Chasing the Elusive Franchise Quarterback
Teams spend decades looking for what Packer fans take for granted
By GregMeinholz

When the NFL Draft rolls around every year, what position is the most anticipated, gets talked about the most, and let's be honest, is maybe a bit overvalued given the other talent on the board at the moment? If you guessed Quarterback, you are correct. Draft after draft, the big question is always, "Who's the top Quarterback?" 15 times in the last 20 drafts, the first overall pick has been a Quarterback. But guess what? Only seven of them, you could say, truly worked out for the team they were drafted by, with the last three TBD. Even outside the first overall pick, the ratio of first-round quarterbacks that truly work out for their drafting team is astonishingly low. So then, why the investment?
Some teams have proven successful with just average quarterbacks, but when you look at Super Bowl winners of the last two decades, nearly all of them have what you would define as a "franchise quarterback." If you want to be successful in this league, you need "the man" behind center. Otherwise, most of the time, you're destined for your team to be called "okay or good, but not great." I'm sure San Francisco fans will come for my head with this comment. Still, what if instead of riding a derailing Jimmy Garoppolo train into 2021 and eventually turning to Mr. Irrelevant of 2022, Brock Purdy, for not that much better results, the 49ers traded with the Lions for Matthew Stafford? As much as it would've made me nauseous, the 49ers likely would've hoisted one, maybe even three Lombardi trophies. Stafford at the helm of the 49ers' "Avengers" team? Forget it, they may have dominated the NFC, or may still be.
That's how important a franchise quarterback is. And that's why so many teams spend years/decades trying to find one. It's not always the first round where you find them, but it can be the highest chance of success.
In this past draft, the Tennessee Titans picked Quarterback Cam Ward with hopes that he would be their franchise quarterback. If you look back at the Tennessee Titans' history, including their time as the Houston Oilers, they have a pretty good list of franchise quarterbacks. From 1984 to 1993, they had Warren Moon, and then from 1995 to 2005, they had Steve McNair. A pretty decent two decades of quarterback play. But after 2005, they haven't been so lucky. Since McNair's departure, they've drafted four quarterbacks in the first round and have had big investments in a few others. Except for a decent stint from Ryan Tannehill, whom they signed as a free agent, the majority have been lackluster. Imagine if the Titans toyed with throwing in the towel on Marcus Mariota two years earlier and ended up drafting Lamar Jackson in 2018? There's a chance we'd be talking about a Titans Super Bowl appearance in the last 5-6 years.
It's these little moments that show you how important a franchise quarterback can be.

The Packers know how to nurture them.
When you look at the history of failed first-round quarterbacks, you can't help but wonder, "What went wrong?" Loads of talent displayed in college, enough to be considered a first-round pick, but for some to barely be average starters in the NFL just seems odd. There is the argument regarding the strength of college competition being a factor, or perhaps they had a supporting cast also worthy of a high draft pick to help them, but there are plenty of instances where this wasn't true. All the talent was there without the glaring caveats, and yet, they still failed. These are the times you need to turn to the coaching staff or roster management.
You can have all the talent in the world, but on a field where you need 10 other players to do their job well for you to be successful, that can take a toll. You can't put the first overall quarterback pick at the helm of the worst team in the league and expect much better results. You need an offensive line to create a comfortable pocket, and a few pass catchers that can help get the ball out quickly. Not to mention a running back that can take some of the pressure off, getting at least 2-3 yards per carry. This all helps a young quarterback relax and get into a rhythm so they can start showing some of that talent that got them to where they are.
The Packers, however, have adopted a different route. Their last two franchise quarterbacks have come after drafting them in the first round and having them sit and learn for a few years before handing them the reins. It worked out very well with Aaron Rodgers as he became a surgeon of sorts behind Center, he could dissect a defense within 2-3 seconds if he hadn't already before the snap and make the right call for a successful play. Jordan Love may not be at that elite level quite yet, but he's displayed a patience and understanding of the game that most quarterbacks don't possess in their first two years as a starter. This can come from coaching.
