Hello Wisconsin: Preparing for a 2025 Re-Do
The Packers appear content to run it all back next season. That's not reassuring.
By TimBackes

It has been nearly a month since the Green Bay Packers ended their season with another inexcusable collapse in Chicago, and it now appears clear that the team has no intent of making any real staffing changes heading into the 2026 season that they weren’t forced to do.
In the immediate aftermath of the game, the internet was aflame with fans calling for coaches’ jobs. Even long-time media stalwarts with reputations for being level-headed like Bill Huber and Tom Silverstein penned pieces for their publications indicating that the Packers should fire Matt LaFleur.
This was different; while LaFleur had always had his share of vocal critics, they tended to be a loud and small minority. This time, though, that group of critics launched into the forefront and became larger than ever. This was the most heat the coach had ever felt, and it felt like the tide had turned.
Soon, though, it became clear that the Packers were not going to fire LaFleur. Considering some of the head coaching hires made by other teams since then that may have been a wise decision, but at the same time, nothing has really changed since the Packers last took the field. LaFleur is who he is, and there is a large enough sample size to produce some significant skepticism that he can be the man to lead the Packers to their 14th championship.
So, okay. LaFleur is coming back. Those most critical of LaFleur forced themselves to accept that the combination of reasonable regular season success, his work with Jordan Love, the market for available coaches, and the team’s list of injuries this year made it difficult for the Packers brass to want to make a different decision. Fine, whatever. But, for those critics, for this decision to be more palatable, there had to be some coordinator changes made.
And then the monkey’s paw curled.
Gone is the one decent coordinator the Packers had, Jeff Hafley, to be a head coach in Miami after just his second season in the NFL. Gone go several assistants to his staff.
Somehow, Rich Bisaccia retains his job after multiple years of continued terrible special teams play, a cycle that may not be entirely his fault given the team’s historical awfulness in this aspect of football, but a cycle that he also has done nothing to break.
Somehow, Adam Stenovich, who assisted in presiding over a mercurial at best offense that gave Jordan Love little help at key moments throughout the season, who scoffed at suggestions Matthew Golden could or should be a key part of game plans in the playoffs, gets to keep his job as well.
The only changes made to the Packers’ staff of any real consequence are ultimately the ones the team was forced into changing.
They really do intend to run it all back.
Who knows, maybe the whole thing really can just be chalked up to bad injury luck. After all, losing players the caliber of Micah Parsons, Zach Tom, Elgton Jenkins, Devonte Wyatt, and Tucker Kraft (among others) is always going to be a major blow.
But when you consider the way in which the team kept falling apart in the most crucial moments, it’s hard to come away feeling good about the coaching staff assembled for 2026. It’s hard to make the case that the team did anything to get better in that part of its football operation.
We’ll see what Jonathan Gannon brings to the defense; he has to produce results at least as good as Hafley’s did. We’ll see what happens when these key guys get back.
But I’m having a hard time feeling any sort of excitement about what the next season brings in store.
Maybe things will change in July when I’m desperate for the return of football. But for now… the idea of running it back has little appeal for me, and it feels as though the Packers are just kind of asleep at the wheel.
Wisconsin Beer of the Week

We’re in the thick of porter and stout season, so why not feature a porter today?
This is a beer I’ve never had from a brewery I have little to no experience with. It’s Nov. ‘93 by Low Daily Brewery, which is based in the small town of Burlington (known for its chocolate factory and Tony Romo, among other things). It’s been quite a while since I have paid a visit to Burlington; I remember running in a track meet there in high school, and the track was situated close enough to the chocolate factory that it was all you could smell.
Anyway, it should be no surprise then that this porter features a bit of a chocolatey flavor, though technically it is a vanilla porter (brewed with Madagascar vanilla beans). As you’d expect from a beer of the style, it weighs in at a moderate 6-ish percent ABV. It’s smooth and a little sweet; not too heavy at all. It’s ideal for winter nights where you’re looking for that warming roasty flavor but not trying to fill yourself up.
This was my first Low Daily experience and I was impressed, so I’ll be on the lookout for some more of their stuff in the near future.
Super Bowl highlights teams that have quickly reinvented themselves
It is probably a dramatic understatement to say it is really freakin’ hard to get to, let alone win, a Super Bowl.
That’s one of the reasons why what the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks have accomplished this year is so impressive.
Both of these teams were powerhouses to a degree in their own conferences during the last decade. Both of them fell off significantly by the start of this decade and had to go through some pretty significant identity shifts, changing coaches, quarterbacks, systems, entire rosters.
What Eliot Wolf in New England and John Schneider in Seattle (both former Green Bay guys) have done is truly impressive. These are teams that were winners relatively recently and didn’t have to take too long to perform a rebuild and get right back to football prominence. For Schneider who has been there the whole time, it might be especially impressive, and reminiscent of what Howie Roseman managed to do with the Philadelphia Eagles after that 2017 Super Bowl championship and the team’s ensuing brief collapse and rapid transformation.
