Packers (Finally) Building On Special Teams Success

In 2022, the Packers finally broke a long string of abysmal special teams play. In 2023, they don't show any signs of letting up.

Packers special teams, by whatever metric you use (DVOA, PFF, watching football), has been pretty much the worst in the league for the last half decade.

One of the reasons was because they kept cycling through special teams coordinators and had no player continuity on the unit. This, more than anything, just showed that the Packers didn't care enough to prioritize special teams.

Maybe the special teams disaster that cost them (yet another) title shot finally woke them up, becuase last year, things seemed different.

Getting another new special teams coordinator was typical for most years, but Rich Bisaccia was different. He wasn't a candidate that just felt like more meat for the grinder. He was a highly-respected former NFL head coach with an impressive and impactful special teams resume.

The Packers leaned on late round picks (which is typical), but more than that, they brought in new faces, signing players like Keisean Nixon, Dallin Leavitt, and Corey Ballentine exclusively for their special teams value. They also went out and got Pat O'Donnell, who has proven he can punt and hold in cold weather.

And the results were impressive.

Keisean Nixon got a ton of (very warranted) attention. He didn't start returning kicks until the middle of the season and still led the league in kick return yardage. There's no other way to describe that except "incredible."

But he wasn't the only late-comer to play a starring role.

Linebacker Eric Wilson didn't even join the team until October, but still finished second on the team in special teams tackles and received PFF's highest special teams grade for all players across the NFL (minimum 85 snaps).

With all the changes and standouts, the Packers overall total special teams output last year was... average.

That doesn't sound like anything to get excited about, but for a team that has earned the title "Worst Special Teams Unit In The NFL" year in, year out for every season in recent memory, it's pretty awesome. A case can even be made that special teams outperformed the offense and the defense last year. 

That may never have happened before in most of our lifetimes.

Now, the Packers are taking action to build on that success.

They re-signed Bisaccia, who some mentioned as a head coach candidate. They're also keeping the talent he depends on stocked up. Special teams are no longer a shoulder shrug consideration. The Packers are actively re-signing core special teams players just to play special teams.

Kicker and punter are the positions that get all the attention in special teams, but it's the core guys - the coverage and blocking units - that really determine the overall fate of the units.

The Packers finally gave those positions some much-needed attention last year and this year, they're building on it.

So far this offseason, they've re-signed Tyler Davis (#1 in special teams snaps), Dallin Leavitt (#2 in special teams snaps), Keisean Nixon (#4 in special teams snaps), and Eric Wilson (#6 in special teams snaps). None of these guys has a chance of starting, but they were priority re-signings solely for their special teams value. All this in a year where the Packers are ignoring offense and defense in free agency. Imagine that. It's also worth noting that Isaiah McDuffie, Josiah Deguara, Rasul Doudlas, and TJ Slaton (the other guys who ranked in the top 8 for special teams snaps last year) are still under contract and the Packer re-signed Corey Ballentine, who played almost exclusively on special teams last year.

The Packers have not had continuity like this on special teams in a long time.

With a great special teams coach, and core players returning to build cohesion in the units, the Packers are finally in a position to have good special teams.

And it can make a huge difference for a young team in transition.

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Bruce Irons has played, coached, and studied football for decades. Best-selling author of books such as A Fan's Guide To Understanding The NFL Draft, A Fan's Guide To Understanding The NFL Salary Cap, and A Fan's Guide To NFL Free Agency Hits And Misses, Bruce contributes to CheeseHeadTV and PackersForTheWin.com.

Follow Bruce Irons on Twitter at @BruceIronsNFL.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
7 points
 

Comments (40)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
NickPerry's picture

April 07, 2023 at 07:32 am

They should be better this year too which is awesome. We all KNEW the Packers weren't bring in any FA with the cap issues they have, but it's great to see they've brought back "Bisaccia's Guy's" to keep the Packers ST Units moving up the ranks.

Sorry but I have to say it...

