Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - No Soup for Barry

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

Well, De'Vondre Campbell had a few things to say on his way out the door, didn't he? Campbell expressed no love (or soup) for Joe Barry. Personally, I commend him for pulling back the curtain and confirming what I believe the majority of us already knew - Joe Barry was a disaster of a hire from day one. His defense was as predictable as the sun rising every morning and he only knew one way to do things. It took way too long for Lafleur to intercede on behalf of his players who were sick of "just doing as we're told" when they knew it was a failed plan.

I wonder, when did YOU first realize Barry was the only one in love his defensive scheme? For me, the first tell was Jerry Gray. Remember when he was required to do a coaches' presser with the media how any time he was asked a scheme-related question, he refused to answer and deadpanned, "you have to ask the defensive coordinator." The look on his face told you he couldn't say what he really wanted to say (it's a loser's scheme!). When Gray left, it was obvious to me the reason was he couldn't take coaching his players - FOOTBALL PLAYERS - to be so passive.

One is left to wonder what might have been the last three years and how far the Packers might have gone with a defense that didn't play two safeties 25-30 yards deep, or Preston Smith covering wide receivers or cornerbacks five yards off the first down marker on third downs, and overall, allowing teams to march down the field at crucial times in the game. Oh want a fantastic Packers fantasy scenario I can conjure up, but instead I'm left with the reality of what I've had to watch the last few years.

And of course, Matt LaFleur has to squarely take the blame for the wasted opportunities of the last three seasons. Every Packer fan on the planet looked at Barry's past coaching record and asked, "why would they hire him?" But LaFleur did. And after a season of seeing what his defense was about, the fans asked, "why should we keep him?" But LaFleur did. After a second season where things got worse and the Packers missed the playoffs, fans asked, "LaFleur wouldn't keep Barry, would he?"  But Matt did. In the third season, the Packers surprised the NFL world by making the playoffs and running roughshod over the Cowboys at Lambeau South. After that, they came within one defensive stand of advancing to the NFC Championship game when Barry's defense did their thing and sat back and allowed Brock Purdy to march the 49ers down the field as if he were Joe Montana. FINALLY, that was the last straw for LaFleur and I hope he's kicking himself every day thinking about what might have been...

That's all I have for today. Back to working on the draft guide - only two short weeks away!

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther.  Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

15 points
 

Comments (111)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
TKWorldWide's picture

March 20, 2024 at 06:14 am

Very troubling indeed to read Campbell’s comments on his way out the door. But his release was like truth serum; no reason to lie or try to put a fake, positive spin on things.
Question: is my brain clogged with malted hops and bong resin, or wasn’t Barry’s FIRST season actually pretty good? Campbell was first team All-Pro, right? And Rasul had all those sweet picks? And then years 2 and 3 were straight down the tubes with all the aforementioned problems? I gotta ask “Why?” Why did JB become so fearful, cautious, and soft? Was there so little communication between him and MLF?
Anyhow, eager to see Hafley’s D with press-man on the corners and McKinney manning the post! GPG!

12 points
13
1
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 06:46 am

The first year was just full of highs but still had its lows. Cambell was the MIKE where he played best and wanted to be. After that the D has mood swings, and you could never tell which would show up even between drives let alone 1/4s, 1/2s or games.

7 points
7
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:15 am

I have to wonder if Campbell wouldn't still be our best answer at the Mike LB spot. Him, Zadarius, and Rasul seem to have gotten done dirty, and been on the losing side of their interaction with JB. Others on our defensive roster would have done better in a different scheme, but at least they're still here ...

1 points
4
3
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

March 20, 2024 at 02:51 pm

Agree that Rasul and DeVondre were rightly frustrated; but Z had some self-created issues that ‘Sul and Campbell didn’t have.

3 points
3
0
PeteK's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:23 am

Regardless of who's in charge, tackling better improve because missed tkls was a major weakness in this D and that I believe is on the players.

3 points
4
1
TKWorldWide's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:41 am

Totally agree! Alignment, scheme, etc is all worth nada if the tackling sucks!

2 points
4
2
Cheezehead72's picture

March 21, 2024 at 06:34 am

Do you know or do you think that

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 21, 2024 at 07:28 am

Ha! Well played! Touché, even!

However, we get all geeked up talking about press-man, nickel, exotic blitzes, etc, (myself included) but it’s all for naught when our beloved, high RAS guy misses the tackle. That is hardly the same thing as “I KNEW they’d draft a defensive player in round one!” Or, “I KNEW Jamarcus Russel was going to be a bust/be the solution.”

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:52 am

Yes, the players have to make the tackles. For those who have played football, tackling is a skill that MUST be practiced. Blocking too. Two essential skills. Not practicing a skill...keeping the saw sharp...will quickly dull the skill.

When did Barry ever practice tackling? Emphasize it? For a prevent D, tackling needs to be a big deal. Tackling got worse during his 3 years. That would also be on the HC who rarely practices with live blocking and tackling. Thump tackling in practice is just glorified touch football.

Fortunately it seems Hafley places a high priority on practicing tackling technique. Hope so.

