Exploring Some Reasons Why the Green Bay Packers Keep Beating Themselves

The Green Bay Packers have lost five games so far this season. All five of those defeats have come in one-possession games. The frustrating part for the team and their fans is that it seems the only team that truly has beaten the Packers this year has been the Packers. But why has this team lost so many close games in this manner? Today we will explore some popular explanations put forth by fans. I am not saying I agree or disagree with all of these possible explanations, but I am presenting them to spur discussion and debate.

One factor that is often discussed is coaching. We have heard the complaint that Matt LaFleur often gets too conservative in big games or in big spot. The criticism is that instead of coaching to win, he coaches not to lose. The comparison is often made to Detroit’s Dan Campbell who is considered more aggressive. Now, LaFleur turned this on its head during the team’s Thanksgiving Day win over the Lions. In that game, the Packers play calling was aggressive and they ended up winning the game in part due to their success on fourth down. But was that a one-game change or a new approach for LaFleur?

Another potential factor has been a lack of discipline. The Packers often make self-inflicted errors. The most prominent example has been pre-snap penalties. Lining up offsides, illegal formation calls, false starts, and other unforced errors have cost the team dearly this season and in the recent past. These are mental errors that have disrupted offensive drives and given opponents second and third chances to defeat the Packers. So many drives by the Packers have been foiled or opponents drives extended by these unforced errors.

Many fans also question how much coaching plays into this lack of discipline. That seems to be especially true on special teams, where the team has been criticized for making similar mistakes over and over again for several years. In addition to questioning LaFleur, many fans question special teams coordinator Rich Bisaccia. Bisaccia remains one of the most highly paid special teams coaches in the league, but the results have not been there. Blocked kicks, for example, have cost the team at least two victories this season.

Another question that has often arisen is lack of elite talent. One of the goals the Packers had when acquiring Micah Parsons before the season started was to add another elite player. GM Brian Gutekunst has built a roster full of good players but are there enough elite players? The fact that Parsons was the only Packers player named to the NFC Pro Bowl team illustrates this point.

If you look back at the Packers two most recent Super Bowl-winning teams, they had a few elite players with at least one on each side of the ball. Then they added several star players on either side of the ball. The Super Bowl XXXI team featured future Hall of Famers Brett Favre, Reggie White, and LeRoy Butler. The Super Bowl XLV included Aaron Rodgers and Charles Woodson. Do the current Packers have enough elite players who are difference makers on their roster?

There are fans that also blame GM Brian Gutekunst for the way he has drafted this team, especially in the first round. Gutekunst has often selected players who have outstanding athletic traits but may not have been as productive statistically in college. The goal then is to develop those players to reach a level of play that equals their pure athletic ability. These players are often considered projects and need time to develop. Sometimes, they do reach their potential and sometimes they never do. Fans have questioned the selection of players like Eric Stokes, Lukas Van Ness, Jordan Morgan, Jordan Love, and Rashan Gary both at the time they were drafted and in hindsight.

Other people question the leadership of this team. They wonder if the 2025 Packers have players who can inspire their teammates and help them reach that elite level of play on a more consistent basis. They question whether Love is able to rise to the occasion with the game on the line. While the numbers may not confirm this, and his teammates may not agree, there is a perception among some fans that Love is not a great leader. Others question whether the team has enough leadership on both sides of the ball. Is that perhaps a reason this team does not come through in the clutch and often loses in the closing minutes of games?

Whether you believe some of these explanations are part of the problem, all of them or none of them, these theories have been discussed by Packers fans in recent seasons. They will likely continue to be discussed until the Packers win another championship, something that hasn’t happened in 15 years.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (59)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
NickPerry's picture

December 25, 2025 at 10:41 am

"Another question that has often arisen is lack of elite talent. One of the goals the Packers had when acquiring Micah Parsons before the season started was to add another elite player. GM Brian Gutekunst has built a roster full of good players but are there enough elite players?"

