He may be slightly better, but you don't turn into a different player in your 4th year. Let's keep in mind that this was the 1st preseason game. The Titans weren't game-planning to win, their schemes were about as vanilla as you can get, and their best players didn't even play. He was playing against scrubs by the 3rd series.

Nope. Not buying it.

I'm not buying either. If his preseason lands a 7th round draft pick take it. He shouldn't be the backup and I doubt he will be. He has one year left on his contract. Everyone and his brother thought Hill was better than Hundley last preseason and we lost Hill to a very grateful Saints team. Don't make the same mistake losing Boyle. The kid as an arm and already the ability to stay in the pocket. I'm guessing a poll would show most Packer fans would be more confident in Boyle than Hundley. Hope Hundley kills it all preseason, then ship him out.

It's only one game but I liked the play of Tim Boyle a little more than Hundley or Kiser. Boyle seemed a little more crisp and accurate with his passes and appeared more comfortable. His timing was pretty good and he got rid of the ball quickly. He appeared to see the field and read the defense well. It's only one game but Boyle did much better than I thought he would. Kiser needs work but showed promise and Hundley looked good but he just couldn't get it done last year after spending 3 years learning the system. There's 3 more games before the regular season starts but I'm sure Rodgers will get some snaps in the last game or two. So it will be fun to watch the competition to see who will be the #2 guy. Will they keep a 3rd QB?

Did everyone already forget how good Hundley looked in his 1st preseason action? If Rodgers goes down Boyle, Hundley, and Kizer won't save the Packers season. All 3 looked good Thursday night 2 out of the 3 had a rough year last year.

Having a QB competition is a good thing. Competition breeds excellence. Let's just enjoy the camp QB battle and pray for Rodger's health. If we can get through preseason without more injuries and go through the regular season with a healthy Rodgers the Packers will be dangerous.

I liked Boyle the best as well. But we still have a ways to go before we start cutting/trading players.

Brett will never get the tap dancing out of his delivery if he hasn't by now. A fatal flaw for QBs. FAS.
Fred Astaire Syndrome.

I'm with Bearmeat on Hundley - you don't suddenly become a better player in your fourth year. Unfortunately Hundley probably has no trade value whatsoever.

I like Boyle but I doubt McCarthy is ready to turnover the Packer's backup spot to a guy who played mediocre football at UConn and EKU and has zero pro experience. Hopefully the Packers can smuggle him onto the PS.

That leaves Kizer as our backup QB. I hope he plays very well during the rest of the Packer's preseason.

I would love it if Hundley showed up enough to actually be wanted somewhere else. By the end of last year I think most of us would have been happy to trade him for a hamburger. I know Hundley had better stats than Kizer, but I thought Kizer was throwing with faster reads and better velocity. In the long run he is going to be an upgrade. I hope Boyle can stick around on the practice squad at least. Love his passion for the game, his steadiness in the pocket and his long ball. If anything happens to Rodgers, I think we could still competei if everyone else stays standing.We have speed to stretch the field, players with a lot of catch radius over the middle, and I think our running game is better also. The new punter should net us better field position overall as well. A long way to go before we get down to 53, but the potential roster is looking better to me! Go Pack, Go!

I do believe players can get better from one year to the next even after 3 years. By all accounts Rodgers was pretty dismal his first couple years here.

His first year starting he went 6-10 after a 13-3 season with Favre.

I'm not saying Hundley is any better than last year but he is already playing better in the preseason than he did last year. I don't want to see him make the team as I think the other 2 have higher ceilings. Still hope he plays lights out and gets somebody to pony up a pick for him.

Just got done watching the replay of the Packer game. I agree that Boyle looked pretty good and confident....but it was against lesser talent on the Tennessee defense. I just wonder if the mistake of cutting T. Hill last year will make the Packers think a little harder in keeping a rookie qb with some upside. Can’t wait to see how it all shakes out after the pre-season games.

Just got done watching the replay of the Packer game. I agree that Boyle looked pretty good and confident....but it was against lesser talent on the Tennessee defense. I just wonder if the mistake of cutting T. Hill last year will make the Packers think a little harder in keeping a rookie qb with some upside. Can’t wait to see how it all shakes out after the pre-season games.

I think Hundley has had enough time and coaching for us to know what his ceiling is. At this point in AR's career, I'm all for keeping the backup with the most upside every year in hopes that we might stumble upon a QB with legitimate starting ability and maybe find our version of Jimmy G.

For this reason, I was really mad that they got rid of Hill last year. It's so hard to get a high enough pick to get a starting QB. It seems more likely to get someone later in the draft that was overlooked (like Brady was).

