called was magnified in games where the pressure was consistently getting to the QB and, to your point, when Alexander was out there.
GBD79boog
March 23, 2025 at 10:50 am
It should say, "The list on OFFENSE since 2ooo:
WestCoastPackerBacker
March 24, 2025 at 05:37 pm
And Jordy Nelson was NOT a first round draft pick. He just played like one.
harleycops
March 23, 2025 at 10:53 am
"Packers need in draft is on defense----AGAIN!" How often have we heard that one before? Since 2015, Packers have drafted 18 DBs and 12 DLs. Every year we have to fill those needs. Seems we can never get enough of them. Draft picks don't turn out the way you hope or they get too expensive and thus the repetition. Next year it'll say: "Packers need in draft is on offense-----AGAIN!
cdoemel
March 23, 2025 at 10:46 pm
Hmmm. 🤔. Somewhere I heard that defense wins championships?
WD
March 23, 2025 at 10:57 am
As usual you have to wait to see how the 22 picks ahead of us fall. I agree we need a CB but we also need at least one pass rushing specialist if only on passing downs. That would be edge James Pearce. There is a chance he might be there at 23. We could then address WR and CB. Again, depending how it unfolds.
Frankly, the reason I like Pearce is because of his 4.47 combine. He is expected to drop slightly because of alleged character issues.
Several years ago we obtained a really great free agent CB whose name escapes me. Sam maybe? He evidently smoked some weed before the draft. Granted, stupid. But, he was fast as hell and became a really great player for the Packers.
GregC
March 23, 2025 at 12:53 pm
Sam Shields. He was a great player for us.
dobber
March 23, 2025 at 01:15 pm
He played 3 years of WR in college and only one year at DB. I think that pushed him down draft boards as much as anything.
WestCoastPackerBacker
March 24, 2025 at 05:38 pm
Shields had been caught with cannabis too, and he went undrafted.
splitpea1
March 23, 2025 at 11:17 am
Thomas is another young and raw prospect who is going to need time to develop, as he only has one year of starting experience. Do we really want to do this again? Or be in sync with Mel Kiper's mock draft? If we're going to take a CB in the first round, he needs to have immediate contribution potential.
dobber
March 23, 2025 at 01:22 pm
I like Thomas as a Brother Harris clone. He has many of those same attributes. He's played plenty of college snaps and against good competition.
I would argue the Hobbs signing says the Packers want to play more zone, though, and I don't see Thomas as being that guy. I also think the Hobbs signing means the Packers don't go CB until day 2 at the soonest. I think round 1 is a DL, OL, or **gasp** WR.
splitpea1
March 23, 2025 at 03:45 pm
Let's be a nice guy here and not suggest taking another OL in the first round!
beerandbrats
March 23, 2025 at 11:33 am
"For this upcoming draft, the team’s two biggest needs are...cornerback and the defensive line." We lost Stokes and we might lose JA but we picked up Hobbs. We lost Slaton but we still have Clark, Wyatt, Brooks and Wooden. What about the Watson injury? We picked up Hardman but is DT a higher priority than WR? If we go CB in round one, what should our priority be in the second round?
GregC
March 23, 2025 at 01:01 pm
So CB is an "urgent" need because they "only" have five CBs with game experience? That sounds like plenty to me, and it's six if you count Javon Bullard, who played in the slot last year. They were the #6 defense, so these guys must not be chopped liver.
I thought when they signed Hobbs, the mock drafts would stop projecting so many CBs for the Packers in the first round, but it hasn't changed. The reasoning seems to be that they are letting two first round picks go (Stokes and probably Alexander), so they need to get another one. I don't buy it. Even if the BPA is outrageously in favor of a CB, I would want them to trade back and focus on WR, DT, and DE in the early rounds.
Coldworld
March 23, 2025 at 01:11 pm
If Azareye'h Thomas is the clear BPA, I’d field offers to trade down. Not because he’s bad in isolation, but because there are likely bigger opportunities to improve the team now still on the board and will be with the extra pick too this year.
