Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - A Golden Bullet

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

Golden Bullet: When first round WR Matthew Golden ended up with jersey number 22, there were cries of disappointment across Packer Nation (don't ask me why). I thought I would help by pointing out that the number 22 also belonged to Pro Football Hall of Famer "Bullet" Bob Hayes, a speedster like Golden who was 5/11" 185 lbs to Golden's 5'11" 190 lbs. Almost a body double. This week it was revealed that Rich Bisaccia, hearkening back to Bob Hayes, has given Golden the nickname "Bullet." I'm proposing taking it one step further and making it "Golden Bullet."  Good idea or no?

Jenkins - Something smells fishy here - actually a few things. In an interview from Camp, Jenkins stated that he skipped OTAs and minicamp because of a family matter. Yet he was on the field and just not participating. Then the Packers put him on the NFI list and tell us he was dealing with a back issue. Who is the source of the dishonesty here - Jenkins or the Packers? Next, Jenkins tells us he was the one who initially brought up the possibility of moving to center last year, agreed to it when the Packers took him up on it, and he has no money concerns. We were led to believe by media reports that money was the reason he was "holding-in" but Jenkins says that was never the case. Is that the truth or is the truth that it was about the money, but the Packers refused to do anything so now Jenkins is backtracking? In the end, wouldn't it be easier for everyone to be just a little more honest upfront? I know, it's just a silly dream...

Hobbs - Well, "according to Hobbs" there's no such thing as letting up in practice. He even ignored a chat with the coach to come back and do it at another practice. This time it got him a more stern talking to and he was told to take a seat for most of the rest of practice. There was no Hobbs news yesterday, so I guess that's progress?

Lloyd - For awhile there, we assumed the Hobbs hit on Lloyd is what caused his injury in practice. The Packers are saying it happened before that hit and was a non-contact injury. Do we think that's true or they just trying to save face for Hobbs and keep the fact he injured a teammate from looming over him? Polluted minds want to know. 

Simmons - Could the Packers have unearthed another diamond where previously there was only sand? Kudos to the Pro Personnel scouting staff, to Jeff Hafley for putting together a plan for Simmons and lighting a fire under him and to Simmons, for realizing Green Bay was the best place for him to revive his career. It's not real football yet, but things are looking good. 

Back to Jenkins moving to center: I'm always wary of advanced stats, but with the stats below, at least we know that only true pass sets are being included and they are weighted by individual snap counts, so that's all good. We don't know by who or how the evaluation of "pressures" is being done, but if we assume every player is being evaluated by the exact same criteria, these stats can be useful for comparison purposes. So looking at these pass protection numbers, the Packers were top seven in the league at the guard position and dead last by a lot (no other team even close) at the center position. I'd assume Jenkins was most responsible for the guard numbers, and now his pass pro abilities move to the center position. The thing I don't know is if Aaron Banks was most or least responsible for the 49ers poor guard stats.

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (70)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
NickPerry's picture

July 30, 2025 at 06:24 am

"The Packers are saying it happened before that hit and was a non-contact injury. Do we think that's true or they just trying to save face for Hobbs and keep the fact he injured a teammate from looming over him?"

I call Bullshit... Hobbs was spoken to before that by MLF and Hobbs ignored it. Hobbs needs to get a fricken grip while practicing against his OWN teammates.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 30, 2025 at 08:28 am

I can't find that quote about Hobbs in the article. Was it removed? Anyway, I think the injury really did happen before the contact. I heard it was a groin injury. That's generally a non-contact injury. I wonder if the injury made the Hobbs hit look worse than it was. He still needs to be more careful though.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:30 am

"As he came around the corner there [pre hit], he planted to change directions and something grabbed on him," Gutekunst

"It looked like he stuck his foot in the ground and he never put it back in the ground when he had an opportunity to. That would lead me to believe it happened prior to the hit." Matt LaFleur

Both in pre-practice media comments yesterday.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:23 am

I was not there there. However, from the accounts of 3 who saw it live, one of which is Herman in his practice review podcast available here, it was neither a dirty hit nor an obviously premeditated one. It was simply a bang bang play that ended up taking Lloyd down with an outstretched arm after contact with a third player by Hobbs i believe.

Apparently this is not inconsistent with many teams’ interpretation of full contact but no live tackling interpretation. It took place in what several have described as a pretty physical practice, but LaFleur apparently has a black line rule that any play that results in an opponent hitting the turf is unacceptable. So contact but not such that might take a player down. That apparently led to the brief time out.

