Packers 27 Commanders 18 Game Balls & Lame Calls

The Packers continue to stack success, rolling into legitimate NFC contention. 

Your Green Bay Packers are 2-0, having defeated the 15 win NFC North Champion Detroit Lions and NFC runner up Washington Commanders, and never even really looked tested through any of it. Another dominant performance for the green and gold (or green and white, on Thursday), predicated on a fast start from the passing attack, clock chewing from an effective running game, and a defensive front that, so far, looks like a group of world beaters. That's a formula for an extremely hard team to beat. 

It's been as ideal of a start as even the most optimistic fans among us could have expected. The team is on the road for four out of the next five games that they will play, and did exactly what they had to do in order to put themselves in the most ideal position for this road stretch. 

Game Balls

Tucker Kraft

If he wasn't already "broken out" for the national audience, Tucker Kraft certainly is now. Six catches on six targets for 124 yards, 74 yards after the catch and a touchdown. Kraft YAC n' Cheese is here and he's a matchup nightmare. The Commanders had no answers for Kraft all night, but I thought Thursday night was a great example of what the offense can look like with the heavy 12 personnel offense that we've been seeing hints of all summer. Luke Musgrave had a solid night himself, not only catching but showed a level of improvement in blocking as well. 

Once again the receiving room avoided a recorded drop, and the entire unit looks sharp and in lock step with Jordan Love. Jayden Reed was on course for a monster game before his unfortunate injury, and LaFleur will likely draw up a gameplan that involves Matthew Golden in that role against the Browns. 

Keisean Nixon & the entire coverage unit

For all the hoopla  during the preseason about the Packers' cornerback room, Keisean Nixon, Carrington Valentine and Nate Hobbs showed exactly why the front office put so much faith in them. Let's take a look at the numbers: 

  • Keisean Nixon: Six targets, one reception for nine yards with five PBUs
  • Carrington Valentine: Four targets, one reception for seven yards with one PBU.
  • Nate Hobbs: One target, zero receptions, zero PBUs.

The Commanders were forced by the pass rush to utilize the quick game all night long, meaning alot of the Commanders pass yards came against linebackers, who altogether allowed 106 yards. Jeff Hafley & Co. allowed the underneath throws all night, and continued to swarm the ballcarrier with energy, just like they did against Detroit. 

Keisean Nixon gets a game ball for the incredibly physical, aggressive coverage he showed all night, showcased by the five PBUs he had on Thursday night. Want to guess how many Nixon had in all of 2024? Six. 

Time will tell if the cornerbacks (and the defense as a whole) can continue the absolutely stellar level of play to this point. The name of the game in the NFL is to stay adaptive, and NFL offense will adjust to what the Packers defensive line is doing. So far, Jeff Hafley has earned the benefit of the doubt when it comes to making his own adjustments effectively, and having his players ready to do so as well. 

The Pass Rush

It's impossible to quantify the exact impact that Micah Parsons has had on how good this group looks, but isn't it incredible how that one move turned what was the team's biggest liability, into perhaps its greatest strength? We all remember that moment in the wildcard loss last year, when the Packers rush let Jalen Hurts stand tall in the pocket for approximately a half century. We all remember how Brain Gutekunst called for urgency as the offseason began, and bid his time before making what might be remembered as the most aggressive move in Packers history. The impact on that move has been immediate, and wildly effective. 

Jayden Daniels ran wild on defenses in 2024, but never looked comfortable in the pocket (or even really on the run) in this game. Add him to the club with Jared Goff, and we're two-for-two on shutting down a couple of the NFC's top QBs. The team notched five sacks, four QB hits, and 23 hurries (a little over half of Daniels' total dropbacks). Add onto that two batted balls by one Devonte Wyatt, and it's a heck of a day at the office for the pass rushers. 

Stopping Jayden Daniels was always going to be a tall task, but they and the linebackers did an excellent job at keeping contain as well, allowing just 17 yards on seven attempts. Let's give some credit to Demarcus Covington as well, and thank our Lord and Savior Vince Lombardi that Jason Rebrovich was shown the door last offseason. 