4 points
4
0
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:02 am

The CBA rarely if ever allows live tackling drills anymore. I think the most contact is one on one blocking/rushing drills in camp.

Like someone here mentioned in an earlier discussion (could have been you even?), if they don't have the tackling and hitting coming out of school, they probably will never have it.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:18 pm

Gotta have the right Personnel and the ascension of Barry was propelled by LaFleur's nexus with the Old Boys Coaches Club. As far as I am concerned, this is LaFleur's prove it year. Why would any DC have his people play with Fear?

0 points
2
2
LLCHESTY's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:22 pm

Jeez, you mix beer and bong water? Might as well throw some Taco Bell in on top of it and really get the party started!

2 points
2
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:52 pm

Heh heh
Land of equal opportunity, baby!

1 points
1
0
Minniman's picture

March 20, 2024 at 01:18 pm

It was also quite telling by who IMMEDIATELY hired Campbell after he was made a cap casualty.

The 49ers now have 2 ex-Packers LB's on the team (Campbell and Oren Burks).

The 49ers, who, you know, aren't a crap football team (on either side of the ball).

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 20, 2024 at 01:45 pm

Burks will be playing Sp Teams for the Eagles.

2 points
2
0
porupack's picture

March 20, 2024 at 06:30 am

Indeed, Al, Indeed so. Why the hire of Barry. Certainly a lot of factors are in conversation, regarding schemes that might not have worked out for Barry's former team, but valid as potential fit with different cast. Certainly, one can't be too quick to pull the plug every 2-3 years, like Redskins, Lions, Bears model. But, yeah....that will be a blemish on Lafluer's legacy. He threw good capital on top of wasted capital, like a gambler that couldn't walk away. No way Barry should have seen year 3.

The good news; GB got better this off season
The bad news; all teams always get better in the offseason....
............up until the games begin. Then some start getting worse.

10 points
11
1
HawkPacker's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:39 am

We automatically got better when Barry was let go.

Also, with LaFleur hiring Barry and keeping him for 3 years, doesn't it make you question your faith in LaFleur?

3 points
6
3
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:21 am

MLF does some things well. All of those fit within the job description of OC.

He also does some things poorly, at least under the pressure of multi-tasking in big games. All those fit within the job description of HC.

I'm not going to carry on a campaign of wishing he were OC and a HC was brought in, that hasn't happened and it seems like a 0% chance, at least this coming season. Instead I'm going to focus on the positives of all the changes made, and hope to see an improved season. The tiniest bit of improvement brings GB into the NFC championship game, and a win there ...

GPG!

6 points
8
2
Rebecca's picture

March 21, 2024 at 08:14 pm

Good take on the MLF. I’m looking forward to the Hafley defense.

0 points
0
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:48 am

The point is to win and Lafleur's done a whole lot of that. Dont lose sight of the big picture trying to nail him to the wall over Joe Barry. Lafleur's not the first good head coach to stick with a bad coordinator for too long and he wont be the last. Mike Tomlin is supposed to be a guru coach and look how long he held onto Matt Canada. It may have taken longer than we liked, but Lafleur got it right. Thats all that matters.

0 points
4
4
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:01 am

The D personnel were/are best suited for press, but with the mobile and dangerous QBs today they are going to have to play zone, facing the QBs allot. Whenever they did that the last couple seasons, they weren't prepared for their matchups and didn't know who to pass to who (or so it appeared). That left the middle of the field wide open for passes or running and made even the Zac Wilsons of the league look like MVPs.

From the encouraging descriptions of his past players, it sounds like the new DC does all the legwork and extra planning for the players and makes it easy so they're just reacting not thinking to what they see on game day.

We'll see if that's too good to be true and what the Os they face can do to combat this new defense, but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and hope MLF learned his lesson and doesn't let the strings get too loose again on his team.

3 points
5
2
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:30 am

"they are going to have to play zone, facing the QBs a lot"

I question the broadness of this idea. I think it's very possible to defend against this with a man coverage scheme, but it does take one that works with the players you've got.

I look forward to a DC who knows more than I do, and I have to wonder what he's up to and how he succeeded under circumstances that seemed like a loss was inevitable. I also look forward to offensive coaches constructing our O line in ways that don't have me, every other fan, and every sports writer all pointing out obvious changes that need to be made, only to see them work weeks later when our coaches finally make those changes.

Basic mistakes like that don't win championships. I want our coaches seeing things like that before anyone else, and implementing the appropriate in game changes. The coaching staff is considerably different, I can hope ...

GPG!!

4 points
5
1
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:55 am

I like press and had tunnel vision for it in my kind of D. Then during the last season, I learned thru here at CHTV and listening to other successful DCs around the NFL, that in today's NFL no scheme can get totally away from zone and be successful. Even if it's only a zone look to start with that they switch out of or just some of the D is zone and other parts press (LBs, safeties in zone, corners press type thing).

Some QBs excel against man, and some excel against zone. Jordan Love was a great example of that last season and Dac was the opposite. The Ds have to adjust per opponent even during games because the Os will change as they see how the Ds react.

At least that is what I think I learned last season.