LaFleur also seemed to suggest that on film, the reason the arm took him down was that Lloyd avoided replanting his foot after contact despite the opportunity to do so. That’s consistent with a player who is carrying a groin tweak—those typically don’t bite before planting and so is possibly suggestive of a prior occurrence.

What I get from this is that Hobbs isn’t dirty and that LaFleur has a more restrictive definition of full contact than the CBA and many other teams, likely including the Raiders it seems.

Kraft suggests that LaFleur also limits offensive players by banning the stiff arm (again not CBA required or commonplace in full contact). Kraft was clearly pissed at being called out for a fumble when he couldn’t hold the defender off and the manner in which it was handled by LaFleur. He told Schneiderman explicitly that he had been publicly “thrown under the bus” by LaFleur.

Interestingly Tom and Kraft and others of the O, appeared to suggest a similar reaction to Walker being made to run a lap by LaFleur for a scuffle with Enagbare. The entire O pointedly ran with him.

This could be nothing but temporary frustration, but it could also be the most significant development in camp to date: a sign of a developing distance between coaches and players, some key ones. It’s one to watch to see if it continues to surface. Such rifts can be incredibly destructive.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 30, 2025 at 10:22 am

I looked into the comment by Kraft that LaFleur threw him under the bus. The article I read said that Schniederman made it clear that Kraft made that comment in a light-hearted manner.

0 points
0
0
mnbadger's picture

July 30, 2025 at 02:44 pm

Rifts like this can also strengthen the bond of the offense as a single unit.
GPG!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

July 30, 2025 at 02:59 pm

I agree with your take CW but I also have another point:

good coaching will get everyone back on the same page before even trying to move forward. If they actually have today off that might make it easier, but even if they're practicing today with no media availability MLF should still be able to accomplish this, and it's VITAL that he does! Not just because of #85 either; you want EVERYBODY striving for excellence and not because of internal strife.

So far this team is very much united in intensity and goals, you want that to build and can't afford any setbacks, even just in attitude.

While I'm here I might as well say I hope Big E remains our Center as long as he wants to play in the NFL, which might prove to be another 8 years? This could be / should be "our year"

GPG!

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:25 am

Holmgren wanted his crew to practice at full speed and set the form. Maybe Lloyd had the groin tweak and could not evade fast enough?

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 30, 2025 at 06:52 am

With Jenkins, all's well that ends well, but he sure took an odd path to get to where he is. When the Packers acquired Aaron Banks and announced that Jenkins would be moving to center, they said they had discussed the move with him and he was enthusiastic about it. Then Jenkins did the hold-in thing at minicamp. My suspicion at the time was that the Packers had told the truth (why would they make that up?) but Jenkins had then talked to his agent, who convinced him that the position switch gave him leverage to negotiate a new contract.

Obviously they overestimated the leverage thing. So now Jenkins has come back and actually confirmed that he was enthusiastic about switching positions. His story about having a family matter, as Al points out, makes no sense, and the Packers' explanation that it was a back issue is not very credible either, because if that was the problem, why didn't they say it in the first place? It looks like they were just trying to cover for Jenkins. Thankfully, he is better at playing football than he is at public relations, and everyone can now put this whole weird episode behind them.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

July 30, 2025 at 12:08 pm

Perhaps a better agent could have also helped Jenkins.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 30, 2025 at 06:54 am

No shocker about the pressures allowed at the center position. Josh Meyers was abysmal last season if you actually watched the line play.
-
The line overall was good-not-great in pass protection in 2024 - about top third of the league in my estimation. Low sack numbers were a bit misleading; Hits, hurries, pressures told a somewhat different story. Low gross sack count was influenced by extremely low pass attempts and also by our QBs who were evasive, got rid of the ball while under duress, and hard to tackle when hit.

I believe this years OL will be much improved- just by merit of guards not having to bail out the center nearly as much- once they start to gel.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

July 30, 2025 at 07:06 am

Al I do not get spun up with nicknames. If they want to call him Bullet or Golden Bullet or Bullitt because he runs fast and jumps very high. Yes young people may not get that. So be it.

I agree with you on the Jenkins matter. Having both sides come out and be honest on what transpired allows people to form their own opinion. The problem with not being transparent (Rodgers saga) is that the media makes up things and fans believe the crap.

I will combine the Hobbs and Llyod issue. I believe Lloyd was hurt with Hobbs hit. Yes Hobbs needs to be more careful and take care of his teammates. One good thing is if he is hitting that hard in practice I cannot wait to see him hit in a game. I am concerned about Llyod and his injury issues. Also I hate soft tissue injuries because they tend to linger longer.