Lame Calls

Run Blocking

Let's start by giving credit for another great day of pass blocking from the offensive line (in my opinion, both sacks on Jordan Love were more on him than the OL). But there's an elephant in the room. If there's an area of concern for this Packers offense as we head into a ten-day absence of Packers football, it's a concerning lack of "push" from the offensive line on running plays. I highlighted this last week, but this was an area of concern last year as well. No one is pushing the alarm button on this yet, especially following an 84 yard performance by Josh Jacobs. But a lot of that yardage was Jacobs making something out of nothing, and it's certainly an area to keep an eye on.

Offensive Lessons

It feels a bit odd to say, but doesn't it still feel like there was a little meat still on the bone at the end of this game? We've already talked about the penalties, but there's still those small miscues, those three and outs, the stuffed runs and the missed connections between Love and his receivers. Maybe it's just a by-product of the treatment we as fans got from Aaron Rodgers for so long, but it just feels like the team is this close to going absolutely nuclear on the offensive side. 

This is less of a full "Lame Call", maybe call it a half. You might even want to call this a positive, depending on your view of evenly-filled water glasses. 27 points is nothing to sneeze at, and gets you a win more often than not in the NFL. The offense was effective, and Jordan played an extremely impressive game. But I can't shake the feeling that there's another level to this group that we haven't seen since the playoff win against Dallas. 

Three and Out

-- The Packers had an unfortunately long list of injuries as they headed into Thursday's matchup, and will need to add Jayden Reed to the list, as Matt LaFleur confirmed post game that the receiver suffered a broken collarbone. I'm sure the team is looking forward to a ten day mini-bye before their week three matchup. Zach Tom and Aaron Banks were reportedly game time decisions for the team, which spells some optimism that both will be ready before a matchup with Myles Garrett. Zanye Anderson may also be a candidate to return in that time, was a Questionable designation on Thursday. Some other names to keep an eye out for a week three return are Ben Simms, Warren Brinson and Bo Melton, but we won't see Cox for al least a month following his IR designation.   

-- There seems to be a bit of uncertainty at returner for the Packers, and it's interesting that through two games this year, Matthew Golden started the game returning punts but did not finish the game doing so, replaced both times after fielding a single kick. Instead, Keisean Nixon took the punt returns for the rest of the game. At kick returner, Emmanuel Wilson joined Savion Williams on returner duties, even after not seeing a snap on the unit last week. I'll be very interested to see how those groups shake out in Cleveland next week. 

-- Today's word of the week is actually two (I know, way to cop out of the rues of my own segment). "Stack Success". We've heard that phrase used all offseason by the players and coaches, but especially from Matt LaFleur himself. It's clear that a big emphasis within the building is to keep their momentum going, and to let each win contribute directly to the next. The way this team has been playing over the beginning of the season, the sky's the limit. But it's going to be up to the players, coaches and staff to maintain that same momentum, and build on it. After all, the name of the game in the NFL is to be playing your best football in January, not September. 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Co-Owner of the thirteen time world champion Green Bay Packers. Sometimes I write about them. Follow me on Twitter at https://x.com/kjones_in_co and on Substack for film breakdowns!

__________________________

 

0 points
 

Comments (69)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
PackBacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 07:48 am

I hope the Packers don't forget to include Jerry Jones on the list of people who get Super Bowl rings.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

September 12, 2025 at 07:55 am

In 2 weeks we get to bring our new toy to Jerry World. I hope he gets 3 sacks and the crowd is cheering him on.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 12, 2025 at 07:51 am

Couldn't be happier to watch Keisean prove me wrong- hope he keeps making me look foolish all season.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:09 am

I've been of the opinion that he's playing his last season in GB. He's a relative bargain for a starting CB, and after Hobbs signed his deal I can't help but think that Nixon might be wanting to get that next contract in place. I've had to walk back that stance based on the weakness of depth in the CB room, and Hobbs' track record of missing games.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:19 pm

I thing odds are better the Packers keep him on the team. He's entering his prime, playing to his ceiling and expect they would pay him Alexander the Occassional money because K also plays in actual games.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:25 pm

If they pay Nixon like he's Alexander- even the occasional- something is way out of whack.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:31 pm

Nixon is signed through 2026 at a reasonable salary. Why would they move on after this season?

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 01:40 pm

I he keeps balling like he is they would be crazy to let him get away. What a stud diamond in the rough!

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:48 am

I never understood the Nixon hate. He’s grown every year as a pro. He is now a legit CB1 and I’m not at all surprised.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:20 pm

He's only been playing CB for the last two years...and hardly any slot or DB snaps before that.

