Packers GM Brian Gutekunst Must Address This Position Group Over the Offseason

Green Bay Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst gambled last offseason at cornerback, which is a premium position in the NFL. That risk ultimately backfired and cost the team over the course of the season. Now, Gutekunst must address the cornerback position this offseason although he lacks a first round pick and much cap space to do it.

Last offseason, the Packers knew they would likely part ways with former top cover corner Jaire Alexander. They tried to trade Alexander but found no takers and eventually released the former first round pick.

In the draft, Gutekunst failed to address the cornerback position until the seventh and final round. He selected Micah Robinson in that final round. Robinson initially made the team but was placed on the practice squad after the Pack traded for Micah Parsons just before the season started. He was later claimed off the Packers practice squad and never played a down for Green Bay.

Prior to that, the Packers added one cornerback in free agency, former Las Vegas Raiders slot man, Nate Hobbs. That meant the team entered training camp with Keisean Nixon, Carrington Valentine, and Hobbs as their top three cornerbacks with no proven depth players behind them. Nixon was going to be the top cover corner, Hobbs and Valentine would be next on the depth chart on the boundary with Javon Bullard lining up in the slot.

The hope was that Parsons and the Packers pass rush could help cover for the team’s questionable talent and depth at cornerback. They also hoped some of the team’s returning players would step up their games and thrive in new roles.

Unfortunately, the plan didn’t work. Over the course of the season, Nixon proved he is not good enough to be an elite cover corner. Yes, be broke up five passes in the Packers Week 2 win over Washington and finished the season with a career-high 17 passes defended. In his first six NFL seasons, he had a total of 16.

But Nixon was inconsistent in coverage. Opposing quarterbacks had a quarterback rating of 105.1 when throwing to receivers covered by Nixon according to Pro-football-reference.com. Last season, the rating was 78.9.

Nixon also took far too many penalties including unforced penalties for unsportsmanlike conduct where he just lost his cool. That including taunting opponents or jumping on a pile of players after the whistle.  

Hobbs struggled through an injury-plagued campaign. But beyond that, Hobbs was a player without a position. He primarily played slot corner with the Raiders, but the Packers tried him on the boundary. He failed to excel on the boundary. With Bullard playing well in the slot and Evan Williams playing well at safety, there was no place for Hobbs to fit into the lineup.

Hobbs will likely return next season and may get another chance to play on the boundary. It’s possible he could be better there if he can remain healthy. But ultimately, he’s better suited to playing the slot, a position where the Packers already have a quality starter.

Valentine had some good moments this season, but he, too, was inconsistent in coverage. He finally made his first and only interception of the season in the playoff loss in Chicago. It was actually a ball he would have been better off dropping as it came on fourth down and cost the Packers field position. He also struggled with tackling. His lack of effort when tackling was seen far too many times. Opposing quarterbacks had a quarterback rating of 121.2 when throwing to receivers covered by Valentine according to pro-football-reference.com.

According to Pro Football Focus, none of the Packers top three corners graded out in the top 32 of qualified corners, meaning the team lacked a true number one cornerback. All of the top three corners graded out as average at best.

Worse yet, the Packers cornerbacks were truly exposed after Parsons suffered his ACL injury and was out of the lineup. Without a big pass rush, opposing quarterbacks were able to exploit the Packers secondary.

The Packers don’t have a lot of cap space this offseason and they lack a first round pick to address the cornerback position. Whether it’s in the draft, free agency, or via trade, Gutekunst must fortify the Packers cornerback position this offseason. Returning with the same “big three” next season would be the definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and hoping for different results. The ball is in Gute’s court.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (72)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Snap the ball's picture

January 15, 2026 at 09:49 am

In 9 playoff games we have scored 47 points in the 4th qtr.

