2025 Packers Running Back Room: An Embarrassment of Riches?

A look at who could be the odd man out.

Perhaps because of Jordan Love’s injuries, perhaps because of chronic wide receiver drops or perhaps simply to feed the hot hand in Josh Jacobs, the Green Bay Packers were a run-heavy crew in 2024.

Let’s face it, since he’s been head coach of the Packers, Head Coach Matt LaFleur hadn’t had a physical, dominating running back like Jacobs. Aaron Jones was a talented fan favorite, but he had the tendency to be brittle while in Green Bay. And for all of A.J. Dillon’s popularity in and around Green Bay and Door County, he was at times inefficient. So handed a weapon like Jacobs, perhaps LaFleur simply decided to wear defenses out on the ground more often.

But for a quick comparison, during the 2023 season, Jordan Love’s first full season as the starter, the offense recorded a total of 441 rushes for 1,905 yards, for 4.3 yards per carry. Last season, quarterbacks handed off (or took off themselves) 526 times for 2,496 yards, notching a 4.8 average. Jacobs handled 301 of those carries on his own. Chris Brooks and Emanuel Wilson split most of the rest and did so efficiently. And in 2025, the team expects 2024 third-round running back Marshawn Lloyd back in the fold after a lost rookie season that was torpedoed by injury and illness.

Is it possible the Packers could keep four running backs on the roster? Doubtful, but at the same time, it’s tough to say goodbye to either of those undrafted backups. Here’s a quick look at what the running back riches in Green Bay – outside of the obvious starter in Jacobs – look like as we bear down on training camp.

Chris Brooks

The undrafted third-year player is a California/BYU product who, until two of the final three games of the season, didn’t handle more than four carries in a game. He then had six carries in a Week 16 blowout of the Saints, totaling 23 yards on the ground and scoring his first touchdown in the NFL. In a meaningless loss to the Bears in Week 18, he notched 8 carries for 59 yards, breaking one for 23. On the season, the talented Brooks totaled 36 carries for 183 yards, with 11 receptions for another 69 scrimmage yards. Coming out of college, he projected as a backup – a downhill runner with mostly average traits. It will be interesting to see if he finds a place on the 53-man roster at the end of camp, or if the Packers attempt to sign him to the practice squad.

Emanuel Wilson

A more frequent contributor in 2024, the 5-10, 229-pound Wilson, racked up 103 carries for 502 yards and four touchdowns. He also hauled in 11 passes for 48 yards and an additional score. In other words, a solid backup who at times flashed. His most productive game last season was that aforementioned loss to the Bears, in which he carried the ball 14 times for 73 yards and a touchdown. The Fort Valley State product also was undrafted coming into the NFL, first signing with the Denver Broncos and then getting a shot in Green Bay in 2023. He’s a solid pass-catcher and has the trust of the coaches. NFL Analyst Lance Zierlein said of Wilson, “Wilson’s size and burst are NFL-caliber and worth keeping an eye on if he makes it into camp as a priority free agent.” It’s proving out, as Wilson has proven to be a worthy backup.

Marshawn Lloyd

I’m looking forward to watching Lloyd in preseason games. Fans saw little of the second-year player during his rookie season, thanks to hip, hamstring and ankle injuries early in the season, followed by appendicitis last November. The 5-9, 220-pounder showed serious burst in college, but only had 6 carries for 15 yards and one catch for 3 yards during his rookie year in the NFL. If he turns out to be what the Packers apparently believe he can be, after choosing him 88th overall in the 2024 draft, it will provide one heck of a one-two punch along with the powerful Jacobs. During his final college season at USC, Lloyd rushed 116 times for 820 yards, for a 7.2-yards-per carry average. He also caught 13 passes for another 232 yards. Those stats might just give LaFleur a reason to keep running the ball – it would be nice to see Lloyd stay healthy and get 100-plus carries this coming season.