4 points
5
1
Coldworld's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:10 am

It’s not playing zone per se. It’s how you play zone as well as how often. Barry in his first year let players press more. After that he increasingly went to a default of playing off and reacting after, not attacking the catch point.

You can play the catch point in zone not just through press coverage, but Barry’s D, despite the personnel suiting contesting at the catch point, went heavily to off and frequently deep off, allowing the opponents to progress down the field too easily and quickly, gaining confidence and momentum while reducing takeaway opportunities.

The other concerning point regarding LaFleur isn’t just his selection and then retention of Barry for so long, but the fact that both Pettine and Barry became much more conservative, safe-minded after a year under him. In both cases everything became about not giving up big plays. Both got worse after that change and in both cases players had to intervene to positive effect. In both cases it was explained as resulting from LaFleur feeling that we have to reduce explosive big plays.

6 points
6
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:40 am

Many people conveniently forget that Barry was hired to run THAT defense. Barry worked for LaFleur.

3 points
3
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:05 am

Yes. Matt wanted to run a defense designed to play with a lead. Unfortunately he hired a crony coach who failed running it at 2 previous stops. Then continued to fail for 3 years in GB giving up leads over and over in close games.

Matt has finally changed his view and now wants an aggressive, attacking D and also knew Barry can't coach it.

Welcome Haf!

2 points
3
1
dblbogey's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:09 am

Yep. That was the scheme MLF wanted, and Barry is a close friend of MLF.

2 points
2
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

March 20, 2024 at 02:55 pm

In 2022 GB had an injured QB with very few reliable offensive skill players. That might have made Barry become more conservative. Then in ‘23 he had a first year starter at QB and may have wrongly been too conservative for that reason as well, until Love and the offense started clicking and LaFleur demanded more aggressive defensive play.

0 points
0
0
PearlyBakerBest's picture

March 20, 2024 at 03:18 pm

Cold world just doesn’t like MLF, which, for the better part of 3 years, is a horse he has beaten TO DEATH. Expect more of the same until about week ten as it will take at least that long to get the D playing cohesively.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 20, 2024 at 05:37 pm

I am not shy of my concerns about LaFleur, but his pushing of both Pettine and Barry to prevent big plays as the first priority and the results are not made up to suit that narrative.

I’m also on record as saying more than once that it will probably take till November to be able to fairly start to asses whether this (or any new) D is promising. I like what Hafley is saying, but only time will tell whether that translates, and that starts in September, not ends.

So I’m not sure where you are going with this, except maybe to deflect absent a positive argument to make.

3 points
3
0
PearlyBakerBest's picture

March 21, 2024 at 09:08 am

I just stated a fact and made a prediction. You’ve been talking about MLFs incompetence as a head coach for the better part of three years. Not just about the D but about the O as well. A lot of which MLF has proven you wrong. And instead of eating some crow about it, here you are, hammering away about MLFs incompetence again.

Whether you’re on record about the D has nothing to do with my predicting if they perform poorly the first half of the season that you will lay the blame at MLFs feet.

You’re also on record chastising people for saying the EXACT same things you have said only short periods later so it appears you can be a bit of a chameleon.

0 points
0
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:14 am

Joe Barry epitomized the two worst NFL hiring practices:
1) Nepotism; and,
2) Hiring people based on who they know and not what they know.

What I call the Friends & Family plan.

If Hafley can exorcise the demons we will have a much better defense, but also more damning evidence that hiring and keeping Barry was pure managerial malfeasance.

6 points
10
4
lou's picture

March 20, 2024 at 08:21 am

No one could have said it simpler or better.

1 points
3
2
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:31 am

Except his #1 and 2 are the same thing, lol

7 points
7
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:03 pm

Except in many situations #2 it's not a friendship, but "I worked with so and so, check him out". It's an introduction simply based on past work connections and not merit.

1 points
1
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:57 am

Thats a pretty myopic view of Lafleur. He didnt just hire Barry cuz theyre friends. He hired Barry cuz he was the LB coach of a #1 overall defense with the Rams and was hoping Barry could duplicate that in Green Bay. It didnt work out and now Barry's gone. Youre making it out to be some nefarious violation of ethics. Relax, dude.

-1 points
4
5
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:05 pm

Funny, the Baloney is supposed to stop with you when it seems to get more momentum...

"He hired Barry cuz he was the LB coach of a #1 overall defense with the Rams and was hoping Barry could duplicate that in Green Bay. "

And did I miss Barry's stay as LB coach for the Packers? He was hired for DC. His previous 2 stints as DC were abject failures so who cares what he did as an LB coach. Irrelevant to his hiring as a DC.

1 points
3
2
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

March 20, 2024 at 02:59 pm

Why is it nepotism? Barry isn’t his son. He’s somebody Matt knew, but most NFL coaches know many other coaches around the league. I can’t see it as nepotism when Barry wasn’t even the first guy that was offered the job. If LaFleur was just wanting someone he knew and felt comfortable with, why offer it to Leonhard first?