Take away 14 points from the two blowouts wins wins

We scored 26 points an avg of 3.7 points in the 4th qtr

The bears scored 25 points in the 4th qtr. one game

So WE HAVE 3.7 points in THE 4th QTR. THAT DOESNT WIN MANY PLAYOFF GAMES

AND THE RECORD SHOWS THATS.

NEED TO FINISH

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:17 am

We can talk all we want about improving the defense, but until we can score points, it isn't going to matter.

Look at the winning scores from the first round of the playoffs:

34, 31,30, 27,23, 16. Next week will be even higher. You simply aren't going to advance in the playoffs unless your offense can score points against a good opponent when the game is on the line.

XXXXXXXXXXXX

I think that Gutekunst will address the CB spot, but not in the way many people think. He spent high picks on Savage, Alexander, Stokes, but got more return out of guys like Nixon and McKinney and Valentine. Then, last year, with Cooper DeJean staring us in the face, we chose to get a developmental offensive lineman and guys like Williams and Oladapo on Day 3.

IMO, Gutekunst thinks that getting a DB in FA that has shown he can play in the league, and shown that he can stay healthy, and who has already made all his rookie mistakes, is a better bet than spending a high pick on a guy who's all potential but hasn't proven anything in the NFL yet.

I'd be surprised if we drafted a CB in the Top 100, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if we signed a FA vet.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:44 am

What happens at CB depends if Hafley goes and who replaces him in large part. Hafley clearly loves Nixon as a prototype. I have my doubts whether that is standing the test of time as an every down player. However, I firmly believe that Hobbs was obtained in the belief we’d have 2 perimeter corners who are very good in run support and thrive facing the QB.

I don’t see any other DC being quite as enthusiastic about that as a starting proposition given that it invites teams to go deeper. Situationally, yes, as CBs 1& 2, Probably not. Therefore a change may significantly elevate the perceived need at corner by draft time.

0 points
0
0
advdj76's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:56 am

I am not sure that you are right. He got great return in Mc Kinney, but Alexander is miles better than Nixon or Valentine. They are replacement level players. Nixon is a great returner and big liability as CB.
Stokes as a rookie had a season that is miles better than anything Nixon and Valentine did until now.
Williams and Bulard are few levels better players than Nixon. Oladapo didn't play much. But when he plays he is ok.
In my opinion Nixon is the worst starter at this moment. But we will see what GM is going to do this offseason.

0 points
0
0
Lare's picture

January 15, 2026 at 09:58 am

Gutekunst has tried over and over again to improve the CB situation in Green Bay. He has failed. Maybe they should let someone else try.

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:12 am

YES!
That, and let someone else choose any 1st rounders too, Gutey ain't nearly as bad with 2nd round picks.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

January 15, 2026 at 01:34 pm

Don't worry we don't have a first round pick in the next two drafts. Those picks are healing from an operation.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 15, 2026 at 03:02 pm

Howl about this, Hound dog

2017 Move down for Kevin King & Josh Jones (rover) ; forego T.J. Watt
2018 Josh Jackson vs Jesse Bates, or Donte Jackson
2019 Elton Jenkins (Gold)
2020 A.J.Dillon vs WillieGay or Logan Wilson LBs
2021 Josh Myers vs Creed Humphrey (heart attack alert)
2022 disrupted two picks for the #22 to Quay. Net Watson, lose Tre McBride
2023 Musgrave , One TD in 3 years vs. Brian Branch; Lippman another Badger
2024 Edge Cooper (Gold) fell to Pack.
2024 Bullard, INTs (0) a rover guy vs Calen Bullock (9); Kam Kinchens (6); Cole Bishop (3). ballhawks.
2025 Belton +/- vs a more mobile Tate Ratledge

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:14 am

Stokes apparently had a good season. Ja had a good few years, before an injury he never came back from. (so far)

I don't call that a failure.

And both Nixon and Valentine were good this season, before losing Micah. Hobbs only played hurt and might still be good, although obviously better in the slot. He's had some things to say about that, worth listening to. Recall that he's the one who was put on the hot seat for "practicing too hard," a habit this whole roster obviously needs to adapt. Diggs is an unknown.