There are also two other running backs coming into camp: Jalen White and Amar Johnson. White enjoyed a solid career at Georgia Southern with more than 3,300 scrimmage yards and 36 touchdowns, while Johnson was first team All-Missouri Valley Football Conference last year at South Dakota State. Could one surprise? 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Kevin Gibson is a professional writer and author based in Louisville, Ky. He's also a former sports writer who covered high school, college and professional sports, a Packers shareholder and a fan since 1975. Even John Hadl couldn't break him. Follow him on Twitter: @kgramone

__________________________

 

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (33)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
EricTorkelson's picture

July 11, 2025 at 06:11 am

This is a tough one, and assuming everyone comes out of camp injury free I'm going to predict because of Wilson and Loyd having the same skill set and Brooks being the better pass blocker they go with Jacobs,Loyde,Brooks. Maybe if they showcase Wilson enough in the preseason they could garner a seventh rounder from a team starving for a running back.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 11, 2025 at 08:46 am

Wilson doesn’t have the same skillset as Lloyd. He’s closest to Jacob’s and able to come in and allow the O to continue unchanged. Lloyd in contrast can take the ball outside the tackles better than any of the returning RBs and is a threat after the catch if you can get the ball to him in motion.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

July 11, 2025 at 07:45 pm

I agree.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

July 11, 2025 at 06:33 am

With his size couldn't MLF use Brooks in the FB role like he likes to use his swing TE for? What ever happened to (Dagara sp)? I think they aren't that deep in the TE room anyway and couldn't that justify keeping them all?

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

July 11, 2025 at 07:15 am

Deguara is long gone as a free agent and they haven't had an H back since. I doubt either Brooks or Wilson are big enough to play TE given the inline blocking responsibility.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

July 11, 2025 at 07:34 am

Thanks. I was just hoping that with his blocking they could use it as an excuse and possibly line him up with one or the other. Be good to see two back sets again.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 11, 2025 at 08:54 am

The 2 back set perhaps becomes relevant with Jacobs and Lloyd because that gives both an inside and outside threat and run after a catch option at the same time. This likely requires, importantly, that Lloyd shows he’s a competent protector/lead blocker to prevent it being obvious he’s in there to get the ball. Wilson is similar to Jacobs and Brooks also does not bring that outside of the tackles threat, so 2 back sets made less obvious stone last year.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

July 11, 2025 at 11:24 am

Doesn't jet motion obviate the need/inclination to line up two RB's?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 11, 2025 at 11:49 am

I think it’s different arrows in a quiver. I doubt 2 back sets become the norm.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

July 11, 2025 at 01:06 pm

at present there may be too many arrows to practically use

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 11, 2025 at 04:24 pm

We will likely have 3 RBs active. So it’s a usage that fits with the likely game day roster as long as Lloyd is healthy. Thus it is going to be available part of the tactical chess match to address opponent weakness or tactics. That is a good thing and one I can’t see a reason not to prepare for, if Lloyd can protect particularly. Less frequently (due to protection) we may see it with Williams if he’s active as well.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

July 11, 2025 at 07:39 am

I wouldn't call their depth chart an embarrassment of riches. Past Jacobs the casual fan wouldn't know who the other 3 even are. They have a stud starter, a hopeful change of pace guy and two guys battling it out for the last spot. Hopefully how doesn't make the roster can get stashed on the PS but since it is the RB position I wouldn't expect these to be the 4 come December as injuries will hit the position.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

July 11, 2025 at 08:08 am

Jacobs and Wilson are one of the better 1-2 combos in the league.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

July 11, 2025 at 08:17 am

Wilson is just a guy. Lots of backs out there with his speed and ability. We don't know what Llyod is yet.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 11, 2025 at 08:10 am

I don't remember the last time they had two players that good battling for the last spot. Normally at this point we are hoping a decent #3 option emerges during training camp.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

July 11, 2025 at 08:19 am

We don't even know how good Llyod is and Brooks played sparingly. Hopefully they all pan out but to call this an embarrassment of riches is being bit of a fan boy.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

July 11, 2025 at 09:05 am

The OL makes the running game go. Some backs are better at being their own blockers...some are better at running away or around guys. But in general, if your OL is bad, it won't matter very much who you're handing the ball to. The Packers also like to hand/pitch the ball to motion guys, and they drafted a guy (Williams) who they'll be scheming to put the ball in his hands.

The Packers have a type they like for RBs, and it's shifted away from guys who are like AJones and toward broader, more compactly built guys. Wilson, Lloyd, Jacobs, Brooks--they all go over 220 and Brooks is the only one taller than 5'10". Jacobs is a good, durable back, but any FFL veteran will tell you that RBs are a perishable commodity: they get beat up, and the fact that Jacobs, who is old for a RB at 27, didn't miss games last season is a blessing.

