Packers DO NOT DRAFT list from CheeseheadTV - 2026

CheeseheadTV writers tell you who the Packers should avoid in the 2024 NFL draft.

Here are some thoughts from our writers on players they wouldn't want to see the Packers draft. The original name was the FUBAR list. If you don't know what that acronym means, look it up. The original feel of this list has changed over the years, so we don't call it that anymore, but enjoy it nonetheless.  Tomorrow, you'll get everyone's Packers second-round pick predictions.

Tim Backes - Carson Beck - The Packers could use a project backup QB (unless they see Desmond Ridder as a true reclamation project and not just a roster filler), but Beck is a guy I'd steer clear of. Turnover prone and lots of college baggage, plus he tends to fold under pressure. No thanks.

Mark Ballard - Caleb Banks - I certainly get the temptation: 6'6" 330 lbs with elite 35-inch arms and 10⅞-inch hands, and a dominant Senior Bowl performance to match. But then you realize all that mass is pressing down on a foot that has been recently injured three times, and surgically repaired twice. In a draft with many quality interior defenders, it's hard to envision Gutekunst and the Packers, coming off their own injury-plagued season, and without much draft capital, spending a day 2 pick on the risky Banks.

Jersey Al Bracco - Jordyn Tyson  Yes, he's listed as the #3 receiver in the draft by most analysts. He's certainly a talented receiver with good size, adequate speed and a well-developed route tree, but he can't stay out of the trainer's room. He's had a torn ACL, broken collarbone and two high-grade hamstring pulls over the course of his college career. Even if he miraculously fell to the Packers, I'd still take a pass.

Kevin Gibson - Ty Simpson - Many mock drafts have Simpson going in the late first round, but that’s mostly due to a thin 2026 quarterback class. The Packers are rumored to be in the market for competition to be Jordan Love’s backup, but even if Simpson falls, this guy has just 15 career starts. I look for Brian Gutekunst to pass on a QB to work the waiver wire for another veteran at the end of training camp a la Malik Willis in 2024 – assuming Desmond Ridder or Kyle McCord don’t take command of the No. 2 role during training camp.

Cory Jennerjohn - Caleb Banks - This might have been the easiest decision for me. A 300-pound lineman with a foot injury history, including re-injuring it before the NFL Combine, is a huge problem. He also will need time to develop because his technique is about as crisp as lettuce past the born on date. 

Kalani Jones - Devin Moore - Moore has missed time three out of four years of college football. While the traits are exciting when he's on the field, I also don't view him as a great scheme fit for Gannon's zone based quarter heavy preferences. Average speed and a lack of juice when closing on routes will be too much for his impressive length to bail him out. 

Luke Leavitt - Chris Johnson - Cornerback is a position of need but not this direction. Lacking in physicality despite having the size of a corner Green Bay is attracted to. A player like Deangelo Ponds if he’s still on the board provides ball hawking and intensity Green Bay needs physically and mentally.

Maggie Loney - Zxavian Harris - From a pure football standpoint, Harris is the type of player the Packers would typically covet. Admittedly, I loved watching him. However, there are a number of character concerns off the field that Brian Gutekunst is likely to shy away from, including an arrest for domestic violence. For that reason, I'm not interested in him coming to Green Bay. 

Gil Martin - Caleb Banks - At 24, The talent is intriguing but the injury history is just too much. Without a first round pick, using one of your top two picks on a player who may be compromised already by injuries would be a big gamble.

Mitchell McLaughlin - Carson Beck - I think he’s too old to be a developmental day three quarterback prospect. If the Packers pick a quarterback would prefer it’s a younger guy.

Greg Meinholz - Jermod McCoy - McCoy is undoubtedly a talented player that could go on to have a good career. However, a potential degenerative knee condition spotted during the combine after an ACL tear which he suffered in 2025 shows him likely to fall in the draft. He could absolutely be a steal for the Packers in the 2nd or even 3rd rounds if the condition isn't an issue. But, with the Packers' immediate needs at CB, I cringe at the thought of spending high draft capital on a player with injury red flags. 