SO...Is it the lack of elite talent or is it the coaches failure to bring out the "Elite" in the players? Back when Ted was the GM he'd draft an O-Lineman in the 4th or 5th round and about 3 years later you had a sure fire All-Pro O-lineman or so it seemed. That same could be said about the WR position. Take a WR in the 2nd round and we'll have a future All-Pro a few years later. Where in the hell are Gutes All-Pros he drafted???

I've thought for a long time the assistant coaches on this team for the most part aren't worth a damn. We hardly ever have our staff raided by new coaching staffs or even interviewed for HC jobs. There's a reason for that and I'm guessing most of the staff is just not that good.

Since Gute took over in 2018 and Matt LaFleur in 2019, those All-Pros or elite players have been few and far between. You also have to look at the time Gute and MLF have been given. I mean this has been going on since 2018 and I don't feel like the Packers are any closer to winning a SB. In the last few drafts Gute HAS done better. Since the 2022 draft and beyond, there's actually players I'd like to see extended. But the 2020 and 2021 drafts were putrid. Yes we drafted Love but that is all and frankly the jury is still out on Love.

I don't know what the answers are, that's why I'm the "Fan". But I'm hoping and thinking our new Team President does have some answers and I can't wait to see which way it goes. Hopefully to Championship #14!

0 points
0
0
HawkPacker's picture

December 25, 2025 at 10:51 am

All valid points Nick. There was one issue I do remember about Ted that is a negative. We had a once in a lifetime talent in Aaron Rodgers and Ted never really added free agent talent to get us over the hump. Having a qb like Rodgers and only sb is pure bs. He needed to sign some fa's but was too conservative and it probably cost us a couple of super bowls.

My point is that you referenced to Ted in a positive way but probably not as positive as you suggest.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:13 am

I can agree at times he was too conservative, but that approach worked out pretty darn good. You could look at it from another angle. The NFL has a "hard" salary cap. If he had signed high-priced free agents, how many of their own good players might he have lost from the team? There’s really no way to know which option would have worked out better.

One thing we know for sure is that TT management style was closer to Wolf than Gutey, and both Wolf and TT have won Super Bowls, while Gutey hasn’t. Also, I’m not convinced the Parsons trade will work out in our favor, but time will tell.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:55 am

“that TT management style was closer to Wolf than Gutey.”

Since Gute isn’t in TTs job, that was split between LaFleur for coaching, Ball for a lot of the back room aspects and Gute for roster assemblage, I don’t see how that comparative works.

In terms of the style of overall football side management, any comparison it would surely have to be with Mark Murphy (now Ed Policy) as the only person with direct control over all of TTs former domain?

0 points
0
0
TOMMY'63's picture

December 25, 2025 at 04:43 pm

Tt ? I've never understood why so many adored that price of crap! Until fully demented .he remained! He never gave arod a competent defence in his prime! Look mahomes he's been to 4- 5 superbowls? Arod in his prime was twice mahomes! Had to to carry the team on his back. 31,41,45 points weren't enough to advance in the playoffs!? Tt ruined arods prime, enough!

0 points
0
0
TOMMY'63's picture

December 25, 2025 at 04:48 pm

if someone knows where that pos is buried, send address, I would love to to blow up his funking grave! Worthless pos!

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

December 25, 2025 at 07:47 pm

Jan 21, 2021The Packers compiled a 125-82-1 record and tallied nine playoff appearances over Thompson's 13 seasons as general manager. But in 13 years he added woodson, ryan Pickett and Julius Peppers. They were outstanding additions, but over his 13 years as GM, that's about all the free agent talent he added.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

December 25, 2025 at 09:46 pm

Yes-the failure to give a 4th rnd draft pick for marshawn lynch was criminal.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

December 26, 2025 at 12:10 am

It must have been his RAS score, or lack thereof. Lol. Much may have changed had we made that move.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:24 am

Without being able to point out any one player, the player's union has prioritized not having to practice. Coaches get one padded practice per week until week 11, after that they get one every other week and that includes throughout the playoffs. I don't understand how this is compatible with "draft and develop."

The player's union has also prioritized being able to smoke pot.