It’s also one of the reasons why it’s difficult to stomach what has happened with the Packers not just in LaFleur’s tenure, but over the last 15 seasons. The Packers simply have not managed to do what these teams have, at least yet. They haven’t been able to sufficiently reinvent themselves to the point where they’re not just sneaking into the playoffs, but kicking the doors in. They’ve not returned to the point where they’re expecting to be there rather than just happy to be there.
Between the Seahawks, the Patriots, the Eagles, and other teams like the Rams and 49ers, we’ve seen teams manage to go through these lulls and reboot relatively quickly in recent years to bring themselves back to Super Bowls.
We love the holiday season
And by the holiday season, I mean Super Bowl weekend!
I love the Super Bowl, and honestly I probably have more fun with the game when the Packers are not playing. For Super Bowl XLV I was so anxious that I couldn’t really eat or drink anything the whole day.
For a number of years now we’ve hosted a Super Bowl gathering at my house and it’s always a good time. There’s chili, all kinds of snacks and dips and desserts, and of course, plenty of beverages of a wide assortment. Friends come with their kids, we’ve got a couple different TVs going, it’s a good time.
This year I get to revive one of my favorite Super Bowl traditions: cheering for the New England Patriots.
You see, during the height of the Patriots’ dynasties, my post-Packer elimination philosophy was simple: if I as a Packer fan don’t get to be happy, nobody else does. So what’s the outcome that will cause the most people to be upset? Obviously it’s the Patriots winning. Even the Patriots fans wouldn’t really enjoy it all that much themselves because they’d seen it so many times before.
I’m not quite sure the Patriots winning will cause the same level of angst as it did in the Brady/Belichick years, but certainly there would be a more visceral response to a New England victory than a Seattle victory. And to me, this is exactly what I’m looking for.
I as a fan was denied a happy ending to the season. Now everybody else has to suffer as well. Sorry, that’s just the way it is.
Anyway, I’m looking forward to watching the game (and commercials) with friends. Despite knowing nothing about Bad Bunny, I’m certainly looking forward to the performance as well for the sheer spectacle, though I’m not sure anything will ever beat Kendrick Lamar getting to perform a Drake diss track on live television in front of an audience of 125 million and looking straight into the camera to call him a pedophile with a big cheeky grin. That’s entertainment, folks.
Around the NFC North
As always, it’s time to go around the NFC North.
- The CHICAGO BEARS suck.
- The DETROIT LIONS apparently nearly had Quandre Diggs back in town this season, but he declined to sign with the team when they tried to bring him in off the Seahawks’ practice squad. Diggs has played a key role as a role player near the end of his career in helping Seattle to the Super Bowl; it’s interesting to consider how this could have changed things.
- The MINNESOTA VIKINGS canned their general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah in a bit of a surprise move shortly after the conference championship weekend. Perhaps seeing Sam Darnold lead the Seahawks to the Super Bowl as favorites was a bit too much for the Vikings–a reminder of the decision to allow him to leave in favor of JJ McCarthy, one of the league’s worst starters at the position who was widely panned as being a reach when the team drafted him in 2024. Adofo-Mensah was generally a poor drafter and presided over the team while what had been one of the league’s strongest rosters aged out with no real replacements while the team’s available cap space shrank significantly.
Mr. Backes’s “This or That”
Every day I put a different “this or that” poll up on my whiteboard and have students leave tallies throughout the day. I then compile this information and post it here for laughs.
- Winter olympics defeated summer olympics
- Wendy’s defeated McDonald’s
- Oreos defeated Chips Ahoy
- Apple juice defeated orange juice
- Basketball defeated baseball
Super Bowl Pick
Okay, so we’ve made it. The final game of the NFL season before we head into the long dark of the offseason.
I don’t know that there’s a soul alive that would have predicted this matchup before the season started, but I guess that’s why they play the games. It’s often easy to say of a couple ascending new teams that they could be right back here next year, but we all know that that’s not how this works; for one or both of these teams, this could be their only chance. So it’s going to be fun to see how this one plays out with these fresh-but-not-fresh faces.
It's difficult for me to not pick the Seahawks. While I have generally tuned out any of the talk of the Patriots having benefited from an easy schedule (guess what, they still won all those games), I do not think they have been as efficient or as fearsome as this Seahawks team has been. While the Patriots have the capability of making it interesting, the Seahawks are far more well rounded and have been the closest thing the league has had this year to a juggernaut.
Ultimately, give me the Seahawks in a 30-20 game. An especially cool story for Sam Darnold, and a reminder to never judge a player too harshly for flaming out with the Jets. They’re an irredeemable dumpster fire.
Seattle Seahawks 30, New England Patriots 20
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Tim Backes is a lifelong Packer fan and a contributor to CheeseheadTV. Follow him on Twitter @timbackes for his Packer takes, random musings and Untappd beer check-ins.