I have nothing to say about Simmons issue other than it might work.

As for the stats, you got to be careful on just looking at the stats. Yes you did the right thing. The stats show a story that needs to be considered. What we need to look at is the Packers had an issue at center. The Packers have addressed that issue. As for the Niners guard play there are twso guards which one was the issue. Plus for the guard the center and the tackles could cause an issue. That is where I trust our pro player scouts and the coaching staff to study film.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 30, 2025 at 12:53 pm

Re: Simmons might work

I agree, it might work, there are stories in the NFL of 2nd, 3rd chance players finding redemption, but I admit, I err on the side of caution/suspicion and it is far more likely that he is who he is and a change of scenery/coaching is not going to illicit great change.

If Simmons finds his groove, awesome, Go Pack!, but I'm far more interested in the development of Hopper heading into the season than the turn-around of Simmons.

0 points
0
0
Joster11's picture

July 30, 2025 at 02:29 pm

I don't care what they give him for a nickname as long as we see a ton of "Golden Love" during the season!

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

July 30, 2025 at 07:38 am

Golden Bullet?
I 'll show my age; the only famous Bullet
I knew, was on the roy Rogers show.
"Dog" or "dawg" would be a great way
to describe him.

The news from Jenkins sounds like
a Unhealthy dynamic.
(Behind the doors Toxic Communication).
Moving on works.

Simmons - Going back to the 4-3-4?

Back to the dog days-
If Hobbs isn't in the dog house.
It will always show up in playing time.

Back to Jenkins- The expectations.
My Focus is on Spending money.
Did we really have to sign Banks ?

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

July 30, 2025 at 07:44 am

If you are ok with not taking chances of getting better and looking to stay the same yes we did not need to sign Banks. This is the NFL if you are not improving you are getting worse because there are many teams taking the next step to improving the team.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

July 30, 2025 at 07:48 am

True- but my focus was on spending money!
When so many possible Free Agents need it.
(Losing 2 maybe more, to signing 1)

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:05 am

That's what happens when you try to make comments the way you do. Your meaning gets lost.

You might be right that the one player might not equal two but you need to look at everything such as the two players we save do we really need or once again saving the two players does that make us better.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:41 am

No- it's just your spin.

The next step is the draft.
TT believed in it.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 30, 2025 at 01:14 pm

Last I checked, the Packers participate in the draft every year.

Do not forget that Thompson had his share of doghouse draft picks, too, particularly along the OL early on.

There were plenty of Jason Spitzs, Tony Molls, Costons, Whittakers, Colledges, etc and so forth. The difference is, for better or for worse, Ted was almost always going to just ride with the selections, even if they weren't turning out that great.

I'm a huge Ted Thompson fan, and a big believer of Draft and Develop (and I died on the hill numerous times defending TT over his entire career here at CHTV and Jersey Al's), but if he had a fault, he was too dedicated to his selections and probably could have stood to move on from a draftee that was ho-hum and looked to fill the position with a FA if it was going to move the needle.

I do think Gute paid an awful lot for Banks, but I also believe the overall impact, at least on paper, is a much better starting talent lineup across the entire line.

Somewhere between Gute's aggressive swings in FA and Ted's hardline draft and develop is probably the sweet spot, but I don't think Gute's willingness to bring in FA is egregious by any means- they've worked out well for the most part, too.

Packers aren't in salary cap trouble at this point. The only time they've really had issues was when they were attempting to appease Rodgers' desire to keep older players around him when they clearly should have been rebuilding. I'm not concerned. Part of having a talented football team with growing experience is having to make hard choices with the cap. I don't think the Packers are pressed up against the wall yet, and the cap grows, and the hits tend to lower, and when they don't, it's usually a built in mechanic to force both sides to the table to either extend or nullify contracts.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 30, 2025 at 10:13 am

My guess is they wanted to improve the run play in particular and wanted a known, ready commodity to enable Jenkins to shift. Jenkins isn’t a beast in the run game these days as a G, but he’s a lot better than Myers and many Cs and he is a far better pass protector. I continue to think they see C as extending his career.

The goal was, I believe, to improve overall run play at the same time as improving protection and preventing regular interior pocket collapses into the backfield. They wanted a set type and that cost them. If it works, it will be well worth it.

