Packers Question of the day - Shorter Leash, McCarthy or Thompson?

The problems facing the Packers' offense have been consistent, the completely opposite of what their passing game has been. While Aaron Rodgers continues to miss textbook throws that he would've completed in his sleep two years ago, many are looking for someone to place the blame on.

Some place it on Mike McCarthy, the head coach who hasn't been able to lead the team back to the pinnacle of the NFL world since February of 2011. Ted Thompson, meanwhile, arguably fails to provide McCarthy with the proper tools it takes to engineer the dynamic offense we haven't seen in Green Bay for a few seasons.

Who is on the shorter leash between the two? Meaning, if Mark Murphy was to dish out some roster cuts of his own, would McCarthy or Thompson be first to go?

__________________________

Zachary Jacobson is a staff writer/reporter for Cheesehead TV. He's the voice of The Leap on iTunes and can be heard on The Scoop KLGR 1490 AM every Saturday morning. He's also a contributor on the Pack-A-Day Podcast. He can be found on Twitter via @ZachAJacobson or contacted through email at [email protected].

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (81)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
ejr450's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:17 am

Fair question - honestly, we know the answer is neither. However, I think it's more likely that TT steps down/retires before Murph would swing the hammer on MM. Couple reasons:
1) He's not going to interfere w/ the GM running the football operation - just not how he operates it.
2) MM still has a lot of $ tied up from his extension. That all gets owed to him if we let him go.

Now, behind TT we have the esteemed Mr. Wolf (version 2.0). I think that changing of the guard will happen sooner rather than later. And I think he will be allowed to make a choice on the head coach, much like TT did after year 1.

All that said - I think there is very likely to be a significant changeover on the offensive staff following this campaign. They're stale - the game has changed but MM and team have not. There's no one outside of Clements that has any experience elsewhere on the coaching staff, so where are new ideas coming from?

Bottom line, organizational adjustments are (and should be) coming. But it will be at the GM level first.

0 points
0
0
lebowski's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:18 am

we can all dream....

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:18 am

Neither.

We have no one in authority to make a move regarding TT.

TT will never make a move on MM.

And, they won a Super Bowl back in 2010.

That victory, making a quick annual appearance in the playoffs and consistently finishing ahead of the mighty Lions & Bears every season, is good enough for the Packer organization.

Sure there will be some grumbling about how the Zimmer-led Vikes have passed us by, sort of like there was when Harbaugh was leading the Niners and how Seattle has owned us, but the loyalists will point to bad luck and the always available injury card and before you know it, seasons 13 & 12 respectively of the TT/MM era will be upon us.

0 points
0
0
Hematite's picture

October 19, 2016 at 06:50 am

The Green Bay Packers Board of Directors has the authority to fire all three of these clowns.

0 points
0
0
dschwalm's picture

October 20, 2016 at 03:41 pm

Now that's just depressing but oh so accurate

0 points
0
0
NMPF's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:31 am

Don't think so, In order for MM to be on a short leash TT has to put him on it. For TT, Mark Murphy has to do it. When at anytime over the last 8 or so yrs has Murphy ever shown he is willing to do anything other than something to do with $$$$$$$$ for the organization.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:32 am

I don't think either are on that short of a leash. They are not a knee jerk team.

That being said I think the one who's time in Green Bay may end first I think would be Thompson. I really get the sense that the Packers don't want to lose Wolf. So much that I could see them having Thompson take some sort of mentor type of role and promote Wolf to GM.

0 points
0
0
packerbackerjim's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:49 am

I believe you're right about retaining Wolf, who probably has his own path nearer Ron Wolfs than TT while adhering to the cap, AKA, free agency to a larger extent.

MM is stale, as are his game plans and ability to
Command the attention of the players.

If the season goes as feared, expect wholesale changes in January.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

October 18, 2016 at 01:31 pm

"I believe you're right about retaining Wolf, who probably has his own path nearer Ron Wolfs than TT while adhering to the cap, AKA, free agency to a larger extent."