__________________________




Comments (67)
PackEyedOptimist
February 05, 2026 at 07:21 am
Loved "the monkey's paw curled" reference.
I get the deflated pessimism after this past season, but I truly believe we had a roster that was ready to win a Super Bowl this year--before the injuries.
If we had ONLY lost Kraft and Parsons, our top two All-Pro candidates, I think we STILL would have had an excellent chance. People like to throw around the "you can't blame injuries/every team has injuries, etc. blahblahblah, but dismissing them as though they don't matter much is ridiculous. Ours had a HUGE impact.
When you said, "Who knows, maybe the whole thing really can just be chalked up to bad injury luck. After all, losing players the caliber of Micah Parsons, Zach Tom, Elgton Jenkins, Devonte Wyatt, and Tucker Kraft (among others) is always going to be a major blow." you were correct, and just being tired/annoyed by that doesn't make it less true.
Every one of those players was a Pro-Bowl quality starter
I'd also point out the losses of our key ST players: Nick Niemann, Zayne Anderson, Kristian Welch, Kamal Hadden, and Bo Melton, and the re-injury of MarShawn Lloyd had an under-recognized impact.
Despite all of the roster decimation, wewere never blown out in any game, and came very close to winning many more. Give us back half of those injured players, and I say we go to AT LEAST the NFC Championship game.
Unfortunately, last year's window has closed; I think our roster will not have as much potential in '26 as it did in '25. That's why "injury luck" is ALWAYS the biggest influence on who gets into the Super Bowl, in my opinion.
Ha. I knew I'd get an avalanche of downvotes.
So many people need to blame someone (coaches, GMs, players) rather than accepting that LUCK has a huge impact in sports.
Packerpasty
February 05, 2026 at 01:55 pm
Injuries or not, the Packers did not beat teams they should have beaten, unlike the Patriots...hopefully that will change this coming season if it doesn't and they dont start dominating at Lambeau, thing could go south in a hurry...there were enough Boo's last year at times, hate to hear even more...
Oxymoron 3339
February 05, 2026 at 04:10 pm
Injuries are part of the game and luck can have something to do with it. Having said that we really don’t have the greatest talent group. GM needs to step it up.
GreenandBold
February 05, 2026 at 09:40 pm
“ Every one of those players was a Pro Bowl quality starter “ that doesn’t stand for much anymore !
Cheezehead72
February 05, 2026 at 07:30 am
Two weeks ago I knew I was going all in on the NFC to win the Superbowl. Yes I would prefer the Rams to be playing but the Seahawks are fine. I did not want the Broncos to win because I do not like Payton. I would rather see the Seahawks win over the Patriots because the Patriots won so many SB under Brady. Unless I do not care for the NFC team I will usually go for the NFC.
The Seahawks win by 13.
jannesbjornson
February 05, 2026 at 08:38 am
Will not be watching.
dobber
February 05, 2026 at 09:00 am
We will if only for the commercials. My daughter wants to see the halftime show.
jannesbjornson
February 05, 2026 at 09:21 am
I used to watch with the former players commenting like the Mannings , or Brees. Roll it back Monday w/out the commercials. Getting the snowshoes out for a calorie burn. LOL.
egbertsouse
February 05, 2026 at 07:32 am
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. That about sums up the Packers management philosophy.
I used to compare the Packers offseason to the movie Groundhog Day. Now, I compare it to the movie Blues Brothers. “We’re puttin’ the band back together. We’re on a mission from God.”
Cheezehead72
February 05, 2026 at 07:56 am
The Blues Brothers is a classic. Trivia here. It held the record for the most cars destroyed in a movie for years. But not anymore.
Houndog
February 05, 2026 at 08:02 am
LOL, yes it did, and some of it was filmed near the SummerFest grounds in Milwaukee. I've been gone too long to remember if those freeway ramps to nowhere are still there.
Cheezehead72
February 05, 2026 at 09:07 am
The Hoan Bridge has been connected. I was back there oh maybe 10 to 12 years ago and they have a nice freeway going from Cudahy to Hwy 94 in Milwaukee. It is nice.
Coldworld
February 05, 2026 at 09:10 am
That’s the Hoan Bridge/I 794, then under construction. It’s still there in finished form.
LeotisHarris
February 05, 2026 at 08:23 am
I think it would be helpful if Policy, Gute, and MLF had a visit with The Penguin.
dobber
February 05, 2026 at 09:01 am
White toast.
No butter, ma'am.
Plain white toast.
Cheezehead72
February 05, 2026 at 09:08 am
She had only two desks
Coldworld
February 05, 2026 at 09:18 am
I think it would be better if we had an alternative way of selecting the Board members. They have allowed us to end up in a position where a sports property lawyer is appointing/retaining our head coach. Gute yesterday admitted he wasn’t part of that decision, just informed.
