5 Things to Watch in Packers vs Vikings: Battle in the Trenches
The Packers may have an advantage up front on both sides of the ball this week.
By markoldacres

The early kick-offs
The Packers have already been given plenty of help in their unlikely quest to make the playoffs, but they’ll still need some more if they are to sneak into the postseason.
With Green Bay playing in the late window, there are several games being contested earlier in the day which could have an impact on their playoff hopes. The main game to keep an eye on is the Washington Commanders vs the Cleveland Browns.
If the Commanders lose, the Packers will go into their matchup with the Vikings finally in control of their own destiny, meaning two wins would put them into the playoffs. However, a Washington win will mean Green Bay is eliminated from postseason contention if they lose to Minnesota.
Elsewhere, the Packers will be rooting for the Indianapolis Colts over the New York Giants, since two Giants losses paired with two Packers wins would also see Aaron Rodgers and Co. make the playoffs.
If the Detroit Lions fall to the Chicago Bears, they will be eliminated from the playoff hunt and would have nothing to play for against the Packers in Week 18, which would be helpful if the Packers enter the final week in a ‘win and in’ scenario.
A New Orleans Saints win over the Philadelphia Eagles would mean the Eagles and Dallas Cowboys would still reason to play their starters in Week 18 against the Giants and Commanders respectively, which would also benefit the Packers.
So, there’s your rooting guide for the early kick-offs, now onto what you should be watching in the actual Packers game.
Battle in the trenches
As the old cliché goes: “the game is won up front”. Winning in the trenches will be key to a Packers win this weekend, and Green Bay has a real chance of coming out on top on both sides of the ball.
The Packers’ defensive line has improved of late, with Jarran Reed and Devonte Wyatt stepping up to provide the resurgent Kenny Clark with some assistance inside. Conversely, the interior of the Vikings’ offensive line, which was already a soft spot, is further compromised right now.
Kirk Cousins isn’t the type of quarterback who can scramble out of a collapsing pocket, so if the Packers can get pressure from the interior, they could force mistakes from the Vikings QB.
On the other side of the ball, Green Bay will finally have their preferred starting offensive line available, with David Bakhtiari set to return after his appendectomy.
Minnesota’s defensive front, led by Danielle Hunter and old friend Za’Darius Smith, is capable of wreaking havoc at any time, so having the strongest possible group protecting Aaron Rodgers is a huge boost.
Jaire vs Jefferson
When the Packers and Vikings faced off in Week 1, Justin Jefferson exploded for nine catches, 184 yards and two touchdowns, as he ripped through a Joe Barry defense which presented an inadequate gameplan to try to negate him.
Jaire Alexander was clearly frustrated with the lack of opportunities he was given to cover Jefferson one-on-one, and this week called Jefferson’s big day back in September “a fluke”.
Expect to see more of Alexander covering Jefferson this time around, but don’t expect the Vikings wideout to be shut down.
Jefferson is a special receiver, and he’s going to have production no matter what an opposing defense throws at him. All the Packers can try to do is prevent Jefferson from winning the game on his own like last time.
Watson and Nixon’s health
Christian Watson and Keisean Nixon enter Sunday’s game with a ‘questionable’ designation, and their availability (or lack of) will be a significant factor in which team comes out on top.
Green Bay’s offense is completely different when Watson is on the field. His presence means the Packers are a threat to score at any time, and his absence would mean longer, more difficult offensive drives being required to score points.
The same can be said for Nixon on special teams. For all the improvements Rich Bisaccia has made to his unit this year, Nixon’s ability to regularly deliver healthy kick and punt returns has been the true game-changer. He’s been a solid contributor on defense, too.
You could argue the Packers would be about a touchdown worse off if Watson and Nixon aren’t on the field, or not able to play at full speed.
Darnell Savage
Savage was thrust back into the spotlight against Miami, receiving his first significant playing time since being effectively benched a few weeks earlier. The break appears to have done him some good, as he turned in a steadier performance on Christmas Day.
Savage spoke this week about the mental adjustment he’s had to make, telling the Green Bay media: “My biggest downfall is I feel like I can make every play. It’s just not realistic”.
Hopefully something has clicked for Savage, who has flashed his first-round pedigree at times during his career with the Packers. He’ll face a stiff test against the Vikings’ potent offense this week.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres
__________________________



Comments (26)
splitpea1
December 31, 2022 at 03:59 pm
The spotlight is on Barry. If it hasn't already arrived, it's Judgment Game for him. What's the plan this time around? Containing Jefferson is essential, but you need to be paying attention to Thielen and Hockenson (13 catches last week), as well as keeping Cook under control.
I think it's a fair assessment that the Packers would be a touchdown worse off if Watson and Nixon can't suit up. Watson draws a lot of attention. But the Vikings aren't particularly good vs. the pass, so that works in our favor.
Savage? I'll have to see it to believe it.
