Can the Packers Afford To Carry A Fifth Safety Again?
Don't be surprised if the 2026 roster looks similar at saftey to last years.
By Dan Saia
The Green Bay Packers have never been afraid to challenge conventional roster-building strategies if they believe the talent warrants it. General manager Brian Gutekunst and head coach Matt LaFleur have consistently emphasized keeping the best 53 players rather than forcing positional quotas, and that philosophy has occasionally led to the Packers carrying an extra player at a specific position. Last season, safety was one of those positions, as Green Bay elected to keep five safeties on the initial 53-man roster. As training camp approaches once again, the question naturally returns: Do the Packers have enough room to carry a fifth safety for a second consecutive year?
At first glance, Green Bay appears to have a strong and well-defined safety room just like last season when they carried five. Xavier McKinney enters his third season with the Packers after establishing himself as one of the NFL's premier defensive backs. His leadership, instincts, and ability to create turnovers transformed the back end of Jeff Hafley's defense, giving Green Bay a true difference-maker at the position. The expectation will be that continues under Jonathan Gannon. McKinney isn't simply a roster lock—he is one of the foundational pieces of the entire defense.
Behind him, Evan Williams enjoyed an impressive sophomore campaign that exceeded expectations. The former fourth-round selection proved to be a physical, intelligent defender capable of contributing both in coverage and against the run. Williams quickly earned the trust of the coaching staff, and there is every reason to believe his role will continue expanding and his impact growing as he enters season three.
Javon Bullard also figures prominently into the Packers' plans despite his versatility allowing him to line up at multiple spots. While he is penciled in as the primary slot defender, Bullard's physicality and football IQ make him one of the defense's most valuable young players and if needed he would move back to safety. Even if his responsibilities extend beyond the traditional safety position, he undoubtedly occupies one of the roster spots allocated to the secondary.
Kitan Oladapo rounds out the safety room as far as players who you likely expect to be on the roster come the end of training camp. While he has not played many defensive snaps in his young NFL career, he does boost impressive physical traits that the Packers seem to want to continue to develop. It wouldn’t out of the question for him to technically be the first off the bench should an injury arises to McKinney or Williams in order to keep Bullard at his slot position.
The real discussion begins with the remaining potential roster spots.
Competition for that final spot could become one of training camp's more overlooked battles. The Packers have consistently shown a willingness to develop young defensive backs with athletic upside, and the coaching staff values players who can contribute immediately on special teams while growing defensively. If another young safety separates himself throughout camp and preseason, Gutekunst may once again face the difficult decision of whether sacrificing depth elsewhere is worthwhile.
The biggest obstacle isn't the quality of the safety room. It's simple mathematics.
NFL rosters remain capped at 53 players, and every additional player at one position creates a shortage somewhere else. The Packers already face difficult decisions across several position groups.
Wide receiver may require six roster spots given the combination of established veterans and promising young talent and special teams skills of Bo Melton. Tight end could feature four players because of both offensive versatility and special teams responsibilities. With the lingering Josh Jacobs uncertainty then running back is a spot you might have to justify four spots as well.
Defensively, the numbers become even tighter.
The defensive line is one of the deepest groups on the roster, with numerous players competing for rotational roles. Edge rusher could also require five or six roster spots depending on how several young pass rushers perform during camp. Linebacker remains competitive, while cornerback has enough uncertainty that Green Bay may prefer keeping additional depth there instead of allocating another roster position to safety.Those numbers add up quickly.
Special teams further complicate the equation. New special teams coordinator Cam Achord will value players capable of covering kicks, blocking on returns, and filling multiple roles on game day. A fifth safety who contributes heavily on every special teams unit offers significantly more value than a player buried on the offensive depth chart who rarely dresses on Sundays. That reality worked in favor of the safety position last season and could once again influence final roster decisions.
Another factor working in favor of carrying five safeties is Cannon’s defensive philosophy. All of Cannon’s defensive have seen some of the highest utilization of safeties in the league year after year. Add in the fact that the modern NFL defense frequently utilize three-safety packages to counter versatile offensive personnel groupings. Safeties are expected to rotate between deep coverage, slot responsibilities, run support, and even occasional linebacker duties. Having additional depth provides flexibility throughout a grueling 17-game season, particularly considering how quickly injuries can impact the secondary.