That scenario is exactly the type of situation Harlen changed the structure to end (back then it was bank managers and car dealers etc on the Board). The current Board became full of Murphy sycophants and allowed him to unravel the separation. Now we don’t even have a football person making those decisions.
Policy (irrespective of other merits) should never have been promoted without a prior return to the Harlen structure. We are seeing the signs of where this is taking us.
Leatherhead
February 05, 2026 at 09:31 am
The guy who thinks I'm allergic to change is still banging the drum to go back to the way things were years ago.
I love how you know the Board is Murphy sycophants. Could you point to some examples?
LambeauPlain
February 05, 2026 at 11:58 am
Here's an example: The executive board hired a search firm to find a replacement for Murphy. The firm created a list of 90 candidates. Then the board unanimously voted for Policy anyway.
If he was so unbelievably above the other 89 candidates, why the search firm? It was a PR ruse only as Murphy had complete control of the decision.
How do you know they are not Murphy's sycophants?
Houndog
February 05, 2026 at 07:54 am
"run it all back"? Of course, why not?
I watched the tape of Gutey's press conference this morning, and what I saw was a guy that had just received an extension and was feeling very secure and comfortable with where he sat. No worries!
What I didn't see, or hear, was a dedication, promise, or anything close to an ultimatum that losing your last 5 games in horrible fashion was unacceptable, and would not be tolerated again.
Instead, we got his best MLF impersonation on how we (this team) can do better, and "yeah, we need to do better in Dec. and Jan.". At some point I almost expected the old McPuffy 'Pad Level' excuse, but it never came, he substituted praise for Bisaccia and Gary (in a lesser degree) instead. Try to sleep on that thought!
He also tried to bullshit us by saying "I expect all those guys under contract to be back'! How does that work with the salary cap, amongst rumors of low-balling assistant coaches you can somehow find an extra X-$millions within the cap to keep them all? Great, just don't tell anyone, but Rashan Gary, really!
I ended up slapping myself for ruining my own day at 5:00 AM, thanks Gutey!
mrtundra
February 05, 2026 at 08:11 am
"I expect all those guys under contract, to be back!"-- Gutey sounds like he is a viking front office person/fan! They seem to think that the cap doesn't really matter, and they can change the rules, whenever it suits them.
Leatherhead
February 05, 2026 at 10:55 am
If the cap is well-managed, you don't have to let good players leave because you can't afford them.
If you go to Spotrac, and look up the Packers, you can see who we have under contract and what the terms are.
Right now, today, we have 66 guys under contract. If you add your active roster, to the inactive roster, and include the practice squad, that comes to 69 guys, so we pretty much have our 2026 team
McKinney, Bullard, Williams, Oladapo, Nixon, Valentine, Cooper, Hopper, McDuffie, Parsons, VanNess, Brinson, Sorrell, Oliver, Wyatt, Brooks, Wooden.
That's 16 guys on defense, not including Walker or Enagbare or Gary or Hobbs or Cox or Mosby or Stackhouse. And some others. THE POINT is that we have most of the defense in place already. Yes, some guys will hopefully be replaced by better guys that we get in the draft or FA. but mostly this is what we are.
On offense, it's the same story. Most of our horses have been around the track. The only offensive guys that don't have contracts are Willis and Wilson. And of course, Doubs, who has been a pretty reliable guy but is probably worth more than we can cover. Watson, Reed, Golden, Wicks, and Williams are all under contract. Kraft and Musgrave. Jacobs and Brooks.
There are some places we can get cap relief, as we all know. Jenkins brings about $20M in cap relief while only costing $4M in dead money. You could save $11M on Gary, at a cost of $17M in dead money. Hobbs saves $12M but costs $12M in dead cap. Nixon would save $7M but cost $2M. And of course, create another hole we have to fill.
We have some possible replacements in the pipeline, guys like Sorrell and Brinson and Hopper and Stackhouse. Marshawn Lloyd, if he can ever survive training camp.
If it were me, I'd be more than willing to run it back, with mostly the same people. Use the draft and FA to fortify the Oline...all the other pieces are in place.
jannesbjornson
February 05, 2026 at 08:53 am
Interpretation: A lifetime Contract a' la Joe Paterno and we'll get it done some year.
crayzpackfan
February 05, 2026 at 09:03 am
It's feels like the Packers have been taken over by squatters. They moved into the big, fancy house, changed all the locks, and are smugly telling the masses to GFT.
Houndog
February 05, 2026 at 09:46 am
LOL, I had forgotten all about Paterno, but yeah, it's similar, Forever Yours is their favorite song!
FumundaStank
February 05, 2026 at 12:15 pm
Well, the pad level could definitely use some work. I mean, did you watch some of these guys trying to block or tackle all season?
Guam
February 05, 2026 at 08:06 am
Sadly, the author nailed this article. The Packers are clearly running it back again. The FO tried this a few years ago with Rodgers and Company and failed abysmally and apparently learned nothing from the experience. So here we go again. Ugh!