I still don't understand why people state any kind of expectation for how Eliot Wolf will work the organization. There's no data...only speculation. For all we know, the Albino One has been a puppet on a string for Wolf the last year or two and all this that we're unhappy with is originating from him...

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

October 18, 2016 at 01:40 pm

Come on dobster - that's a bit far out there in the conspiracy bin.

0 points
0
0
L's picture

October 18, 2016 at 10:35 am

Completely Agree.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

October 18, 2016 at 04:39 pm

Agree as well. Falls into the TT is an extraterrestrial category.

0 points
0
0
rdent's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:46 am

I have posted this several times weeks ago and got dislikes,last offseason GB promoted Elliot Wolf to the highest position behind TT so that tells me they want Elliot Wolf to be there when Ted retires and that may be sooner than we think,Whether the new GM retains McCarthy,nobdy but he knows but I wouldn't be surprised to see some changes this off season if Thompson hangs it up.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

October 18, 2016 at 01:34 pm

They've also gone out of their way to protect Brian Gutekunst. We all seem to be putting our eggs in Eliot Wolf's basket...but don't be too sure.

0 points
0
0
rdent's picture

October 18, 2016 at 02:40 pm

Yep,who knows,Wolf might get an offer from another team before TT retires and if he does I doubt GB will hold him back, it's not their M O but I'll bet they would prefer to promote from inside the organization.According to inside info Wolf is very involved with TT in the later rounds of the draft and I believe Wolf would be a good fit as GM for GB. I just find it amusing that now all these people are suddenly on the Elliot Wolf bandwagon.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

October 18, 2016 at 02:47 pm

The sooner the better! I only Have to look at the 2014 draft. Espn was laughing at Adams, thornton, and R Rodgers. Calling them all a Reach in a draft that was suppose to be the deepest in years. I wrote in 2014 that TT was sabotaging the packers future. And then he signed Peppers. He knows the draft to good over the years for that. For crying out loud he needs to step down before this turns into another escapade.

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 18, 2016 at 03:10 pm

What are you even saying? Can't hit em all. But you can on some. No GM hits 100%. This is not a bad haul in three years. And we still have three or four unknown quantities in Clark, Lowry, Fackrell, Spriggs
1) HaHa
2) Linsley
3) Ryan
4) Martinez
5) Randall
6) Rollins
7) Monty
8) Hundley
9) Rip

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

October 18, 2016 at 04:04 pm

I'm saying the group of 2014 was a reach. Ha ha was a Fans choice no brainer. And they needed a center. ( Linsey was a steal. ) But as it turns out. TT was in a contract year. He also lost Dorsey and McKinzie. Both knew him well , and after he signed peppers I believe he was helping his buddys. He since has still made his choices based on a GM. Not a scout. Randall and Rollins were a great GM move. But could he not have moved Williams to safety and signed Hayward? Still we all like how Randall and Rollins turned out. Monty was back-up for Adams failures. I'll take Kuhn over Rip any day. But look who TT lost out on, in some of those drafts too. Especially when Bishop was never replaced, or a RB. And when I look at the players TT did not draft. I'm saying TT needs to give the young guys their chance now. I just don't like how things have gone since we won the super-bowl. And based on some articles recently. Mistakes have been made!

0 points
0
0
Point-Packer's picture

October 18, 2016 at 07:13 pm

Rip is a "hit"? Based on what...?...

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

October 19, 2016 at 04:14 am

It is interesting opinion on Packers CB. Casey Hayword had cost us several games in season prior his release (in 2015) and Tramon Williams cost us at the end NFCCG against Seattle, reacted like rookie on that Russel Wilson throw covering sideline and giving WR to go inside. Stupid decision. As far as we know Tramon had no big role after his release... Casey is good with Chargers, but he is not outside CB and he never be...
Also, you can not keep ačč of them with Salary Cap. I think those 2 decisions were good decisions as well as decision to let House go. He is playing for Jags now with no much success... Your opinion of John Kuhn comes after he played well in one game (probably get that good game as opponent was not prepared for Saints to use him!). Before and after that game he was nowhere.
My God, when the people learns that business is not doing by heart and emotion, but by cold mental logical decisions. Being to emotional will allow you to score 1 of 10000 which is path to disaster...