It seems to me that if any team decided they want to practice more (which the CBA does not prevent) they'd have a clear path to at least improve a lot even if they can't win it all in dominant fashion. One obvious application for this would be for JL10 to get together with WRs grouped in bunches according to speed, and just play catch. Let him get used to everybody. He's got targets with 40 times ranging from 4.19 - 4.66, it's not surprising he doesn't hit everybody in stride. At this point, the off-season would be the earliest opportunity for any of this.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

December 25, 2025 at 12:18 pm

I can help you with this-
1. Gute states; the life of a football player has a short window.
It gets even shorter, if they leave in Free -Agency.
2. TT never drafted a injured player, until he knew he was A-OK.
3. You had 2 all-pro QBs. And most draft Guru's stated;
Devante Adams must attach himself to Rodgers.
We didn't see that anymore, because Rodgers was pushed out.
4. Your still seeing OL make money elsewhere.
5. The Dcs have been bad and fired.

This saying tells you right out.
Gute doesn't re-build, he Re-loads.
When you re-load it's for the faster result.
With Gute it's a revolving door!
Gute believes in a shorter window.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

December 26, 2025 at 12:24 am

Absolutely great points NP. I'm looking forward to the new fresh set of eyes focused on all the things that we point out here at CHTV each and every week,season after season, and specifically the coaching. We have such an enormous amount of talent, more than we've had in years, and yes some holes to fill, but what we haven't had is health and much luck. But all the things done to self-destruct over and over leads only to the coaching staff and that has to change immediately. Otherwise we squander this great talent we do have. Isn't it time we stopped this nonsense?

0 points
0
0
HawkPacker's picture

December 25, 2025 at 10:46 am

All great points Gil and yes, I believe they all contribute our losses. In addition, we do not get the turnovers as much as we should. This is also a big reason that contribute as well.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 25, 2025 at 10:57 am

Hawk, of course everything contributes, but I think you nailed it—lack of turnovers is the biggest reason for those losses.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:28 am

Lack of turnovers?!? Going 1 for 9 in the red zone over the last two games seems like the single biggest issue to me. Further, X getting a PBU via flying across the field is still a positive play, even though it would have been even better had he caught it.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:34 am

Prior to those two games, they had the best red zone offense in the NFL. If we’re talking the whole year, I think TO’s were the biggest culprit.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 25, 2025 at 12:18 pm

Fine but the last two losses are the most important right now. We knew Cleveland and Carolina were going to haunt the rest of the season. Surprisingly, the Eagles game could have been won and again, the problem was our offense sputtering out.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 25, 2025 at 10:51 am

"In that game, the Packers’ play calling was aggressive, and they won in part due to their success on fourth down. But was that just a one-game adjustment or a new approach for LaFleur?"

What if one or two of the fourth down attempts had failed, like in the Bears game? I’d say Campbell’s style is too aggressive, and it cost him the playoffs last year and several games this season. Being overly aggressive doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the right way to manage a game—there’s a lot that goes into making the right decision. MLF was very aggressive in the Bears game, and some might argue it cost them the win.

Of course, hindsight makes it easy to critique. Overall, I’d like to see MLF hand over game management decisions to a competent coaching team handle them so he can focus on play calling.

As for penalties, they can be frustrating, but we’re middle of the pack there—no pun intended. Interestingly, two of the better teams, Jacksonville and Denver, are second and third in penalties, respectively. On the flipside, the Rams, 49ers and Cinci have the fewest.

0 points
0
0
HawkPacker's picture

December 25, 2025 at 10:53 am

It's just not the penalties themselves but the timing of them in the Red Zone that hurts.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:32 am

"Overall, I’d like to see MLF hand over game management decisions to a competent coaching team handle them so he can focus on play calling."

How would that be different from demoting MLF from HC to OC? What I've called for since the first season I paid attention to him, and I still think it would help the team. Not that I'm suggesting it might actually happen but if we lose Hafley we should make him HC to keep him here and if MLF can't swallow his pride to take the demotion we're still better. Although keeping MLF as play caller does have value, despite his gaffes. His bigger faults all fall under HC responsibilities; player evaluation, in-game adjustments, clock management ...