A. Jones has to be good for more than 5 carries this time, doesn't he? Jeez.
Coldworld
January 01, 2023 at 10:12 am
Savage was decent at least last week, but the opponent ran a game that “forced” usage in coverage, which is what he’s better at. It certainly made me more confident that the issue with him is a disconnect between his abilities and what Barry asks of him. Barry’s use of safeties seems to ask things of all of them that none of them can do all of well. Not many in the league are capable of aggressive run defense and deep coverage and even playing CB in effect in zone hand offs. Players or paradigm at fault? Possibly both, but I feel like the scheme gets less than it should from what we have and thus ought to have been tempered accordingly.
SinceLombardi
January 01, 2023 at 10:57 am
I don’t care if they shut the Vikings out… The jury is already in on Joe Barry. For me it’s in on MLF too.
I’m tired of seeing this team pushed around by physical teams.
If they make the playoffs I’d give MLF another year. Barry has to go no matter how they finish.
Leatherhead
December 31, 2022 at 04:38 pm
On defense, rush with 4 and cover with 7. They'll still complete over 60%, but if we tackle after the completion we'll be fine. Those long runs after the catch are hurting us.
On offense, I'd line up in the 3-1-1. Force Minnesota to play nickel, then use our TE and Oline to pummel the six defenders left in the box. Smaller defenders. And then you've still got Jones, or Dillon, or Rodgers with the ball. It's good math for us. Maybe it's boring to watch, but it gets it done on a cold day.
PackyCheese500
December 31, 2022 at 07:13 pm
I would add in some blitzes and stunts. We have to make Cousins, a relatively immobile pocket QB, uncomfortable.
jannesbjornson
January 01, 2023 at 09:17 am
Cousins likes to have a rolling pocket, both right and left side action. He connects on the long ball out of it. I like the idea of blitzing in his face.
Guam
January 01, 2023 at 08:22 am
A good rushing attack is never boring Leatherhead! And that statement may indicate just how old I am.........
SinceLombardi
January 01, 2023 at 10:58 am
We are extremely weak at TE
NoNonsense
December 31, 2022 at 06:26 pm
We just signed Bo Melton off Seattle's practice squad and have elevated RB Tyler Goodson finally. I want to see GB run the rock on the Vikings, control the clock and keep Justin Jefferson off the field as much as possible.
If Christian isn't full go, use the new guy and his 4.3 speed to open up the offense with play action passes and quick screens, bubble screens, slants and short to middle crossing routes. Get the ball out quick to our playmakers and negate Z and Hunter's pass rush.
GB has everything to gain and nothing to lose. Play loose, play fast and score a lot of points.
13TimeChamps
January 01, 2023 at 10:24 am
"If Christian isn't full go, use the new guy and his 4.3 speed to open up the offense with play action passes and quick screens, bubble screens, slants and short to middle crossing routes."
If you think Rodgers is going to be throwing all those types of passes to a rookie WR he's never played with before, you've been watching a different AR12 than I have.
PackyCheese500
December 31, 2022 at 07:12 pm
On an unrelated note, I just finished watching the TCU Michigan game. TCU’s WR Quentin Johnston is something else. He is 6’4, 215 lbs, with a 4.40 40 yd dash. He looks incredible - one of his best plays was taking a rushed screen pass 75 yards for a TD. He is projected to be an early-ish 1st round pick. I don’t think the Packers should take a WR in round 1, but Johnston may have changed my mind. If he falls to the Packers’ pick, I think they should seriously consider getting him in 2023. A trio of Watson, Doubs, and Johnston would be an enticing WR group.
BirdDogUni
December 31, 2022 at 07:17 pm
*79 yards... Just saying!
If we don't want to draft a WR in the 1st round, might I suggest:
https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Rashee-Rice-WR-SMU
Dude can ball... Think Davante Adams with real speed... (4.36)
Thinking we can probably draft Rashee Rice with our 2nd round pick.
PackyCheese500
December 31, 2022 at 08:02 pm
I was estimating, but thanks for the clarification. Rice is one of my favorite 2nd round prospects. My other favorite WR prospects are Cedric Tillman of Tennessee, A.T. Perry of Wake Forest (both 2nd round), Xavier Hutchinson of Iowa St, Jonathan Mingo of Ole Miss (3rd round prospects), and Cornelius Johnson of Michigan (early 4th round).
Rices speed would be what separates him. Having two perimeter WRs over 6 feet and with 4.3 40s would be enticing. Especially since Rice is a good blocker
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou
January 01, 2023 at 08:37 am
At one time I thought/hoped Johnston would be available for the Packers to draft in round 1 but he no longer will be available. The Pack would have to trade up for him and that isn't going to happen.
From my perspective I'd be perfectly fine with a WR in round 1 as the team needs another talented WR on offense. However, the WR would need to be worthy of a round 1 pick. With all the other needs the team has at key positions on offense and defense they need to draft best player possible in round 1 IMHO regardless of position. Take your pick at DL, Edge, Safety, TE, and WR. For that matter QB if one of our top 2 QB's is traded in offseason.