They paid for a plug and play LG to try and remove the question marks a new draft pick inevitably brings or remove depth. In fact we now have assembled a deep pool oh youn potential Gs competing to play RG and provide depth now and in the future.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

July 30, 2025 at 10:38 am

We know why they did it.
My point- spending the money to do it.!!

If his pff grades for the year flop.
Now that a medical condition has popped up.
The gamble for 1 hurts the majority.

It Hurts the roster building.
It Hurts the draft and development .

The position in question was never LG.
It was center and possibly RG.
Lack of money is the biggest danger
of any team.
Money to sign draft picks.
Money for the future of draftees who do develop.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 30, 2025 at 02:22 pm

I consulted 4 different NFL Cap sites, and the Packers were ranked as having between the 11th and 17th most cap space in the NFL.

I don't know why there's variance, but the bottom line is, it appears the Packers are doing no worse than middle of the league in terms of cap space in 2025.

I would defer to TGR in analysis of how the cap landscape looks, I'm no accountant, but to my casual fiscal eyes, I don't see much reason for all the cap angst, except to find fault with the current GM.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

July 30, 2025 at 03:24 pm

TGR thought Banks was an over-pay and I agree.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:57 pm

We shall see if the market got reset. Another factor is the revenue was strong again, with the NFL seeing an 8% increase and the Packers getting a 10% increase based in part on having a 9th home game.

2025 was a terrible year in free agency for a team in need of offensive line help, which is most teams. At Center, the top free agent was Dalman, who while pretty good was also hurt (554 snaps in (2025). He got $14M and was signed by Chicago, so we will see him up close. Ryan Kelley has been a good center for a long time, but he is old and he only managed 601 snaps. He got 2 yrs/$18M and is in MN so we will see him up close. Robert Hainsey has been a nice utility offensive lineman and was thrust into the starting center role (over a 1000 snaps in 2023) when ryan Jensen had to retire due to injury. Not so hot as a starter but not terrible. TB drafted Graham Barton to replace Jensen and sent Hainsey back to the bench (88 snaps). He got $7.5M per year. Not enticing. I would have bid on Kelly to give the team time to draft Myers' replacement for $9M AAV.

The guard alternatives were bad and still expensive. Wil Fries got 4 yrs/$87M ($17.5M) but he played just 268 snaps in 5 games last year. He is young at least but do you want to be reading about how they are draining his knee after games? Fries signed in MN (are you seeing a pattern here?). Mekhi Becton signed for 2 years/$20M ($10M AAV) after being a one year wonder. He was a high draft pick. I think he would have been a decent stopgap but I would defer to the team who can check to see why he was such a disappointment for 4 years and also into the 2 years he missed with an injury.

I suspect that the market is reset since multiple guys turned scarcity into paydays. Now, if Fries, Hainsey, Kelly, etc. all disappoint and get released, maybe the market will not reset.

They did the sign a guard thing. The thing is that Banks is not great and 2024 was his best year after disappointing in previous years. He is a good run blocker but he definitely is not great at it and he is average in pass pro. I certainly think overall Jenkins was a better guard than Banks. Even he only managed 775 snaps in 13 games. $19.25M!

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

July 31, 2025 at 06:59 am

Similarly Detroit moved Glasgow from guard and drafted Rutledge to fill his spot, a couple picks after the Pack went with Belton as an OT. There were no centers selected until Philly grabbed Kendall in the fifth round, who may have been a steal?

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

August 01, 2025 at 10:58 pm

Jannes,

I do think the pricetag for Banks was steeper than I would have liked, but cap management is about the entire roster.

There will always be players who get paid more than what is subjectively (or even objectively) considered market value for the level of play they produce, and conversely, there will always be players who go above and beyond the level of play that would be considered expected at a given pay scale.

Cap management, IMO, comes down to the overall level of talent on your team being balanced with having the financial room to extend players, make mid season acquisitions to fill gaps due to injury, and acquire new talent in the off season if talent becomes available that fits.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

August 02, 2025 at 09:27 am

Cap management is also incredibly boring. As long as they're running out 53 on Sunday who gives a shit about what their contract details are. Do they win - that's the only relevant issue. Somehow they make the numbers work, and for the last thirty years this team has had a shot. Even when weighed down by Rodgers and Bakhtiari's last contract they fielded 53, and were in the race at the end of the year. Many fans on this site have never seen a bad team in Green Bay. (though probably most of us geezers truly have)

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

August 02, 2025 at 10:46 am

Well, I mean, I do agree that contract details are not my cup of tea, and being concerned about the cap is not something I find fun or interesting personally..