Mark Oldacres - Bryce Lance - Anyone who thinks Lance is the second coming of Christian Watson due to his similar dimensions, athleticism and the fact they share the same alma mater, is going to be disappointed. He certainly has the speed, but he lacks functional strength, every area of his game is raw, and he is an older prospect coming out of the FCS. I struggle to see how he is a consensus top 100 pick.

Mike Price - Ty Simpson - Andy Herman brought this idea into the universe in a podcast and I haven't been able to sleep since. We have a championship level roster with a young QB; it just doesn't make sense. much like a one-dimensional player for me. Sure, he can generate pressure on obvious pass downs but I don't know if you can even play him on run downs, and in this division that could be half the time.

Joseph Randolph - Lee Hunter  - While Hunter may be near immovable in the run game, he leaves a lot to be desired in the pass game, which is exemplified by his 4.12 RAS. A Day Two selection is a steep asking price for a guy who, depending on field position and personnel, may only see 1st Down before being replaced by someone else.

Dan Saia - Chris Brazzell - While he is an elite athlete and could make for a nightmare trio with Golden and Watson, there are immaturity concerns popping up from NFL scouts. also the style of offense he is coming from at Tennessee has not been kind to skill position players at the NFL level. 

Carter Semb - Lee Hunter - The Packers need a nose tackle, and Hunter fits that bill size-wise --- but that's all. At 6'3" and 320 pounds, he has the size and strength to make it difficult for offensive linemen to move him, but he faced weak competition in college, and he relied more on his size than on good technique. His athletic profile makes it really difficult to see him panning out. His 10-yard split, 20-yard split, 40 time, vertical, and broad jump all fall short of what the Packers typically look for. He'll also be 24 before training camp opens.

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
4 points
 

Comments (57)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
TKWorldWide's picture

April 23, 2026 at 06:30 am

Shemar Stewart!
Oh, wait, that was last year.
Never mind.

4 points
4
0
Cheezehead72's picture

April 23, 2026 at 06:42 am

Watch what you say. Gute might trade 52 for him.

1 points
3
2
GLM's picture

April 23, 2026 at 03:59 pm

lol

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 24, 2026 at 06:25 am

This is 2024

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

April 23, 2026 at 06:41 am

Over all I agree with this list except for a few things mentioned which I will get into. Like I said yesterday if Gute selectes any edge at 52 I will be really upset. You went out and got Parsons and gave up a lot. We need to worry about other positions. I believe we should not take an edge until day 3 but I will live with a edge being taken in the third round.

Not sure what is up with Mike Price's comment as Ty Simpson is mentioned but it talks of a defensive player.

On day three if Banks is still there I think you take a chance but I doubt he will be. Lee Hunter will be a good pick at 52 because we need something to stop the run. People got to remember when you have no first round pick you get what is left and sometimes it is not someone who checks all the boxes.

I am ok with taking any of these QBs on day 3. We do need a backup QB. If the right guy is there go get him.

I agree steer away from any player with an injury history. But when we get down to the fifth round or later sometimes you have to take a chance.

-5 points
1
6
Cheezehead72's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:04 am

Oh I forgot to mention. I do not want to see them draft Ponds. I get visions of Hobbs, Randall, and Rollins.

-2 points
1
3
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:46 am

I don't get your logic Cheeze. What you are saying is even though we have a big need @ Edge, we shouldn't fill it with a player @ #52 who has a 90% chance to start in 2026. And the reason we shouldn't is because we traded for Parsons? You are in the 5% that think the Parsons trade was a bad deal for GB, get over it.

We have a need @ Edge because we lost our #2 & 3 Edge rushers this off-season and #1 is coming off ACL surgery. You must have seen how not having a pass rush after Parsons got hurt affected the whole defense. We don't need another JAG pass rusher in the 7th, we need a guy to take over until Parsons is back and replace him in 2-3 years when we can't afford him. LVN, Cox, Sorrell, and the other 2 have shown basically nothing to show they can handle it.

2 points
3
1
Cheezehead72's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:54 am

We need to stop the run up the middle. Please tell me how an edge will help that. We need CBs that can cover. This is why you do not box yourself in a corner by giving away 2 first round picks and a DT for one guy. If it was that good of a trade please tell me why we need another edge with our first pick. I was against not signing Egebare.

