Is New Tight End Luke Lachey More Than Just a Camp Body?
Newest Packers might have a better than thought chance at sticking around past training camp.
By Dan Saia
Every offseason, NFL teams bring in players who are immediately viewed as roster longshots. Some arrive as undrafted free agents, others as low-profile veterans looking for another opportunity. Most will be labeled "camp bodies" by fans and media alike—players expected to help fill practice reps before quietly exiting when roster cuts arrive at the end of camp.
For the Green Bay Packers, one of the more intriguing under-the-radar additions heading into training camp is tight end Luke Lachey. While his signing might be more noteworthy for the fact that he originally failed his physical and had to wait to officially be added to the roster until this week, its still an under the radar addition at a position of need. Dismissing Lachey as merely a training camp placeholder could prove to be a mistake.
The former Iowa tight end enters a crowded position group, but he also arrives with a skill set and pedigree that make him worth watching closely throughout camp and the preseason.
Whenever a tight end comes out of Iowa, NFL evaluators tend pay attention due to the lineage associated with the school’s program.
The Hawkeyes have become one of college football's premier tight end factories, producing stars such as George Kittle, T.J. Hockenson, Noah Fant, and Sam LaPorta. While not every Iowa tight end becomes an NFL standout, the program's reputation for developing fundamentally sound players carries weight.
Lachey was once viewed as the next player in that pipeline.
At 6-foot-6 and around 250 pounds, he possesses the size teams look for at the position. During his time at Iowa, he demonstrated reliable hands, toughness after the catch, and a willingness to do the dirty work as a blocker.
His college career never quite reached the heights many projected, largely due to injuries and inconsistent quarterback play at Iowa, but flashes of potential were evident whenever he was healthy. The fact that he is still a young player, entering just his second professional season alone makes him more interesting than the average camp addition.
Drafted in the 7th round last year by the Houston Texans, he couldn't break the team out of camp and spent the whole year on the teams taxi squad. He managed to catch 5 of his 6 targets for 21 yards while playing 99 snaps on offense and 24 on special teams.
At first glance, the Packers' tight end room appears fairly settled, even though it may be considered underwhelming.
Tucker Kraft has emerged as one of the young offensive building blocks on the roster. His physical running style, improved receiving ability, and growing chemistry with Jordan Love have made him a fan favorite and a cornerstone of the offense.
Luke Musgrave remains a highly talented pass-catching threat when healthy. His speed and ability to stretch defenses vertically create matchup problems that few tight ends can replicate. The issue Musgrave is he has just never quite found his footing (literally) in Green Bay and many project him as a trade candidate this summer. Josh Whyle has impressed with the cases given and could step up if Musgrave was shipped out. Unfortunately, there is no 3rd tight end currently on the roster worth keeping.
The Packers have valued depth at tight end under Matt LaFleur because the position plays such an important role in the offense. Tight ends are expected to block in the running game, contribute in pass protection, and create mismatches in the passing attack. Finding players who can handle all three responsibilities is not easy.
Lachey doesn't necessarily need to beat out Kraft, Musgrave or Whylie to make the roster. If he shows he is good enough, they can find a spot for him. Kraft is coming off a serious injury and the Packers might want to limit him at the start of the season. Maybe that Musgrave trade finally comes to fruition. Or maybe a preseason or camp injury opens the door for an extra body to be carried after final cutdowns. The Packers have carried four tight ends on the active roster before.
One reason Lachey shouldn't be dismissed is that he doesn't fit the mold of a one-dimensional player.
Many fringe tight ends enter camp with either receiving ability, blocking ability but not both usually. Coaches often struggle to find a role for those players because opponents can predict how they will be used.
Lachey offers more versatility to Green Bay.
As a receiver, he has shown an ability to find soft spots in zone coverage and make contested catches. He isn't likely to outrun defensive backs down the field, but he understands how to use his frame to create separation.