CB certainly needs to be a draft priority; I'd be surprised if a big move in FA can be made.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:51 am

Stokes was rendered a misfit after his rookie year by our change to a zone based off coverage approach that Hafley has continued. Stokes was picked to be a lengthy CB to contest the pass in man coverage. Something he did very well as a rookie and was again doing this year.

He looked to have regained some speed too, after that very bad injury. He would have remained a very bad fit for Hafley, but he’s shown he was not a bad pick for what he was drafted for through his play this year.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

January 15, 2026 at 01:37 pm

With the proliferation of running QBs or QBs that threaten the run more zone coverage is needed. Yes I do not like it.

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 09:59 am

Why MUST GM Brian Gutekunst do anything?

Where is this MUST coming from?

Gutey is gonna get a lucrative new extension and more power within the organization.

Why MUST he do anything differently given that his boss is perfectly happy with his 8-year record as the Pack's GM?

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:15 am

Unfortunately, Ken, you're right!
The Packers hierarchy and front office is fine with mediocrity!

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:34 am

All this Gutey MUST find CBs or MLF MUST fire this coach or that coach is just more BS fluffery.

They are both going to get huge new contract extensions, so why would anyone think Gutey or MLF MUST do anything other than what they have been doing that led them to get new contracts after 7 & 8 years, respectively.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 15, 2026 at 03:09 pm

The guy is incompetent and the net result is no advancement to a SB. His blue chips are free agents, stressing the CAP. Love has saved his job, to date, but a mobile QB seems to be the trend. Jalen Hurts had the Championship legacy from Bama and Oklahoma. Love does need
his line to be more athletic. Why the opponents stunt them and threaten Love. Better Protect him. He's your Franchise.

0 points
0
0
blacke00's picture

January 16, 2026 at 07:53 am

Not this year. Pocket QBs are the highest rated.

The running QB is a "fad". History has shown that the traditional pocket QB is the time tested model.

Now, that doesn't mean a Qb shouldn't run on occasion. Typical "running" QBs have poorer accuracy and decreased longevity. Are there exception sure , but overall the above statement is true.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:05 am

We need a lot, so take your pick. I'll go with two OL, two DL, one CB, and a blocking TE. Oh, and a developmental QB if Willis leaves... That cornerback needs to be as close as possible to being able to contribute, so I don't think we can afford any projects here.

The signing of Hobbs didn't make any sense. He can be cut, but there's more savings if we wait. Or he can linger around for another season with the hope his performance will rebound, but what's the point?

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:18 am

The point is Hobbs' performance is likely to improve, if he's not played out of position.

While another blocking TE would of course be nice, a sixth O lineman works and we need more development of more of them anyway.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 15, 2026 at 03:17 pm

A sixth O lineman takes a weapon away from the offense. Strictly a short-yardage strategy.

0 points
0
0
Boneman's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:15 am

Cornerback is the perfect position to need when you don't have a number one draft pick. It is a highly volatile position with ups and downs no matter where you are drafted. Go for quantity in late rounds and UDFA's and let them compete. Concentrate on the DL and OL for your higher remaining draft choices. Clearly the DL get's worn down as game goes on, all the stats show it. I would keep drafting OL every single year in mid rounds and find a coach who can develope them, Mike Wahle anyone?

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:28 am

Pretty sure, if you look back, Boneman, Wolf drafted at least one O-lineman every year.
And, I second your Mike Wahle suggestion (and Charles Woodson for DB coach)!

0 points
0
0
GreenandBold's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:56 am

While we’re hiring staff how about Mike Daniels DL

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:21 am

Lol that interview was great, but "it's a different league now" and I'm not sure if his mindset would fly? I'd love to see it though

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:56 am

Mike Wahle had already stated many times he has no interest in coaching GB nor the politics involved.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:20 am

And James Jones for WR coach! Need some ex-players as positional assistants to teach technique.