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:51 pm

Ya he surprised me with his speed. Very impressed with him

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:06 am

Edgerrin Cooper was everywhere last night. Play after play, he was active bottling up runners, getting in on an occasional blitz, and playing sideline to sideline. 10 tackles, 7 solo, half a sack: he had a really nice game.

TACKLING--when was the last time we saw a Packers defense that tackles like this? Not just swarming to the ball, but with the first guy making the play? I'm sure that statistically I'll be surprised to see more missed tackles than I'm remembering, but there sure didn't seem to be many. Winning defenses tackle, and so far, this is a winning defense.

"Time will tell if the cornerbacks (and the defense as a whole) can continue the absolutely stellar level of play to this point."

So far the Packers have been able to beat the OLs they've played and harry the QB both weeks. The DBs haven't been called on to hold up against an offense that gives its QB time. One of these weeks, that's going to happen...maybe it's Dallas, maybe it's Philly--who knows--but the real test will be when they're asked to spend more than 2.5 seconds on a regular basis in coverage.

"Jayden Reed to the list, as Matt LaFleur confirmed post game that the receiver suffered a broken collarbone."

This is a blow. Yes, Reed really only played in 11 personnel, but he made things happen when he was on the field. The speed of the WR group just dropped meaningfully because only Golden brings the juice now: the other "starters", Doubs and Wicks, are not fast. On the plus side, Reed will have 6-9 weeks to let that Jones fracture heal.

This opens the door for Musgrave to get more snaps as a "big slot," and the attention defenses will be swinging toward Kraft will give him opportunities. He just needs to learn how to pick up his feet. For someone who was supposed to be an outstanding athlete, he looks wonky running down the field. Kudos to Malik Heath for making an impact with outstanding concentration on his sideline catch--that was a key play for the Packers last night. Maybe it doesn't erase that ball that skipped off his hands late against Philly in the playoffs, but he's going to get some chances now, too. He needs to make the most of them.

Game ball--1-0 last week, 1-0 this week, and 10 days until they play their first road game in Cleveland. The Browns' defense is good. The rest of the organization is not. Get the starting OL together, rest up, focus on the next one.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:11 am

The kick and punt coverage deserves a lame call in an otherwise good victory.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:22 pm

I don't understand how Bicassia earns his Assoc. HC and ST coach pay, One of the highest in the entire NFL.

The Carlson mess was all on him.

0 points
0
0
jont's picture

September 12, 2025 at 02:29 pm

I don't totally disagree, LP, but in fairness, Basascia brought Nixon to the Packers so there's that.

0 points
0
0
LuvPack's picture

September 15, 2025 at 05:48 pm

Missing Melton and Anderson on ST is apparent! And IMO, maybe Nixon replacing Golden on punts was because of Reed's injury!

0 points
0
0
mjbrogno's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:12 am

True to the fact that you don’t win Championships in September but, the Pack has sent a message that they are for real. Starting out with two wins against two of the NFC’s top opponents is quite impressive. I want to stay calm and not get overly confident about the D but, it’s hard not to. The sky’s the limit for our team this year, Go Pack Go!. Most of all , We will never forget 9/11, Godspeed

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:19 am

"Starting out with two wins against two of the NFC’s top opponents is quite impressive. "

Agreed! Two conference (one divisional), home wins. That's money in the bank!

I think both Washington and Detroit will be playing better ball later in the year--and, frankly, I think Washington is overrated--but you can only play the team that's on the schedule this week.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 12, 2025 at 11:57 am

I hope our O is playing better then too. As far as Washington goes, I think they were a good match up for us. With Cooper and Walker at ILB and now Parsons, there is plenty of speed at and behind the line as we showed against Gibbs and that extends to the QB yesterday (who is not a physical challenge either, like a Jackson and thus Bullard was very well suited to them too). They don’t really challenge between the tackles and that’s where we have questions. So much so that we reduced all NT snaps, including Wooden’s. Detroit for some reason failed to attack us concertedly, but Washington was never likely too.