The Packers experienced firsthand how valuable secondary depth can become over the course of an NFL season. Even if five safeties appear excessive in September, injuries often make that decision look wise by November. Gutekunst has generally preferred preparing for the inevitable rather than reacting after injuries occur.
Still, keeping a fifth safety cannot come at the expense of losing a more talented player elsewhere.
If the final defensive lineman, offensive lineman, or wide receiver clearly offers more overall value than the fifth safety, Green Bay's front office has demonstrated it will adjust accordingly. The Packers have consistently preached competition, and roster spots are earned—not guaranteed because of positional precedent.
If Green Bay feels like the players that could find themselves in that mix for the fifth safety spot are included in the best 53 players on the team then they should be on the team. Those players include Jonathan Baldwin, Mark Perry and Jaylin Simpson. Between the three of them they have appeared in two career games (Baldwin and Simpson one each in 2025). But if they come out and show this summer they can take control of that 4th true safety spot and allow Bullard to remain full time in the slow then there is no question they should be kept.
The reality is regarding of what they do at safety it will final comes down to special teams performance throughout the preseason. Defensive snaps may be limited for players competing near the bottom of the depth chart, but every kickoff, punt, and coverage rep will carry significant weight. If the Packers are finally going to fix special teams, Achord’s evaluations should prove just as influential as those of the offensive and defensive coordinators when determining the final few roster spots.
Ultimately, the Packers probably do have enough room to keep five safeties again—but only if the fifth player clearly justifies the investment. McKinney, Williams, Bullard, and Oladapo provide Green Bay with an excellent core, and if another young safety emerges as both a reliable defensive reserve and an impact special teams contributor, history could easily repeat itself.
However, this year's roster appears deeper across the board than it did a season ago. Competition at nearly every position means every available roster spot carries even greater importance. While carrying five safeties remains a realistic possibility, it is far from a certainty.
As training camp unfolds, the battle for the Packers' final roster spots may not generate the same headlines as the quarterback or wide receiver competitions, but it could ultimately determine whether Green Bay once again invests heavily in one of its deepest defensive position groups. If the fifth safety proves to be among the team's best 53 players, Gutekunst has shown he won't hesitate to make room. If not, the numbers game may finally catch up with one of the Packers' most quietly talented position groups.
-Dan Saia




Comments (15)
Cheezehead72
July 09, 2026 at 10:30 am
It is too early to tell and Gute and MLF do not have an answer right now. If they do not know I do not see how a fan would know. I say stick to the best 53 within reason. If we have five safeties I am good with it. If we have 7 WRs I am good with it. If it means keeping 11 OL which I do not see happening with this group so be it. And so on with the defense. Keep the best 53 players.
SicSemperTyrannis
July 09, 2026 at 11:53 am
"Do the Packers have enough room to carry a fifth safety for a second consecutive year?"
That's an important question. Of course we can't answer it, and no amount of effort we might put into trying to will have any effect at all. With 3 weeks left til TC starts, it's a reasonable topic for an article.
Will switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4 have any affect on this? I've read some analysts making a case for yes. I'm not sure they're right.
Factor in the effectiveness of our pass rush, which is entirely unknown for more than the opening 1/4 of the season. Factor in that Bullard only plays in the slot, regardless whether you call that CB or S.
Factor in Gutey's continual churn, and I like the flexibility of being able to make roster changes after the initial 53 was set, with the most likely changes (hopefully) coming from our own PS. We can't trim the WR down to 4 only because Bo Melton and (hopefully) Skyy Moore are needed on ST. I'd like to see the initial 53 trimmed down to 8 O linemen because that's enough to cover every position and 3 injuries in one game, and it frees up room at EDGE and maybe elsewhere on defense to be able to rotate and keep legs fresh.
It will be interesting to see what they actually do come August 30!
Reghamster
July 10, 2026 at 09:21 pm
Just have to say that keeping the best 53 is kind of a tautolgy. Much as cheesehead t.v. peeps like to think we know more than coaches uh we don't! ( I doubt we keep 5 safeties desite who our DC is !) Still I honor your thoughts. Places like cheesehead t.v. is where you lay down your marker!