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:21 am

Thanks Gil,
I need that reminder to keep me pissed off for the rest of the day!

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:25 am

Gute has enough on his plate, can we let him finish his MLF peas first.

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:33 am

Per the Packers present structure, (and all reports) MLF would be dealing directly with Policy.
I don't know where the Peas come in!

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:40 am

It would be good for Gute if he knew who'd be coaching his draft picks, no.

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:58 am

Gutey's contract is up for renewal too after '26 and he'll likely be meeting with Policy very soon as well or he'll be a lame duck.
The needs of this team are pretty clear no matter who's coaching them, and one might argue that Gutey hasn't recognized many of those needs, so.......
For all we know, MFL could be arguing with Policy right now that he was left 'short-handed, and that wouldn't be completely unrealistic with injuries and Gutey's blindness.
Policy needs to get it together!

0 points
0
0
FumundaStank's picture

January 15, 2026 at 01:12 pm

I can see Policy meeting these two guys individually. Gutey is blaming MLF because he and his coaching staff can't coach up his awesome draft picks. Meanwhile MLF is blaming Gutey for drafting awful players that can't be coached up. What a mess.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

January 15, 2026 at 12:09 pm

It is time that whoever is GM controls the draft and the coaching of the 53. Drafting and recruiting must be to a coherent vision and coaching must be completely in synch with that.

We seem to willing to give coaches what they want sometimes and then at others to hoist on them someone they do not know what to do with, notably Golden, but in a slightly different sense, how Belton and Morgan have been handled by coaches.

Then you get picks like Williams in the third round that seem even less easy to comprehend in terms of how that helped now or even next year significantly. On the other hand, when he gives the coaches returners, they go out of their way not to use them while there are activated players not getting snaps.

0 points
0
0
GVPacker's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:39 am

Gute needs to Improve the Pass Rush, Micha Parsons needs help and If the Packers can get him help they can get away with a mediocre Secondary! OL Help Is badly needed, depth on the OL must be addressed. Saw something yesterday online Gute might release Rashan Gary?

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:44 am

I thought Parsons greatness was to help the lesser get better, now Parsons needs to help to be great. Can we make a decision on what Parsons is for this team?

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:28 am

You didn't watch the season? I thought you might have noticed #52 and what he didn't do.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:42 am

I did watch the season, and he had a tad higher level of play than Nick Perry, who also made his rep against bad teams and disappeared often. The season didn't end with the loss of Parsons, it was obvious with the play, by him and team, each week with him, and when wins were unable to cover the warts that would inevitably turn the team from an assumed Prince Frog into mere toads.

Oh, I'm sorry, you want to talk about Gary, and him being the reason for failure, but Gary was a failure when they gave him that ridiculous contract, and expectations grew for his production with the Parsons trade, and how'd that work out from either perspective. As flat as a pile of crap that got stepped on...which is what actually happened.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 15, 2026 at 03:24 pm

When Micah Parsons went down, this squad still had two former # One picks on the D-line. They did not perform up to their draft status.

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:14 am

pass rush will increase when Gary is gone.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:29 am

We are already looking at 8 FAs that we'll have to resign or replace. Start adding guys like Gary, who are under contract but not "good enough", and we're going to be replacing guys on our gameday roster with UDFA rookies.

We lose Enagbare, we get rid of Gary, Parsons gets hurt in midseason again......who do you see playing DE for us down the stretch?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:58 am

Van Ness, Sorrel, Oliver and, at some point, Parsons are already going to be on the 90 even if Gary isn’t. I think they bring back Cox relatively cheaply if they can and add a later draft pick. Doesn’t seem too bad to me. Might actually be more threatening than this year.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 15, 2026 at 01:26 pm

I don't think that replacing Gary with Sorrel and Oliver is an improvement.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:27 am

#52 should have had a great season; he started that way and then it looked like he just stopped trying. I have no idea what was going on with that, an undisclosed injury, personal problems or what, but keeping him would seem unlikely. A trade seems better than a release though?