For the last 20 years, the Packers have had some very quarterback-focused coaches. From Head Coaches Mike McCarthy and Matt LaFleur, to assistant coach Tom Clements, the Packers have been spoiled with quarterback whisperers holding highly influential positions on the team, giving them the power to mold any QB that comes through the door by any means necessary. On other teams, you watch young quarterbacks who could benefit from a year or so of tutelage, get drafted high by teams with defensive-minded coaches, and they're thrown directly into the fire to burn on week 1. Lucky for us, the Packers have learned that patience and tutelage are the best ways to go.
Across the NFL, you watch teams struggle to find a decent quarterback that'll be successful for more than a few years. The Packers have been fortunate to find success in that category for over 30 years. It may not be perfect at times, but the Packers have had "the man" every year since 1992. Time to continue to keep that up and win another Super Bowl.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.
__________________________




Comments (14)
Leatherhead
June 03, 2025 at 11:42 am
I wouldn't say the Packers take it for granted, event though some fans might. They recognize that you can do your scouting and pick a guy towards the end of the first round, develop him for a couple of years, and then put a good team around him....and win games..
Other teams think they can just put Caleb Williams on the field, or Justin Fields, and they'll win games for you. Or you can keep changing QBs, like Minnesota. I think the Packers way works, and the Chicago and Minnesota way.....not so much.
GregC
June 03, 2025 at 11:43 am
You are underselling Brock Purdy. He is a lot better than Jimmy Garappolo. Purdy and the 49ers took the Chiefs to overtime in the Super Bowl a couple years ago. Interesting to consider how they might have done with Stafford, though.
I think it's too early to be running victory laps on the Jordan Love bandwagon, but he does look promising, and I agree that the Packers have done a good job coaching up their QBs.
TXCHEESE
June 03, 2025 at 01:40 pm
Agreed on Purdy. If not for a freak injury in the Philly playoff game, I believe they may have won it all in '22.
TarynsEyes
June 03, 2025 at 11:46 am
The Packers have been successful with the QB's over the last 30 years, since the SB win with Favre going back to back in 96-97 and the 14-year drought until the Rodgers win in 2011.
Success is a hard word to offer a definition for and in the NFL, especially the fans, even losing is defined as success, as last season proves because the record erased the poor showings against the Division and winning teams. Winning a weak Division for a decade and more is a success. Making the playoffs is a success, even when bounced in the first game, yes, a success.
Teams make the playoffs, won an SB without franchise QB's, for whatever that means, as its definition is as flexible as success. Does that make them as successful as the two mentioned here for GB?
There is no doubt that Rodgers had much more success than Favre, as a QB, but is legitimately less due to SB appearances. Both, however, are failures compared to other QBs that have gone to more SB's and won as many or more, in less years of success, again based on whose definition of success is being used.
The article claims that Packer fans care not about regular season or Division titles, but Championships, well, based on the low number of SB wins, much less only 3 appearances, how successful has this string of expected HOF QBs actually been, if honesty comparing to those who have equaled, or surpassed the accomplishments of the three over the last 30 years.
I know, winning or reaching the SB is hard, but how do others do it more frequently with less at QB? Take out Brady and Mahomes, and ask if the QBs in GB are what is claimed, wherein lies the problem, when those with less achieve an SB spot?
There are four QBs getting paid SB winning, appearing money that haven't sniffed the scent of an SB appearance, Prescott, Tua, Herbert and Love. They all have a couple of things in common that hinder them. HC decision-making, pre and in game, the Chargers prior to las year, player position starter level and depth.
The Packers have been too invested in the QB success string, and simply not enough into what makes a team reach the SB, and why they will fail to achieve it less often or at all, as some others, and while denying that Division Titles and a mere playoff spot is what's most accepted, especially now that even that isn't a guarantee anymore.
I've said it before, and again now, I do not believe Love has the Favre or Rodgers effect to carry a team, but he does have enough if the right pieces are in place, and a HC that can get out of his own way more often. Years go by fast, and so far, the Packers have and continue to waste them, believing it ALL rests with the 'FRANCHISE QB'. How about a franchise team.
