Leo Chenal NFL Draft Prospect Profile and Scouting Report

NFL Prospect Profile: Leo Chenal, LB, Wisconsin

Name: Leo Chenal

School: Wisconsin

Year: Jr

Position: Linebacker

Measurables: 6’2 5/8th 250

 

Stats: 

 

General Info:

He was a consensus three-star recruit by Rivals, 247, and ESPN. Attended Grantsburg High School in Grantsburg, Wisconsin. Chenal was on the honor roll all four years of high school. He also lettered in basketball and track as well. Played running back and linebacker. 385 tackles, 55 tackles for a loss, and 7 sacks in his high school career. He rushed for 3706 yards and 68 touchdowns. Two-year team captain. The former Badger’s brother John is a fullback at Wisconsin. He played in 11 games as a freshman with 2 tackles for a loss and one sack. His Sophomore season was his first as a starter. He started all seven games of a shortened 2020 COVID season. He collected 46 tackles, 6 tackles for a loss, and 3 sacks in the shortened season. All-Big Ten Honorable Mention in 2020. He has played and started 10 games in the 2021 season. He had 106 tackles, 17 tackles for a loss, 2 forced fumbles, and 7 sacks. He missed the first two weeks of the 2021 season with COVID.

 

Positional Skills:

Strengths

Chenal is a large linebacker, larger than most that we are seeing these days. He is a bit of a throwback being 6'2 250 and having played at 260 this season. He brings a strong/physical and aggressive nature to the field. He has shown to be a decent blizter, he has a dip move that he implements. He does have a lot of experience dropping into zones. He seems to have a decent feel for it. Chenal is active and always looking for work. He dropped 10 pounds from this past season which should help his agility. Chenal has shown to have the strength to deal with offensive linemen. He does Use his hands to keep his feet clean when he is near the line of scrimmage. On film, he does show good tackling form and technique. If he gets his arms around you, you are going down. he has versatility going for him. He has experience lining up inside, outside, and also on the edge.

 

Weaknesses

His size is probably what holds him back a bit, his speed and agility are pretty average. In coverage, his feet look heavy when he has to shuffle and turn. His man coverage skills are an unknown right now, with his average athleticism on film he might struggle with that part in the NFL. He does not seem to have a plan when he is blitzing, he seems to just put his head down and drive into the offensive lineman. He relies too much on his strength instead of setting up moves and using different moves to get past blockers. when he attacks blockers his pad level is too high and he tends to either get stuck or bounce off them. He has shown on film that sometimes he will miss a tackle here and there. It is usually due to him trying to tackle the player too high around the shoulders. When filling run gaps, he will occasionally take false steps, although for the most part he doesn't he could be better. His arms are only 31” long which is short for a guy that is almost 6’3. They are probably part of the reason he misses some tackles due to not being able to wrap up. This will also cause him problems as a pass rusher in the NFL when he goes against offensive linemen whose arms are three to four inches longer.

 

Fit with the Packers:

Chenal would be an Okay fit for the Packers. He is kind of a throwback type of linebacker. That is probably why a lot of packers fans like him, and he went to Wisconsin too. Despite his amazing testing at the combine if you watch his film the agility doesn’t show on film, it’s not terrible, it’s just ok. The explosion and straight-line speed is there. Chenal is definitely a hammer in the run game and has extraordinary strength for a guy who is only a junior. He looks mostly like a two-down linebacker that you can occasionally use on 3rd downs as a pass rusher. He probably would be a bit of an upgrade over Barnes with his run defense and size and strength. Where he is expected to get drafted it probably wouldn’t make sense for the Packers to draft him though and they run a lot of nickel and the 2nd linebacker only plays 20-30% of the snaps depending on the game plan. Chenal would need time to work on his pass cover skills as well since he didn’t do it much at Wisconsin. He would probably be a better fit on a defense that relies on aggressive blitzing and run defense.

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
3 points
 

Comments (14)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

April 19, 2022 at 03:36 am

If you are looking for marginal improvements on defense over the 2021 personnel, then replacing Henry Black (with almost anyone) and bringing in someone to compete with Krys Barnes (527 snaps) should be the top priorities. Black played 262 snaps, and I suspect he would have played more but for his poor play.

Chanel is fun to watch. The film was of 72 running plays, some blitzes, and running down the seam with a back. He is fast. I wish he had run that three-cone at the combine rather than at a pro day.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

April 19, 2022 at 06:03 am

You laid this out very well, Brian. I am a Badger fan, but no.

