Our #3/#4 WRs would be James Lofton and Donald Driver, our #2 TE would be Bubba Franks, and our #2 RB would be Ahman Green. We didn't do Nickel and Dime backs, because we wanted to make this All-Time Team just like a typical starting lineup for a team: 11 players starting on offense, 11 starting on defense (base 4-3 scheme with 4 DBs), and the key special teams players.

Thank you! Paul Hornung was a tough one. He was a great Packer (very versatile player), but we didn't know where to put him.... We wanted to make this list like a true team (11 on offense, 11 on defense, with a kicker, punter, kick returner, and punt returner). We could've put Hornung at RB and Jim Taylor at FB (since they both ran and blocked for each other), but we wanted to put a true FB at the FB position. In our opinion, the best pure FB in Packers history was William Henderson, so that's why we put him there. Just know that we realize how great and versatile Hornung was, but in this format, it was tough to put him at a particular position.

It was very close between Crosby and Longwell. Longwell played nine seasons for the Packers, and Crosby has also played nine seasons, so that was helpful. Overall, Longwell has a slight edge in accuracy, but that's about it. First off, Crosby is better at kickoffs than Longwell was (even when considering they moved kickoffs from the 30 to the 35-yard line in Crosby's 5th year). Secondly, Crosby simply has a better leg. His range is much better than Longwell's was (Crosby holds the Packers record for the longest field goal). Finally, we couldn't ignore the fact that Crosby just passed Longwell to become the all-time points leader for the Packers. If Crosby re-signs with the Packers, I think there's a good chance that he will continue to show why he deserves to be on this list. Last thing: We tried to look at both of them and their play on the field.... We really didn't consider Longwell going to play for the Vikings, but I'll just say that it doesn't help him much (in terms of being on a Packers All-Time Team).

Jim Taylor was listed as a FB, and he did block for Hornung, but he led the Packers in rushing for seven consecutive seasons when he played. The RB and FB positions were essentially the same positions (interchangeable) back in the late 1950s and 1960s. Taylor was a dominant player in 12/14-game seasons.... We had to put him at RB over Ahman Green, especially since Ahman had some fumbling problems. We put William Henderson at FB, because we saw him as the best pure/traditional fullback in Packers history.

Thanks! Like I said in my comment above, Paul Hornung was a tough one. We realize that he was a great Packer (very versatile player), but we didn't know where to put him. We could've put Hornung at RB and Jim Taylor at FB (since they both ran and blocked for each other), but we wanted to put a true/traditional FB at the FB position. In our opinion, the best pure FB in Packers history was William Henderson, so that's why we put him there. Taylor was listed as a FB, but he led the Packers in rushing for seven consecutive seasons when he played, so we thought it was best to put him at RB. Sharpe and Lofton are debatable.... My grandpa and especially my dad had a hard time deciding which one to put on here, but we went with Sharpe (my dad loved Lofton). Both were great for the Packers. Finally, I think Aaron Rodgers will be on this list once he retires, but for now, we felt it was best for Starr to be there. Rodgers still has several years left to accomplish even bigger things.... I expect Rodgers to be named the greatest Packers QB of all-time when he retires.