Assuming all these guys emerge from camp healthy, Jacobs and Lloyd are locks to make the 53. After that the Packers have two pretty different backs vying for one spot. Wilson is a faster back who isn't as accomplished a blocker as Brooks, who is not so fast but blocks and catches well. If past precedent means very much, they'll keep the blocker (think Patrick Taylor) and let Wilson go. Some are afraid Wilson will get scarfed up off waivers, but RBs who can get you what's blocked are not a rare commodity and they can be readily signed off practice squads. RB is about as plug-and-play a position as there is, and most can run a limited set of plays with short practice prep.

So I'm predicting Jacobs, Lloyd, and Brooks.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

July 11, 2025 at 11:28 am

I'm wondering if WIlliams isn't actually an obstacle for Lloyd in that he offers outside threat and pass catching from all positions. Can line up in backfield, can slot, can go wide. Ostensibly faster than Lloyd. Does Lloyd become a trade piece?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 11, 2025 at 11:55 am

To me, he’s an obstacle for Brooks in that Brooks was used as a pass option when not blocking. Williams is not going to run a lot of snaps though and not as a traditional rb when he does: he’s not a true RB in the sense Lloyd is and his blocking is a major issue in the context of being more than a decoy if he’s not getting the ball. Williams spares Reed and Watson from snaps in the backfield mostly at this be point I suspect.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

July 11, 2025 at 02:39 pm

In aggregate, Packers WRs had 32 carries last season--less than 2 per game, but with the sweep action they like to run, it felt like more than that. Reed led the team with 20.

I'd be surprised if Williams stays healthy and doesn't top 32 by a wide margin on his own, and probably out of more varied sets. I think they're going to design specific opportunities to get him the ball. I agree that he'll probably pull some of the volume that Reed had, but they'll still try to get Reed the ball on the move.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 11, 2025 at 11:48 am

I wouldn't say they've shifted away from RBs like Aaron Jones. He was an exception. He was the only scatback type RB they've really used much in recent history. He was a late draft pick (5th round) who was way better than expected. It helped that for a smaller back, he ran with a lot of power.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 11, 2025 at 05:33 pm

“RBs who can get you what's blocked are not a rare commodity and they can be readily signed off practice squads. RB is about as plug-and-play a position.”

How do you characterize Wilson that way when, in 2024 he:

1) Averaged 4.9 yards per carry — 9th among running backs with 100 or more carries.

2) A success rate of 59.2% —- 2nd behind Bijan Robinson on Reddit.

3) Averaged 2.93 yards after contact (27 missed tackles forced).

That was achieved over 103 carries for 502 yards and 4 rushing TDs. To me that’s the absolute opposite of a RB who can just “get you what is blocked for.”

It’s also the reason why I can’t agree with your take at all as to merit or the likelihood that he would not interest other teams if waived.

PS. Rotowire had Wilson with a zero Drop Rate and a 9.1 yards per catch average, the same as Brooks, but Brooks has a 7.7% drop rate. Since both were almost entirely targeted within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage (usually less), the comparative drop rate should be a pretty fair measure. Again, myth over reality?

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

July 12, 2025 at 07:49 am

I think some people think a good #2 back is just a less-good version of the starter.

Packers priorities in RBs:

1) Availability: Wilson was at all the games and practices
2) Assignment sure: Wilson never missed assignments in pass protection.
3) Ball security: Wilson did not have a single fumble
4) Pass catching: Wilson caught 11 of 14 opportunities
5) Running ability.

Wilson, like Dillon before him, is a very good #2 RB

0 points
0
0
13TimeChamps's picture

July 11, 2025 at 09:19 am

Assuming Lloyd lives up to his draft status and has solved his fumbling issues, I think Jacobs/Wilson/Lloyd...or Jacobs/Lloyd/Wilson...however you want to list them, could be one of the best 1-2-3 running back combos in the league this year.

It seems Wilson's primary role would be to give Jacobs a breather while Lloyd would be the change of pace/outside threat. Hopefully, they'll be utilized in the passing game as well.

Also, don't forget Savion Williams, who will be running the ball at times as well. With that in mind, I have a hard time seeing them keeping 4 running backs on the 53.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 11, 2025 at 09:24 am

The Packers RB room will be solid if they all make it through TC and pre season injury free. I'm looking forward to seeing what Lloyd can do if he stays on the field.