And by the time Leonhard turned it down, there were not as many impressive candidates to choose from. Still a bad hire, but it means something that it wasn’t his first choice. Barry may have been a better interviewer than he was a coach and he wasn’t awful his first year. He just got worse, and Matt was probably too loyal to let him go after only 2 seasons.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 20, 2024 at 05:52 pm

Nepotism covers more than just immediate family these days, though that’s the narrower root, based on Papal practice of appointing people with family connections that tied them to the appointer by obligation.

“Family” as understood originally was a hugely broader group than just offspring and even blood kin, including those dependent on direct patronage or indirect favor in a feudal sense. To understand it as only progeny or siblings would be to miss the point. As the concept of family has narrowed, so most have expanded the explicitly included groups.

I’m not particularly invested in this aspect of the debate—this is a semantic diversion—but if Barry was hired on the basis of non professional relationships, in whole or part, that would be nepotism as most often used today.

noun:

“the practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives, friends, or associates, especially by giving them jobs.” Google/Oxford

“the unfair use of power in order to get jobs or other benefits for your family or friends.” Colins

0 points
0
0
jvole's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:14 am

After the Barry hire and 2023 retention, I worried that Lafleur was one of those people who is uncomfortable supervising folks that are 'better' than he is or that have a domineering personality. Unconsciously or consciously, I've seen managers avoid competent people and it usually ends like this, or the incompetent person blunders along for years. No one likes to work with an arsehole, but lets face it, sometimes they are the most competent!

0 points
6
6
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:18 am

Or, MLF is one of those managers that is so insecure they only hire people that are dumber than themselves so that they never feel challenged.

-3 points
4
7
HawkPacker's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:41 am

.....and those have no chance for success!

0 points
1
1
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:50 am

I think he trusted him to do his job and spent all his time trying to run the offense. Still learning to be a head coach not just a coordinator. I hope he's still learning now that he realizes that it's up to him alone to make the next steps. If you stop learning you stay the same which won't win in the NFL.

11 points
11
0
jvole's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:05 am

Hopefully Lafleur reads CHTV so that he can learn from his mistakes :).

7 points
7
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:29 am

The best indicator of future performance are past results. Not the only, but the best indicator.

We can always change, and change is usually an incremental process. Not always, but usually.

After the attempt to lure Jim Leonard away from the Badgers (wonder if Jim has regrets?), Coach Matt did a 180 and made a crony hire of a twice failed DC. Just what did Matt think Barry would do differently this go around?

With all the investments in the defense, I had hope Barry could oversee a successful D. His introductory presser was concerning. I really did not know what his philosophy was going to be. He was energetic, but it was a rambling affair and I wondered how the players would respond to his communication style.

The best year of Barry Ball was the first season but the past results of Barry led Defenses began to show.

It wasn't the points given up, it was WHEN they were surrendered. When a stop was essential, you knew it was unlikely. With the talent on the defense, they played well at times, in spite of the weak run D, passive pass D.

Coach Gray obviously voiced his concerns behind closed doors. And after the '22 season, and Matt announced his "continuity decision" to keep Barry, Gray quickly departed...even as Matt still wanted him to remain. To do what...coach DBs in a defensive scheme he despised? That was curious.

The past results of Jeff Hafley have me far more encouraged than the announcement of Barry 3 years ago. I am very impressed with the coaching talent he recruited. If the defense can become a shut down, takeaway group...this team can be the talk of the NFL.

7 points
8
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:35 am

I can't wait to see what Hafley does defensively.

6 points
6
0
NickPerry's picture

March 20, 2024 at 05:02 pm

YES!!!!!!! Me too RC!

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:35 am

Well that was a bit of a bummer down memory lane...Kind of gets ya all pissed off all over again. Al reminded us of this past years ineptitude which actually made me think of the 2021 season and the playoff loss to those SAME 49ers as well. The defense played well that night except for the final 3:20 when they drove right down the field into FG range when the Packers only had 10 players on the field for the FG attempt...

Sigh.... Good times...NOT!!!

7 points
7
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:39 am

That was an interesting defensive ... scheme? "We're so good we'll beat you with only 10 on the field, and they all have one arm tied behind their back!" Not really what I think of with the phrase "schoolyard football."

1 points
1
0
vin0770's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:23 am

So do you think the silos Opie created prevented Gute from doing his GM job and step in over MLF weak sauce and fire Barry? If it’s so obvious to EVERYONE but MLF, don’t you think Gute would have superseded MLF and fired Barry? Gute has proven he has the stones to go make brutally tough decision but couldn’t because of Opie’s silos?

0 points
4
4
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:33 am

Murphy has a very sound football mind. Didn't he even get a couple starts while he was in high school?

I shouldn't detract from him, I understand he was a very good player at all levels and even though I was a starter, didn't play after high school.

-2 points
0
2
croatpackfan's picture

March 20, 2024 at 01:10 pm

Do you ever hear that if you are good or excellent as employee it does not mean that you'll be good as manager? Maybe, regarding football, the level of competence for Mark "WANI" Murphy stops at player level, not showing the same excellence at football manager level. World is full of failed promotions to top positions because you were excellent employe.