As a blocker, he brings the physicality expected from an Iowa product. While there is always an adjustment period when transitioning to NFL-level competition, his willingness to engage defenders gives him a chance to earn coaches' trust. The coaching staff needs dependable players who execute assignments correctly. Mental mistakes often end roster battles quicker than physical limitations and are quick tickets out of town.
Another factor for those fighting for spots at the bottom of the roster is special teams. If Lachey is ultimately going to earn a roster spot, special teams may be the deciding factor.
Green Bay's coaching staff has placed a renewed emphasis on special teams in recent seasons. First year coordinator Cam Achord will likely have a say in those final decisions and players competing for reserve positions must demonstrate value beyond their primary position.
A fourth tight end who can cover kicks, block on return units, and contribute on field-goal protection teams becomes much more valuable than one who only offers offensive depth.
We Fans naturally focus on offensive and defensive highlights during preseason games, but coaches are often evaluating who can help across multiple phases of the game. Special teams isn't always sexy, but they lost (emphasize on lost) the Packers meaningful football games and if Lachey embraces that role and performs well, his chances of surviving final cuts increase significantly.
Even if Lachey falls short of making the initial 53-man roster, that does not mean his time in Green Bay would be over.
The Packers have consistently used their practice squad as a developmental pipeline. Players who show promise but need refinement often spend time developing within the system before eventually earning opportunities.
Given Lachey's age, size, and athletic profile, he could be an ideal candidate for that route. That would allow the Packers to call him up weekly if needed or elevate him full time is an injury or ineffectiveness strict the position.
Green Bay has demonstrated patience with young players before, especially at positions where development can take time. Tight end is notoriously one of the most difficult positions for young players transitioning from college to the NFL because they are asked to master responsibilities as both blockers and receivers.
A year on the practice squad could allow Lachey to continue developing while remaining within the organization. There is not much young, controllable talent behind Kraft currently scheduled to be back in 2027.
The reality is that Luke Lachey enters training camp as a longshot. The Packers already have established contributors ahead of him, and roster spots are limited.
However, labeling him as merely a camp body oversimplifies the situation.
Camp bodies typically arrive with little chance of sticking around once the preseason ends. Lachey brings a strong football background, NFL-caliber size, experience in a pro-style system at Iowa, and enough versatility to compete for a legitimate role.
Will he become a major contributor in 2026? That remains unlikely given the talent already ahead of him on the depth chart.
But can he push for a roster spot, earn a place on the practice squad, and potentially develop into a valuable depth piece? Absolutely.
Training camp is filled with players fighting to prove they belong. Some are exactly what their critics expect—a temporary roster placeholder. Others surprise everyone.
Luke Lachey may not be entering camp with much fanfare, but he possesses enough tools to make the Packers' decision-makers take notice. And in a league where opportunity often emerges from unexpected places, that makes him far more than just another camp body.
-Dan Saia




Comments (36)
Coldworld
June 18, 2026 at 11:12 am
Lachey is a willing blocker and has some technique to build upon. What he needed was to add core strength and a little functional mass. If he’s done that assiduously then he has the makings of a true Y. As a receiver he’s not bad but he’s not the athlete you look for in a move type. He should be capable of moving the chains, but that should not be why he makes the team if he does. His upside is to be able to block like Kraft so Kraft doesn’t have to. He will be competing with the bigger Swinson, but competition is a good thing in this case.
Turophile
June 19, 2026 at 05:48 am
Lachey is really competing with Whyle and maybe Dabney for blocking duty. He (Lachey) is slower that both, but he could be a 3rd TE during and after 2026, if his blocking is at least the second best of the three.
TE1 is obviousley Kraft and you could argue whether Musgrave or Whyle is currently no2.
I think Musgrave is gone after his contract ends after 2026, if he isn't traded earlier (which I'm not expecting because, depth). This is what gives Lachey a small window of opportunity, but he must improve to be a clearly better blocker than Dabney, as the Packers would never have 5TEs in their final 53. They might only keep 3, but I'm guessing they keep a 4th, mainly for ST and depth.