Keep the guy with the most upside every camp even if it's a new guy every year. After only one game so far, my vote is for keeping Boyle on the team whether they keep 2 or 3 QB's. He's big, great arm and looks comfortable in the pocket = UPSIDE.

Besides, what was the famous quote - "Fellas, if QB1 goes down we're Fu*ked. And we don't practice Fu*ked."

I'm all for making a commitment to develop a young back-up as soon as we get one that looks like he has starter potential. I love Brett Hundley the person, but I don't see him as an NFL starter.

Taysom Hill will be 28 in 12 days. Rodgers plans on playing until he's 40. If we can assume Rodgers plays at a high level for the next 5 years Hill wouldn't have gotten a chance to start for 4 or 5 years. That would put him at 32 or 33.

I liked his athleticism and seemed like a likeable guy. I just think he has a better opportunity with the Saints were Drew Brees only has a year to 3 left. I don't see Hill getting us to the playoffs in 2017 if he was in for Hundley. All I do at this point is watch Hill in preseason with the Saints.

I'm not buying it with Hundley. We've seen this movie before. Hundley has looked good during the preseason and he still flopped in the games that count after 3 years in the system. I hope that we never need to see him in a real game again.

As for Taysom Hill, I don't understand why it was a mistake to release him. It's not like the Packers released Johnny Unitas. Hill is just another guy who looked good in preseason but has yet to take a snap in a real NFL game. With the Saints he is 3rd on their depth chart behind Brees and Tom Savage.

Against the Jags on Thursday he started the 2nd half, went 8/9 for 72 yards against Jag scrubs and ran 7 times for 52 yards and a TD. He ran for almost as many yards as he threw for. Not exactly a pocket presence. His completions were all quick/short throws.

Hill has a better chance of contributing on STs than he does as a QB. If he ever actually gets in an NFL game at QB then we can discuss this allegedly dreadful mistake the Packers made by releasing him. As of now releasing Hill is nowhere close to the mistake the Steelers made when they released Johnny Unitas. Thanks, Since '61

I think he must have spit out his gum and did not hesitate as much as he had in the past. I am in a wait and see mode. I really want to see him play well! Hopefully for someone else...

“For me this year though, it’s the anticipation, it’s the understanding, it’s the game slowing down so things are a lot easier,” Kizer said, who finished 9-for-14 with 108 yards, a touchdown and a passer rating of 81.9. “I just feel calmer back there.”

“Hundley couldn’t be more right. He looked different back there. He didn’t show off his happy feet which made the Lambeau Field faithful groan last year whenever he chopped his feet in the pocket, unsure of his next move.“

Did we get names mixed up. On that note, I didn’t see enough difference between all three to pick as a back up. I will say as long as Hundley has been in the system...he should be playing better.

I'm going to be waiting before making decisions on Kizer. Remember, this was his first game in this system. Lets give the man some time. If Kizer in his first game looks about as good as Hundley does after three years, I think that says something good for the future of Kizer, but we'll see.

This time a have to agree with Corey. Huntley looked much better.
And he looked better than Kizer an Boyle. but there is a lot of preseason left.

Letting Hill go was no mistake. Nothing special, too old. Boyel is ok for the PS and nobody will pick him up there, thats a sure thing

Sometimes it is as if actually watching a play simply can not be done prior to writing about it. BH did not make a perfect throw to adams. Seriously go watch what you are writing about and give credit where it is due. The ball was late, soft, to high and not deep enough as well as inaccurate in terms of the sideline/middle of the field.

ADAMS made as good a play as a WR can make. he dipped inside, set up the CB, then adams moved back OUTSIDE and slowed down for the ball. A decent throw was a TD. Please it is not that tough to watch. And it is not so difficult to credit adams for an outstanding move set. It could not have been done better.

I think they'll be keeping Keiser no matter how well the other 2 do. They didn't make that trade with the Brown's just to chuck him in the end. It would come off as a bad trade trade and I don't think Gutenkunst would like to see his first trade as a GM show any ineptitude in judgement. The front office has to look competent in the early going. So for me it's Keizer's position to lose.

Hundley has not had a problem looking good in the preseason. I think he led the NFL in pre-season passer rating as a rookie. That's where all the ridiculous "we can't take anything less than a 2nd rounder for Hundley" talk started from. Playing good in a pre-season game against a rookie head coach doesn't mean he's turned the corner. He threw a great pass to a really good wide receiver. But it's going to take a whole lot more than that to say he's 2.0

Let Chuckie and McKenzie get the highest of the Pack's 2019 first rounders and their choice of any of the Packer backup QBs for Mack.

May not be enough, though. But Chuckie does like QB grooming.