Maybe the 5% are right. Sometimes the minority is correct.

I like how you said a JAG 7th round pick when I said I would be ok with using a 3rd round pick.

Remember we could not stop the run up the middle last year.

-2 points
3
5
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 09:51 am

I just did. "We have a need @ Edge because we lost our #2 & 3 Edge rushers this off-season and #1 is coming off ACL surgery."

I am not saying we don't need to stop the run, what I am saying is a top Edge rusher like Jacas or Dennis-Sutton would probably start and be difference makers right away. A draft DT probably would not have the same effect. I would draft Edge @ #52 if one of those 2 were available, or I would trade back and select Orange around 65-70.

" I was against not signing Egebare."

Enagbare wasn't worth $5 million let alone $10 million.

-3 points
2
5
blacke00's picture

April 23, 2026 at 08:41 am

I disagree. Gutenkunst drafted 2 players last year. They are "the" replacements for who you lost. Any guy you draft ( at this stage) has no more guarantees than what you already have and he'll be rookie! it will take a year or two to develop him. Of course if you get lucky you won't but that counts for every position.
We need to draft player as depth positions which MAY develop into starters.
If you can draft a quality OL ( which is really a more pressing need. A couple of CBs would be nice.

If you really want a shiny penny draft a RB high that person will like play right away and contribute.

Remember DL players take a year or 2 to develop.

Taking WR high is not necessary! You already have 4 WR that want the ball. Plus, they have a couple PS guys who have potential!

Where you really need help is TE, LB and as I said OL.

6 points
6
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 01:50 pm

"I disagree. Gutenkunst drafted 2 players last year. They are "the" replacements for who you lost."

I really don't think GB drafted Sorrell and Oliver thinking they would be starting at Edge this year. The 2 guys i would not hesitate to pick @ #52 would start in GB in 2026, that's Gabe Jacas and Dan Dennis -Sutton. Both are better than any of our Edges not names Parsons. No development, starters.

"If you can draft a quality OL ( which is really a more pressing need. A couple of CBs would be nice."

No O-lineman we draft @ #52 or after will start in 2026, and the only way they even play is if multiple players get hurt. And yes we need 2 CBs in this draft, starting with pick #84.

WE also badly need a better TE2, I said that last year too.

"If you really want a shiny penny draft a RB high that person will like play right away and contribute."

No RB we draft will start over Jacobs, and he won't play much either.

1 points
2
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 24, 2026 at 06:33 am

And DT / NT

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 23, 2026 at 09:07 am

Agreed: I'm all in favor of adding bulk to the middle of the defense, but I think it can be helped more immediately with a big, rangy 3T/5T type. I'm not bypassing a 3-down DT/DE/Edge or a quality CB in round 2 for a run-down only NT who probably doesn't help the team very much in 2026.

The Packers surrendered big rushing games in 5 contests last year (not counting the JV scrimmage against the Vikes): 2 Bears games, one Giants game, Carolina, and Baltimore. They won two of those games, could've won two others. A couple of those rush totals were augmented by mobile QBs, which a fat NT doesn't help much against. The one that sticks out in people's minds is the Ravens where, yes, they got trucked unmercifully.

I'm not being Kevin Bacon from Animal House ('Please remain calm! All is well!') on run defense. They need to get better. But it's highly likely that the kind of player people want the Packers to pick in round 2 to specifically be a run stopper is a poor investment at that point.

1 points
3
2
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 02:00 pm

Dobber, my hold out hope is that GB signs Calais Campbell to a reasonable contract after the draft. He would let us push that type of selection to 2027 when we have more picks.

Tell me what you think about T J Slayton. There is a good possibility he gets released from the Bengals to save $$$. They don't really need him now after trading for Lawrence and he is about 4th on their depth chart now. He was decent when he played for us. What do you think about either guy?

I do like Chris McClellan-Missouri DT in the draft, he has some pass rush skills and is about 6'4 315 already. I like Xzavian Harris too, but I don't know the true extent of his lrgal issues. Has he actually been convicted of a crime and if so how did he play in 2025?