I actually don’t think he fits a Hafley D well. He’s not elite fast (4.5 40), he’s a man coverage tall CB not an off/zone guy. He can be grabby when beaten for speed because he’s not got elite agility (he doesn’t seem to have completed agility testing either). He’s more Stokes without the speed than Alexander.
dobber
March 23, 2025 at 02:03 pm
"I thought when they signed Hobbs, the mock drafts would stop projecting so many CBs for the Packers in the first round, but it hasn't changed. "
Why would the clickbait "mockers" do anything to shift their perspectives? Many don't seem to look far beyond the surface analysis, or consider scheme fit or team drafting philosophy, anyway.
As of right now, the Packers have four CB under contract beyond 2025: JA, Valentine, Hobbs, and Nixon. It seems that JA is a sure thing go be cut/traded before then. King (and others) would have a ERFA/RFA status, and could be back if the Packers want them. I don't see CB as a round 1 need at this stage anymore, either, but could see them going that way depending on how the board falls and trade options.
GregC
March 23, 2025 at 03:38 pm
Very true, but I look at the mocks anyway. They are still a good way to get a rough idea of what the draft will look like, at least in the first few rounds.
PhantomII
March 23, 2025 at 01:12 pm
LOL...We scored like 10 pts.in the playoffs....We absolutely need OFFENSE and that means at least 2 WAY BETTER WR's than they have now....that should not be hard to find WR's that can catch a ball should be first, beyond actual 40 time. Next is route running ability. Next is speed. A good TE like Kraft would be great also in case he gets injured. Then DE / DL / CB, since we did next to nothing in FA.
Leatherhead
March 23, 2025 at 01:33 pm
Every season ends with an offensive failure.
Every offseason thinks the solution is to draft more defense.
Here's who we're dressing on defense:
DBs, 8 (4 safeties,4 corners)
McKinney, Bullard, Williams, Anderson/Oladapo.
Hobbs, Nixon, Valentine, King?
LBs 5 Cooper, Walker, McDuffie, Hopper, ?
DEs 4 Gary, VanNess, Enagbare, Brooks
DTS 4 Clark, Wyatt, Wooden, ?
So, that's not very many question marks. The starters are pretty well set. This looks an awful lot like the defense that was #6 in scoring defense last year.
Meanwhile, on offense, we've lost a dangerous weapon and there's very little depth on the Oline. So let's fix that by drafting a defensive player.
dobber
March 23, 2025 at 01:42 pm
I could see a draft where the Packers pick a DL on days 1-2, a CB and LB/DE on day 3, and the rest is offense. This could be a 3 OL draft...and that's after 3 last year.
IN EDIT: sorry, a DL on day one or two, not one and two.
Leatherhead
March 23, 2025 at 01:49 pm
I think the biggest hole in the team is at #1 WR. I don't see any other position upgrade that would help us more. We have to score more points.
greengold
March 23, 2025 at 02:19 pm
3 holes on O: LT, WR, OC. All three call out for upgrades to various positional qualities we are and have been lacking.
The Packers have not had a bona fide WR1 in years.
The Packers have not had a LT who can pass block and run block at high levels since Bakhtiari lost his knee.
The Packers have not had an OC who can pass block and run block at high levels since Corey Linsley in 2020. 4 entire seasons of ineptitude in run blocking at C for the Packers...
FIX THOSE!!! FFS. Gutekunst really dropped the ball here last season, signing Jacobs and failing to insure he would have maulers in front of him.
Adding to the hot mess on O are the declining production numbers from Elgton Jenkins. Hoping that his 2024 season regression was nothing more than a blip. Figure, he seriously had JAGs on either side of him when it came to opening up running lanes for Josh Jacobs, et al.
Leatherhead
March 23, 2025 at 02:51 pm
Why is LT a hole? Walker has done very well there, and Morgan is the heir apparent.
Why is OC a hole? It's pretty obvious that we acquired Banks so that Jenkins can move to center.