The Packers failed to get a TE in the 2026 draft. I'm pretty sure that going in they wanted a Y type TE who could catch a bit and have reasonable athleticism, but the draft didn't fall well for that, they needed solid value with every pick having few of them, and TEs went early relative to their skill level, so the value was never there.
Lachey might only be a one-year-rental until the 2027 draft, where they have many more picks and I think they get a TE as one of them. Whoever they get, I'd expect a larger TE (ie 6'5"+ with 4.6 speed), a Whyle clone, really. That would mean the TE room would then be Kraft no.1, Whyle / draft pick as the 2&3 in any order, and either Dabney or Lachey as the 4th.
Coldworld
June 19, 2026 at 06:52 am
I’m going to disagree with you on that. If Lachey is competing with Whyle, a move TE, then the pick up was largely pointless. As for Dabney, he’s more of an H back with a smaller frame than an in line prospect like Lachey or Swinson. I suppose he’d be in the mix with those two once healthy.
Lachey is not the athlete in space that Whyle is, but he is a better blocker and could, with added core strength be a much better one. Swinson is bigger man but probably the most pure blocker in the spectrum. If Lachey makes it for valid reasons it’s because he proves he can block well. If Whyle makes it legitimately it’s because he’s a more rounded threat than Musgrave and a little less weak as a blocker.
Turophile
June 20, 2026 at 08:56 am
I see what you are saying. While I don't expect Lachey to replace Whyle, especially not as a pass catcher, if he cannot at least be a better blocker (than Whyle), then the only reasons to keep Lachey are that he is, or can become a better blocker than Dafney, or if he can become a ST monster (that seems unlikely, given his slow 40 time).
It's that lack of speed that makes it hard for him to survive for any length of time on the Packers squad. Now if he could get close to what Marcedes Lewis was as a blocker, he could carve out a niche all of his own, but that is an Olympian height to reach. I'm still expecting him to be a one year rental, but if he improves to where the Packers want to keep him longer term, I'll applaud him.
Oppy
June 19, 2026 at 08:22 am
Kraft should never be relieved of blocking duties- for one, he's good at it, and second, it's the balance that having your TE not only capable of blocking but also utilized to do so that makes an offense unpredictable while bolstering both your passing and rushing attack.
What we really don't want is an offense where when there's two TEs on the field you know one is going out into route and the other likely staying home to block.
Coldworld
June 19, 2026 at 09:55 am
Yes, it really sucked having Lewis and the sub 100 yards per season by the non Kraft TEs since really make defenses take them into account. We had more yards from a non TE 1 from Lewis than any other since. This is exactly the fallacy that leads to the risibly bad blocking. It will continue to result in that if we trot out Whyle and Musgrave.
Of course you don’t stop Kraft blocking, but you free him for the option of not having to block or chip before getting up field. Kraft is a good blocker, but he’s a better weapon and it’s that that is truly hard to duplicate and foolish to diminish beyond the necessary.
Whether Lachey is the Y TE to do it, I do not know. But he has the tools if he’s added strength. If not it’s Swinson or a guy not on the roster.
PackEyedOptimist
June 18, 2026 at 11:20 am
The one thing that stood out to me, watching Lachey’s highlights, is that he was regularly brought down immediately by a single defensive back. Tucker Kraft he ain’t.
I think he has a solid chance to compete for a spot, though.
golfpacker61
June 19, 2026 at 09:47 am
The fact that you found Luke Lachey highlights is a surprise P A E. I am not saying Lachey is the next Travis Kelsey, but Lachey was on an Iowa team that never valued the passing game. The Iowa game plan was run, run, try to pass on 3rd down and then punt. Then let the defense try to win a low scoring game. With constant substandard QB play at Iowa, Lachey accomplished everything he did on his own. So not many highlights to view.