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:36 am

Do you really think the only thing a HC does is call offensive plays and be a game manager? If so, no need to debate this issue any longer.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 25, 2025 at 12:21 pm

Not even close to what I said, please do learn to read more carefully. Also, usually the HC doesn't call plays but that's OC duty, at least prior to McVay about 2017. If it worked with MLF doing it that would be one thing, but in the biggest moments of the biggest games it's consistently proven to be too much for him along with everything else a HC is normally tasked with. I really don't care how responsibilities are delegated nor what title anyone has, but this is not a formula that's produced winning football at the highest level.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:01 am

I’d counter with the fact that the only thing LaFleur has a certain claim to competence in is that piece that you would take away. If that’s what we need to do with LaFleur, it’s also a big reason why we need to move on from him to become more truly competitive. As a side note, any such change would likely require a deep clean out of the offensive side coaching to be even credible. That in itself suggests that the move to emphasize such aspects of head coaching would be deeply suspect.

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:06 am

Packers have a lot of GOOD players.

Packers have a GOOD head coach.

Packers have a GOOD GM.

The Packers have just one GREAT thing going for them Micah Parsons.

With most of the core players returning and still relatively young but no 1st round pick and little room to spend under the cap I expect another GOOD but not great season in 2026.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:34 am

There are many other greats on this team.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

December 25, 2025 at 06:14 pm

only in a few peoples opinion...how'd that pro bowl voting go? Not that it means much anymore...many other "greats"...gimmi a break...

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

December 25, 2025 at 06:58 pm

"Not that it means much anymore."

Any selection where the fans count a third of the outcome means nothing.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

December 25, 2025 at 09:19 pm

Who?

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:28 am

Merry Christmas to all my fellow Packer fans and the excellent CHTV staff and contributors. I wish everyone a great holiday.
Enjoy! GPG! Thanks, Since ‘61

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

December 25, 2025 at 11:43 am

The number of issues presented in the article answers the very question posed to us fans. Each will create different opinions about them all, but correcting them is the real question. Recognizing the issues is the first step, but it seems that those who could correct them are unable, unwilling, or have tied hands.

Since these issues seem perennial, all we can do is hope that an answer slips through the cracks that are preventing the resolution of them. What's another 15 years, we can tie the drought between Starr and Favre.

Merry Xmas all.

0 points
0
0
TOMMY'63's picture

December 25, 2025 at 04:59 pm

for us who went through the 70s, 80,90s, we'll be dead and buried if and when the packers win another superbowl!!!

0 points
0
0
Packerlifer's picture

December 25, 2025 at 12:22 pm

I'd say it's "all of the above." But each issue has shown up and played its role at various decisive points of games and various and decisive games. It's not one big gaping hole but many popping out of the dyke while trying to plug one.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

December 25, 2025 at 12:47 pm

It's Whack-a-Mole, but the mole is elusive to the ORG.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

December 25, 2025 at 09:20 pm

Completely agree!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

December 25, 2025 at 01:34 pm

Disagreed. QB2 completing passes of 26 & 31 yards when better routes seemed to exist is not losing football; I think we can scratch that off the list. Many point out how well coached this game was on both sides of the ball; ok. When #8 was first playing hurt, that was questionable. Then it got worse. Finally it became a glaring HC mistake that hurt this team drastically, contributing to this loss in a key game. Hopefully #8 can recover, although his ankle problem might be an indirect result of playing on a knee the size of a basketball. Nobody's at 100% this time of year, but his effectiveness is probably reduced through February.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

December 25, 2025 at 12:49 pm

BECAUSE THEIR LOSERS.
It's that simple.
Losers never have their way.
It short lived and in spurts.

Yea - you can point to discipline./repetitions

Winners; know they won't lose and don't
succumb to pressure.
IMO- emotional Resistance.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

December 25, 2025 at 12:55 pm

Special teams: I've come to the conclusion that the actual coordinator is just a figurehead. In the past 15 years we've had coordinators that have succeeded in other places, but when they come to Green Bay, they haven't been effective. So maybe this organizational blight falls at the feet of the head coaches and their lack of proper diligence to the matter?