We're 20 days from the draft and now we're hearing about all these other possible trade partners on different Packers sites. Just this morning I saw two, one with the 49ers, one with the Ravens. Obviously the Packers love rumors like this, it motivates the Jets or other teams to up their offers and get it done.

I don't really care anymore where Rodgers ends up. Personally I think he could go to the 49ers and STILL fuck up that chance to win. Afterall, he KNOWS better than any HC he's ever been with.

I went there to say this... I still believe a deal gets done before the draft. WITH those additional picks the Packers can address the TE and WR positions and get Love the MUCH NEEDED help at the skill positions. Right now the Packers ST Unit is probably the best unit on the team, and IMO the best coached unit on this team as well. Bisaccia has been around a long time and with his new title as an assistant HC, hopefully MLF leans a little more on him.

8 points
11
3
CentralPA_PackFan's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:45 am

I’m with you, Nick. The more rumors the merrier on teams interested in trading for AR. Living in Central PA, I obviously get inundated with tons of Eagles news year in, year out, and I think Mark Murphy should make himself useful in the Rodgers trade by whispering the following in Woody Johnson’s ear each day:

“Woody, in the time you’ve been owner of the Jets, the Eagles have pulled off the following QB trades: backup A.J. Feeley for a 2nd-round pick (No. 35), washed up Donovan McNabb for a 2nd (37) and a next year 4th, backup Kevin Kolb for a 2nd (51), mediocre Sam Bradford for a 1st (14) and a next year 4th, Carson Wentz (who everyone knew the Eagles no longer wanted at that point) for a 3rd (70) ]and a next year conditional 2nd (that became a 1st (16) based on playing time). Not a single MVP or Super Bowl win between any of those QBs – before or after. Also, keep in mind, that Favre had his most efficient, highest QB Rating season at age 40, and of course, Brady had multiple Super Bowl wins after 40. Now, Woody are you going let your GM try to lowball us and draw this out for getting a Super Bowl-winning, 4-time MVP in return? Really? Give me a break.” [Side note – I posit the same argument to the national talking heads, and anonymous FO types and scouts who say the Packers should except the equivalent of a bag of doorknobs for Rodgers.]

With the above in mind, here’s what I’d propose to the Jets as a fair trade for Rodgers: swap 1st round picks, and receive the first of their 2nd round picks (42) for this year (ensuring the Jets don’t take the Packers targeted player in either round without giving up more to some team - in addition to getting the extra 2), a conditional 3rd in 2024 (that becomes a 2nd if the Jets make the playoffs this year or Rodgers is on the Jets roster the day before the 2024 draft, a 1st if the Jets make the Super Bowl or Rodgers wins MVP this year), and a conditional 3rd in 2025 (that becomes a 2nd if Rodgers plays 70% of the snaps in 2024, a 1st if the Jets make the Super Bowl or Rodgers wins MVP in either 2023 or 2024).

Both teams would be protected. If the trade turns out to be a total bust for the Jets, they gave up basically a 2 and two 3s for a Super Bowl-winning, 4-time MVP, and based on the Eagles fleecing other teams above (pretty much total busts in all cases for those teams) for mediocre at best QBs to begin with, big deal for the Jets to give up a 2 and two 3s for Rodgers and it’s a bust. The Eagles have pulled off worse on five different teams.

On the other hand, if the Jets get to the Super Bowl or Rodgers regains MVP form, the Packers get two 1s and a 2, pretty much right what they should get if the Jets get to the Super Bowl or Rodgers returns to MVP form. The negotiating for me would involve the conditionals for the in between scenarios. I wouldn’t budge on the best and worst cases. Your move Woody.

1 points
1
0
CentralPA_PackFan's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:45 am

Sorry, double post.

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

April 07, 2023 at 07:34 am

Keeping Bisaccia was the counterweight to keeping Joe Barry. Opposite sides of the see-saw.

14 points
14
0
T7Steve's picture

April 07, 2023 at 07:47 am

That's a good way to put it.

I hope Bisaccia can concentrate on helping the D preform where it's supposed to and allow MLF to just worry about being the OC.