T7Steve
June 03, 2025 at 01:40 pm
What do the prior two QBs have in common during their SB appearances?
Defense!
What did they have in common in the non-SB seasons?
No defense!
What did all those other pedestrian QBs have to win SBs?
Defense!
We're starting to get defense so it's too early to judge Love at this point. He's getting the experience, running game, and defense he needs to take the next step.
Enjoy.
TarynsEyes
June 03, 2025 at 02:08 pm
"We're starting to get defense so it's too early to judge Love at this point. He's getting the experience, running game, and defense he needs to take the next step".
Yes, we've been hearing this since the 2012 season, after the Packers got arse-kicked by the Giants in what was supposed to be the back to back SB runs as with Favre.
No matter how many times the Defense has a good ranking, it just seems to fail when needed against the better Offenses, but it will be different next year, next year, next year, while not dismissing the other aspects that get the same promise. This team needs to learn about evaporation of the few assets it had/has, because it takes too long to solidify them with others of equal worth, if ever/rarely achieved.
If there is one thing this ORG is consistent in doing, getting the fan base to buy-into the constant reverberations of the same excuses.
I will enjoy the season, while hoping for more on the plate than has been for far too long and often.
I wasn't judging Love as you think I was, but rather all the other things that need more than a simple tuning.
T7Steve
June 03, 2025 at 02:16 pm
K.
I'm not fatigued about hopping for better results (60 some years or so), but you make us sound like Bear fans who only can be excited during the preseason.
TarynsEyes
June 03, 2025 at 03:31 pm
The Packer fans have reason to hope to do more, though proving futile yearly, the Bears fans only had delusions to achieve mediocrity. But, I'll still take the futility each year over delusion.
EricTorkelson
June 03, 2025 at 07:21 pm
Im going to agree with you T7Steve , for the last 30 years the Packers have relied on stellar passing attacks from franchise QBs. QB play that almost always guaranteed a playoff berth , but in most cases all but two, the defense was deficient and in some playoff games humiliated. Franchise QB play wasn't enough. The Packer glory years led by franchise QB Bart Starr was always anchored by talented, physical, gritty defense. I believe it starts with physicality, attitude... where has there been a Packers defense in the last few decades that opponents actually feared.
nagawicka
June 04, 2025 at 01:28 am
Without Reggie White, not to mention #93 the Gravedigger &etc, who would Brett Favre be but the last Francis Tarkenton.
Handsback
June 03, 2025 at 12:53 pm
Detroit, Cleveland, Houston, and Jacksonville would love a QB that had taken them to a SB. Having a QB like that allows the team to focus on secondary weaknesses that cost much less to fill.
I'm saying to the SB and not necessarily winning it. A QB good enough to get you to the Promise Land, is good enough to win it. There are lots of reasons that keep teams from winning the SB, as every Packer fan understands, but getting THE GUY is important.
JMHO
Bitternotsour
June 03, 2025 at 02:07 pm
Detroit had/have a quarterback(s) who have taken teams to Super Bowls. They swapped the super bowl winner for the other one. They have an adequate QB, they just lack championship DNA.
NFLfan
June 03, 2025 at 01:48 pm
Love does not have the proper offensive support around him. GB has not provided him a seasoned, reliable WR #1 or( #2?) He does not have elite protection (Bakhtiari v R. Walker) and Love is playing in a much more difficult Division.
Love would play much better if he knew he was protected, could trust his receivers to run proper routes/ catch the ball and had an elite play-caller. MLF loses his poise in every game.
vin0770
June 04, 2025 at 04:49 pm
I get it that Love struggles with an OL that gets beat or a Defensive that can’t get the one stop for an extra possession, or a body crippled up from injury…who wouldn’t!
But for me JL is in the show me season. I still see him being susceptible to making unforced errors, (interceptions) that leave you wondering WTF. I want to see another nice long stretch of games where he’s on fire like we saw for a while TWO years ago. I don’t want to be at the end of this year looking back and saying it now appears that hot stretch TWO years ago is the “one off”.