Coldworld
January 01, 2023 at 10:23 am
We have a lot of needs, some multiple like S, DL and TE. I would love Johnston, but Watson’s showing only strengthens his appeal I suspect. It’s early, I haven’t really started looking in depth, but i think he’s long gone. I don’t want us burning the picks required to reach the top 5 as we need them badly. In fact, this could be a year to trade and accumulate given our needs and cap constraints. I don’t see another receiver I think we should take in round one in current circumstances. I think 2 and 3 will yield good options to add to Watson, Doubs, Toure and Melton. That’s a good core to build around. If I took a skill player early this year, it would likely be a TE based on need and the options available.
jannesbjornson
January 01, 2023 at 09:19 am
Johnson is in the top five.
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou
January 01, 2023 at 02:35 pm
What do you think of WR, Jalen Hyatt? A speedster who just won the Fred Bilitnikoff (spelling) award for best WR in college. Hmmm....?
Thegreatreynoldo
January 01, 2023 at 02:38 am
The Packers elevated Kicker Ramiz Ahmed for the Vikings game. The Vikings have a very good returner in Kene Nwangwu, who has averaged 28.6 yards per kickoff return over two seasons and 26.0 this year. I am not sure that Ahmed can kick them out of the endzone in January, but he should get them deeper, at any rate. The Packers also elevated Tyler Goodson, per Tom Silverstein.
I have to think Bo Melton might be inactive. Teams don't elevate players from the PS unless they plan to make them active for the game. To a large extent, it becomes a numbers game. Aaron Jones was a limited participant all week but did not receive an injury designation of any kind. They have Patrick Taylor on the roster, and while they don't have to make him active, he seems to be the #3 RB. Perhaps Goodson is going to return kickoffs, but he only had one kickoff return for 5 yards in his three college seasons. That doesn't mean he can't do it, but it might have more to do with the team wanting to manage Aaron Jones' snaps like they did against Miami. IIRC, Goodson got a look during TC on returns.
It is all good to me. I wanted to see Bo Melton, but I also wanted to see Tyler Goodson.
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou
January 01, 2023 at 08:43 am
I see Goodson very similar to Hill who was let go earlier this season. Would be good to see him play some. Melton would have been fun watching play. I am hoping with his 4.34 speed he develops into a good WR for the Packers. The thought of him on the field at the same time with Watson at a 4.36 speed would be fun watching defenses try to defend that kind of speed. Then having Doubs doing what he does. Priceless!
Still need a quality TE like a Hockensen.
BruceC1960
January 01, 2023 at 09:45 am
If Goodson, Taylor, Dillon and Jones are all active is it likely Jones is less than full speed?
Coldworld
January 01, 2023 at 09:50 am
Melton has had issues with drops in college and in camp with the Seahawks. He apparently did work on both punt and kick returns there though as well as as a gunner based on his comments and those of friends who follow them. In college his team had good specialist returners while he was their star WR whom they seem to have tried to protect when they could and used him as a gunner unless their returner was hurt.
His lower body power is impressive, but his upper body is in need of development. He struggles to beat press and is poor if the catch is contested. I don’t know that he profiles as much more than a returner or gunner and maybe an option/go type. I do see upside for the future, although he probably profiles best to the slot at a little under 5’11 and very sudden. I’m happy he will be with us for the future. A good development prospect: I think an upgrade over Amari in terms of upside.
Elevating Goodson puzzled me. They could have elevated Abernathy and kept him, but that could say more about their assessment of him. Goodson is an excellent pass catcher and the nearest to a Jones type as a runner that we have. Is that the reason? Is Jones going to be limited, was there interest in poaching him too or is it STs? If so, I can only say that Goodson looked dodgy on punts in the little I saw of him. Melton and Goodson seem like their initial roles would be very similar if they aren’t replacements for specific absentees. It will be interesting to see. He’s a guy I thought made a strong argument for a spot as an option type and even partial slot role in camp.
The elevation of Ahmed I think confirms what many of us suspected and that the team has come to terms with this being the last year of the Crosby era. That’s in a way sad, he’s been a great Packer, but it’s a relief that they seem not to be in denial at least with respect to that.
jannesbjornson
January 01, 2023 at 11:53 am
I was pushing for Ruggles to take his spot, but he shanked the pressure kick last evening vs the Bulldogs.
Leatherhead
January 01, 2023 at 02:11 pm
Here are the WRs under contract for 2023, according to Spotrac
Watson, Doubs, Toure, Melton. All cheap rookies. This is reminiscent of Gutekunst's first WR reload, when he took three guys on Day 3 of the draft, and some FAs, and in the end he got two pretty decent NFL WRs...Lazard and MVS, to line up with Adams. Now, we're looking for the guys we want on the field with Watson, the number 2 and 3 guys. Unless we bring Lazard back, which I hope we do. Then our WR unit is largely set for 2023.
SinceLombardi
January 01, 2023 at 02:35 pm
Thank you Carson Wentz for making the Packers game meaningful.. and thanks Ron Rivera for not benching Wentz today.
Leatherhead
January 01, 2023 at 02:46 pm
We complain about our QB situation....how'd you like to be Washington? Or Cleveland?
SinceLombardi
January 01, 2023 at 03:02 pm
I think Cleveland will be ok with Watson . Washington is in trouble. Imagine making the $$ Wentz makes, and being totally inept!