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:19 am

Part of the reason there is a "lack of push" from our OL, is that Banks did not play. He is a road grader and was brought to GB, as such. Get our guys healthy and then lets plow the road!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:21 am

They said that Tom and Banks were both game-time decisions, and I can't help but wonder if they took the chance that they could get them rest and healthy, while still winning behind Belton and Kinnard. If so, it worked this time, and hopefully those guys are ready for a good Cleveland D in 10 days.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:01 pm

At least in PFF’s eyes, the issue was Morgan primarily in the run game. So missing Banks and having Morgan at G not T (lighter/less physical) instead of Kinnard likely bit us twice over.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:27 pm

Belton wiped a TD off the board with his choke hold. He's not ready to start. Kinnard was far better. But even he is not close to Tom's RT skills. Good to know he will be back to attack the Browns.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:42 pm

A rookie had one penalty on a stunt and he’s not ready to start? I beg to differ. I’m glad he got the early season experience and he will get better.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:50 pm

Really, why did he then get benched?

0 points
0
0
Norm's picture

September 12, 2025 at 01:21 pm

I thought they were alternating series, not sure I would call it getting benched.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 01:47 pm

I was responding to his benching after the penalty that wiped out the TD.

Don't get me wrong...he's going to be a good OL I believe. He's a mauler and needs more seasoning to the NFL fast, quick, strong DL. The last two weeks he faced some of the best DL of his entire football career. He will learn and he is big enough to dictate to his opponent...soon, I hope.

He's a load. And he wears #71. How about resurrecting the old U 71...6 OL for road grading that worked so well with Ahaman Green.

JJ, with just some room to run, using his balance, quickness and strength, can break off a big gainer.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 03:44 pm

Well he played a ton more snaps than Kinnard.

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

September 12, 2025 at 03:09 pm

Banks wasn't playing good when he was in the Detroit game. He isn't blocking well, pass or run. That's how his stint with the 49ers ended. I hope to be wrong, but just don't see him being a consistently good left guard.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 12, 2025 at 04:16 pm

Banks’ pass pro was fine till he got hurt. Certainly Morgan wasn’t better yesterday.

0 points
0
0
Doug_In_Sandpoint's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:23 am

Game balls…Kraft of course. Nixon was the best I’ve seen him. Parsons just changes the game. Overall team speed is incredible on D. Gold package crowd was amped. We never sat down the whole game. Much louder than Sunday. Bullard made some nice tackles. Savion Williams could/should have a bigger role.

Lame calls…ST coverage units. What a difference 4 days makes. MLFs late 3Q play calling slump (but he made up for it with the next TD drive which was a thing of beauty).

2-0 is nice.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:26 am

"MLFs late 3Q play calling slump (but he made up for it with the next TD drive which was a thing of beauty)."

I thought Love looked really comfortable for most of the game last night. Washington, like Detroit, was keying on Jacobs in the first half. Like Detroit, once they started bringing more rushers, the sledding got much harder.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:09 pm

Interesting. I don’t think they packed the box to the extent Detroit did. I don’t think LaFleur went as far into his shell as he did in Detroit either. I do think we do better when the intermediate game is equally emphasized with the run and the deep ball. Reed going out may have impacted that, but LaFleur has been averse to slants and the like going back to recent prior seasons.

I don’t know why. We have players with speed and size who can create mismatches out of both 11 and 12 personnel, even last night with Reed out (Golden, Williams and the 2 TEs in a slightly different variant).

0 points
0
0
Aldo's picture

September 12, 2025 at 04:15 pm

I'm glad someone else noticed the poor play calling by LaFleur at the end of the 3rd quarter. When they had to turn the ball back to Washington, that could have been a huge swing in momentum. Thankfully, the D remained up to the task.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:33 pm

"Overall team speed is incredible on D."

I said this to my wife while watching the D swarm all game long saying they have some of the fastest guys in the NFL in their front 7.

Parsons, Gary, Van Ness, Walker, Cooper. All 5 are burners.

There has to be a stat somewhere on who is the fastest Defense in the NFL. I do know they are among the youngest....

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

September 12, 2025 at 01:38 pm

As to the speed it's interesting that internally the Packers defense calls the combo of Parsons, LVN, and Gary the" Cheetah" package.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 01:54 pm

That's appropriate!

In addition to Kalani's Kraft YAC and Cheese on O...we can add SACK of Cheetahs on D.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:49 pm

“Savion Williams could/should have a bigger role.”…‼️‼️
INDEED!!