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

October 19, 2016 at 04:38 pm

My opinion of Rip came after the dallas game. Kuhn was all -pro and knew how to block. Not based on the saints. Casey is not fast enough to play outside. (But the coaches did feel he could replace Williams. ) And I'm sure williams was a cap reason. How many players has TT kept after 30? Not many. So TT s approach still was a good GM decision. But not his 2014 draft. TTs best drafting is NEED! Not back-ups. But he still left the most glaring holes since 2010. Thats LB and RB. Thats not emotional, just plain lack of vision.

0 points
0
0
dschwalm's picture

October 20, 2016 at 03:45 pm

They are all adequate and serviceable but hardly any home runs or HOFers.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:43 am

If something happens TT goes first so that the new GM probably Wolf can choose their own HC. At the least changes need to be made to the offensive coaching staff which is up to MM. In any case nothing will or should be done until after the season.
Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Gianich's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:53 am

Push Tinkering Ted out into a facade of a celebrated retirement and use him as a consultant and hire Wolf as GM and he can hire his own coach to coach up this team. There is talent on the roster and no GM can control injuries but the coaches have not been able to maximize the team's talent since January 19, 2014

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:57 am

Duke - I agree...change is "in the wind". The act between TT and MM has slowly become stale. It happens. They had a relatively good run, but we need to take advantage of the few remaining productive years of Rodgers career.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

October 18, 2016 at 10:30 am

For argument sake, perhaps Edgar Bennett has been promoted to a position above his ability to quickly. He is the OC and has a big say in the offensive playbook week to week and since his departure as receivers coach, both receivers and Rodgers have been fruitless.
However, is this because MM ignores his input or is his input something that MM needs to work around during the game plan weekly which limits the play call variations (predictable or limited) via lack of practice of install.
Lastly, the fact that Rodgers himself appears more out of touch with the plays, since all the blame cannot be placed at all others for blown assignments, perhaps he is the one playing video games instead of learning the playbook.
Someone or multiple people need to be held to some severe level of accountabilty. Up to and strong possibility of a game benching of Rodgers if another inept showing of play by him against Chicago.

0 points
0
0
Malland56's picture

October 20, 2016 at 12:50 am

GOD SAVE US IF WE LOSE TO THE BEARS!!!!!!!!

0 points
0
0
lou's picture

October 18, 2016 at 10:46 am

After the Seattle debacle I am sure that Mike McCarthy had no intentions of giving up the play calling, that had to be an edict from Murphy, Thompson, or both, we all know how stubborn McCarthy can be. In regards to either Murphy or Thompson having a hands off philosophy with the head coach that does not look like the case. I also believe McCarthy was given the ultimatum from one or both to jettison his pal Slocum, if Mike makes the call he is still the ST coach. We need a little laughter with every thing going south, Mike Hart in the Journal/Sentinel said today, "Many tailgaters wore Halloween costumes Sunday, the scariest one was the Mike McCarthy game plan".

0 points
0
0
Razor's picture

October 18, 2016 at 10:49 am

Ted - replace the punter, release Starks, get a tight end in here. You have one week.

Mike - if you miss the playoffs you will be fired.

Mark - a move you could make now that wouldn't totally mess up the season is to retire Ted and promote Elliot Wolf.

PS - finally a move (trade with KC) that might help the team and in the middle of the season no less.

0 points
0
0
L's picture

October 18, 2016 at 03:34 pm

Side Note:

According to Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune, Bears LG Josh Sitton is expected to miss "some time" with an ankle injury.

Looks like either Larsen or Eric Kush will get the nod Thursday against us which is good news because through six games, Sitton owns PFF's third-highest guard grade out of 78 qualifiers. It should be a pretty big blow to the Bears' offensive line.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:21 am

What is Lane Taylor's guard grade over the first 5 games?