Don't you think that Bisaccia can make them hungry and have fun playing again? Most of last season they looked like they had no fun and were playing by themselves out there, not as a unit.

Also, as I've mentioned before, maybe in his new position, he'll be able to see thing and help make in-game adjustments. A thing that's been unheard of in GB in recent years with the past two HCs..

2 points
3
1
LambeauPlain's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:36 am

In Acting GM Murphy World, this makes sense.

Make Rich Assistant HC so he can actually perform as the Acting HC.

Free up MLF to concentrate on O (that's mostly what he does anyway) to be the Acting OC.

Have Rich look over Barry's shoulder to evaluate his planning and player deployment, as Assistant DC.

It may work but why not just make Rich HC, MLF OC, and Barry DC (until he is finally fired)? Only the Murphy knows.

2 points
3
1
PatrickGB's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:51 am

It made me wonder what kind of coaching background Rich has. (Other than interim HC) What is he good at? Does coaching “Wefense” translate to coaching other rooms?

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:26 am

He's only been a football coach continuously since 1983 beginning in college for several years (3 programs) and the remainder coaching in different roles for 6 NFL teams...DB, RBs, STs, and as Assist. HC a few times too.

His depth of football knowledge, experience and positive performance makes him the most experienced, and probably the most talented coach on the Packers.

2 points
2
0
PatrickGB's picture

April 07, 2023 at 05:49 pm

Wow, I actually looked it up. He has been an assistant HC a number of times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Bisaccia

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:19 am

Bissacia was imposed on LaFleur it seems. Perhaps out of guilt for screwing up Rizzi and potentially a Super Bowl in fairness to LaFleur. Bissacia clearly has leverage and is willing to use it.

Apparently the team didn’t feel that Barry had plumbed the depths Drayton achieved and so let LaFleur have his way, perhaps they feared not doing so would effectively make it clear he wasn’t a true HC.

1 points
2
1
BirdDogUni's picture

April 07, 2023 at 11:39 am

Can we put Rich B and Nixon on one side and keep Barry up in the air the whole season?

Please?

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

April 07, 2023 at 07:37 am

" A case can even be made that special teams outperformed the offense and the defense last year. "

As I was reading, Bruce, I was thinking the same thing. One step forward two steps back.

I think this season, with a full camp and healthy lines that won't be getting shuffled around as much, we can take some surprising steps in the NFC North. Can't believe I just wrote this! Guess I was being generous with the "two steps back". More like two jumps back.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

April 07, 2023 at 07:39 am

"Packers (Finally) Building On Special Teams Success"

Nothing like waiting until your HOF QB leaves to decide to build the whole team. Also, now would be a great time to draft a WR in the first round and a TE in the 2nd round.

I do really like that they have brought back their core special teams players. Obviously the biggest one being NIxon. He was electric as a return man. But the other players they brought back are key players. Ford was a great gunner. Leavitt was a special teams leader. Wilson when he was brought in was really good. Its good to see them paying attention to the special teams.

7 points
8
1
mrtundra's picture

April 07, 2023 at 07:42 am

I would not mind, one bit, if the Packers drafted Tre Tucker, WR/ KR, from Cincy, in the late rounds of the draft. The kid would be a back up for Nixon at KR and could help the offense as a slot receiver. I look at him more for his STs abilities than his WR abilities. The CHTV Draft Guide lists him as a KR. Another weapon for Bisaccia. GO PACK, GO!!!

3 points
4
1
RCPackerFan's picture

April 07, 2023 at 07:48 am

I wouldn't mind this at all.

0 points
1
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 07, 2023 at 07:56 am

He is dynamic. Knows the zones and gets there fast.

0 points
0
0
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:33 pm

What do you think of Derius Davis WR/KR/PR out of TCU?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:05 am

It’s interesting that, given our almost non-existent free cap, we have prioritized these resignings. Could this be a quid pro quo for retaining Bissacia? I certainly wouldn’t blame him were that the case.