Iowa TEs have accomplished really good results in the NFL after most didn't have great stats in college. Lachey is underrated and has a great shot to win a job in GB. He is a solid blocker, which Musgrave isn't, but also has really good hands so he isn't a 1 trick pony. Lachey isn't my first choice for GB, trading for Colby Parkinson would be. At least GB is trying to fill the hole @ Y TE.
TarynsEyes
June 18, 2026 at 12:09 pm
The higher the chances of these rookies making the 53-man roster,, the more I'm thinking about how much less those being replaced have been and how low the bar was set. Is the bar higher for these new guys or just a tick better than the low bar for players already on the roster?
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 18, 2026 at 03:44 pm
This guy isn’t a rookie. He was drafted by HOU last year. He’s a depth piece, but then GB won a Title with the underwhelming Andrew Quarless at TE after Finley got hurt.
TarynsEyes
June 18, 2026 at 11:24 pm
Quarless wasn't great, and he wasn't terrible, but in his short time, he gave/did more for the team than Finley. To this day, I still can't understand what so many think Finley did to make him earn such adoration.
Oppy
June 19, 2026 at 08:25 am
I'm not a major Finley fan, but he was in the middle of a massive breakout season posting league leading numbers as the focal point of the offense at the TE position before he was injured and everything came to a screeching halt.
So, I dunno, maybe that's why? Call it a hunch.
dobber
June 20, 2026 at 10:08 am
J-Mike was the last TE that the Packers actually figured out how to feature.
...but he was as much a big slot as he ever was a TE. I think that's become true of most pass-catching TE.
Oppy
June 21, 2026 at 07:19 am
Yep. Mike McCarthy was one of the first coaches in the NFL to really embrace the athletic, basketball-player-build Tight End that has become common place since.
The offense featured Finley to such a degree that the offense was basically crippled when they lost him to injury that year, and McCarthy famously stated later that he'd never design an offense that relied on a single player as heavily as that again. Most of the concepts revolved around using Finley as a chess piece to manipulate or read the defense in one way or another, even if the play wasn't designed for him to receive the ball.. heck, even if it wasn't a passing play.
TKWorldWide
June 18, 2026 at 12:47 pm
The fact that he’s a good blocker definitely gives him a chance to make the roster.
BuckyBadger
June 18, 2026 at 01:09 pm
I see people think this signing puts Musgrave on the trading block and that puzzles me. Had a middling college career (sorry but every TE at Iowa deals with inconsistent QB play) and it wasn't like the TE room for the Texans was bursting with talent. Wish him the best but he has a long road ahead of him to make the 53.
Lare
June 18, 2026 at 01:12 pm
If healthy, Lachey should be a good signing. The Packers definitely wanted him as this is the second time they've tried to get him. It helps that he is apparently a good blocker.
Leatherhead
June 18, 2026 at 01:22 pm
He's a $900K cap hit.
Musgrave, if he were released, would result in a dead cap hit of about $800K, but it would clear nearly $2M in salary. Net gain is a little over $1M. $900K of which you are spending on Lachey.
IMO, the most probable solution is that we'll keep Musgrave this year and Lachey will be the #3 instead of Fitzsimmons or Whyle. Then, since all the TEs will have contracts ending after this season, we'll decide who we'd like to keep.
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 18, 2026 at 04:40 pm
They’ll extend Kraft before the season starts!
Leatherhead
June 18, 2026 at 05:21 pm
And if Kraft gets hurt again? How will that extension look then?
Look, let's play the season. If Kraft is the guy we think he is, there's plenty of time to extend him,but there isn't really any benefit to extending him before the season starts, IMO.
GregC
June 18, 2026 at 05:38 pm
They should be able to sign Kraft to an extension now for much less than it would cost if they wait until after the season. That's the benefit, although of course there is risk that goes with it. He appears to be healing very well, so he will probably not be at high risk of re-injury.
dobber
June 20, 2026 at 10:13 am
I don't see how they don't extend him, and I agree that it needs to happen sooner rather than later--as you said, it gives them a little more leverage on guarantees and/or total value, but also more flexibility in how they play it against the cap in 2026.