0 points
0
0
jfajas's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:05 am

I would argue that 12 and 52 are on a even shorter leash: they make a ton of money.
Still hoping 12 settles and plays at his level (I really think it's a mental issue with him) but if by the end of the season he's PFFs 30th ranked QB... well... not worth 22/23 million.
52 is non-existent. I had to check the game tape to see if he was playing. He is a waste of money and cap space. Completely overrated.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:24 am

Again...#52 has 3.5 sacks on the season and has missed one full game due to injury. In all, about 1 sack per game....on that trend, you're talking 15-16 sacks for the season. Would that be earning his money?

Let's keep in mind that Dallas had given up 7 sacks in four games prior to playing the Packers (note that the Packers got 2 against them). They're no slouches...and if you're game-planning the Packer defense, who are you going to try to neutralize first?

0 points
0
0
jfajas's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:37 am

Hi dobber,
Thanks for the info.
If 52 reaches those numbers of course you are right.
But, I watched the games and frankly, I still think he disappears from the game (aside from the sacks).
Maybe I have higher expectations for 52, I really don´t know...
Curious to see where he stands in PFF ranks to have a clearer idea
Cheers from Portugal mate
Hope we do better thursday!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

October 18, 2016 at 01:47 pm

Yeah, 15-16 sacks seems unreasonable, but if he stays healthy he'd be in line for double-digits. If someone else is recording double-digit sacks, that's a pretty daunting pass rush. But I agree: he didn't have his name called much on Sunday. Cheers!

0 points
0
0
rdent's picture

October 18, 2016 at 12:05 pm

Athalon Sports rates Clay Mathews 4th among OLB's.no. 1: Von Miller Denver. no 2: Justin Houston KC.no 3:Jamie Collins NE. I don't know about you but I wouldn't mind having a top 4 OLB on my defense.

0 points
0
0
Razor's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:06 am

Shortest leash - both.

Ten years and what? Look at the results since the loss to KC in 2011. Keep doing the same thing and expecting different results.

Going into a game with one dinged up running back - are you both out of your minds. What about draft and develop? How many more years before your practice squad guy is ready. Really!

How do you think AR feels about the last five years? Fix the D, fix the D, throw it to DA, throw it to 82, hand it off to fat Eddie, pitch it out to fat Eddie, throw a swing pass to Starks, get rid of Kuhn & Sitton.

I'm a shareholder and 28 years on the season ticket list and this is no fun anymore.

0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:16 am

Good news for you is you might get your tix sooner rather than later!

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

October 18, 2016 at 12:09 pm

If you think this is bad, you obviously weren't yet intellectually functional between 1973 and 1988? It could be worse.

0 points
0
0
rdent's picture

October 18, 2016 at 12:34 pm

Agreed! Be happy you aren't old enough to have to witness the 70's and 80's! Brutal! I was 10 yrs old when GB won the Super Bowl in 1967 but then it was called the NFC-AFC Championship game then they repeated in 68' and I knew then why my dad was such a big fan and took me to games but after Vince left,by 1970 the dark ages began,times were hard for Packer fans back then,so bad I would have rather been in a coma until 1991.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

October 18, 2016 at 12:37 pm

Right...but it was still a BLAST watching Charles Martin body-slam Jim McMahon after that INT in 1986! This was the highlight of that era. (jk)

0 points
0
0
rdent's picture

October 19, 2016 at 09:27 am

Lmao,absolutely!

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 18, 2016 at 02:33 pm

This explains alot for me. Maybe that's why I'm so hesitant to jump off the bandwagon. I lived that period. It was brutal. It makes me happy to be in the playoffs at all watching January football. Superbowl or no. And roll the dice. Before the Magik man brought us to the playoffs......i can't believe we even watched the Packers at all. Packer fans are the most spoiled in all of the land. Ask any other fan. Most fans here were born into the Favre era. You are all lucky to have seen what we've seen.

P.S. Tanking and going to the dark side doesn't guarantee we will ever emerge again. Look at the Saints.