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

April 23, 2026 at 08:52 am

Lee Hunter’s pff run grade in his last year is higher than Stackhouse’s was, but only very marginally. Both were elite. Hunter is slower and less explosive than Stackhouse. Hence is 4 RAS as opposed to 6. The liklihood is that we get a pretty similar rookie outcome and the projection differs primarily because of the freakish depth and quality of the DT class in Stackhouse’s year.

Good player? Yes. Early round candidate? Dubious. Going to help on non rushing downs? No, and no upside to in future.

0 points
2
2
TKWorldWide's picture

April 23, 2026 at 06:47 am

Possibly the most obvious, stupid thought ever posted here at the mighty CHTV:

How about a couple guys that are so good they just force their way into the lineup early on and then continue to improve?

5 points
5
0
dobber's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:29 am

"How about a couple guys that are so good they just force their way into the lineup early on and then continue to improve?"

On the "do not draft" list?
We've seen too much of that over the years....

2 points
2
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 23, 2026 at 08:22 am

Reverse psychology? 🤷‍♂️ 🏈

3 points
3
0
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 06:57 am

Should have listed Daylen Everette,
inconsistent coverage
(nearly 60% completion rate allowed),
a tendency to rely on speed over technique,
high-cut tackling, and high penalty rates.

-1 points
3
4
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:38 am

And Stukes because he is a safety and we don't need one. You are a piece of work man.

1 points
3
2
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:44 am

He's a NB/Slot guy.
Which there isn't depth behind Bullard.
(Who is a FA next year)
And if you google the talk of Stukes.
Many think; he could turn out to be the best safety
in the draft

2 points
3
1
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:50 am

The players name you keep mispronouncing is Bullard, Bullard, Bullard. I get that you love Stukes and he is a decent player, but unless the Packers are throwing up a big smokescreen, Stukes to GB in the draft has not been mentioned at all.

"Many think; he could turn out to be the best safety in the draft."

Better than Downs? Not hardly.

1 points
3
2
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 09:53 am

I changed Bullard, before you posted.
Spell checker fills in the wrong name if you mis-spell it.
The wording is "Turn out."

1 points
2
1
dobber's picture

April 24, 2026 at 08:15 am

"Which there isn't depth behind Bullard.
(Who is a FA next year)"

Bullard is an FA AFTER '27. There's a big difference.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 23, 2026 at 08:23 am

All in the name of the super-Bowl and the 3-4-4, I’d wager.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

April 23, 2026 at 09:21 am

Everette needs work on his coverage and tackling technique (though he’s a willing tackler for a CB), but that’s why he’s not a clear early first rounder based upon his athletic profile, ball skills and other plusses. The downside of picking later is there are always going to be questions and tradeoffs from the ideal.

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 09:50 am

Project- You do know the word.
Don't sugar coat it.

0 points
2
2
Coldworld's picture

April 23, 2026 at 10:00 am

Aren’t you always arguing for going for the great? After early round one that means a trade off involving risk set against upside. Put another way, if you want a high floor you are unlikely to get a truly high ceiling and vice versa. Everette is an example of a decent floor and very high ceiling. That’s why he may be available. There’s no way to have it both ways as you seem to. In our case, his floor is plausibly higher than we have currently as well.

3 points
3
0
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 10:04 am

Comparison Nixon

1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

April 23, 2026 at 10:22 am

Absolutely nothing like Nixon in terms of athleticism or play style. You admitted that yourself when you described him as just trying to win by speed.

2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 11:21 am

Project
Nixon has speed.
And he went to the pro Bowl

0 points
1
1
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 02:08 pm

Man, I will bet you are a real hit at holiday family events.

Stop arguing with everyone. No one is saying Everette or even Stukes for that matter, are first round quality DBs. But where we are picking, Everette will probably be available and in my view, he has better potential than any CB in Green Bay right now.

I look for players that I can separate by position group and where they reasonably will be selected in the draft. And there are probably 6-7 that would work in GB that will be available @ #84 or later.

2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 02:52 pm

Whose arguing?
Stukes has been Mocked. To the Bears.

If you don't want to be challenge.
Then don't post.

Where do you come up with that
Shit, that he would be better.?

Use the stats- Don't flip flop.

