I understand about Winfrey (though I do like the explosive getoff along with those long, strong 35"+ arms).

For me, it was either him, or in round two a tweener guy, Logan Hall, a big edge and/or on D line guy, like Z.Smith, or Cameron Thomas, more of a pure edge guy.

Crushing teams with offense is somewhat unlikely, since Adams is no longer there and GB is probably rocking two new WRs (maybe even a third one late, but that will be a ST guy). Rookie WRs are never a certainty to start well, especially as Rodgers is choosy about who he throws to. With Adams and MVS gone, with Lazard very possibly not returning after his contract ends after 2022, and no indication that Amari Rodgers will blossom yet, that position group needs a new infusion, now.

The way I see it is of the (hopefully) starter-level WR's that I like, Watson, Pickens, Pierce, one will be there at 53. They are all very late round 1 (possibly Watson) or more likely, all round 2 targets. However, there might be a run on WRs between picks 28 and 53, so a WR at 53 (and for that matter at 59) is no certain thing.

Therefore, I don't think the Packers will want to wait between picks 28 and 53 and just hope a receiver they like falls to them, I believe they will get a receiver in round one, just in case round two leaves them without a receiver they want, when they pick. Now that (first round pick) could be Olave or London or Burks (don't see Williams Wilson, Dotson, fitting their draft profile). I think they get one of these just to have at least one viable starter-level WR on the roster. They might not love him (whoever he is) but they need him. It's a hedge against catastrophy (but there is an alternative strategy - see later in this post).

That leaves another round 1 pick, which is where other positions like DL, Edge, OT, S come in.

In round 2, with a little luck (doesn't need much) they get their second receiver, the one they really want (Pickens/Watson/Pierce). Then there is the other 2nd round pick. I'm not getting a TE this early (if I did it would be McBride, but there are other good TE prospects later). I doubt there is an OT worth getting at this point. Neil, Ekwonu, Cross, Penning, Raimann, are all probably gone by now and I don't like Faalele (who is too big), but Edge and DL should have prospects available without serious reaching.

Later (through rounds 3 and 4) I like any TE from Otton, Ruckert, Ferguson, Woods, Okonkwo (Otton is the best blocker).

If the Packers failed to land an OT earlier, then Waletzco, Rosenthal, Diesch and Tom are solid, athletic developmental alternatives in rounds 4-5.

Late picks should always be looked at as a ST prospect as much as their actual position group.

One thing I haven't fully addressed is a Packers strategy to counteract a run on WRs, between picks 28 and 53. They can use the round 3 pick and maybe one of the round 4 picks along with their pick 53, to move up to to where a second good WR can be grabbed before the run on WRs ends (and their round 3 picks are usually pretty weak anyway).

If they have pre-planned to do this and more important, have a tentative agreement to move up with another team, then they avoid that feeling of being forced to take a WR in round one. They can now get one, or two WRs, in the second round.

The TL:DR answer is that if you are looking for a top-of-your-tier-list player at each pick, some of them will be defensive players.

A draft just for you Lh...

Round 1 Pick 22: Kenyon Green, OG/OT, Texas A&M
Round 1 Pick 28: Jameson Williams, WR, Alabama
Round 2 Pick 22: Christian Watson, WR, North Dakota State
Round 2 Pick 28: Trey McBride, TE, Colorado State
Round 3 Pick 28: Alec Pierce, WR, Cincinnati
Round 4 Pick 28: James Cook, RB, Georgia
Round 4 Pick 35 (COMP): Danny Gray, WR, SMU
Round 5 Pick 28: Abraham Lucas, OT, Washington State
Round 7 Pick 7: Trae Barry, TE, Boston College
Round 7 Pick 28: Brittain Brown, RB, UCLA
Round 7 Pick 37 (COMP): Greg Dulcich, TE, UCLA