Lack of stars and leaders: Stars and leaders usually don't happen instantaneously. The Packers always seem to be one of the younger teams in the league, so that's a partial explanation.

Talent: Plenty has been written about Gute's drafting methodology, so I'll skip that.

But what about the deployment of that talent? For instance, it's pretty apparent that Morgan is a tackle, not a guard. Mixing and matching may be useful in a pinch, but it's not a long-term strategy for sustaining a winning offensive line. And what about our most recent first-round pick? Is he not good for more than an occasional pass and another bleeping end-around? All that time Reed was out and you can't get him more involved? I've heard suggestions his route running wasn't where it needed to be, but still, you need to get him more experience--and besides, his talent should be able to overcome some deficiencies even though he's not perfect yet.

Low-scoring games: You hate to see us lose when the defense does it's part. That's happened three times this season. Currently we rank around the median in red zone TD percentage at 58.9% (although you would never know from the last game). We have the talent to do better. A great way to beat yourself is not to score TDs when you should, especially from closer in.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

December 25, 2025 at 09:23 pm

Agree completely!

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

December 25, 2025 at 01:28 pm

So in my horsey days - when I had a steed that I thought / hoped should perform better – the first decision was usually to change the jockey(s) – to see how our runner would respond to a new set of hands. If that didn't produce the desired results – then maybe a new trainer would be considered. If my wishful retirement investment still continued to underwhelm – then a sale or a trade of bloodstock would occasionally occur.

I likewise see this as the order of action(s) for the newly minted President of the GBP. With the large assumption that the status quo will be upended. If so, then we should be looking at a new jockey (coach) to start. Should Policy want to go full action hero – then he may jettison the trainer (GM) as well. Although I don't think so as it may be too un-Packerish. Lastly - a complete dispersal sale/trade of players. While some parts may be replaced – the team body itself is highly likely to remain intact

That being so – putting myself in Policy's shoes - my off-season action plan would include:

1. Dismissal of LaFleur (and others) – possibly replacing him with Hafley.
2. Extending Gutekunst for 1 year – on a prove-it contract.

Then watch and closely monitor the 2026-27 season.

Happy Holidays to All!

0 points
0
0
KurtMc's picture

December 25, 2025 at 02:04 pm

Hate to anyone loose a job but it’s the “Not For Long” league. LaFleur has had his chance. Time for a change. Put Hafley in charge. Find a different OC. Agree with Special Teams in this organization isn’t valued. Maybe Players union contract limits overall in season practice time? Whatever it is it’s the responsibility of the HC to find those answers and make changes.

Therefore, since HC can’t or seems to be unable make changes, he must be changed.

0 points
0
0
Joster11's picture

December 25, 2025 at 03:29 pm

How many prospective coaches would take a job with a GM on a 1-year prove it deal?

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

December 25, 2025 at 03:58 pm

A good question. Any new coach would probably be offered a guaranteed 3 year contract. So perhaps Policy offers Gutekunst a 2 year extension - instead of 1 year - so that both contracts run concurrently - i.e. 2026-28.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:19 am

I want to see a GM who is in charge of overall football operations. Training, contracts, coaching, everything. That way we know we are on a coherent trajectory, wise or not. Restore coherence of vision and transparency of accountability on the football side and not merged with the overall leadership of the foundation itself in one person.

Who should that be? I would accept a complete clear out of that is what it takes, with the new GM hiring the next HC. That however, would need this to have effectively already have been set in motion in order that the GM would be in place to make that happen as soon as the regular season ends and coaching search and evaluation already underway behind the scenes too.

Looking at Gute’s record, I personally do not think he is the major problem, though I disagree with the approach at CB and IDL in particular on the current roster. Because of that, I would endorse giving him the old TT role and a challenge to lead a through overhaul of coaches and team culture unless, during the interviews, he signaled that LaFleur and or significant offensive coaches should stay.