As a lifelong Packer fan I will once again cheer for the Packers and hope for the best, but the reality is I see very little chance for LaFleur to change his ways enough to get the Packers to the Super Bowl. Seventh place and a first round playoff loss appear to be our destiny.
Oxymoron 3339
February 05, 2026 at 04:14 pm
My God are we the Steelers of the NFC now?
golfpacker61
February 05, 2026 at 08:11 am
"After avoiding the position for the past few years following Jalen Ramsey's departure, the Rams are now faced with an unavoidable problem that must be resolved. It would be malpractice for general manager Les Snead to ignore the concern once more. More size, physicality, proper technique, and discipline are needed at cornerback in Los Angeles, and one direction they could go to find that is in this year's NFL Draft, specifically through last week's Senior Bowl."
I read this article today and you could easily substitute Packers & Alexander & Gutey for Rams & Ramsey & Snead. The biggest problem with "Kicking the can down the road" is it still is the biggest need in 2026 along with DT run stopper, but now in 2026 add OL to the biggest needs category. With no extra money this year for a FA, the draft is the only source to fix those holes.
I did read T Vondre Sweat may be a casualty in Tennessee because Robert Saleh doesn't like "Gargantuan" players on his D-line. That could be an option for a trade of a day-3 pick, maybe a 2027 pick when we have those extra comp picks. That would fill 1 huge hole, and I know alot of posters liked him in the draft.
The MINNESOTA VIKINGS canned their general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah. I think this is directly tied to not resigning Sam Darnold. It was baffling for the Viking not to resign Darnold for the "Pittance" he got from Seattle after the season he had. At the very least sign him and trade him for a 1st or 2nd round pick, sure beats a lower comp pick.
I would suggest GB do just that with Rasheed Walker. Why let him go for a probable 4th, maybe a 3rd round comp pick at the end of each round? Sign him to a 3-year $60 million contract and trade him before the draft for a higher pick or picks. He is the top available LT in free agency and will have multiple teams wanting him which would drive up the trade price. No way we would be stuck with him because teams always need average LTs who never miss games. A 2nd this year and a 3rd next would be huge to fix the CB, DT, and OL needs.
Guam
February 05, 2026 at 08:34 am
You almost never see sign and trade deals anymore and there is a reason. Almost every new player contract includes a large upfront signing bonus which is then amortized over the life of the contract. That signing bonus amortization stays with the originating team and can NOT be part of the trade. Worse, that signing bonus amortization all gets accelerated to the year the player is traded, resulting in a massive cap hit in the year of the trade.
That cap hit of an accelerated signing bonus makes a "sign and trade" deal undoable. And no player (or his agent) today will agree to a contract that doesn't have a big signing bonus. The "sign and trade" idea has become a dinosaur because of signing bonuses and the contract rules.
dobber
February 05, 2026 at 09:25 am
Bingo.
You'd have to get players to agree to big roster bonuses down the road that convert to signing bonus at some point after the trade. There's a lot of trust in that.
dobber
February 05, 2026 at 03:21 pm
"I did read T Vondre Sweat may be a casualty in Tennessee because Robert Saleh doesn't like "Gargantuan" players on his D-line."
It's not often that regulars on rookie contracts get let go. Yes, he's a different kind of body and changing regimes often clear out players who were pet projects of past administrations, but I'd be surprised if they let him go on the cheap.
"The MINNESOTA VIKINGS canned their general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah. I think this is directly tied to not resigning Sam Darnold. It was baffling for the Viking not to resign Darnold for the "Pittance" he got from Seattle after the season he had."
The Vikes have been trying to defy the cap for a couple years now. Kwesi has not drafted well, has run the cap into the ground, and all I can figure is that they didn't want to make that commitment to Darnold after making their pick. It was my understanding that O'Connell and Kwesi have been at odds from the start, and O'Connell has Wilf's ear.
"No way we would be stuck with him because teams always need average LTs who never miss games. "
You'd never get him to agree to a deal with such low up-front guarantees that he would be tradable when he'd easily get that up-front money elsewhere in FA. Letting him walk for comp picks is the only call.
sugarbair
February 05, 2026 at 08:15 am
Just when I thought I couldn't get less excited about next season. I hope that press conference was just the usual BS. I am watching those early March roster bonuses. There are a few there I hope we cut the player before we pay the bonus. That will tell me some of what Gute is thinking. Then I will watch how he gets some salary cap room. Then I will know how much beer I am going to need to thru the season. GPG
TXCHEESE
February 05, 2026 at 08:20 am
As the injuries piled up, I was less optimistic of a Packers Super Bowl bid, but the 5 game losing streak, the inexcusable 4th quarter collapses, and the total meltdowns against the Bears, had me ready for house cleaning in the offseason. When they retained MLF, I was certain, there was an agreement, he would get rid of the weak coordinators and position coaches. Now. the only thing us poor fans can hope for is that upper management is smarter than us, and there really is a good chance the team will turn it around.