There is also difference between running company vs running specific programs. While you can be good in construction business, in football you might be the idiot!

2 points
2
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

March 20, 2024 at 03:04 pm

Ha! Yes, many folks seem to think Murphy doesn’t know football and they don’t know enough to know he has a Super Bowl ring as a player, before being involved with the NFLPA, getting a law degree, and being Athletic Director at the college level.

0 points
1
1
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

March 20, 2024 at 03:06 pm

Don’t most head coaches hire their own staff? I don’t think GMs hire the coaching staff for their head coaches. They seemed to require LaFleur to keep Pettine, but then it was up to him.

And the whole friggin point of changing the structure was the “silos” between McCarthy and Thompson, who were not even communicating with either other towards the end of their time as HC/GM. This way Murphy can ensure Gutey and LaFleur are on the same page.

Newly minted Eliot Wolf in NE doesn’t hire and fire coaches; even though he’s the “de-facto” GM. He only does personnel, like Gutey in GB.

-1 points
0
1
Coldworld's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:28 pm

Wolf is the Scouting Director. Since he’s now solely responsible for the draft with the departure of BB, he’s fulfilling the non coaching GM duties necessary for the draft. The new HC is assembling his team pending a decision on how to proceed post draft. A Somewhat different, pragmatic response that is not expected to be permanent.

0 points
0
0
Untylu1968's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:41 am

Another dead horse to bury! Hopefully, we learn from our poor decisions and try not to repeat them. The future is bright in Green Bay, onward, and upward!

7 points
7
0
Packer_Fan's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:51 am

Jersey Al, you nailed it. The Packers could have and should have won the Super Bowl last year but never with Barry. His passive way of playing defense is anathema to any defensive player or coach.

How many players underperformed because of Barry. And I too noticed the Gray incident.

So sad that Lafleur took this long to dump him.

3 points
5
2
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:45 am

I won't join in the chorus of coulda woulda shoulda, especially when it comes to predictions of winning it all last month. They had a great post season, and came up short in their final game; on the first play, the last offensive play, and many plays in between.

Hopefully everybody on the roster uses that to up their intensity all off season and comes in in the best shape of their lives, both in terms of physical conditioning and knowing the playbook, as well as having practiced in sensible groupings. There are several of those I can think of. If you look at Favre's SB win, that was the recipe for success that season. I know the league has changed, but this still seems like a viable formula to me ...

3 points
3
0
packerbackerjim's picture

March 20, 2024 at 08:02 am

MLF watched late season games where the defense played very well quite unexpectedly. For reasons unknown, he took that as justification for Barry being retained. Possibly it reinforced his belief that Barry was a good hire.

4 points
4
0
stockholder's picture

March 20, 2024 at 08:04 am

Campbell should have went Quietly.
Change is not always a good thing.
Don't put this on MLF.
Barry already got hired.
This is nothing more than a guy
who couldn't live up to expectations.

-13 points
4
17
lou's picture

March 20, 2024 at 08:32 am

He did go quietly until he received random derogatory tweets from no names
Change (aggressiveness) led to the team making the playoffs and beating the Cowboys and nearly beating the 49ers
MLF hired a guy with an abysmal resume who had a competent father in law get him his NFL jobs
Barry got hired as a Linebacker Coach (Campbell got hired to replace a Pro Bowler LB)

5 points
8
3
PeteK's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:01 am

We all forget that the Barry is the second failed D coach in a few yrs. I really thought Pettine was the real deal until he wasn't. Also, I was somewhat fooled with good defensive performances in the playoffs of 20 & 21. Let's hope that the third time is a charm.

5 points
5
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:47 pm

See if he can bag a LB with comparable ability? Campbell did call out this clown show during the season, as well as Jaire and Douglas air grievance. LaFleur must have had a Caesar moment and let them move a Pro Bowl player in-season and substitute a false equivalent for the Fans to speculate about as if the guy was Doug Evans. A lot of Hot Air around the wood stove over at the Feedstore. If Campbell's knee is healed, he may come back to haunt cheeseland if they face Shanahan's crew during the '24 Playoffs.

3 points
3
0
Guam's picture

March 20, 2024 at 08:29 am

I believe in Matt Lafleur as an offensive coach. He helped Rodgers to two MVP seasons and displayed a very diverse offense in the first post Rodgers year. His offensive staff has generally done a good job developing drafted talent and managing the various offensive units (with a few exceptions on the O-line). Offensively Lafleur has done his job well.

However I still have questions about Matt Lafleur as a head coach. It is hard to overlook Barry, Mennenga and Drayton. Lafleur needs Hafley to be a home run hire to put to bed the notion he has serious problems evaluating non-offensive assistant coaches. Three bad hires and keeping Barry for at least a year too long have tarnished his head coaching judgement.

Lafleur was hired as a young head coach and people often grow into their positions. I thought Lafleur showed significant growth last year and I really like the Hafley hire (but I have zero qualifications to evaluate football coaches). I hope Lafleur is growing into his position as head coach and he is finally getting the defensive half of the team in order.