..however, I do think it's important in the sense that a poorly managed cap results in a team that has to make moves it doesn't want to make, or limits a team from making moves it would like to make, based on finances instead of football related reasons.

So long as the team isn't strapped for cap space and isn't in a position where they are limiting the health of their future cap, I really don't care much. During those years where the Packers caved to Rodgers' demands to "run it back" instead of rebuild, they did effectively start to impact the health of their future cap- I am thankful that we cleaned house as quickly as we have and got out from under that weight of 'voided years' contracts and Rodgers' cap hits as quickly as we did and with minimized impact.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

July 30, 2025 at 03:21 pm

Humphrey, Barton were there when it was his turn to pick. When you go in the other direction, then you may end up paying for experienced talent to fill the Voids. We'll see how Banks works out. If they want a power front, then Love stays in the pocket. Morgan has the pulling ability, so maybe he stays RG.

0 points
0
0
HawkPacker's picture

July 30, 2025 at 08:56 am

'I 'll show my age; the only famous Bullet
I knew, was on the roy Rogers show.'

Roy Rogers show? I don't remember that but I do remember the silver bullet on the Lone Ranger show!

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:54 am

Calling cards don't work.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

July 30, 2025 at 03:39 pm

Remember what Jay Silverheels said to Johnny Carson regarding Ke-moh-sah-bee in translation...

0 points
0
0
mnbadger's picture

July 30, 2025 at 02:52 pm

Hi Ho Silver! Awaaayyy!
GPG!

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

July 30, 2025 at 08:14 am

When its professional sports it is always about the money. When they say it isn't about the money they it is REALLY about the money. Jenkins knows his age and what he will be able to demand after this year so he made a powerplay to make more. Gute said get out there and play because the alternative is even worse for you.

I do think Jenkins will improve the center stats in both the run and pass. Myers was simply a bad player. People complained about the short yardage play calling, Myers limited to what they could do. Good question about Banks, I am not thrilled with that signing. Hopefully he pans out.

You think Hobbs would be a little more cognitive of what he was doing since he has had some injury issues in his past. They didn't sign him to be a bonehead and get others hurt.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:37 am

A OL works as a unit in coordination. Each player should know what he has to do and to be able to trust his line mates to do the same for it to function to its potential. The problem with an OL with a consistent weak spot is that it makes the job of those around it much harder. The neighboring players have to be aware of the possible need to compensate in both directions regardless of what the defensive call mandates. It’s a knock on effect. Fix the problem and play at 3 positions improves, even if the personnel playing next to the weak link don’t improve individually.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

July 30, 2025 at 08:19 am

Don't know much about the Jenkins contract issue...now seems it was much ado about nothing. If you don't ask, you don't get and when an agent is involved there is always the "asking"...and too often it devolves into threats and holdouts. None of that here, thankfully.

What is apparent is Jenks usual availability is back in the locker room and on the practice field. He has always been a warrior. Back in business.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

July 30, 2025 at 08:21 am

“Whenever they say it’s not about the money, it’s about the money.”

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

July 30, 2025 at 08:30 am

That, right there!

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

July 30, 2025 at 08:27 am

Golden Bullet ... very 70s pretty lame
At Lafluer's press conference he once again gave short non informative answers regarding Hobbs , and because he gives condescending answers to the reporters, they are always afraid to pin him down and get answers.
Jenkins at center will be huge as far as being efficient at blocking assignments but Myers was a pretty efficient snapper so well see how that transpires.
Lots of hype about Simmons, but the reports I have read on him is he doesn't like to hit, so its great he covers and gets there not so much when needed to stop YACs

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

July 30, 2025 at 08:35 am

As long as Elgton doesn't kiss any of his teammates on the head, we should be good to go.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:44 am

A graceful bow and finger kiss is of course the proper etiquette in a civilized NFL locker room.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

July 30, 2025 at 10:03 am

I don't know Coldworld, Matt LaFleur looks like an air kisser to me.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

July 30, 2025 at 04:32 pm

Yet pats on the butt are still acceptable?

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

July 30, 2025 at 08:52 am

I agree with Al about honesty but it is just not practiced anymore. Unfortunately, spin, doublespeak, agent-speak, coach-speak, fan fantasists, team PR interference on fansites are what dominates the 'conversation' these days.

I'm just waiting another month for actual reality to show up.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:12 am

I did a search on the term Golden Bullet and this is what I got.