0 points
0
0
Snap the ball's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:43 am

Let’s play conservative at home vs Carolina. Vikings. Eagles.

We did. Lost two of them

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:49 am

CB needs to be upgraded, but even so, the Packers finished the year 11th in pass yards/game. They were 17th in run yards/game. The Packers Safeties are a strength of the team and will be for awhile.

The DL was a greater loss of focus by Gutey in my opinion...especially with incredibly deep 2025 DL draft class he ignored in the first two days.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:54 am

Someone else needs to choose CB, OL and DL players-these postions are too important to let Gute choose again, unsupervised

0 points
0
0
GreenandBold's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:58 am

I nominate us we all could do a better job

0 points
0
0
Oxymoron 3339's picture

January 15, 2026 at 03:14 pm

Gute needs to go.

0 points
0
0
bean's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:57 am

CB is a problem. It's important to note, the pack did sign former all pro Diggs in week 17. He's no savior, but he is likely better than any of our starters once he's been through training camp and a #2 starting CB. I know he needs a new contract and that's manageable. Nixon is wearing out his welcome, so a high pick is needed. Also, our future #2 QB is on the roster in Ridder. He's entering his 4th year after being a 3rd rnd pick in 2022. Far more preferrable to any pick likely available this draft in the 5th round or later. So, another DB or 2 certainly, but no QB needed unless a 7th rnd psquad development guy.

My OL preference is to simply draft a center. Someone like Iowa's Logan Jones who can step in and play immediately. This allows Ryan to move back to guard and let's Belton and Morgan compete at LT. At 6'6" 335, Belton is much more suited to LT than Morgan and he's outplayed Morgan when given the opportunity at guard. Of course, he has to win the job. Starters then would be Belton, Banks, Jones, Ryan, and Tom. Backups are Morgan T/G, Kinnard T, Ryan C. Easy fix and add depth deeper in the draft because our depth is sad.

On the Dline, Wyatt is coming back for a D that performed quite well when and he and Parsons were available. No crazy need here, just get healthy. Draft a DT for depth to go with the numerous free agent and practice squad signings already made.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:01 am

Diggs played one snap. Likely a reason

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:13 am

Bean, I'll just touch on one of your points, the rest Ill leave for others.
Yes, they signed Diggs, and he played pretty well against the Vikings starters,
Then, they played him ONE Snap, ONE Snap, against the Bears, and you think it'll be easy to renegotiate his contract? I think maybe Not!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:31 am

"Nixon is wearing out his welcome, so a high pick is needed."

These two don't go together, at all. A high pick at CB is needed regardless if they keep Nixon, CV, or both.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

January 15, 2026 at 02:55 pm

Disagree about Belton. He is right where he should be at RG. He is a powerful man, but he lacks quick feet and speedy pass rushers would blow right by him. Morgan isn't powerful enough to play guard, but his last few games at RT demonstrated he has the quick feet and balance to play tackle.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

January 15, 2026 at 10:59 am

Were you being serious when you made it seem the loss of Alexander was a major loss for the defense? He had been hurt for large chunks of the previous season since 2021 (2022 was an outlier). As you noted, none of the other 31 teams were interested in trading for him. Baltimore picked him up off of waivers, and then he effectively retired from the Eagles in November.
What the Packers need to do is find football players who are corners, guys who can come in and contribute immediately, and not be great athletes with "promise" who need to "develop their game". This won't be easy, but that is why these people get paid.

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:19 am

Ricky
Philly actually traded a 6th rounder to Baltimore for Jaire, imagine that!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:40 am

Ja retired 10 days after being traded. I bet that pissed off the GM.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:37 am

Our whole "draft and develop" idea has mostly fallen apart, and we see why. GB is too cheap to pay coaches capable of doing that. Mike Wahle's idea is since there are two coaches in every position room, have one focus on scheme and the other on technique.