We football. amateur plebians enjoy the side show known as Cheesehead t.v. We love ya Jersey Al . Dang I lived in NY but have royal roots in WI. My family brought over the 1st Guernsey cows to WI. On the other side, my family brought over barley from Germany that could survive the cold Winter temps. in WI. So my family kind of claims a bit of royalty in WI. Smiles laughing . Doesn't mean I know diddly squat about the Packers but GPG. Since beyond the womb ( Gotta love since 61 )
BuckyBadger
July 09, 2026 at 11:46 am
The the roster positions at the bottom of the roster are constantly fluid. Not much to worry about in August and nothing to worry about now. For the original 53 the health of the roster will play a big part of it.
I worry about the D but safety isn't really a top concern. I look at the edge without Parsons and I think there has to be an addition coming. Running LVN, Sorrell and Cox out there isn't scaring anyone. I don't like the depth for the DL and the CBs will be new.
Coldworld
July 09, 2026 at 11:48 am
I think it depends in part on play between now and the season, but absent a surprise emergence, it will come down to special teams. Last year we carried a safety who really was pure STs. It’s possible Oladapo’s STs made him releasable or it maybe they hope that the UDFA this year or Perry are hoped for replacements.
Of course players at other nominal positions could also factor, such as ILB. Those body types could assume the ST role and also play S in some multi S packages. Hopper is already a key STer and a good one last year and a plausible candidate for a S in multi S packages. They paid the UDFA ILB a large guarantee for a small ILB though. STs would seem a logical motivation as would coverage as a big S.
PackEyedOptimist
July 09, 2026 at 12:15 pm
Two things:
1. You forgot about Murvin Kenion III, who I actually like as a dark horse.
2. Our "fifth safety" could easily be one of our CBs; St Juste and Jackson have both been mentioned as guys who could potentially play safety.
2.5 Even our backup LBs have the speed to play safety in a pinch (Nick Niemann, Kristian Welch, and T.J. Quinn all ran 4.5s)
gsd3
July 10, 2026 at 06:35 am
Linebackers mentioned don't have the coverage skills required or they wouldn't be bottom of the roster guys or udfa.
Agree 100% with the rest.
dobber
July 10, 2026 at 08:54 am
I should've read your post before I posted, PEO.
I think Quinn is a dark horse roster candidate.
Leatherhead
July 09, 2026 at 04:47 pm
It’s pretty common for us to dress 9 DBs, and carry two more on the 53
9 DBs. McKinney, Williams, Bullard, Nixon,Valentine, St Juste, Cisse. That’s 7. Two more TBD. Probably Oladapo.
You play quite a bit the time with 5 or 6 DBs on the field, and guys do get hurt. And speedy guys are useful on special teams.
Coldworld
July 09, 2026 at 06:26 pm
I believe that, among the DBs, Kennion and Perry at S and Bartholemew and Jackson at CB have reputations as ST players. I could see one spot being won by one of that group purely for ST reasons. Just another thing to watch in August.
gsd3
July 10, 2026 at 06:33 am
Keeping anything that could be perceived as "extra" should in most cases come down to special teams and versatility.
Savage57
July 10, 2026 at 07:55 am
But the question is why?
The Packers have other, more important roster mouth's to feed.
dobber
July 10, 2026 at 08:48 am
If Gannon likes to run a big nickel--and he has at other stops in the past--the question is whether he satisfies that with a jumbo safety like Oladapo or with a coverage-savvy LB (who will likely be undersized but quick...like Quinn). They'd need to add bodies to make sure they can make it work and not have a single injury take it away from them...so you'd think they'd go looking for depth pieces to help do that.
Right now the Packers are only rostering 7 safeties (although Bullard is primarily a slot CB) and 7 off-ball LB (although Oliver might compete for some snaps there, too). Since the Packers eschewed adding an experienced LB or S who tends to fit that big nickel mold, they either think they have the pieces in-house to run it or Gannon doesn't see using it very much.
That said, I wouldn't be surprised if they kept an extra S or LB who can contribute to special teams and play defensive snaps as needed (re: Zayne Anderson), but probably not both.
Cannon...Gannon...no problems.
Lphill
July 10, 2026 at 11:09 am
I think when they extended the season they should have expanded the roster past 53, that was set in the early 90's, I think its time to make an addition I don't know who would oppose it.
TKWorldWide
July 11, 2026 at 07:08 am
Count Bullard as a (slot) corner and the safety total goes back to four.
Done!