11 points
11
0
CheeseEdWest2's picture

March 20, 2024 at 04:34 pm

A good HC keeps an eye on the whole team. If he's offensive-minded, he still needs to listen to the defensive coaches and players. Losing Gray and Campbell is a sign that he needs to listen better and check out things that are bugging the players, esp. when his DC is suspect.

1 points
1
0
LeotisHarris's picture

March 20, 2024 at 08:45 am

Nothing to add to the Barry postmortem, but I would like to make my annual plug for the CHTV Draft Guide It's always very well done, buying it is my way of supporting the site. So, if you are on the fence, cough up a few bucks to help keep this place for us to vent our spleens and exchange disconnected thoughts chugging along. It's worth every penny.

10 points
10
0
JerseyAl's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:10 pm

THANK YOU!

0 points
0
0
x24's picture

March 20, 2024 at 08:57 am

Onward and upward!

2023 was a pleasant surprise in spite of GM and coaching blunders. Now Hafley is at the wheel on D. Most of the 2019 spending spree has been paid off and we are pretty sure we have a QB to build around.

Let it die- the future looks bright!

0 points
2
2
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:09 am

I like the "Let it die-the future looks bright!" comment, but you said that after the comment about 2023 "GM and coaching blunders". Coaches make blunders all the time. Could you please give me your list of the GM blunders for last year so I can "Let it die".

4 points
4
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:03 am

The only real GM blunder I see from last year is the way Rasul was given away. Want to trade him for younger faster cheaper? Ok, I can understand that. Can't get value for him when you'd like? Ok, don't deal; at least not then and there. Give him up AND another pick, to move up some 30 spots into the third round, where you historically suck - and then announce that it was an offer too good to refuse?!? Just no. That told everybody on the roster that they're worthless and will always be worthless to the organization no matter how well they play.

Whether Gutey did that because he had already given up on the season I can't say, but it's the only way I can make sense of it; otherwise it's a head scratcher. Worse, generating turnovers was a major weakness of our defense over the whole season, and Rasul continued to generate turnovers. Can Gutey make a third round pick who contributes as much as Rasul? I highly doubt that, and that has nothing to do with Gutey or his third round history. Can a third round pick develop into contributing that much by 2025? Maybe. That'd be the best I can hope for.

By that evaluation, that one move hurt the team for two seasons. Minimum. I can call that a GM blunder. Fortunately I don't see anything else like that. Then there's the opportunity for our new DC to demonstrate that our defensive roster indeed has talent, way above their performance under JB. That would reflect well on Gutey!

If Hafley can get our defense performing ABOVE their talent level? Gutey has little to do with that, except it would mean that Gutey Hafley and MLF work well together, and are heading up an ascending team. I'm here for THAT!

GPG, this can be a historic run, that redeems the lack of SBs over the past 30 years ...

-1 points
3
4
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:54 am

You're right, and I was surprised when he did the Rasul deal. At the time I thought they were doing it to give him a chance at the playoffs and we were headed in the other direction anyway and sticking with youth. I think he might have been a difference maker in the playoffs considering the 49ers type of O is in his wheelhouse. He can bait young QBs and stick with backs out in the flats.

0 points
1
1
x24's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:12 am

We had the youngest WR group in the league. This was not due to brilliant design, it was because we had no cap room.

We had no cap room because of poor decisions made in 2019 and contracts like Bakh's that kicked the can down the road. The bill came due and tied hands.

In no way am I saying that Gute is a bust, but I don't think he is a genius either. Hopefully the future proves me wrong

0 points
2
2
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:48 am

Thanks.

So it wasn't '23 blunders. You can't blame Gute for the contracts as he has no part of that process.

I'm hoping also that he can hit it out of the park again this season.

2 points
3
1
Packers0808's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:17 am

Campbell ladled out a good bowl of PEE Soup on Barry on his way out!

5 points
7
2
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:04 am

Split pea soup at that, lol

-2 points
1
3
PeteK's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:09 am

Good bye, don't let the door hit you in the back.

-5 points
0
5
Packers0808's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:24 am

Why yours hit you in the face?

1 points
2
1
PeteK's picture

March 20, 2024 at 04:52 pm

??? Meant that for Campbell and Barry. However, too late, I was already hit with the ugly stick.

2 points
2
0
Packers0808's picture

March 21, 2024 at 07:37 am

I meant that for Campbell that it surprised you they let him go.

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

March 21, 2024 at 08:43 am

No, good riddance and on to better options.

0 points
0
0
Zapato's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:34 am

Must be pretty busy with that draft guide Al! Thanks for reiterating what everyone already knows and what every other sports writer has been saying.

Yeah, I was perplexed that anyone would hire a DC who went 0-16 even if it was over ten years prior. Never did like the hire, never did have faith in a Barry defense. Only positive I can say for Barry is that he wasn't the only bad DC hire during the Rogers era!

2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:44 am

When did he tell LaFleur we needed more aggression? After the Denver loss? After the LV loss? After we held the Rams to 3? After we held KC to 19? When did this take place?

We gave up 350 points last year. We'll see if we improve very much.