0 points
0
0
Razor's picture

October 18, 2016 at 08:50 pm

I knew the Packers were crap. I'm not interested in "better than crap".

Since the SB in 2010 Ted and Mike have been unable to improve the team to the point that it is embarrassing.

I agree with several others who think Ted should be retired and replaced by Elliot Wolf.

Please, this is fixable but change is needed.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

October 19, 2016 at 04:24 am

Well Razor, go out and claim TT's job. Tell them that you are not interested in better than crap. You are interested only in crap. Maybe they will hire you and than you will prove that TT is just better than crap...
No matter that most of the persons employed in football organization have the highest opinion on both MM and TT, you are here to show us that you are better...
Go, tell Murphy you had at least one voice of support - mine!

0 points
0
0
dschwalm's picture

October 20, 2016 at 03:53 pm

That's always a healthy perspective: "It could be worse"

0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:21 am

What is the problem, aside from all the CB's injured?

The offensive line has been better than good. It's the passing game.

Has Rodgers lost it? Has Nelson? Does the scheme lack creativity? You saw what the Cowboys did with Beasley and Lucky? That's the type of creativity we don't see in GB.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:26 am

If change is merited at one (or both) of the two spots, then make a change. I'm attached to the Packers, not the GM or coach. All I'm going to say is that you need to be damn sure that it's necessary when you do it. When you spend most of your time at the top of the league, there's a lot more room to fall than to go up. When you ask for a change, sometimes you get what you ask for...

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

October 18, 2016 at 01:18 pm

^^^100% this. Without getting into the total wins/playoffs v. Super Bowl wins nonsense, GB has been at the top of the NFL during the entirety of MM's/TT's tenures. You just don't throw that away based on a few games, or some perception that either have somehow lost touch with the modern NFL.

If change is ultimately needed so be it. There just better be appropriate replacements ready to take over.

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 18, 2016 at 02:36 pm

I second both of you. The grass is not always greener. In fact.... It seldom is. Unless we're talking about my new wife versus my ex.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

October 19, 2016 at 04:27 am

That is very good analogy...

0 points
0
0
Samson's picture

October 18, 2016 at 11:26 am

Nothing will change during this season regardless of GB's final record in January.

TT will retire shortly after the end of the season. The "new GM" will let MM and his staff go and then hire his own people.

I'm hoping to get a call. I'd like to be the person who inflates the footballs for practices and games. (I hear it's over $10 an hour)

0 points
0
0
Point-Packer's picture

October 18, 2016 at 07:14 pm

Why get proven talent when you need it (CJ Spiller) when you can get a nobody two weeks too late (Knile Davis)...

TT's off-season has proven to be horrendous.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

October 18, 2016 at 12:00 pm

PP - don't post that here - it's too logical and flies in the face of the TT apologists. Prepare to be excoriated!

0 points
0
0
Rossonero's picture

October 18, 2016 at 12:32 pm

To be fair, how could anyone predict that Lacy and Starks would both be injured at the same time? Nobody saw that coming.....hindsight is 20/20. The mistake was McCarthy not activating Don Jackson.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

October 18, 2016 at 01:52 pm

I agree that they likely should have added the extra RB to the roster to cover their butts on Sunday, but did the lack of Jackson on Sunday likely cost them the game? I don't think so.

In all, the fact that they went outside the organization to get someone (Davis) before they activated Jackson (if they do at all) tells you heaps on what they think of Jackson.

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 18, 2016 at 02:42 pm

There must be some oddball reasoning here to not activate Jackson. But if we examine it closer, the only way to do it would have been to release someone else. Seems like all of the injuries are short term. That's the problem. No one is going on IR to make room on the roster. We have like 11 injuries. None can play. None can IR. But they still count against the roster. Some of the young guys that could go to PS are all starting right now. It's kind of a mess. That really only leaves about 30 guys to work with and half of those are wide receivers which apparently we need.

0 points
0
0
dschwalm's picture

October 20, 2016 at 03:56 pm

No, it didn't cost them the game but it probably cost them Lacy!