Especially with former players teaching technique that could work, but you might have to pay them ...

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:04 am

Packers say they are draft and develop but there are too many draft mistakes coupled with sub-par positional coaches, particularly OL and LB. Packers messaging does not align with their actions. They've had to go the FA route to make up for D&D fails.

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:23 am

You nailed it NFLfan
To hear that the Packers are being tightwads on assistant coaches is unbelievable. How do you develop anything without quality coaching? WTF? The good college teams know better!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:43 am

Yup. Impossible to evaluate a draft pick when no development happens. GB has the money to pay competent assistant coaches but until they do, draft and development has little chance of any success. I'd think ex-Packers would be the perfect choice for positional assistant coaches to teach technique

0 points
0
0
canadapacker's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:27 am

""Statistics, damn statistics, and lies" refers to the cynical idea that data can be easily manipulated or presented misleadingly to support almost any argument" I am not quite sure that Hafley s quite the defensive genius that warrants a head coaching job. Now his defence improved quite a bit but many guys didnt. What I did like was the fact that we tackled much better. We had as Urhlacher would say no loafs - and gang tackled better. But we had a lack of discipline and nobody got benched - NIXON. We did dumb things - like catching INT on a 4th down long pass ( you could fumble ) just to get an INT stat. I also felt that we playing too soft coverage at inappropriate times. Now we played some great games against teams that we match up against well - but I know about injuries - Ravens wasnt one of them. TT for years. tried to upgrade the backfield - but unless you have pressure on the QB - that is hard to do. But with a good Dline to stop the run and with a pass rush - as long as the team tackles on those sweeps and screens ( which we did a pretty good job except for a few cases) - then we can compete. So I am in favor of picking the best player available where we are drafting and not necessarily a D back . I would also hope that we find a running back as we are thin there - since our O line has holes.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 15, 2026 at 11:58 am

"We did dumb things - like catching INT on a 4th down long pass ( you could fumble ) just to get an INT stat"

Had he broken one tackle that might have become a pick 6.

"I also felt that we playing too soft coverage at inappropriate times."

Completely agreed. I don't know if that was acquiescence to MLF, the style of defense he's stated he prefers. Sometimes it's ok but it's the polar opposite of Hafley's style, which is to be aggressive. Seems entirely out of character, and when used was often out of touch with the game.

"upgrade the backfield - but unless you have pressure on the QB - that is hard to do."

This is incredibly important! Not just for specific losses but to Nixon and CV. So many are crucifying them but they were good until Micah's injury. Make no mistake, CB is still a priority draft need, but they aren't terrible with a pass rush. Seems like the team's biggest need is an assistant coach who can teach pass rush technique. And Micah can do that? Especially before his return from injury.

Our current RB room is great. #8 didn't drop off, he played with a knee the size of a basketball for well over a month. Emanuel Wilson proved himself a reliable backup, and #3 is still our best pass protector. No doubt they'll wait on Marshawn Lloyd to return from injury. Can he ever make it through one game? Fix the O line and RB is fine.

The more that draft priorities can be narrowed down, the more likely any team is to come away with rookies who can contribute.

0 points
0
0
canadapacker's picture

January 15, 2026 at 01:35 pm

Sorry Sic - we were thinking of a different play - even the announcers said that he should have dropped the ball. Dont remember the exact game. I like our guys too but it might be nice if there is a later rounder who could help the special teams and surprise people like Lloyd was supposed to like you said. We do seem to have a few too many bandaids - especially in the receiver room. I once again have questions about our offensive line coaching and training. Cant push the pile, cant open holes and cant protect the passer and take too many presnap penalties. Jacobs is know for one up year and one down year and we do know he was hurt - but he also didnt bounce off many tackles early in the year like he was doing the year before.