This coming offseason will be interesting to follow with the number of players set for free agency. Hope Gute and Ball can figure out a way to keep the keepers, and renegotiate those contracts that need attention. Looking at you Rashan.
As for the this or that choices, agree wholeheartedly with all except basketball over baseball. The NBA is unwatchable, and with college athletics how they are, I won't even watch March Madness this year, which is the only basketball I ever view.
T7Steve
February 05, 2026 at 08:28 am
"he has to produce results at least as good as Hafley’s did."
Talk about running it back! "At least as good", is not near good enough! Not the only reason, but the D has to take on some of those last 5 games and needs to improve when it comes to closing time.
There's a reason why most of the coaching staff remains. They aren't getting poached. In fact, the ones in the past that have been haven't fared too well. What does that tell us about running it back? Especially with that implant from the Bears that coaches the O-line.
Houndog
February 05, 2026 at 08:52 am
"At least as good"?
How does two completely embarrassing losses to Da Bears within a couple weeks play into that?
Will trailing for the entire game and losing be sufficient? Is that better?
How about playing for 60 instead of 30 minutes, and losing, is that good enough?
Kinda' sounds like it is, the results would be 'at least as good'!
F#&K This!
T7Steve
February 05, 2026 at 09:22 am
I really couldn't believe Tim wrote that and copied it in real time while reading, actually hoping he'd qualify that statement later. Maybe in "This or That" with: At least as good beat at least as bad.
Houndog
February 05, 2026 at 09:55 am
Steve,
I forgot to mention an article I read maybe 8-10 days ago about Butkus being handcuffed and often overruled by Stenavich regarding O-Line issues, if I can find it again I'll post a link.
Either way, I keep hoping for the day another team 'poaches' Stenavich for their OC, and there's talk about Seattle doing that. Poaching, my ass, it'll be a gift by someone taking him, and I'll believe it when I see it.
Maybe then MLF will get a real Coordinator, Maybe! And Maybe I'll live to be 110!
Guam
February 05, 2026 at 10:31 am
Would love to see the link to that article Houndog. You mentioned it in another post and I went looking for it but couldn't find it. That could certainly impact my opinion of Butkus versus Stenovich.
The musical chairs usage and positional mis-evaluation of the Packer O-linemen has driven me nuts the past couple of years. I have been blaming Butkus since we didn't see as much of that when Steno was the O-line coach but maybe I have been blaming the wrong person.
LambeauPlain
February 05, 2026 at 12:04 pm
Stenovich's interviews have been very few...2 outside the organization since 2019 (?) and failed to impress in either one.
Not surprised. When I hear him speak about coaching tactics, strategies, principles, accountabilities...he is impressive as a bowl of plain lettuce.
jannesbjornson
February 05, 2026 at 09:03 am
Messaging for mediocrity. Giving the Fans a soporific of sorts, to prepare for the coming Months. See what he says, February 2,2027?
dobber
February 05, 2026 at 09:23 am
"There's a reason why most of the coaching staff remains. "
Actually, most of the defensive staff, some of the training staff, and the QB coach are turning over, and most have either gone directly into new positions (poached) or have been hired on elsewhere. That's a lot of coaching turnover. Gannon seems to have been given the green light to reshape the defensive staff. I think it feels like nothing is changing because the guys we were most focused on are still there (re: LaF, Bisaccia, Stenavich, Butkus).
Packers are still looking at Connor Senger to be their QB coach, but are apparently competing for his services.
GregC
February 05, 2026 at 10:37 am
"There's a reason why most of the coaching staff remains. They aren't getting poached."
Are you kidding? DC Jeff Hafley to the Dolphins as a head coach, LB coach Ryan Duggan to the Dolphins as defensive coordinator, DB coach Ryan Downard to the Dolphins as DB coach and pass game coordinator, QB coach Sean Mannion to the Eagles as a play-calling offensive coordinator, and now WR coach Ryan Mahaffey to the Eagles as run game coordinator and TE coach. All upward moves. I don't remember the last time so many Packer coaches were hired away.
Coldworld
February 05, 2026 at 12:20 pm
Insert the word offensive and the point has validity.
GregC
February 05, 2026 at 05:51 pm
Two offensive coaches were poached--one of them to become an OC for one of the better teams in the league. How many offensive coaches should we expect to be poached every offseason?
Leatherhead
February 05, 2026 at 12:51 pm
Steve, I get your frustration with the defense, but I urge you to remember that some key pieces of our defense weren't there for the last 5 games. Wyatt didn't play after Thanksgiving. Parsons, as we know, was finished after the Denver game. I think if you went to any defense in the NFL, and removed two of their best starters, you'd see a weaker defense.