We have one hole: No #1 WR. And we also don't have very good depth on the offensive line.
greengold
March 23, 2025 at 03:08 pm
Yeah, I agree it is not a hole on O if they give Jordan Morgan a legit opportunity to win the starting LT position. Totally agree there. Question is, what the hell precluded this staff from giving him that opportunity straight out of the gate in 2024? He might not have gotten injured early playing his natural position at LT, which he started at for 4 years prior to being drafted.
LaFleur and his staff have got to quit screwing around and start making better decisions in every aspect of team management and coaching. Put your players in a position for success for a change.
Rasheed Walker was a horrific run blocker last season. That's all I was speaking to.
Believe me, LH. I see WR1 as one of their TOP priorities in this draft. The truth is that the Packers have a bunch of important holes to fill. We'll just have to see how it all falls to us.
Coldworld
March 23, 2025 at 05:00 pm
Re Walker: Horrific no, below average for a starter yes. It was above Myers’ grade PFF for example, slightly below Rhyan’s. More importantly, he got better as the season progressed. His pass grade was just shy of elite or just over that line, depending on who you look at. Only Tom was higher and the gap to Jenkins was vast.
dobber
March 23, 2025 at 02:24 pm
If we presume that Hunter and Tatairoa are both gone by 23, which seems to be the consensus, and that Golden has moved up into the top 20 also, it makes for interesting choices at WR if the Packers stay put. The Packers seem to like college WR with big volume in their history and there's no deficit of that.
It's hard to look past Egbuka with the OSU WR machine behind him. I've seen some mocking Luther Burden to the Packers in round 1, too. Both seem to be mostly slot-types, though, and it will be interesting to see if the Packers double-down (Reed) on that. The physicality of Burden is intriguing.
I think there are more classic X-types who can run and have a history of production available that seem to be consensus round 2 guys. It will be interesting to see how the Packers go, but if they don't go WR in round 1, I suspect teams will try to jump ahead of them in round 2 to poach WR prospects.
Oppy
March 23, 2025 at 05:29 pm
Packers were 8th in the league in scoring in 2024.
If you believe the WR room can improve on their drops (I believe they can), and you believe that Jordan Love's injury in game 1 and subsequent missed games / affect on performance isn't likely to occur in 2025, it stands to reason this offense will probably score more points regardless of an addition to the WR room.
Frankly, the Packers may have upgraded the OL through subtraction. If they have even an "average" center step in, I expect the offense to operate more efficiently. Meyers was too often a turnstile allowing pressure right up the middle.
All that being said.. The Packers need WR's, but it's not because they lack talent- it's because too many were selected at once and there are a number of contracts that all come up at the same time. They can't keep them all and they need to stagger/stage WR contracts ASAP to maintain continuity going forward.
greengold
March 23, 2025 at 02:28 pm
dobs, I could see them taking an OT as easily as them taking a WR, an EDGE, a DL, or a CB in R1.
It's gonna be wide open for GB in April. There is just a boatload of great talents running deep into Day 3 at a good many of our need positions.
dobber
March 23, 2025 at 02:58 pm
Absolutely. But if they draft an OL, it should be a T who they want to play T.
greengold
March 23, 2025 at 03:22 pm
Ha. Hahaha... Ha-hahahaha! Tom Hanks The Money Pit-style!!!
RIGHT???
LH cleared my brain fog on that with the possibility of this staff pulling their collective heads out of their asses on the O side of the ball and starting Jordan Morgan at LT, the way they should have to begin the 2024 season...
To this day I'm baffled by their utter buffoonery not even giving him an opportunity to win the starting LT job, because Jordan Morgan put together a 2 year masterpiece of historically top-level production at LT entering the 2024 year draft. He had PLUS 80 grades in both run blocking and pass blocking his last two seasons at Arizona.
What the what??? I will question LaFleur until he shows he doesn't need to be questioned, after that 2024 debacle. That man has got to start proving himself as being a solid HC, which he has not been these last two years. Both in his team management, player management and game time management. Huge gaffes everywhere that call out to realize legit corrections.