"Golden Bullet" most commonly refers to Remington's line of .22 Long Rifle ammunition, known for its reliability and affordability, particularly for target shooting and small game hunting. Google AI

Al you are onto something. If Matthew Golden becomes a reliable WR in the NFL he fits that definition of being reliable and affordable being as he is on his rookie contract.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:58 am

lol, I found less savory connotations.

If he lives up to our hopes, the English colloquialism “he’s bloody golden” comes to mind. Golden meaning “excellent, valuable, advantageous, or achieving a perfect or ideal outcome” and Bloody meaning amplify times 10.

Bloody is a proper football nickname in my view. No one forgets John ‘Blood’ McNally. McNally was 6'1" and 188 lbs., known for his speed, agility, and pass-catching ability. Seems like a nice homage to a similar talent.

That’s Bloody Golden mate!

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

July 30, 2025 at 09:59 am

It's too bad the reference applies to only a .22 caliber round.

0 points
0
0
BruceC1960's picture

July 30, 2025 at 10:04 am

Josh Myers taken the pick before Creed Humphrey is the biggest miss in recent memory.

0 points
0
0
13TimeChamps's picture

July 30, 2025 at 10:17 am

Maybe it's time to move on from that, don't ya think?

0 points
0
0
BruceC1960's picture

July 30, 2025 at 05:32 pm

Agreed. But hard to. I’ll try to do better.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

July 30, 2025 at 12:14 pm

That sounded like baloney, so I had to check it.

That same year, 2021, we took Eric Stokes at #29. That wasn't a bigger miss? Myers was a starter for every game on a good line . We also drafted Royce Newman instead of Nate Hobbs that year. Certainly that's a bigger miss.

We miss a lot.....so does every other team. When you draft a guy who starts for four years on a good line on a good offense, that's not a miss, regardless of who you could have taken. Hell, we missed by not drafting Brock Purdy. We missed not taking DK Metcalf. We missed by taking Jaire Alexander instead of Lamar Jackson.

And of course, if you want to go back to the Dark Days of the Long Dry Spell (before Wolf) you can find some unbelievable misses.

I know that there's a lot of people here who have contempt for Myers for not being "good enough" (or worse). So now can find a new "weakest link" to throw crap at.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 30, 2025 at 03:34 pm

Not sure why you buck so hard against what should be common sense.

A player who starts for 4 years but plays at a sub-par level is certainly not a "win". Every NFL team looks to not only raise their ceiling, but also their floor. Yes, there will always be a "weakest link", but the goal should always be that the weakest link is as good of a player as you muster. You can, believe it or not, have a weakest link that is still a plus football player as opposed to a negative.

Perhaps the Packers were not in a position to prioritize an upgrade from Josh Meyers during his time in GB, perhaps they believed he would blossom. None of that changes the fact he wasn't a successful draft pick because he started for 4 years, it simply means they didn't have better, for one reason or another.

Go check out the chart in Al's article. Find "Packers" in the left hand column. Skiddle over to the "Center" column in that row. See all that red and the biggest number in the column? That means "Josh Meyers was not good."

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

July 30, 2025 at 04:16 pm

so the line/offense overall were really good, despite the players. got it.

Also, when you consider that only 44 first round picks signed a second contract with the team that drafted them (between 2011 and 2020) it gives some perspective to the people who want to relitigate/redraft the past. Also too, despite the team not opting to resign him, he's still in the NFL. One of 1200. On the planet.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 30, 2025 at 04:38 pm

The Packers OL wasn't really good, it was good, with room to improve. Getting rid of Josh Meyers was a colossal step to improve the overall line. Do you get that? Can I make it any more clear for you two?

Second point: My stating Josh Meyers wasn't a good starting NFL Center does not equate to my saying he's not a talented football player at another level. I have full respect for the fact that at the end of the day, he's better than hundreds of thousands if not millions of other people who have played Center during their lifetimes in high school, college, etc.. That does not change the fact that at the level of NFL Starting Center, he has struggled, and hasn't been good enough to retain that job.

Are you familiar with NBA player Brian Scalabrine? If you're not, run the google search with the terms "I'm closer to LeBron James than you are to me."

Here's the thing: Josh Meyers is ABSOLUTELY closer to Jim Otto than most other people are on the planet to Josh, but the thing is, Josh Meyers isn't competing with random dudes in college or off the streets, he's competing to be a starting caliber NFL Center, and within those parameters, he's one of the worst in the league. I wish him well in New York. Who knows? Maybe he'll surprise everyone and win the starting job there.. and if he does (which is doubtful), if he doesn't improve his play, he'll just be one of the worst starting NFL centers in the league for a different team than the Packers in 2025.