When all hands were on deck, this was a pretty good defense that reliably held the opponent to 25 or less,- Hell, we had 11 games of 22 or less. Even after we lost Parsons and Wyatt, we held Chicago and Minnesota...two division opponents... to 22 and 16. On the road.
And the defense has help arriving. Sorrell, Brinson, Oliver, Stackhouse, Hopper....these guys should all be better players for us this year.
T7Steve
February 05, 2026 at 02:44 pm
I actually (as CW pointed out) was talking about the offensive coaches that have actually been poached or won't be. My bad for not clarifying that because the first paragraph was about the D.
pacman
February 05, 2026 at 08:39 am
Frustrating that everyone can see it except senior management.
And finally, so many have called for it.
Who lives in GB and what is the mood and talk on the street there?
S.O.L.I.D. (Spirit Of Lombardi Is Dead)
I don't post much in the off season but that's going to be my signoff rather than GPG until we go deep into playoffs or MLF goes. It's a tough statement but how else can we fans indicate our displeasure. Anyone want to join me? I wonder what would happen if I started handing our flyers for businesses to post in their windows? That might be too much but I've been 'yelling' this for 3 years - MLF isn't the guy to take us to the SB. Now I'll have to add Pilot to the list. I'm mixed on Gute but he's trending down.
Cheezehead72
February 05, 2026 at 09:09 am
I see that we are looking to be an average team at best for awhile. We will be fighting for the 7th seed.
I wonder if we will look at hiring Stoutland as Campen has been spoken for.
Leatherhead
February 05, 2026 at 01:03 pm
Let's see how much we can improve the offense. The Seahawks and Patriots both scored 100 points more than us this season. We were 16th in scoring...in a 32 team league, that's average. 5 NFC teams outscored us. We were 3rd offensively in our own division.
Independent of anything that we do, or don't do, regarding defense and special teams, scoring another 100 points almost guarantees us a trip to the Championship game. Last year, the Eagles were 7th in scoring. The year before, the 49ers were 3rd in scoring. The year before that, the Eagles were 2nd in scoring. The year before that, Tampa was 2nd in scoring.
The WRs and TEs are all Top 100 draft picks, our QB just threw for over 300 yards, 4TDs and 0 interceptions, our RB is one of the best in the league and one of the best in Packer history. I don't see this as an "average at best" group.
mjbrogno
February 05, 2026 at 09:13 am
We as fans must be missing something about this season. Gutey likes our CB’s and thinks that they played well, I want what he’s drinking. Our sp teams play flat out stinks. And to praise the SP teams coach and McManus is totally shocking. Does he not know how a couple of simple plays cost us two wins. I have absolutely no faith in our future after reading about Gutey’s press conference.
Coldworld
February 05, 2026 at 09:24 am
This organization reeks of self-isolation; a bubble where they only listen to themselves and just reinforce their own vision and gradually drive it further from reality. In an organizational context, that inevitably eventually leads to real pain.
crayzpackfan
February 05, 2026 at 10:01 am
There does seem to be an absolute void of meritocracy and instead, more of a baked in faction at the top who are only looking out for themselves. They provide just enough to keep the mainstream off their scent as well as the loyalists who simply want access (to be part of the club, you know, useful idiots). Then there are the fans who are willing to simply suspend their disbelief in favor of average results. Perhaps it's benign and they're all just woefully underqualified and it all needs more time to come out in the wash.
ricky
February 05, 2026 at 09:25 am
When LaFleur kept Joe Barry around an extra season when it was almost universally believed he would be replaced as the template for the Packers idea of accountability. There needs to be a major housecleaning, and if MLF won't do it, time to move on. And he apparently, like McCarthy before him, has a stubborn loyalty streak, or an ego problem, or something that won't let him admit he should replace coaches who are not getting the job done.
This would start with Butkus, where the OL is a mess, and there is no "develop" to the "draft and develop" approach the Packers have to draft choices. Then Stenavich. If he is not willing to go back to coaching the OL (where he was excellent), say goodbye and get someone else. I was really hoping for McDaniel from Miami, but the Charges grabbed him. Take a hard look at the DL coach, which is similar to the OL. A lot of "developmental" players but only two or three that are difference makers (and the Packers traded for Parsons, so that hardly counts). It could well be time to pull the plug on the LVN experiment. "Hercules" indeed! Physical traits are nice; I'd prefer football players.
Meanwhile, the team continues to play "musical chairs" with the OL. Draft tackles to develop them as guards. Pick a center, and pass over the football player who has made four consecutive Pro Bowls, and instead draft someone else, only to cut him last year. Then move a really good LG to become an "All World Center" who admitted he was terrible at the position.
The lack of accountability is amazing. The team pays lip service to being a SB contender, but rewards decreasing returns and multiple collapses at crucial times by extending those who are in charge of the failures. I apologize for this lengthy and somewhat scattershot post, but I'm just tired of accepting the status quo rather than making hard decisions.