0 points
0
0
lou's picture

January 15, 2026 at 12:13 pm

Concentrate on the Defensive Line first, to win consistently you have to stop the run problem #1, If that improvement also includes more pass rush from the front 4 coupled with our generational addition returning to health the level of corner back play can be average. Look at in the first half of the season the number of breakups both Nixon and Valentine had. Both can play with the return of Parson's and pass rush upgrades from the front 4 and linebackers. That also lets our two top tier safeties to play closer to the line of scrimmage. As several have posted before, build the trenches first.

0 points
0
0
BELIEVER's picture

January 15, 2026 at 12:35 pm

We are all in agreement we need corners. To Gute can’t draft them is not correct; Alexander was great then the injuries, Stokes had a great rookie year and also got injured. I hear he a good year this year with the raiders. There have been misses for sure. I do agree to draft several in later round and sign as many as possible. I am tired of Nixon, says he don’t want to return kicks bla bla bla so what. He is really good at picking up penalties at the worst time. He needs to sit on bench his head is too big. Bo Melton as corner no and double no.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

January 15, 2026 at 12:55 pm

The premier positions in the NFL are, (arguably or not) QB, pass catcher, pass protector, pass rusher, and pass coverman.
Gutey has picked Love, Morgan, Golden, Gary, LVN, Alexander, and Stokes in those positions. He has DEFINITELY prioritized those premier spots in rd 1, with mixed results. But Alexander and Stokes are the only ones in 2025 that contributed NADA to GB. Thus, the need to improve the room. With limited picks and cap, this will be a very interesting off-season.
GPG!

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 15, 2026 at 01:45 pm

Looking at the 2026 salary cap, it would cost $4.8M in dead cap and save $24M by releasing Jenkins.
Also, if we keep Trevon Diggs, it's $15M but there's no dead cap involved in releasing him.

So those two moves, alone, would create almost $40M in cap space and only cost $5M in dead money. Gary would be $17M in dead money to create $28M in cap space.

0 points
0
0
advdj76's picture

January 15, 2026 at 05:04 pm

releasing Jenkins - 4,8 mill dead cap, 20 mill savings
Diggs - no dead cap, 15 mill savings,
Gary - 17 mill dead cap, 11 mill savings

if released before June 1st

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

January 15, 2026 at 02:22 pm

Yup, they need to draft a corner. But lets not forget about the salary cap. As I read it, the Packers are now more than $8 million OVER the cap with the recent signing of T. Diggs. Diggs is an interesting call. He has the ability and along with it a mighty ego and price tag. If they can rework his deal it would lessen the burden at corner. They might just say 'thanks but no thanks" too. The risk might be too high.

If they keep him it comes with a mighty....BUT...which is some players would have to go to make room for Diggs.

The Packers are capped this season and some starters will have to be let go in free agency---or cut---to sandwich under the cap.

0 points
0
0
Oxymoron 3339's picture

January 15, 2026 at 03:21 pm

The only position groups that are pretty good are Safety and Running Back.
Mckinny and Jacob’s were two quality signings by Gute.

Need to get better/add depth at every other position. After 8 years of Gute that’s not good. It’s got very little to do with development.

The rookie draft rankings this year had us 29th out of 32. This article should be about moving Gute to a different role or firing him.

0 points
0
0
Idaho Cheese's picture

January 15, 2026 at 04:05 pm

Isn't he a little late for this? I thought we were "strong" at that position? Same with OT and DL? I'm sure he will reach for some guy with multi-positional upside, no previous production, but high RAS and the potential to make Gutey seem like he is smarter than all comers.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

January 15, 2026 at 04:32 pm

Summarized well.

0 points
0
0
Packerlifer's picture

January 16, 2026 at 10:01 pm

Cornerback. has been the Never Ending Story for the Packers a least a decade.

0 points
0
0