0 points
0
0
canadapacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:37 am

I would not be puffing our chests too far out. There were a lot of good things - even some great things. But without a run game and maybe some of that is one the scripted plans by the other teams to stop Jacobs and our Oline not getting any type of holes plus the lack of motion to spread the linebackers out. Jacobs has also been unable to break the big one. Hopefully that will come. I am concerned with some of the play calling at times - a couple of runs for no yards and a 3 and an incompletion and the defence needs to come back on - especially a bad times ie just before half time and deep in our end. I guess that Lafleur held the motion thing until the 4th quarter with those receiver end arounds etc. But last year we were stagnate when there was not enough motion - and this year it seems that only Doubs was the motion guy - we seem to have so many fast guys and with Wicks gone for quite awhile time to get Golden and Williams into play more - although we know that Lafleur doesnt seem to trust rookies early in the year. But time to use this mini bye to get rested and to ready for Cleveland - and Joe Flacco is relatively slow but gets the ball out - so we should have a good chance to come up with a road win.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:39 pm

They haven’t needed Jacobs to break a big one. It’s two games. DET sold out to stop the run so they beat them through the air. And Jacobs had some good runs later in the DET game. Game two they lost 2 offensive line starters and still put up 27 points (missed FG and TD negated by holding call would have made this a blowout).

I’m thrilled the line held up as well as it did but the run game will improve when the line can play the starters together for some time. They’re not perfect clearly which just means they are good enough to beat a very good team when not playing their best ball.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

September 12, 2025 at 01:01 pm

Wicks caught a couple passes for first downs after going in motion.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 02:02 pm

When Wicks doesn't drop (kept him from being a top draft pick), he's nearly elite. His route running and ability to separate is uncanny. It's incredible. Does he get open on nearly every route? Seems like it.

Golden and Williams are learning from Wicks and Doubs on routes, separation. And from Heath, Doubs and Wicks on attention to detail when blocking.

The two rookie WRs are going to be playing big roles this season. So will Watson, sooner than we thought. Amazing WR talent on the Pack.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

September 12, 2025 at 08:46 am

Yes, the offense appears capable of bigger things. It would make a huge difference if Jordan Love hit just one or two more of those deep passes per game. He DOES hit quite a few of them, but deep passes are hard. Aaron Rodgers missed on a lot of deep passes too. Maybe we notice it more with Love simply because he throws more of them. The best thing about his performance last night was that he was right on the money with the short to medium throws, which is not always the case. It helped that the receivers were frequently getting wide open. The passing game was in a great rhythm on those three TD drives.

The run blocking certainly leaves something to be desired, but I wonder how much of that is due to defenses crowding the box in these first two games. Defenses would rather take their chances against the pass than suffer a slow certain death with Jacobs. Our blockers appear to be outnumbered on a lot of those running plays. Not all of them, though.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 12, 2025 at 09:08 am

Banks missed the preseason and is new, Morgan was primarily at LT competing, Jenkins also missed a lot. Then Tom and Banks are hurt. Banks and Jenkins may not have been 100% to start with. Unfortunately, this group hasn’t had time to settle and gel. To add to that we have been rotating at RG and now RT by choice. Lines work as units, they need to know what their neighbors are doing instinctively and timing on pulls etc. Give it time (and stop making it more convoluted than it absolutely needs to be).

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

September 12, 2025 at 09:29 am

Was about to write the same thing CW. The Packer O-line hasn't had the same starting lineup across any of the preseason and regular season games. It is hard to have a cohesive unit with a revolving door of players. I am surprised the pass pro has been as good as it is, but part of that is due to the stellar pass blocking by the running backs. They have been phenomenal in blitz pickup.

I expect the run blocking will get better when the Packers can field a consistent O-line. Getting Banks and Tom back for Cleveland would sure help.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

September 12, 2025 at 09:36 am

Nothing convoluted about saying defenses have been crowding the box. That's what I keep hearing, and it sure looks that way to me. Do you think people are wrong about this?

Your explanation for the run blocking problems is actually a lot more convoluted than mine, and it doesn't explain why the pass blocking has been so much better than the run blocking.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

September 12, 2025 at 10:48 am

It's been a very long time since I played O-line in high school, but pass blocking was always easier (for me) than run blocking from a technical perspective. Pass pro is usually about one on one matchups unless the D-line is stunting. Not much coordination needed - block the guy in front of you. And the Packers have done a very good job of winning one on one matchups with the backs excelling in picking up blitzes.