Gutekunst could benefit from forgetting about "prototypes" for positions. He has lost himself in RAS, taking the bigger player over the better player (Myers)... and, quite frankly, it makes me question where the directives are coming from, really...???
I mean, did Brian Gutekunst seriously take Jordan Morgan in R1 to play OG??? If that were the case, I'd consider that a dereliction of duty. My guess is LaFleur never gave him a chance due to arm length... despite stoning the top EDGE talents throughout his PAC12 career as a starting LT.
LLCHESTY
March 24, 2025 at 08:39 am
I think it was clear to them by the start of TC that Walker was keeping his job at LT and they wanted to give Morgan a chance to play. Morgan has quick feet but his technique in college was all over the place and there was a lot of talk last off-season about how good Walker looked in OTAs and minicamp.
greengold
March 23, 2025 at 01:53 pm
Our needs on D are huge, as are the Packers needs on O. They are very specific needs. They can go either way, early or late in addressing them, or, stagger them throughout the draft. O heavy early... D heavy early... or late for both... dance the picks back and forth on both sides of the ball if that's what their board presents.
It's all about adding the TOP TALENTS per their board, and I believe there are quite a few of them this draft. It's a HUGELY LOADED draft for GB, right where they need the most help. That range expands out through all nearly all 7 rounds at 6-7 different positions of need.
The Packers should be improved after this draft with Gutekunst working the draft at his highest level. He needs that. A lot of teams will improve, with this draft being deep at nearly every position. IMO the talent levels in this 2025 draft are immense everywhere, save for QB, LB (somewhat), OC (somewhat).
SDPack
March 23, 2025 at 02:18 pm
I’ll be ready for the criticism after this comment but hear me out. We should keep Jaire Alexander on his current deal. Why? Derek Stingley just signed with an AAV of $30M, resetting the market for CB1’s. Jaire is scheduled to make app. $17M this year. Stingley will make $1.7M per game. Jaire would only have to be healthy for 10 games to match that. If he is healthy for all 17 games, he becomes an incredible bargain for a CB1 level player. No other free agent or draft pick will play to his caliber in 2025. I say keep Jaire and now we focus our draft on DT, OL, and WR with the 1st rounder going to DT.
Since'61
March 23, 2025 at 03:04 pm
If we keep Jaire our need to draft a CB drops considerably. If we look at the results of all those drafts where we drafted defense early we have one SB to show for it over the last 25 seasons. It seems to me that it couldn't hurt to draft some offensive talent early in this draft just to try something different and see if we can reach the point where we score more points during the playoffs against the better teams.
The Packers need to score points, build leads and make our playoff opponents one dimensional. Our offense needs to score 24 or more points in playoffs games to become a legit SB threat and to give our defense the opportunity to be more aggressive and force more turnovers. The Packers are not going to get to the next level scoring 10, 17 or even 20 points in playoff games. Yes, they can win a playoff game 20-13 or 21 -17 but those are going to be rare playing against the league's better offenses which are the ones who are in the playoffs. GPG! Thanks, Since '61
Oppy
March 23, 2025 at 05:15 pm
I agree it lessens the pressure to draft a CB in 2025 if Jaire is kept, but realistically, you'd like have at least two seasons to develop an eventual successor and you have to account for the possibility the pick doesn't pan out.
Really, in today's NFL, teams should probably always be looking at adding to the CB room- kind of like how OL are treated.
hanayclan
March 23, 2025 at 03:26 pm
Keep in mind, the Packers are victims of their own success, thereby picking late in each round. This reduces the chance of picking blue chippers. Considering that, it’s remarkable they’ve done as well as they have.
Oppy
March 23, 2025 at 05:11 pm
One person doesn't like you bringing a logical perspective into their emotionally-fueled disgust of the Packers front office.
Packers0808
March 23, 2025 at 04:58 pm
Packers bring back Telfort.