GreenandBold
February 05, 2026 at 10:01 pm
Great post many here feel the same obviously .
Leatherhead
February 05, 2026 at 09:32 am
I think we had a really good team last year, and if not for the injuries we might have made a real run at the Super Bowl. I have no problem with making some incremental improvements and running it back.
GreenandBold
February 05, 2026 at 10:04 pm
Gute has those season tix he promised you in the mail .
TheBigCat
February 05, 2026 at 09:48 am
Tim: I see that photo of Policy wearing dark sunglasses, and with his current stance on MLF, I can't help but think of Tommy (from the rock opera of the same name by the The Who): "That deaf, dumb and blind kid...." Well, at least we have the Wisconsin Badgers women's hockey team to keep the glass half-full.
CheeseWhiz1
February 05, 2026 at 10:36 am
The Badgers Women's Volleyball team is also legit. Maybe Kelly Sheffield could offer the Packers some tips. GPG
stockholder
February 05, 2026 at 09:55 am
Obviously management thought
Bill Huber, Tom Silverstein and others
had fraudulent claims.
Fact, Values, Cause, Effect, and Policy.
All Ludicrous.
They had one true cure.
Instead of trying to seek other less effective
methods and Concerns .
It’s Believe in the magic of bubble baths
“And don't fix everything at once”!
POLICY “FIXED” the hole in the dike.
HE READ BETWEEN THE LINES.
RELAX! THERE’S STILL PLENTY OF TIME.
And the Extentions of MLF, Gute and Ball backed it up.
So forget the bad Luck. And suffering.
Fix a drink, it beats a Quack.
There won't be an explosion.
Since'61
February 05, 2026 at 10:16 am
This concept of running it back has all the marks of arrogance from the Packers management. They seemed determined despite the last 3 seasons, and in particular the end of the last 2 seasons, to prove that what they have been doing and continue to do is going to prove them correct. Specking for myself I don't see any justification for that attitude.
Yes, injuries were a factor. but they will always be a factor. We don't even know if players like Kraft and Parsons will return from their injuries at 100%. Even fully recovered might mean they lose a step or even a half step. There is no way to know who will be injured next season. Also, the Packers are not going to be able to sign all of their players back. Some may just want to move on to another team regardless of what the Packers offer.
Running it back to me means to be ready to expect similar results for 2026 season. After 7 seasons as HC is MLF suddenly going to become that much better of head coach. Is Gannon that good of a coach that the defense is suddenly going to play at a championship level. He certainly didn't show that in Arizona. Gute is talking about resigning Gary. Really!! Give me a break.
In fairness we need to wait and see how FA and the draft plays out but I can't, at this point, expect anything different from Gute or MLF other than what we have seen for the 8 seasons since Gute took over as the Packers GM. Hopefully I'm wrong and time will tell. Thanks, Since '61
GregC
February 05, 2026 at 10:59 am
I thought it was time for the team to move on from LaFleur, but I don't feel the doom and gloom that Tim and so many others do. I think it's quite possible that the new DC will actually be an upgrade, and while Bisacchia has not improved the special teams as much as hoped, the only real weakness was punt and kickoff returns--areas where the team lacked dynamic players. The coverage units were quite good, and we had one of the best punters in the league, so possibly we had net positives overall on punt and kickoff returns vs. returns against. I'm not sure how to check on that. The kicker had two bad stretches (one in the playoff game--ouch!) but that wasn't Bisacchia's fault.
I would like to see a new mind brought in to the offensive side of the ball as OC or offensive line coach, but not knowing exactly how the decision making is divided up there, I don't know what would be best.
Lphill
February 05, 2026 at 11:32 am
if there was a team owner MLF and Bassicia would be long gone, but the Packers sell out at home and make money so the people in charge are satisfied with a one and done season.
Green Bay Shareholder
February 05, 2026 at 11:53 am
Vince Lombardi is famously quoted as saying, "There is no second place. Either you're first, or you're last". Now replaced at Lambeau by - Commitment to Complacency. Maybe that is why after his 1st Championship Game loss in which the clock ran out he promised that it would never happen again. Then he won 5 Championships and never lost another Playoff Game. That is Titletown, not what we are seeing now and have been for quite some time.
pantz_bURp
February 05, 2026 at 12:12 pm
"But I’m having a hard time feeling any sort of excitement about what the next season brings in store."
This is exactly where I am as well. (Thanks Tim)
Pantz B.
the_gavia_pass
February 06, 2026 at 04:39 am
16 years without SB.
I hoped Policy was a new Harlan, but he's not, he's a Murphy copy.
so we are on the way to make that 29 years without SB, as in the 70s / 80s.
Zapato
February 06, 2026 at 09:09 am
Sorry, but I'm not buying the injury excuse. The Packers beat the crap out of the Bears during the first half of both games only to come out in the second half and implode. That's not bad injury luck, that's bad coaching!