XXXXXXXXXXXX

BTW, 6 downvotes already but nobody told me when Campbell allegedly was the savior of the season....according to Campbell. I'd like to know. Because I think it's a bunch of self-serving BS.

-4 points
5
9
Bitternotsour's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:07 am

I still believe that Barry is a convenient and somewhat lazy whipping boy. The base level defense last year got us to the playoffs. The end.

The bigger issue was it took quite a while for the offense to gel. I attributed that to the Rodgers hangover and MLF having PTSD from bending the knee. It remains to be seen whether he is clear of that or he will regress.

Regardless, the future appears quite bright, we have a franchise QB, and now possibly the best running back in the league. Time for that offense to cook. 8-9 possessions per game. Let's average 32 ppg.

-7 points
1
8
LambeauPlain's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:20 am

"We gave up 350 points last year."

That's a nice metric. More important is the Packers lost 7 games last season after the O gave the D a lead, late in the game. That (and player, coaches disenchancement with Barry Ball) is what got Barry fired.

4 points
5
1
Leatherhead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 01:33 pm

Or did we lose 7 games because the offense wasn't able to deliver at the end?

In your world, the SF game was lost because the defense gave up a score in the 4th. In my world, the offense that only scored 21 points, and didn't deliver in the end, was at least partly responsible.

Dallas and SF also fired their DCs. Whipping boys.

-3 points
3
6
LambeauPlain's picture

March 21, 2024 at 06:46 am

In your world, Barry is a great DC. How many interviews for DC did Barry have after he was fired as DC for the third time with as many teams?

Who finally hired him to be their DC for 2024?

No one? Huh. Go figure.

2 points
2
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:17 pm

"We gave up 350 points last year. We'll see if we improve very much."

You really have a hard time with the concept that with 32 teams and a 17 game schedule, most teams face significantly different opponents.

The Packers schedule was a cakewalk of offensive Jugger NOTs.

If you look at a metric that tries to correct for differences in opponents/schedule (like DVOA) the Packers were near the bottom of the league.

7 points
9
2
Leatherhead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 01:38 pm

Every team faces different opponents.

We played Detroit twice.....top ten scoring. We played the Cowboys and the 49ers in the playoffs...the #1 and #3 scoring teams. We played the Rams and the Saints, two top ten scoring teams. And we played the Chiefs.

So, regular season, four top ten offensive teams. Playoffs, two top offensive teams. Six out of 19 games against top offensive teams.

I remember when I fell in love with DVOA, about 20 years ago. It'll pass. The game is decided by points.

-2 points
3
5
LLCHESTY's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:33 pm

Do you have a picture of Barry that you stare at everyday while playing John Waite's Missing You? He's gone, get over it. Defensive players are aggressive by nature so I'm sure Campbell wasn't the only unhappy one.

Also, playing 7 shitty QBs will skew the points total quite a bit and yet they were still 22nd in points allowed per drive.

7 points
9
2
Leatherhead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 01:40 pm

See, there you have to go, making it personal. It's why it's a waste of time trying to talk football with you. I'm just saying, we had 350 points scored on us last year, and we'll see if we do any better. I don't think we're going to do a lot better than that.

-3 points
3
6
T7Steve's picture

March 20, 2024 at 02:46 pm

It's not just the points scored, it's when the points are scored too.

Throw the 9er playoff game out because the D gave Love a chance with time at the end and you can't blame the D. Love had a rookie playoff moment. I forgive him and hope he learned there was allot of game left and not to get desperate. If we'd have won that game, we'd have the same DC again.

I don't think I'll be happy with mid-pack D. Top 5-10 is a good goal to start with and one of the leaders in TO margin.

-1 points
1
2
Oppy's picture

March 20, 2024 at 05:32 pm

"It's not just the points scored, it's when the points are scored too."

Actually, no. it really is just the points scored.

When the points are scored has absolutely zero to do with the actual performance of a defense in terms of affect on winning or losing.

When the points are scored only has a real affect on emotions, not on the outcome of a game.

If your offense scores more points than your defense allows, you win the game. Full stop. It does not matter when the points are scored.

-3 points
1
4
Bitternotsour's picture

March 20, 2024 at 05:55 pm

I just checked the rules, there's no mention of when or how points are scored. Apparently the score at the end of the game is the only metric in regards to wins and losses.

Thanks for parceling that out for me Oppy.

-2 points
1
3
T7Steve's picture

March 21, 2024 at 02:02 pm

I meant that if the score is 7-3 with 5 min left and the D allows the other team to march down the field, use up the clock and score a TD making it 7-10 at the final, it looks like they only gave up 10 points, but in the end, it cost the game. Of course it's on the O to score more, that's why it's a team sport.

1 points
1
0
Oppy's picture

March 21, 2024 at 06:36 pm

I know exactly what you meant- and that's the way 99% of people look at it. However, it's an emotional response as opposed to a logical response.

Imagine the Defense allowed a touchdown in the first three minutes of the first quarter, and on the following drive they held the opponent to a field goal. Then, for the next 5 minutes remaining in the first quarter, and the remaining 3 quarters of the game- they gave up zero points. Despite only allowing the opponent to score 10 points- literally half of the league average per game- the home team offense can only manage to score a single touchdown in the 3rd quarter, and we lose 7-10.