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

October 18, 2016 at 07:03 pm

Because Spiller is...not good? He couldn't beat out Tim Hightower for a roster spot in NO, and has all of three carries with Seattle.

Kniles Davis is younger and played very well last year when Charles went down.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

October 19, 2016 at 04:30 am

Yeah CJ Spiller is proven fail... It must be better to get proven fail than unproven one, who might turn out to be OK...

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

October 18, 2016 at 12:01 pm

Let me start the rumor.

The Packers will lure Jon Gruden away from ESPN with the Head Coach position immediately after their season ends bringing him back to his roots.

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 18, 2016 at 02:47 pm

Head coaches have zero life. They watch tape like zombies for hours on end. They never see their kids grow up. They have to be around hundreds of sweaty men for about 90% of their job. Versus. Commentators get to spend 90% of their time golfing. Talking with NFL icons. Breaking down film once per week and drawing smiley faces on players lined up in y2banana. And get paid more than you and I put together to do it. Which job would you choose? Gruden won't leave that gig.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

October 18, 2016 at 04:13 pm

I do believe you took my " start the rumor " a tad too seriously.

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 18, 2016 at 05:17 pm

As seriously as y2banana and sweaty men. I feel ya taryn. Your sarcasm is never lost on me.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

October 18, 2016 at 04:21 pm

And they make MULTI-MILLIONS for the inconvenience. Don't feel too sorry for them.

0 points
0
0
Rossonero's picture

October 18, 2016 at 12:43 pm

McCarthy would get fired first, but only if the Packers missed the playoffs two seasons in a row, which is doubtful.

Playoff coaches don't get fired. Look at Marv Lewis: been in Cincinnati since 2003, gets bounced from the first round of the playoffs every year, but doesn't get fired.

The issue is not talent, it's coaching. Ted Thompson has done a terrific job building this team through the draft. He frustrates me with his lack of FA involvement sometimes, but would you really want another GM? Look at how many stupid GMs are running teams into the ground right now by spending big money on FAs and making horrible draft picks?

The problem is McCarthy's stubbornness with using the same stale personnel groupings, not holding his QB accountable, not being creative enough on offense, screwing up basic communication, predictable play calling and an arrogance and unwillingness to adapt and change.

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

October 18, 2016 at 01:45 pm

I tend to agree that the problem is McCarthy/Rodgers, not TT.

TT might retire before MM goes, but the way this is playing out , it might be that TT goes, Wolf is promoted, and he chooses a new HC that is (imo) very unlikely to be an old retread, he will go with a hot young coordinator.

All this goes away if the Packers recover their mojo, but this problem has been there for a while, just not as obvious. McCarthy may have 'hit the wall', it's not easy to keep a HC job for a decade. I cannot decide at this moment if the Pack would be better off with a new HC, but a few more poor games and I may be persuaded.

I am getting very tired of the problems always being touted as execution. While that is a part of the problem, I think the MM playbook is getting too long in the tooth and is now too easily diagnosed by opposing teams. If that is a big part of the problem, and if MM will not, or cannot change the book, then he must be replaced.

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 18, 2016 at 03:00 pm

I too think the game plans have been too vanilla for my taste. But players have to be accountable too for our lack of superbowls.
1) Rodgers gets facemasked into a fumble to lose in OT against the cardinals. Not coaching or GM.
2) We should have caught a Kaep interception. Instead. Walk off field goal. Not coaching or GM.
3) Two minutes of death. There are at least five critical individual breakdowns here. Not coaching or GM. Although early game decisions could have made this game more out of reach...so...maybe coaching but not GM. But I'll go with player execution on this one.
4) Overtime Fitzgerald is a badass. Plenty of guys could have made this tackle. Not coach or GM.
5) I will blame coaching on getting trounced by the Giants and Niners. But to be fair...both of those teams went to the SB. One took home a ring. And one was one play away.
I don't want to be an apologist for MM or TT. But some level of accountability has to be taken by individuals on the field. This really is a game of inches. We lost 4 times in the playoffs by inches and Rodgers didn't even get the ball again in 3 of those. Maybe that's why we keep drafting for defense. And now the offense is suffering. Salary cap era makes it hard.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