Run blocking often involves double teams, sliding off a double team to pick up a linebacker, pulling for an outside run or other complicated movements. It isn't rocket science but it often requires more coordination than pass pro (the exception being when a D-line stunts on a pass rush). I suspect that coordination is suffering a bit from a revolving door of players on the O-line.

And yes, Detroit and Washington crowded the line in the first half of each game which is a huge problem for rushing attacks. But the Packers didn't exactly run over either team in the second half when both teams lightened the box and played more pass D. The run game just looks slightly out of sync.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:23 pm

We have only seen two defenses, so we may not have been truly tested, that said, run blocking is a lot about timing obviously. It tends to involve more coordinated motion and for longer. When people are constantly swapping that gets more complicated for those moving and interferes with the natural timing.

In more practical terms the eye test has not been passed: they have not looked coordinated in the two games to date. So we lack 2 good starters (always likely to make us less good) and we are putting out 5 who have not been able to play next to each other since pads went on due to injuries and coaching choices. Hopefully soon we can settle and get a period where they can play and practice in a settled form and build the timing with their neighbors and Jacobs.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:48 pm

The great thing is that the poor line play didn’t hurt them. They got the job done anyway. Jacobs had some hard fought yards, the two rookie receivers had some great carries and Love got a first down with his legs. With his efficiency in the passing game they haven’t needed the same kind of production from Jacobs ( yet). Having Love healthy and accurate makes for a different offense than much of last year.

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

September 12, 2025 at 03:24 pm

It would be nice if Love was consistently accurate. He isn't. While some balls were dead on others made the receiver reach or slow down to bring in the pass. His long balls are not good at all for the most part. He improved on his decision making against the Commanders, so that was good to see. Jordan Love doesn't appear to be an elite quarterback. Luckily the Packers only need him to be efficient and keep the bad decisions to a minimum.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 03:54 pm

It’s week two and Love was out part of preseason with the thumb issue. Several WRs were hurt as well. For a team that tended to start slow, and didn’t get much cohesive time playing together in the preseason, I’m thrilled with how good Jordan Love has looked. He was very efficient this game, made. Good decisions to dump the ball off instead of making him throw that could be picked off, led long drives, resulting in scores. He overshot the rookie wide receiver on a couple of throws, and if they can get that worked out, that could be a really great addition to the offense. I don’t care what terminology you use but he sure looks good to me.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

September 12, 2025 at 02:02 pm

That makes sense, Guam. I think that does account for some of what we are seeing. On the other hand, if the run blocking is bad, you would think opposing teams wouldn't feel the need to crowd the line of scrimmage. Unless it's all about Jacobs. Is he single-handedly affecting the other teams' game planning to that extent?

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

September 12, 2025 at 03:04 pm

Thats all about MLF. Opposing DCs know he wants to run the ball to set up play action passing. The DCs want to disrupt that plan and what better way than to take away the run?

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:46 pm

"...doesn't explain why the pass blocking has been so much better than the run blocking."

I believe the coaches place far more emphasis on pass blocking. You play as you practice.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:41 pm

Well, per Stenovich, the OL won't be getting acquainted with one another soon as he promised musical chairs all season. He seems to like the constant OL subbing...Nijman and Walker, Rhyan and Runyon, Walker and Morgan, Morgan and Rhyan, etc. The OC and his OL coach are unable to evaluate and decide who the best 5 are.

0 points
0
0
TXCHEESE's picture

September 12, 2025 at 09:05 am

ST's need improvement. Those long returns were too common in both the KO and punt coverage. Bissacia needs to get that tightened up pronto.

Hate that Reed got injured. Still the WR group is deep enough to handle it, especially with a possible Watson return in early October, the the TE's taking some of the load off. The OL was playing two backups, so can't can't complain too much about the pass protection. Run blocking was not great, but it did look like Jacobs had some opportunities to cut back to bounce outside, but ran headlong into the pile. I know he's the bell cow back, but it would have been nice to see Brooks and Wilson get more chances in the rushing game.

Overall, a very solid effort by the team. It never felt like Washington was going to take control of this game. Mini-bye. Heal up, rest up, and go stomp the crap out of Cleveland. GPG!