Did the defense cost the game? At the end of the day, it's the exact same same tally with the exact same result- it doesn't matter when the defense allowed the points, or when the offense didn't score the points. The only thing that changes with the timing is your emotional perception of the result.

1 points
1
0
barutanseijin's picture

March 21, 2024 at 10:18 pm

Last i heard, a TD gets you as many points in the first minute as it does in the last.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:46 pm

Oh lighten up Francis. You've repeated your mantra so many times you should know you're going to take flak for it. I looked at points for and against like you do back in the '80s Then I read about a thing called strength of schedule.

1 points
2
1
NFLfan's picture

March 20, 2024 at 09:46 am

It's too bad De'Vondre was the one who had to meet privately with Matt to light a fire under him. That was Matt's responsibility.
Rasul Douglas was another casualty, IMO.
Matt tends to give the keys to his coordinators and doesn't step in until things blow-up.
Time will tell.

2 points
6
4
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:52 am

I would add Zadarius Smith to that list. I mean, maybe his time came up? Maybe he was too expensive. Maybe correct handling would have extended productivity at a high level?

Bygones. Hopefully we don't have roster casualties like those three in our future, but in a few years a lot of currently cheap rookies won't all be able to be retained...

2 points
2
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 20, 2024 at 10:32 am

To be fair - it seems that Barry wasn't MLF's first choice either - with reports that he had offered the DC position to at least one other candidate. Also, the DC candidate field that year struck me as a particularly weak and unproven one. Still MLF is to bear full responsibility for the Barry failure - which he has seemed to have atoned, somewhat, with the Hafley hire. At least with a much better candidate search and identification stage.

As for Campbell - he's not saying anything that we haven't already heard. I'd rather have him critique his own performance - as a one-year wonder - in his 8+ years career.

-3 points
1
4
Bitternotsour's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:08 am

truly. physician heal thyself...

0 points
1
1
CheesedDeadHead's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:30 pm

"I'd rather have him critique his own performance - as a one-year wonder - in his 8+ years career."

He was very open about his success being the result of the Packers having him as the MIKE Linebacker and the only reason he signed with the Packers (other teams offered more $) was that he felt he would excel at the MIKE position. The Packers draft Walker in the first round the following year and change his role. If we just ignore that then yeah he should have done better playing a role he didn't endorse/want/excel at because his DC had no idea how to fit his shiny new toy in with the old toy.

3 points
4
1
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 20, 2024 at 03:57 pm

So he's previously stated his case. OK it's on the record. Continuing to do so - especially as he's no longer a Packer - is just whining - which is a form of negative energy. Truly tiresome.

0 points
2
2
SinceLombardi's picture

March 20, 2024 at 12:07 pm

MLF would be under heavy scrutiny if not for the late season surge and good playoff showing last year. Staff wise, he’s been a disaster. Pettine stayed too long, Drayton cost us a trip to the Super Bowl and Barry should never have been hired in the first place.
Let’s hope he got it right this time. It’s a young, mostly under contract team and the NFC is wide open.

2 points
3
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 20, 2024 at 01:25 pm

Well, Al, as you can see from posting, more or less we all agree with your assesment.

I agree with you that Campbell remarks showed us who is real culprit. Despite some of the fans here believe that Campbell made mistake to put out his grievances on his time at Packers, I understand the man. He is bitter, and who would not be. He might lost few million $ because of Joe Barry on his new signings. I would like to see some of you to be silence with that kind of loss. And I did not touch respect every player want for their performances.

For me, I still see MLF as OC, not HC. I understand that he has to deal with FPQB and he made mistake to not show his balls. Bullies adore those kind of persons. And to be clear, I really liked FPQB talent, football knowledge and his demeanor on the field. What I despise in FPQB is his narcissistic personality...

I'm glad De'Vondre Campbell was part of Packers team and I respect everything he done or tried to do for Packers success. Godspeed De'Vondre!

1 points
3
2
Gman1976's picture

March 20, 2024 at 03:39 pm

Well said AL.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

March 20, 2024 at 06:17 pm

New season, Barry is gone. Hafley won’t start to become a known commodity till mid-season. The only thing we know is that change has happened on D.

How that works out will speak to a lot, but that’s a good six months out. Let’s look forward, not rehash old arguments we can’t resolve till the on field verdict comes out.

4 points
4
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 20, 2024 at 06:48 pm

it's silly season, if we can't rehash old grudges we literally have nothing to talk about. There's only so much conjecture out there.

i can only take so many "I just finished my 11th mock, and I grabbed a safety from Tulane in the fifth". So no, please. Let's get the knives out whether MLF is accountable for his hiring practices. I'm not 100% sure we've covered everything.

1 points
1
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 20, 2024 at 07:05 pm

There's always Aaron Rodgers.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

March 20, 2024 at 11:31 pm

Wash your mouth out.

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 21, 2024 at 04:02 am

You want to say possible future VPOTUS?

0 points
0
0