Those 31” arms just don’t make it in the NFL with regards to top quality LB play. Add to that, for as great as he was v. Run (in college), he was and will remain being a bigger liability v. Pass.

The LB class is loaded with players with 31” arms. Not a deep position group at all.

1 points
1
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 19, 2022 at 10:02 am

Kenny Clark only has 32¹/⁸" arms at DT and he seems to be able to make a living. I think arm length is more important at Edge and OT and, no matter how much some Badger fans wish him to be, Chenal is not an Edge.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

April 19, 2022 at 10:57 am

I guess my point is the pedigree and RAS don't mean a thing if you can't trip a guy up to make a tackle, wrap a RB or WR up as he's jetting by with short arms.

Ty Summers is Exhibit A.

How many times have we all seen the WHIFF?

Doesn't mean I don't like the guy, but, facts are facts. There are of course outliers. Jason Peters was a 32" armed OT. TOTAL OUTLIER in terms of longevity and success. Clark plays interior DL. That's a bit different, but I still consider him an outlier.

Outliers are not plentiful in drafts. Misses are.

0 points
1
1
LambeauPlain's picture

April 19, 2022 at 11:08 am

Right...LBs with 31" arms never make the finalist list for the Butkus Award for outstanding LB play, do they? Well, Leo did.

You can have 34" armed players who are slow and do 10 reps on the bench.

Give me a 31" armed prospect with outstanding college production against top teams with speed, tremendous short area burst and tremendous strength (Leo = 4.53-second 40-yard dash, a 40.5-inch vertical, and a 10-foot-8 broad jump). Benches over 400 lbs. One of only 9 Badgers to lift that amount.

I have no clue why some discard Chenal as a talented LB prospect because "he can't play pass D". No one knows if he can be competent in pass D...because at WI, DC Leonard knew what some fans do not...that it would be a complete waste of talent using him in pass D vs his pass rush skillset. Barry, a LB expert, would not waste his pass rush ability either.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 19, 2022 at 01:08 pm

I am a Badger, but I like Sanborn better as a cover guy.

0 points
0
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

April 19, 2022 at 06:38 am

I'm not worried about his average coverage skills, as I'd want him attacking the line of scrimmage. He may have slightly shorter arms, but he has the NFL strength and speed and explosion of a Pro-Bowl type. I see him in the Z Smith role (who rarely did coverage). Let him attack and disrupt--when's the last time we had a player like that, other than Z? If he plays 30% of the plays, but has a serious impact on most of them, that's a big win.
Additionally, he has the physical traits to be a top special teams player, and Lord knows we could use a few of those.

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 19, 2022 at 01:09 pm

He may fit with Barry's scheme showing more Zone coverage.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

April 19, 2022 at 06:19 am

He's a football player. He'll only make the packers better. (UpGRADE! ) Every time I try a draft simulator. He's gone by 60. Plays fast downhill. I hope they draft him

4 points
4
0
dobber's picture

April 19, 2022 at 08:23 am

He's a guy with a motor you can't help but love. A throwback, "see-ball, get-ball" kind of LB. He makes plays.

Can't just draft him and plug him in and expect high-end results, but someone will find or develop a well-defined role or niche in their lineup for him and he'll be a solid pro for years.

1 points
1
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 19, 2022 at 09:59 am

I think that someone will be name Belichick. Chenal seems like the type that he'd have a higher value in than other teams.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 19, 2022 at 01:14 pm

Because Belichick has efficiency from his safeties. If he's shooting A gaps, there are people ready to read the QB and pounce. Leonard does the same thing.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 19, 2022 at 10:49 am

Totally agree, SH!

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 19, 2022 at 11:05 am

I constantly read and writers continually opine, the Packers love players with excellent college production, high RAS and have versatility. Prospects like Leo, in other words.

Chenal is an excellent run defender. He can rush the QB and disrupt the play from the inside, outside, even occasionally from the Edge, but he got his TFLs, pressures and sacks coming up the middle at WI. Barry would love him on his D. Leo would be prolific part of the pass rush from the inside.

That he would be "a bit of an upgrade over Barnes" is silly. He would replace Barnes day one and play ILB on the Pack for years.

Barnes is a "try hard" player and is a hard hitter...when he finds the ball carrier. He whiffs a lot on run plays with poor angles and lack of quickness. And those who claim Chenal cannot cover, Barnes is NEVER asked to cover and doesn't rush the passer very well...gets caught up in the wash. Chenal would be a HUGE upgrade over Barnes because he is a 3 down player to disrupt the pass in so many rush packages.

And Chenal would be a ST leader, too.

If he is available at 53, put in the Green and Gold!

0 points
1
1