October 18, 2016 at 04:33 pm

Bohj.....GM puts the talent on the roster, the coach puts them on the field. Incompetence is on the talent evaluator that has players fail under pressure, as almost ALL of your events indicate. Throw Capers in there too with his ancient scheme. Perhaps the evaluation of the talent was flawed and these players weren't capable of making the plays? My gut tells me this is more coaching than players, and to a lesser degree, talent evaluation. There's been some dropoff in talent over the years, when you lose guys like Collins and Woodson, but you should have been able to replace these guys because with Woodson it was gradual drop off. When you have players failing under pressure for years, (since 2011) then it goes back to the coaches and talent evaluators and not the players. IMO

0 points
0
0
Bohj's picture

October 18, 2016 at 05:24 pm

Fin. I also see validity in that piece as well. But the reality is....our players are not all first rounders like the Rams defense, the panthers defense, the broncos defense. Those talented rosters come from drafting and accumulating for years. And those years.....suck for those teams. Even the Vikings have been shit long enough to gain talent. Let's face it...we are hamstrung by our draft status because we are just good enough to be out-drafted. And we can't sign enough free agents to keep our future hopeful without wrecking our cap. And we have to compete with all of these younger teams that emerge that have stockpiled higher picks every year: Panthers, Cardinals, niners for awhile there, Seattle for awhile there, Denver Vikings. Basically everyone who sucked a decade ago. The only exception is the Patriots. But no one can be the Patriots. No one.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

October 18, 2016 at 01:30 pm

I've read that TT has it in his contract that he answers to the Bd of Directors and is not accountable to Murphy. As long as the cash keeps rolling in, the BOD is happy and isn't going to upset the apple cart.

I'm not certain if MM answers only to Ted or if Murphy can pull the trigger on the coach. If It is only TT, then they both have 10 mile long leashes because Ted can never admit his mistakes.

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

October 18, 2016 at 06:11 pm

By that, egbertsouse, I guess you mean he keeps players longer than YOU would. Guys that actually make the decisions are almost always more innately conservative than many fans who often have absolutely no patience at all.

I certainly do not agree that Ted can never admit his mistakes. He gives the guys he gets time to show their stuff. A quick hook and (for example) Perry would never be with this team. Again, It is more about him not being as quick to dismiss players as you are.

If it is obvious the player doesn't have it, he can go fairly quickly, like the 2nd round QB the Pack got a few years back. He was gone after training camp in his second season (Brian Brohm, drafted 2008, waived Sept 2009). If they are not total busts they get some time; they have to, as this is a draft and develop team that has an unusually heavy reliance on draft picks and rookie FA.

McCarthy will get the rest of the year to turn it around, if he cannot we will see what happens.

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

October 18, 2016 at 06:53 pm

Comments about cash rolling in with respect to TT always intrigue me. TT and the cap people have to stay above the cap floor. There's only so much money TT can save the Packers, and I'm assuming any savings would be miniscule with respect to the overall corporate budget.

If we're talking more generally, as in the B of D associates the status quo with profitability, that gets a little more murky. I'd be suspicious about reports that TT bypasses Murphy with respect to the Board.

Also, without a big pocket owner, we want the Packers to make as much profit as possible. Otherwise, GB would be at the mercy of the other owners.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

October 18, 2016 at 03:46 pm

So for anyone thinking they made the correct move at RB vs. CB today, Shields went on the 8 week IR designated to return, but God only knows if he ever will. That means we get a few more games of Gunter, Goodsen and whomever else ISN'T injured and that means TORCHED by just about anyone. They should have gone and got ANY CB they could find that was breathing and had experience, because this is going to get ugly now. Randall and Rollins are both in the rehab program so likely won't play Thursday. As bad as we are on the back end, don't think we can't lose to the Bears because we CAN. This stinks. You could have got by with Jackson and Monty for a week or two, but how in Gods name they plan to survive with that secondary......everyone say a prayer or buy a case of Old Mill...you're gonna need it.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