Why? Because that would illustrate that his vision isn’t frustrated and is the status quo in effect. As such his promotion would be a pointless extension of what we have and not a vision to enhance that. In that case we should clean the whole house.

If no searches are already underway, that might mean a new GM post season and promoting Hafley before that. In principle I’d very much rather have a true blank search and selection for HC by a true GM. However, a 2 year Hafley experiment might be a middle course and allow an incoming GM to prepare should it not work out.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

December 26, 2025 at 04:12 pm

Although I wouldn't mind a giant leap forward by Policy - as you have described. My guess is that he will proceed in a less bold manner. Also the management structure could certainly use a re-working - with clearer lines of authority and the elimination of silos.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

December 25, 2025 at 07:10 pm

Move Gutey along with LaFleur. He missed on many guys with high round currency who are not pulling their weight, or earning their salary. His ALL-PROs are mercenaries brought onboard for significant CAP. McKinney seemed to regress for some reason. He dropped three that hit his hands. Change the paradigm. The 20th century is long gone, try a new direction in Packerland.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

December 25, 2025 at 08:01 pm

But is the new guy brash enough to do some restructuring right away? Policy has been with the organization for over a decade and he might not want to upset the apple cart. Even though he said his top priority is winning football games, does that apply to the playoffs as well? I would think the safest route for him personally is to maintain at least part of the status quo, unfortunately--at least to start. We'll see, though. To be honest, four more years of the same may seem kind of unadventurous in many fans' minds.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

December 25, 2025 at 10:04 pm

Yes—I don’t understand the digression of McKinney??

0 points
0
0
White92's picture

December 26, 2025 at 09:11 am

Love the analogy and I agree. This is Lafleur's what, 8th year? Home playoff losses to TB and SF still haunt me. I don't think he has what it takes to get the Packers to the SB.

If it were me, I'd do a wholesale change and have a new GM and new coach connected.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

December 26, 2025 at 04:00 pm

The loss to the Brady Bunch was in Tampa.

Not that it matters. They probably would have lost in Green Bay too.

0 points
0
0
MooPack's picture

December 25, 2025 at 01:38 pm

"One factor that is often discussed is coaching."
"Another potential factor has been a lack of discipline."
"Many fans also question how much coaching plays into this lack of discipline."
"Another question that has often arisen is lack of elite talent."
"There are fans that also blame GM Brian Gutekunst for the way he has drafted this team, especially in the first round."
"Other people question the leadership of this team."

Seems to me we have a theme here. From front office to GM to coaching at all levels down to the team. All of the above starts at the top. In any organization, talented individuals can overcome adversity at times for a while. Long term it becomes increasingly difficult. To truly be top of the class. Tip of the spear. Your gonna need leadership that sharpens the effort and focus every day. The Packers are better than most. For some that's good enough. For others, if you are not No.1, you are forgotten.