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

September 12, 2025 at 09:24 am

I’m thrilled with our receiving corps…and sad for Reed; but he’ll be back. …and Watson returns in a few weeks.
I’m perplexed that our oline is better at Pass-pro rather than run blocking; I had guessed it would be the opposite.
Wyatt is the unsung hero imo.
A few of us raved about Kraft when we drafted him…mostly me.
I’ve always watched defense more closely than offense and I’m so enthused by this D I can’t tell you.
It’s the best D since Reggie et al.
…And oh—my hat’s off to Wicks.
Watch out NFL—there’s a new bully in town.
Go Packers!!!

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:59 pm

It’s great to see Wyatt healthy and so productive under a new d-line coach. That was one of the best off season moves, to move on from Rebrovich and bring in Covington. Adding Parsons has been such a boon. I still can hardly believe Jerry traded him at all, much less in the NFC and to the last team to knock the Cowboys out of the playoffs.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 02:08 pm

Covington was a fantastic hire...kudos to Matt and Jeff for getting the former DC to Green Bay.

0 points
0
0
jvole's picture

September 12, 2025 at 09:38 am

I said it last week but I am still concerned about the mistakes being made by the special teams group. Yes, we finally have fantastic specialists but what % of team penalties are committed by ST? How often do returners catch balls that should be let bounce, or not call off the blockers who could run into a bouncing ball. It feels like Mo Drayton all over again and it is going to cost them a game if it doesn't get cleaned up. Hopefully, not the big one as this is a fantastic team!

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:58 pm

Coaching in his 4th year as Packers ST coach, I am ready to proclaim Bicassia as over-rated based on his results.

They are still too undisciplined and that is coaching.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

September 12, 2025 at 04:31 pm

It’s hard not to agree with you. I raved about hiring Bitchsassy, but things haven’t dramatically improved.
We have two excellent kickers, but it ends there.

0 points
0
0
jvole's picture

September 12, 2025 at 05:03 pm

And an excellent snapper....I do wonder if this chronic packers problem is because Lafleur doesn't dedicate enough time to it in practice. IDK, it is really weird how every ST coach sucks in GB.

0 points
0
0
THESZOTMAN1's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:48 pm

Game Balls to Pack Mash Unit of O-Line. Adequate run blocking. Good pass pro (only 1 sack) Should be even better with 10 days off to heal. Penalties, tho (se below)
Lame calls --- 10 penalties concerning. Gotta get that cleaned up.
The Szotman

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 12, 2025 at 12:56 pm

It’s early of course but it seems major issues from last season are much improved.

Drops - not a problem with Wicks, Doubs or Reed
Pass rush - they’re getting a rush from so many guys. Wyatt, LVN, Gary, Parsons, Cooper, etc
Not utilizing the TE - that’s turned around with Kraft scoring in both games and going over 100 yds
Offensive line depth - already tested and the backups didn’t stop them from being productive or get Love killed

It’s exciting to see the talent the GM has infused into this roster and the coaching with such effective game plans against some top offensive and defensive squads.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 01:07 pm

"Kraft YAC n' Cheese."

That's good, Kalani...did you invent that?

Like Micah on D, Tucker can create positive ripples in the O. With the loss of Reed (big loss!), we will be seeing more 12 personnel. Good! Musgrave showed he can block last night. It should help ignite the milquetoast run blocking that seems to be going through the motions vs pass blocking which is happily close to lock down.

Kraft is a big play just waiting to happen.

It's only 2 games but this is the best Packer Defense I have seen...probably since Fritz's men in 1996. The Front 7 is a wrecking crew.

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

September 12, 2025 at 01:47 pm

LBP I was going to comment on the "Kraft YAC n' Cheese." too, but you beat me to it. If that's original to the author kudos to him!

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 12, 2025 at 02:11 pm

Kalani should trademark it...or you could...live long and prosper stuff!

0 points
0
0
Idaho Cheese's picture

September 13, 2025 at 10:58 am

How bout under Lame Calls the 3 and out series after a turnover on downs by Washington with just over 7 minutes left? The Commanders had two time-outs left, and the clock was certainly their enemy, along with Packer's D. How do you not call three running plays to keep the clock moving and possibly draining the Time-outs, but if nothing else, draining the clock another 2-3 minutes; shortening the game to the point the final Commanders TD doesn't even happen. MLF calls a great Offensive schemed game; however, as a game manager, he needs to grow as well. Also, I cannot stand a Head Coach blaming players, ever, but especially when they have responsibility to take themselves. MLF is in the upper tier for OCs around the league, but whether he ascends as a dynamic, fully formed Head Coach remains to be seen for me.

0 points
0
0