Of these, it looks like Nixon will “start” in the middle as well as returning. In my assessment he earned that opportunity for what he did on D . Davis is supposedly a prospect that they have some belief in at TE. I thought he failed to make progress as a TE last year, but who knows if the Packers think this will be the year. Wilson actually looked like decent depth as 4th ILB. I certainly don’t see him as a liability as that, which is a step up over most recent seasons. Leavitt seems to be a pure ST proposition, but also to be very clearly the unit leader.

We have also brought back or brought in guys like Benjie Franklin, Corey Ballentine, James Wiggins and Tyrelle Ford who seem to be good ST candidates (not just on for return depth) in addition to perhaps having upside on D.

That’s a very deep core pre draft, particularly one with multiple 7th round picks. Ballentine has returned 35 kickoffs in the NFL for 855 yards (24.4 avg.) with a long of 66 yards. Tyrelle Ford was a returner in college before a year in the CFL where he returned one punt for 17 yards. He made 40 kick returns in college for 733 yards and 82 punt returns for 1,139 yards and three touchdowns. Wiggins also returned kicks and punts in college.

Even without considering the ST play of Tarvarius Moore or Melton, that’s a a pretty deep pool of STers in place, covering pretty much all aspects other than the blocking from linemen. So how will that affect what we do in the draft?

What I’m hoping is that it means we can ignore STs later on and stockpile options at weaker positions purely on an ability to help now or upside on O or D. Instead I’m hoping it allows us to restock the pipelines and maybe increase role depth competition now, irrespective of ST acumen or athletic fit of player or position.

4 points
5
1
T7Steve's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:29 am

Don't you think their attitude and success will permeate through the whole team?

I'd love to see some nasty aggressiveness.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:38 am

I don’t know enough about them. I do get the impression that Leavitt is a big plus but he really doesn’t play on D and I don’t expect that to change. Nixon seems like one guy who has the positive attitude and personality that might help the D.

1 points
1
0
LeotisHarris's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:31 am

I know it's a typo, CW, just want to suggest "QuadProQuo" as a screenname option for any free agents out there.

4 points
4
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:08 am

‘Nasty Aggressiveness” would be good as well.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:29 am

Seeing AJ Dillon on a Cubii commercial late at night would blow my mind... Not sure why I thought of that.

Thigh Master >>> AJ Dillon

Cubii >>> AJ Dillon >>> Laughter.

2 points
2
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:01 am

I’m a big fan of laughter.

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:54 am

I agree Rich has changed the strategy and culture of STs significantly.

For the last forever, the Packers used STs as a squad for Day 3 draft picks, bottom of the depth chart players. It was not where O and D starters played.

Frustratingly, STs was mostly an afterthought. It showed on game days. Teams were cobbled together after final cutdowns. Players on STs to start the season were staffed by different guys during Camp and Preseason (except kicker, punter LS).

Rich has insisted STs are staffed by ST proficient players. It has worked. He got his ST guys! If they can also play on O or D, gravy.

As you say, CW...use all three draft days to build depth competition at all positions... and if some can play STs, more gravy.

2 points
2
0
PatrickGB's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:40 am

I had some random thoughts on this.
True, we resigned some great ST’s players but not to long term deals.
Next, we promoted Rich to assistant HC and I wonder how much say he actually has in the rooms.
Right now Crosby has not been resigned so I wonder who will be the kicker.
We have a bunch of later round picks who normally play ST’s and I wonder if there will be room for them on the roster.
Finally, how many of these ST players can step up to be starters down the road?

0 points
2
2
RCPackerFan's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:01 am

I would assume most special teams types of players are mostly going to only get 1 year deals. Unless they are a great return man or something.

I wouldn't be surprised if they drafted a Kicker. Moody seems to be the popular choice.

There will be room on the roster for players that show they are worthy of being on the roster. Also some of the late round guys maybe either redshirted on the roster, or brought to the PS.

If you are talking about rookie and first year players, they have a chance to be starters down the road. If you are talking about guys like Wilson, the only way he is a starter is if there are injuries in front of him. But a guy like Campbell last year, could potentially develop into a starter.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:03 am

Maybe a few can be counted on to play O and D...may a potential starter or two. That is secondary to STs now. Finally!