We can always play the "what if he doesn't fully recover" or "what if he gets hurt" cards, but his game isn't running away from guys, it's running through them. So I worry less about speed, but more about his playing to and through contact.
bjkdad44
June 18, 2026 at 09:09 pm
🤞🏻🙏🏻🤞🏻
Bitternotsour
June 18, 2026 at 09:09 pm
Love the discussions on the 50-thru-60 guys on the roster. Fertile ground there.
golfpacker61
June 19, 2026 at 10:31 am
Sorry Leatherhead, but if Whyle is passing Musgrave on the depth chart as it seems he is, and Lachey has a real chance to be the Y TE which Musgrave will never be, then that makes Musgrave TE4 and expendable. The cap savings pays for the other 2 TEs.
Why keep Musgrave when he will be in a more limited role and get nothing for him in 2027? Surely multiple teams will be TE needy this summer and will offer the same 5th round pick the Broncos offered last year when he was coming off a poor 2024 season. Move him and get something back.
As an example, an extra 5th round pick this year could have gotten Nic Singleton-RB, J C Davis-OT, Dallen Bentley-TE or another depth CB. Get the pick and spend it or trade it next year.
Leatherhead
June 19, 2026 at 12:00 pm
I'm not sure that Whyle has passed anybody on any depth chart. Let's wait until training camp is over before we make that evaluation. He played in 8 games last year and had six targets.
Musgrave, on the other hand, played in all 17, starting 10. He was targeted 31 times and averaged over 10 yards/touch (as opposed to Whyle at 7.2 yards/touch.
Musgrave is younger and more experienced. He does cost more, but it's not a huge amount. The cap savings you mention would be the $1.9M in salary that you would not have to pay Musgrave, but that would somewhat offset by the dead cap hit of about $800K. So that leaves you at +$1.1 M. And then you spend $900K on Lachey??
Right now, this moment, even assuming Kraft is going to be 100% by Opening Day, Musgrave is clearly our next best option at TE, and there's no real financial incentive to getting rid of him.
LambeauPlain
June 18, 2026 at 02:03 pm
Packers stayed after Lachey after he failed his physical...so they see value in, and have a plan for him.
He got knocked down in the 2025 draft after missing most of 2023 with a severe ankle injury and a slow recovery during 2024...eventually amassing 28 receptions (with lousy QB play).
Packers obviously see untapped potential in Lachey.
dobber
June 18, 2026 at 02:42 pm
He hasn't put on a jersey, yet, but he spend last season on Houston's PS, so he's not someone with zero chance to make the team--which is what you'd call a camp body. Right now he's likely number 70-something on the 90-man roster, though, so let's not make him out to be much more than that.
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 18, 2026 at 04:41 pm
Maybe except don’t they really need a blocking TE?
golfpacker61
June 19, 2026 at 10:55 am
Well 70 is kind of low dobber isn't it. A better way to gauge Lachey is he is fighting for the #3 TE spot with Musgrave who doesn't block. And Houston actually has a good TE position group at this point, so the 7th round pick probably didn't get much of a look. That's their loss and our potential gain.
"So let's not make him out to be much more than that."
Most of us, including you dobber, have posted that GB needs a decent Y TE and a better TE group in general, so there is nothing wrong with getting a little excited that GB is trying. Add in the fact that most Iowa TEs have been underused in Iowa's pathetic offenses, but some have been really successful in the NFL, can give us hope Lachey can succeed too. We don't need him to be George Kittle, just a solid Y TE would be an upgrade.
dobber
June 20, 2026 at 08:55 am
"Well 70 is kind of low dobber isn't it."
70 is essentially a practice squad player (53+16). For a second-year guy who hasn't played an NFL game and hasn't practiced with the team? I don't think that's too low for an initial assessment.