It's professional football. Its a performance and results based business fueled by competition. Meyers dd not play at a high level. This shit isn't complicated.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

July 30, 2025 at 07:27 pm

Well,I think that guys who start for us for four years are successful draft picks. Manufacturing a statistical comparison to validate your own bias isn't a hard thing to do .

You strike me as the kind of guy who'd eat a pretty good meal, and then try to convince me that the meat was rotten (in addition to the cook being no good)/ Because you sit there and say that we accomplished things on offense despite our line, especially the disaster named Myers. I KNOW, however, that nothing good happens on offense if people don't get blocked. So I can't go along with your premise there..

So who's going to be your weakest link whipping boy this year? Runyan is gone, Myers is gone? Maybe it'll be Morgan?

I do love this "prioritize the upgrade" stuff. Was this because there were other, more critical needs to attend to ? Even more important than a 'disaster" in the middle of our line? And why is that?

You should let it go. I don't see the point in trashing guys like Runyan and Myers and others as not being good enough after they aren't part of the team anymore. There will always be a weakest point in your starting lineup, but that's still the 21st guy on the roster. Why focus so much on that?

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 30, 2025 at 11:07 pm

You like the Packers to play well, correct? LIke the Packers to win football games?

A better offensive line leads to an improved offense, which leads to scoring more points and better control of the game, which generally leads to winning more football games.

The Packers improving at Center, a position of weakness for the last four years, goes a long way to further the goal of the Packers playing well, to the goal of the offense playing better, to the conclusion of the Packers winning more football games.

Being objective about player and group performance doesn't make me an ogre who's hateful of players and demands blood. You don't win football games based on warm and fuzzy feels, you get there by increasing the talent level on your team and constant, steady pursuit of improvement.

By the way, just to toss you crumb, Sean Rhyan is, at the moment, the weakest link on the Packers projected starting OL at the moment.. and he's soooo much better of a lineman than Josh Meyers was. And guess what? The Packers should be encouraging as much competition as possible for the spot at RG, because that's what you do in professional football- continually look to get better, as opposed to sitting back on your laurels and saying, "we've got a pretty good line." And here's the part that will melt your brain: If Sean Rhyan is the weakest link on the offensive line, but his play isn't sub standard? I won't be chastising him for sub-standard play. It's not just that Meyers was the weakest link on the line, it's that he wasn't a good center. See how that works?

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 30, 2025 at 11:16 pm

Side note;

The shortest distance for a defender to reach the QB is straight up the middle. The player that sits between the defenders and the shortest path to the QB is the center.

When your center is giving up the most pressures, that means he's a liability and the guards are frequently having to place more attention on the middle of the line to make sure center isn't giving up the shortest path to the QB.

A result of that bias is the guards are going to be compromising their b gap duties, and the tackles will more often truly be on an island with pass rush specialists / edge defenders looking to collapse the pocket as well.

Pass protection is always an inside out proposition. If you are weak in the center, there is a domino effect.
On the flip side of the same coin, if your Center is stout and self-sufficient, it frees up at least one guard to put more of his attention elsewhere, which will benefit the line play as a whole and open up the ability to seal off the edge of the pocket.

I will not feel guilty about being realistic about Josh Meyers poor performance at Center for the Packers. I'm not attacking him as a human being. I don't want his dog to die or people to throw rotten tomatoes at him or yell at his children... But I'm more than overjoyed the Packers have moved on from Josh and we have a far better lineman playing center today than we did last season. I guess I'm just a monster.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

July 30, 2025 at 10:19 am

Banks’ strength has been run blocking, not pass blocking, so he might be part of the Niner’s stats there.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

July 30, 2025 at 11:07 am

Once again, I continue to hear reports...from people and coaches who are actually at practices.....that Golden is legit. If he can stay healthy, he's going to be on the field a lot, along with Reid. He's actually a guy who can run patterns and catch the ball......as well as being a real danger to just run past you. He's going to help us a lot this year, and I'm making a prediction. If he's healthy, he's going to make All Rookie.

If he's healthy. I have to say that about Morgan, Musgrave, and Marshawn. These guys have been on the roster for a combined total of 68 games, but only have 25 total appearances, most of those by Musgrave with 18. Lloyd played in one game. Morgan with the other six. IMO, it's a good time for us to get a better ROI on these Top 100 draft picks. If they can't stay on the field, they can't produce.