0 points
3
3
dobber's picture

April 24, 2026 at 08:16 am

Bears got their S. They won't be taking Stukes. They need help in the trenches.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

April 23, 2026 at 11:35 am

Richard Sherman was a 5th round project. It’s not all about what these guys did in college but about what they could develop into in the pros. Like Sherman becoming an all-pro shutdown CB.

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 23, 2026 at 03:49 pm

Who drafted him?

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 23, 2026 at 03:47 pm

Think Stokes.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:29 am

One of my favorite articles of the year! Remember when Rashan Gary was on this list? Thanks to all the contributors!

"...his technique is about as crisp as lettuce past the born on date."

I'm just not sure what to do with that.

4 points
4
0
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:40 am

Yes- Gute ignored the
Low production numbers.

4 points
4
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

April 23, 2026 at 11:37 am

Gary was used differently in college so his numbers were not true edge rusher numbers.

-2 points
0
2
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 03:14 pm

And Burns was just sitting there

3 points
3
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 23, 2026 at 08:23 am

Trade him to Dallas?

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

April 23, 2026 at 08:29 am

I'll get right on that...
(this is where you put the gif of Kermit the Frog typing furiously on a typewriter)

2 points
2
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:55 am

RB Mike Washington. We would have to spend #52 to get him and he is not worth it. How about spend that pick on a player at a big need that has a chance to not only start but will play alot. Jacob's replacement will come in next years draft or as a FA in 2027. This year's plan should be sign a cheap, solid FA to be RB2 or 3.

I will just add any QBs that GB would have to spend a draft pick on. The Packers have too many actual need to waste a draft pick on a QB who has a 2% chance of making the team. I did see GB had QB Kyron Drones-Va Tech in for a 30 visit, he would probably be ok as a UFDA. He has some similarities to Willis although he isn't even as fast as Ridder.

1 points
5
4
Coldworld's picture

April 23, 2026 at 09:00 am

Washington is a hard no for me because he can’t protect and looks like he either doesn’t want to or does not like having to take hits when he’s not carrying the momentum. Particularly one to avoid because LaFleur refuses to play anyone who can’t protect more than most coaches and regardless of their rushing talent. Just a bad fit with our coach.

3 points
4
1
stockholder's picture

April 23, 2026 at 10:12 am

Aaron Jones- Remember him.
Get a FB - Jam Miller - Alabama

1 points
2
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 23, 2026 at 03:44 pm

A couple of Bucky Irving drafts ago. This is Phase Three of Groundhog's Day with the Gutedkunst extension.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

April 23, 2026 at 07:59 am

Anybody with an arrest record. Anybody with a history containing a major injury. Anybody with questions about his effort. Anybody who hasn’t started a college game. Avoid these and they should be fine.

5 points
6
1
TheKanataThrilla's picture

April 23, 2026 at 09:11 am

I 100% understand the comments on Caleb Banks, but my question would be if the team would consider him enough of a talent to give him a redshirt medical year assuming the medical staff thinks that with proper rest and rehab that the risk of reinjury would be low. Our rookies are often sitting on the pine anyhow.

I certainly want an immediate starter and contributor with #52, but I can see taking a chance as long as our medical team is on board.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 23, 2026 at 10:12 am

Banks is a wild card. He could be off boards, more likely off boards till a certain round or some teams could think it’s just misfortune and not a congenital risk. It only takes one.

He could go early still, based upon talent or he could drop like Darnell Washington (a TE I really wanted and a perfect fit) who fell to the late 3rd despite his potential. Who knows what our medical advice is? Not I or any journalist or poster.

Given how cautious we have tended to be, I suspect he’s unlikely to be a pick of ours unless we are really confident or he falls beyond the second. Even then, I suspect another team will jump sooner.

1 points
1
0
Swisch's picture

April 23, 2026 at 09:57 am

Kind of on the flipside, is there anyone worth trading up for as a first-round pick?
My understanding is that the quality falls off at about #20.
Maybe Gute would trade one of our current players plus draft picks for 2027 to move up.
Are there any scenarios that make sense? It would liven up Thursday night.