"And Houston actually has a good TE position group at this point,"
Maybe at this point after drafting a TE on day 2 and signing a vet TE (Moreau), but not so much last season, which is what matters. Houston is pretty heavily an 11 personnel team and used 2 TE sets less than just about everyone else in the league. In Lachey's defense, maybe after drafting TEs on day 2 twice in the last 3 seasons, that made it easier for them to let Lachey go.
"Most of us, including you dobber, have posted that GB needs a decent Y TE...Iowa TEs have been underused in Iowa's pathetic offenses, but some have been really successful in the NFL,"
Absolutely. I can't disagree on the Y-TE thing. Clearly the Packers like this guy.
Yes, Iowa's reputation for turning out TEs is well-known, much like UW's reputation for turning out OL from Alvarez until just the last few years. Here are all the TEs drafted out of I-O-Ugh in the last 20-something years:
hawkcentral.com/story/sports/college/iowa/football/2023/05/05/here-are-12-iowa-football-tight-ends-selected-in-the-nfl-draft-during-the-kirk-ferentz-era-hawkeyes/70179795007/
I'm going the other way, though, in that maybe Lachey--who played with crappy QBs and decent OLs in a very run-first offense--with his weak 40 time, mediocre college production, and up-and-down scouting assessments of his blocking coming out of Iowa was actually thrown a bone as a pick in round 7.
Once you're drafted/signed as a UDFA, the college don't mean a helluva lot: you've got to show up. And he as a draft pick (who usually get the benefit of that status) couldn't crack the 53 even after Cade Stover got hurt and was readily let go after rosters expanded to 90--and the Texans signed an FA and drafted another TE early.
YES, I'd love for Lachey to come in, lock down the #2 or #3 TE spot for the duration of his ERFA and RFA years as an effective blocker and occasional pass-catcher, but I think there's also plenty here to say, "Um...and?"
Leatherhead
June 19, 2026 at 02:08 pm
If Lachey is our #3 or #4 TE, he'll get targeted once/game, if that.
We usually carry 4 TEs and dress 3. The #3 guy gets special teams snaps, mostly. #4 gets activated if there are injuries.
At this moment, Kraft and Musgrave are both veterans who've been with the team 3 years, know the playbook, and have practiced and played with the #1 offense. If they both stay healthy, this would be one of the better pair of TEs in the league.
There's a spot on the 53 for this guy, but he's going to have to beat some others for that. Unless he gets to play more because Kraft and/or Musgrave get hurt, he's not going to catch more than a few balls.
dobber
June 20, 2026 at 09:05 am
I tend to agree: at this stage, barring injury, the three top TE spots seem to be going to Kraft, Musgrave, and Whyle, and that gives them two guys who can soak up any additional snaps Kraft may cede as he gets up to speed. That leaves about 5 guys fighting for one more spot on the 53 and places on the PS, and their ability to play STs will likely be the determining factor.
T7Steve
June 18, 2026 at 03:32 pm
Let's see if he can get through camp healthy, then look again. Someone who can block AND catch would be nice for a change.
Savage57
June 19, 2026 at 04:39 am
Nice article, Dan.
One of the more enjoyable ones I recall reading here.
golfpacker61
June 19, 2026 at 11:08 am
Lachey was an actual sleeper when he was drafted. Iowa does have pedigree with successful TEs. The Hawkeyes have gone thru a really long streak of poor offenses. bad OCs and QB play, they traditionally have a run strong mentality. Because of that any TEs and WRs really struggle to get any stats that might get them drafted. TEs have had way more success getting to the NFL than WRs have. WRs and QBs have the highest transfer portal rates on the Iowa team year after year.
I am choosing to be optimistic because GB is trying to upgrade the TE room and Lachey fits the description of what we need at Y TE. Great teams don't have any weak position groups and that's why GB has struggled for a while now. Weak TE, CB, Edge, DL groups have held us back because good teams can take advantage of our weaknesses. Signing Lachey is a step in the direction to strengthen the TE group and take some pressure off Kraft. Hopefully it works out, the price would sure be a bonus and allow us to spend money to fix the other weak spots.
If not then we keep looking.