Obviously the OL is the key to the ground game and the RBs will go as far as the OL takes them. Healthy RBs and OL should be very effective this season and enable deadly play action passing for Love and the receivers. GPG! Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

July 11, 2025 at 10:37 am

Wilson is a lock to make the team. He is a well proven commodity.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 11, 2025 at 12:04 pm

If Jacobs goes down or needs a breather, we know Wilson can carry the load effectively and move the pile. He’s also got better hands than credited (zero drops last year) and isn’t a bad protector by any means, if not as proficient as Brooks. I’d argue Brooks got used as a target (near the line of scrimmage almost exclusively as a way to give the O more options with him in beyond him being an obvious protector. This year I’d hope that Lloyd is that option (and not just as a near horizontal target).

However, I don’t want Lloyd having to carry the run game yet or Brooks, who is a lesser athlete. Wilson to me is a no brainer behind Jacobs. The wild card is if Lloyd can’t show adequately in Protection. Then again, if we go to a truely good blocking 3rd TE (or Kraft) in those situations—Lumpkin and Swinson are protectors and lead blockers, the RBs may have to carry less of that load.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

July 11, 2025 at 10:41 am

For a team that is one of the top running offenses in the NFL with a near 50:50 run pass ratio, keeping 4 RBs is not a stretch, but logical.

Wilson has proven to be a solid backup to JJ, and he is more than "just a guy". Kid is good!

Lloyd still hasn't evidenced his skillset on the field, but he's not going to get cut.

Brooks was known to the Packers the year he was drafted and they obviously followed his career. LaFleur really like him and was excited to get him on the team.

And I do not believe Wilson, Lloyd or Brooks would make it to the PS. To me it would make more sense to keep 4 RBS (like they did last year, plus a FB in Beck) vs 4 TEs...both Sims and Fitzpatrick would likely make the Practice Squad too.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 11, 2025 at 12:15 pm

I’m not aware that any of Lloyd, Wilson or Brooks are expected to be significant ST factors. That makes it hard for me to see us keeping them all, unfortunately. Add in Williams as a potential ball carrier and target to scheme open from behind the line and it seems less plausible still.

I think Lloyd’s college talent means he would be claimed on waivers. I think Wilson’s ability to move the pile last year would similarly interest teams. Moreover, I would not want to have my Jacobs substitute inactive, forcing Lloyd to carry the load as lead back in the event of injury at this point.

Brooks, who is a lesser athlete, I think could get through waivers unless a team needs a protector badly. He’s sort of like his predecessor, Taylor, good enough to play a role, a good comfort option to have, but not critical or essential. He’s one of those guys one wants to keep but ultimately can’t squeeze him in and he doesn’t have enough upside to tip that calculus or persuade another team he’s worth rostering over what they have. until injuries bite.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

July 11, 2025 at 02:24 pm

Brooks played almost 30% of the ST snaps in 2024, so he was a regular. Bo Melton was the only offensive player to play more STs snaps. No other RB played more than 2 STs snaps.

I'm not worried about waivers. RBs are not hard to find, and to claim a guy off waivers, he needs to go on the 53 of the claiming team. It just doesn't happen a lot at the end of preseason. One way or the other, the Packers are going to cut a RB who can play...but not a RB who's irreplaceable.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

July 11, 2025 at 01:11 pm

I agree that if anyone can surprise it is Amar Johnson. We know he can run with incredible speed. Also returns kicks for TDs. If he can catch passes he would really be a gem. Can't wait to see him in preseason. If they keep four he would make sense. Practice squad for sure just on potential alone.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 11, 2025 at 03:17 pm

It will be an uphill battle for him as a smaller RB (5'10", 205 pounds), but he is intriguing. As you say, he could be fun to watch in the preseason games.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

July 11, 2025 at 05:48 pm

Johnson can run, but can he protect? As a smaller back and small school star player that’s a big ask at this point. Zierlein says he can, which is very encouraging, but it’s still a big step up and a very different offense and defenses to learn.

He does return kicks, but not punts, which is where we need most help, otherwise I’d wonder if he had a route to the roster by beating out Hardman. The wild card for me are his hands. He was seldom used in catching situations. If, like Cobb, he can show that was coaching choices not talent then maybe.

Personally I see him as a PS guy to develop, hopefully use to back up the Lloyd role in future, if he can show up in camp. Certainly looking forward to seeing him in actin this summer.

0 points
0
0