Musgrave has had 50% availability, much better than the other two. Kraft has to rest a little, especially early in the season, and the best alternative to Musgrave appears to be Ben Sims, who was available for all 17 games and even started 5 of them, because we do run plays with 2 TEs on the field . Kraft was on the field for an astonishing 85% of our plays, so 30 good snaps per game from Musgrave would really help that. If he stays healthy.

These three guys would all dress out on offense if they were healthy.

And on that subject, I'm hoping that Mr. Hobbs understands that when the Head Coach is telling you to stop doing something, then stop doing it. You aren't winning points with your teammates by knocking the crap out of them in July. Yes, thump them a little, but don't knock snot out of your teammates.

It's a long season. You've got to have people help.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

July 30, 2025 at 01:29 pm

Musgrave and Morgan could provide the Packers a lot of depth this year. If the walking soft tissue injury (Lloyd) is out again for any length of time the Packers still have Wilson and Brooks. Fingers crossed Musgrave and Morgan stay healthy.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

July 30, 2025 at 11:14 am

Lloyd: Who knows, but I'm starting to get the feeling this guy is snakebitten. Luckily we have plenty of depth at this position.

Hobbs: Seems he's ready to start the season, albeit over a month early. I like the enthusiasm, but hopefully he can contain himself until the season opener, and hopefully that enthusiasm on defense is contagious.

The chart: I hate to bring up again, but it's so glaring noticing the entry for the Chiefs below the Packer's center--and we all know who is responsible for that. But looking on the bright side, our tackles fared much better than theirs, so that's a credit to Tom and Walker.

Happy to be on the hype train with Simmons. I think he's going to make a difference both on defense and special teams, and I'm very much looking forward to seeing him in action.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

July 30, 2025 at 12:47 pm

Lloyd -Whether Hobbs caused the injury or not ( I think not) - Lloyd injured again. I think that we have reached the hope stage of Lloyd's early career - in hoping that he can have a long and productive career. Rather than thinking - believing - anticipating that one is possible for him. It seems that his career path may now be more closer to a Luke Musgrave or a Tyler Davis.

It is probably prudent for the Packers to now look past Llloyd as the no.2 RB due to his unavailability. Fortunately the Packers have some good choices for the position.

Still I hope the best for Lloyd. Although the worst looms larger.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

July 30, 2025 at 01:26 pm

Yeah, another soft tissue injury for Lloyd is worrisome. A groin pull rarely heals quickly so he could miss some of TC again. Thankfully the Packers have Wilson and Brooks.

So far Musgrave and Morgan have stayed healthy.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

July 30, 2025 at 03:01 pm

I have more belief in Morgan's health and abilities. From last year's rookie O-line crop - he showed relatively well in his limited snaps. While this year he is receiving some solid reviews from Packers coaches. Not hearing much - if anything - with Musgrave's performance to date.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

July 30, 2025 at 03:46 pm

I expect Morgan to be the starting RG this year. Musgrave - IDK. I hope he is healthy enough to spell Kraft. They about wore Kraft out last year.

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

July 30, 2025 at 04:28 pm

So that means they bench Rhyan, not so sure. Now that Jenkins is healthy, I believe the battle is between Morgan and Walker, which was advertised before camp... If so my prediction is Morgan surpasses Walker by week four. I still say Walker has been good but still remains an overachieving seventh round pick.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

July 30, 2025 at 07:36 pm

This is our last opportunity to get value out of Rhyan. We got nothing the first year, a little bit the next year, a starter the third year. Worst case he'll alternate with somebody. We're not just going to put him on the shelf. Morgan....we have under contract for 3 more years. No hurry to get him in the lineup.

Musgrave could hugely help. He's going to be one of these skill position players that we suit up who we don't start, but can bring in. You have 5 "weapons" on the field, and he could be one, as could Lloyd or Williams or Watson. That is depth.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 30, 2025 at 11:37 pm

What is the point of prioritizing "getting value" out of Rhyan, because there still more years of "value" in Morgan...if (and that's an IF) Morgan is a better player than Rhyan? Last I checked, if they're both on the roster, they're both getting paid. The value is lost if you're not putting the best product on the field.

Putting lesser talent on the field because it's your last chance to get a player's services on the cheap is antithetical to the goal of putting the best football team you can on the field.

That's missing the forest for the trees.

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

July 31, 2025 at 07:53 pm

No hurry to get Morgan in the line-up? It will, if Walker regresses in any form. I'm going to stick with my prediction. There is a reason Z Tom got the big bucks not Walker.

0 points
0
0