-4 points
0
4
Coldworld's picture

April 23, 2026 at 10:20 am

The cost to trade up even to the last pick in the first round would be our second and an early 4th, so in our case probably a second, 4th and late 5th. We could use a pick from next year, but they are discounted by a round and we do not have a first then either.

It’s not going to happen unless we trade a good player in lieu of a pick. Perhaps Reed could get a third? Would you trade Watson, McKinney, Williams? They might get us there in some combination. To get who? Late firsts are no guarantees anyway. I would not even consider that kind of trade. Forget the idea of a pick in first round or even a high second.

5 points
6
1
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 02:31 pm

Thanks CW, you beat me to it. Trading up for what indeed.

0 points
2
2
Swisch's picture

April 23, 2026 at 03:04 pm

I appreciate the thoughtful reply, Coldworld, and am pretty much in agreement with you.
However, I don't really know the players in the top 20 of the draft, so I was wondering if there was one of them that might be worth trying to draft by making a trade.
As has maybe been noted here at CheeseheadTV, Gute seems to perform better in the later rounds of the draft anyway, and and perhaps even with free agency (at least relatively speaking, in terms of getting the most value in relationship to the opportunity at that particular position in the draft).
***
In general, I genuinely do like good discussion, and so raise sincere questions.
It's a bit baffling to get downvotes for putting out a question for discussion, but I'll try to somehow move on from this crushing development and try to eke out a decent life anyway ;-).
My best to everyone.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 23, 2026 at 10:22 am

"Maybe Gute would trade one of our current players plus draft picks for 2027 to move up.
Are there any scenarios that make sense? It would liven up Thursday night."

So we should trade away players and future draft picks to move up in the draft so we can "liven up Thursday night?' Wow, I almost don't know what to say. We should just trade up to 15-20 in the first round, do you know what that would cost us? We are sitting very pretty, even without a 2027 first round pick, in thr 2027 draft which is going to be one of the strongest ever. I hope no one in GB even reads that suggestion.

On an actual serious note, are there any medical people on here that know what is wrong with Caleb Banks feet, and what is the prognosis on those injuries? He looks like can't miss prospect, but is he worth the risk?

Next question, does anyone actually know what Xzavien Harris was arrested for and what were the legal outcomes? If his charges were factual then we are probably out on him, maybe we are anyway since no 30 visit. Have the charges been dismissed? Was he convicted? If so why was he still playing in 2025? He is a real talent if his legal issues are not as serious.

-2 points
2
4
Swisch's picture

April 23, 2026 at 03:18 pm

Please, golfpacker61, it's obvious that I didn't say Gute should make a trade to liven up Thursday night.
I asked if there were any scenarios that make sense, and then added that such a trade would liven up Thursday night.
***
Why can't we be more charitable with each other here at CheeseheadTV, and in America in general?
I'm all for robust discussion and different points of view, but when we start ridiculing and attacking each other, it really stifles the discussion to the detriment of us all.
I'm of the opinion that all people of good will have something to add to the national discourse. I wouldn't want to do anything to discourage anyone from stating a sincere belief or opinion.
To me, that's a key part of being an American. It's also a way to make society a lot nicer and a lot better.
No one has all the answers, right? We need each other. Let's not inhibit the synergy of good people working together.

4 points
4
0
splitpea1's picture

April 23, 2026 at 11:54 am

I understand about Banks: he has the athletic upside, but he's a project with an injury history. Already have a couple of projects on the DL.

Lee Hunter had a good season at Texas Tech, which did not play "weak competition". Allright, so he has limited upside with pass rush, but so do a lot of NTs. The problem is the low athletic score, which may have already scared the Packers away ( I hear he did bad with his broad jump, but honestly, who the bleep cares). I'd strongly prefer Miller, but I'll take him over Orange.

Strongly disagree about Chris Johnson. He would be an excellent fit for our defense. Probably doesn't matter, though, because he won't be available without a trade-up.

Banks, Simpson, McCoy, and Tyson are popular "do not draft" picks in other places. I don't think we have to worry about the Packers drafting them.

Do not: Wait until the seventh round again to draft a CB or add to our collection of primarily "space-eating" DTs with little disruptive talent.

4 points
4
0