Racingdad
March 23, 2025 at 06:34 pm
They did
LLCHESTY
March 23, 2025 at 09:41 pm
🤷
Turophile
March 23, 2025 at 05:01 pm
Value is all about WHERE in the draft you take a player.
I wouldn't say Azareyeh Thomas is the best value in round one............but in round 2, him, or Morrison, Amos, or Porter, one of those four would (hopefully) be available. Something like DT Kenneth Grant then Thomas would be a fine duo.
Oppy
March 23, 2025 at 05:08 pm
Value is also wholly dependent on the buyer's need and desire.
stockholder
March 23, 2025 at 06:06 pm
IMO - We only need to replace Slaton.
And in No way should we need to use a
early pick, to do that.
Next- up Offense-
I remember the trade that brought
John Jefferson here.
I also remember bringing in Keith Jackson @ TE.
Again - In No way do we need to use a early pick.
Yet- If we don't take one.
You can start biting your Nails.
Edge rusher? You know the price New Orleans paid.
To move up for a guy that wasn't ready.
I've been following drafts a long Time.
Why can't we just get a No - miss player @23.?
The rebuild is over. There are No major pieces missing.
Kevin Greene said it best-
It's Time. Time for a difference maker.
Felipe Reis - February 20, 2025 Article suggests-
Depth at LB. And you'll get a pass rush.
#66 would do wonders, even if his replacement
doesn't start.
jannesbjornson
March 24, 2025 at 07:00 pm
Put your difference maker in the Personnel Dept. Needs....Holes...Voids...no talk about getting the Trophy.
This should irritate the masses:
#30 Derrick Harmon DT Oregon
#54 Jack Sawyer DE OSU
#85 Jack Bech WR TCU
#91 Cobee Bryant CB Kansas
#127 Dillon Gabriel QB Oregon
#159 Nohl Williams CB CAL
#170 Jack Nelson OT Badgers
#190 Cam Jackson NT Florida
#191 Zah Frazier CB USTA
#198 Drew Kendall OC B. C.
#250 Hassanein DE Boise
Get guys who know the Game. Why develop players who make mistakes and lose.
Turophile
March 25, 2025 at 04:26 am
For me: I'd like
23 DT Kenneth Grant
54 WR Jayden Higgins
87 Edge Ashton Gillotte
or how about if we trade our 1st and 5th round picks for Seattle's 52 and 54. Then you might get:
50 DT Tyleik Williams,
52 CB Darien Porter,
54 WR Jayden Higgins,
87 Edge Ashton Gillotte
stockholder
March 25, 2025 at 06:05 am
If DT is the priority-
Then Tyeik Williams is the guy I'd take.
I Still like Tre Harris or Bach more than Higgins.
Tre runs big after the catch.
stockholder
March 25, 2025 at 06:17 am
#127 Dillon Gabriel QB Oregon
You came around-
Bech is rd 2. - I'd Trade 85 and 159 to get him.
And still take Tre Harris @54
Give me 2 Wrs this draft
Extra Picks 170-239?
Still I like your draft.- Thumbs up.
Racingdad
March 23, 2025 at 06:30 pm
I’d like to see dt in first Harmon, Nolan , or grant - than in second after same trade back center Jarod Wilson than in third Tory Horton in early fourth Donte thorton to replace doubs and Watson than one or two corners ,a ilb,a te , etc this draft would have gb letting Kenny Clarke, and Jenkins walk next yr with Jaire gone also that clears Nearly 60 million from cap - have a good cheap center for four yrs and two cheap wrs again check them out tell me I’m wrong ??? Improving the team and planning for the future
albert999
March 23, 2025 at 06:37 pm
LOVE DONTE THORTON JR 🦾
nagawicka
March 24, 2025 at 04:29 pm
Unless we have a shot at Pearce or Membou, it falls like this:
Derrick Harmon
Kenneth Grant
Harold Fannin
Dorian Porter
WR of mid round choice