October 19, 2016 at 04:44 am

Sorry man, but I mean not to be disrespectful - are you stupid? You were praising Gunter after his first, more or less complete game (Giants) and now he is bust after second one /Cowboys), but not taking in consiuderation that he played on his right side against Giants and on the left side against Cowboys, which is not his natural side. He had some bumps exclusively of his footwork which is significantly different when you play one or another side... And that is the reason, for example, why Richard Shermann never change his side when plays for Seahawks.
Of course that player can be learned to play both sides, but that requires time (not 2 weeks or month) and Packers were just trying to cover the injuries...
Remove your high emotion and hurt and start to look cold headed. Situation is not much better, but it is easier to understand some flows of the team!

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

October 18, 2016 at 04:00 pm

TT has provided players on both sides of the ball. MM has not utilized them as effectively as he could or should have. Check out the OL- all from TT, and some changes in the off-season very possible, and younger players, whose contracts are up, will be re-signed, and at least one veteran let loose. Lacy has been a good addition. Abby and Montgomery play well when allowed . Janis, anyone?

The problem began last year with the embarrassment in Denver. Since then, Rodgers has declined significantly. And who or what is going to stop the tailspin? Apparently, it's being left up to AR himself. And he thinks everything will simply work out. Eventually. Hopefully. Just be patient. Well, it's time to fish or cut bait. In this case, either AR gets some help, or the Packers trade him and move on. He's suffering the same problem Favre had: the inability to accept outside criticism. Until MM came along, and held him accountable.

So, is a new coach the answer? Jim Harbaugh if he would like to return to the NFL? Coughlin? Or is this simply idle speculation, because TT won't fire MM. And the management won't urge him to resign "to spend more time with my family." So, either try another coach, or get rid of AR. Take your choice, and take your chances.

0 points
0
0
jh9's picture

October 18, 2016 at 04:04 pm

Let's not confuse the issue. The GM's job is to find the best talent he can and get them on the roster. The HC's job is to get the best out of the talent he has been given.

Ted Thompson is responsible for getting Aaron Rodgers on the roster. Is Mike McCarthy getting the best out of the talent he has been given?

Ted Thompson isn't the problem.

Those that say the Packers won't fire MM until TT retires and a new GM is in place might be right. However, what if TT gives the assignment to find a new coach to Wolf. Wolf gets his man in place while TT stays to the end of his contract. When Wolf becomes GM, his man is already there.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

October 18, 2016 at 04:33 pm

Not saying TT has given MM all the tools to win it all, but he has given him enough to have fared better than we have over the last few years.

With that said, I do not see TT canning MM so he has to unfortunately go first. I would gladly go with Wolf and Gruden. I still believe we won in 2010 because we had an awesome D and Rodgers, and while MM is to be commended for holding team and locker room together that year, I feel we won in spite of MM on several occasions and the Super Bowl as well. And yes I felt in 2007 MM played a big part in losing to NY

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

October 18, 2016 at 09:30 pm

Now w/o Shields and the other top two guys w/ groin issues....there aren't any (or many) CBs that can come into Green Bay and start over what they have currently on the roster. So I'm think w/ Rodgers in his swan dive condition, the Pack is an 8-8 team. If Rodgers can get himself on the plus side of that 100 QBR, then they will make the playoffs. Either way, Clements and QB coach are gone. IMHO

0 points
0
0
sheppercheeser's picture

October 19, 2016 at 06:31 am

After reading all of these posts, it seems apparent that as long as the MM/TT team keeps making the playoffs, their jobs are secure. Such a shame to have two HOF QB's back to back and only have two SB rings in twenty years of effort. Belicheck has been much more efficient with his time with Tom Terrific.

0 points
0
0
Irish_Cheesehead's picture

October 19, 2016 at 01:43 pm

After watching the last few games, I don't think TT or MM ever threw the football. Short leash?

"While Aaron Rodgers continues to miss textbook throws that he would've completed in his sleep two years ago..."

0 points
0
0