0 points
0
0
Swisch's picture

December 25, 2025 at 02:09 pm

Are the Packers going to take all of the experiences of this season, good and bad, and use them to finish strong.
I guess that's a question we can apply to our lives as we enter into the astounding miracle of Christmas, and try to take the spirit of the season into the new year.
To paraphrase Bart Starr (in quoting William Jennings Bryan), life is not a matter of chance but of choice, not a matter of an outside destiny but of our own inner determination.
That's the drama for each of us. The stunning consideration of Christmas is that there just might be a God who actually cares about the intimate details of each of our own lives, who roots for each of us passionately as not only our creator but also as our dearest friend.
One of the reasons there were no hospitals before Christianity is because no one in the ancient world thought that it was important to provide advanced health care to the ordinary person (with the first hospital being invented by St. Basil of Caesarea after the legalization of Christianity in the 300s, offering compassionate care to people of all religions).
Before Christ, there was no concept of the equality of all humans without exception. Some people mattered, most people didn't. Only in Christmas are we all priceless and irreplaceable, as in "It's a Wonderful Life."
Lest it be thought that I am overly sentimental and perhaps irrelevant to football, the irascible Vince Lombardi went so far as to describe the phenomenon of his Packers teams as matter of love. (Really. . . See the excellent two-part biography by ESPN as part of its series "A Football Life," which first aired during the anniversary of his death in 2013.)
Lombardi wasn't preachy, but it was essential for him to be more than a teacher of football; he desired to be a leader of men. He believed that the game of football was an important and honorable part of life, and that the lessons of life applied to football. Motivated by his faith, what Lombardi instilled in his Packers was an ethos of camaraderie and sacrificing for each other and going beyond individual achievement to shared glory.
No team before or since (in the playoff era of the NFL) has won five championships in seven seasons, and three in a row. To be the greatest team in the history of pro football suggests a synergy that goes beyond strategy and talent and even hard work. It's a matter of friendship, of love that drives a team reeling in bitter adversity 68 yards in some four minutes to win the most famous game of all time, the Ice Bowl of 1967 -- which serves as the culmination and epitome of the Lombardi Era.
***
So it is that the Packers of 2025 have the answer to the above article in their own history as a team, made tangible in the treasures of the Packers Hall of Fame. The key to the rest of the season lies within each of our players, how they prepare and how they perform in each game.
It's not a guarantee of a Super Bowl. As perspective, according to a piece of artwork on a wall behind me as I write (which is the same as displayed outside the elevator of a hotel I stayed at in 2022, a few blocks down the road from Lambeau), we have these words of Lombardi: "The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have."
This seems to be what Lombardi understood, or at least grew to understand, when he said that winning is everything. He meant that we don't live life as a matter of mediocre participation in various entities and events. We give it our best in all that we do. We chase perfection knowing we won't achieve it, but so as to attain excellence. We run so as to win the race. Then, whatever the results, we are winners.
If our Packers take this to heart as individuals and as a team, they will reach the fullness of their potential. And that is the most satisfying way we can live the entirety of our lives. And it helps a lot if we have others with us to provide camaraderie and support.
I say all this not as one not triumphant, but as one struggling and striving, as one continuously trying to enkindle the fire of hope within even on frigid and bleak winter days.
Merry Christmas to all of the staff and fans at Cheesehead TV!!! I pray for everyone light and warmth.

0 points
0
0
MooPack's picture

December 25, 2025 at 02:15 pm

Thank you Swisch.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

December 25, 2025 at 10:07 pm

Very good!

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

December 25, 2025 at 02:37 pm

After teeth-gnashing most of the year I have come to the conclusion that 'I am powerless' over what Gute, MLF and Policy do. The Intel from Rob Demovsky is Policy will reinstate Gute---not my choice but I am powerless.
I over-drank the koolaid re: a SB run but it is now clear that I over-drank the koolaid. It is the recurrent problems with no solution that wear my fandom down.

The new me is more philosophical but less interested.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

December 25, 2025 at 04:48 pm

I have a small wager that the Packers would make it to (and win) the SB this year. While still possible - it is certainly less so than 3 weeks ago. Nevertheless I have been entertained by this team - as they have been very competitive - for the most part

My current belief is that a change in HC may be the prime catalyst in sending this team to the next (top) level. That and some favor from the football gods regarding injuries. I am seeing how the Bears have greatly improved with the hiring of Ben Johnson. IMO - Hafley as a HC - may have the same or similar impact. In fact so much so that Gutekunst may become a secondary factor to the team's potential success.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

December 25, 2025 at 09:31 pm

🤞🏻🙏🏻🤞🏻

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

December 26, 2025 at 10:27 am

The catalyst may not lead to a smooth path to being back in a Super Bowl. One has to accept that change may bring hardship as well. However, if one does not see the status quo as ever likely to achieve the desired objective, then that change is an absolutely essential precursor to securing another title.

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

December 25, 2025 at 03:24 pm

Maybe their masochists?

P.B.

0 points
0
0
Gman1976's picture

December 25, 2025 at 05:21 pm

There is a common denominator in all the reasons. If you don't see it now, you'll figure it out in a year or two. Hopefully, Policy sees it and makes the necessary change.

0 points
0
0