Before Rich, STs were bottom of the depth chart players, some who played STs before, some who never did. And very few of those guys ever stepped up to be starters on O and D as well. So that's a wash.

I like Rich's approach. Staff STs with ST players to win many more plays than you lose.

0 points
0
0
TxFred's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:53 am

I really like RB's coaching style. Basic football. Coverage, blocking & tackling. Skills vacant in today's "entertainment".

5 points
5
0
Since'61's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:16 am

I agree. Bissaccia is a solid football coach type of guy. However, MLF has him beat in the arm flapping category.
LOL. Thanks, Since '61

2 points
3
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:35 am

And he doesn't need the Hair Gel.

1 points
1
0
Dragon5's picture

April 07, 2023 at 11:37 am

Perhaps that's one of Rich's new roles...prevent the arm flapping while breathing heavily down the HC's neck.

2 points
3
1
Packers0808's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:49 am

I think RB will be head coach this year instead of Rodgers!

2 points
3
1
splitpea1's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:52 am

Now if we can just find a young replacement for Crosby who can be accurate on FGs/XPs and kick the ball deep, we should be set. Deep kickoffs are important because it means less work for our guys on coverage and less potential injuries for both sides.

3 points
3
0
ricky's picture

April 07, 2023 at 11:17 am

What a concept. Instead of hiring retreads and incompetent coaches, you actually bring in someone who knows what they are doing. Of course, that may cost a bit more, but if you want to win football games, sometimes you need to spend some money to bring in people who know what they're doing. Now, if they could just hire a defensive coordinator that might cost more, but could bring in a staff to bring out the best in your players, and design a defense to fit their skills, rather than stubbornly trying to make the players fit into a scheme that doesn't match their strengths.

3 points
3
0
jhtobias's picture

April 07, 2023 at 11:34 am

I would say rich b has more influence on the roster than lafluer which is absolutley the right call.

Matt L has made the greatest error of them all. He has risked his career by keeping joe berry not a bet most 8 yr olds would make.

Great thing is Rich B should be the head coach after this yr and bring in his own guys.

Lafluer and you can tell he is backpedlung saying chance he gets not to expect much from this team lower your expectations which is a smart move to cover his brear end .

U fortunatley when the defense falls into the bottom of the league becuase he retained an absolute pathetic d coor thats on him .

2 points
2
0
oldpointer's picture

April 07, 2023 at 11:37 am

Rodgers departure will mean a diminished ability for the offense to win games. The defense hopefully will help win a couple via turnovers. Special teams now will be counted on to assist the new offense with a few scores (field goals & punt/kick-off returns) and field position. Their importance has increased with the expected struggles on a JL led offense and it's smart to build the ST (players and coach) to the point where they can have a meaningful impact during the post-Rodgers transition. Their impact will be necessary for any success. Should be interesting to watch.

0 points
1
1
PatrickGB's picture

April 07, 2023 at 05:54 pm

I wonder if Rich’s past experiences can help all the rooms? I read his background and he has a ton of experience. But he does not get retained. Some of the time it’s been because of promotions but other times it has not. It’s a puzzle.

0 points
0
0
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:01 pm

1. Packer punt and kick coverage seemed better, but I have not looked at the numbers year to year.

2. Packer punt returns and kick returns all improved once Nixon was put in the game. That is obvious.

3. Kick offs were the shortest in the league - that is documented - but I would keep Crosby for field goals and a boomer on the roster to handle kickoffs.

4. Packers were still having trouble stopping the opposition from blocking punts - remember the Jets and the Vikings next to last game (probably others) - and field goals and extra points. Did not look at the number relative to last year, but I would bet it is the same or worse.

5. I see another long snapper has been brought in to compete, maybe to solve #4

1 points
1
0
vin0770's picture

April 08, 2023 at 09:23 am

Bisaccia should be the Head Coach…he doesn’t strike me as weak.

0 points
0
0