Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Spent

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

Spent - that's me. For 10 hours today, I did little else but enter numbers into the CheeseheadTV Draft Guide. Combine measurables and testing results, Pro Day testing, RAS numbers, etc etc. I pretty much wore out my arthritic right hand and wrist with all that mouse scrolling and typing and copying and pasting and whatever. Then just to make it worse, I went and played a tennis match for 2 hours after dinner. During said match, I barely had power in my wrist to hit a decent shot, resulting in some pretty awful tennis. Now I'm back home icing my hand in between typing the words you are reading. Woe is me! (By the way, I always assumed that was purely a Shakespearean phrase, but a quick google search places it's origin in the King James Bible, which I guess is where Shakespeare borrowed it from). 

Anyway, my point is not just to complain, but rather to let you know why this will be a very abridged version of Polluted Mindset. I ask for your forgiveness and throw myself at the mercy of the CheeseheadTV Reader's Court.

Moving on (and pausing to ice my hand)...

We had actual words form Matt LaFleur and Brian Gutekunst on Monday (although still not a peep from Jonathan Gannon who is either mute, suffering from extended laryngitis or locked in closet at 1265 Lombardi Ave lest anyone be allowed to ask him a question).

LaFleur gave us the reason why he received a low grade from the players with regard to encouraging their input. Seems there were players not happy with their roles. I think it's safe to say some of those players are gone (Quay Walker & Romeo Doubs, for sure), Some likely remain (Dontayvian Wicks, Matthew Golden, Jordan Morgan). As LaFleur said, making a connection with players, communicating and clearly defining roles is the coaching staff's job. But it's up to the player to excel at his role and work to carve out a new role, if that's what he wants.

LaFleur said  he went through an extensive evaluation process of the offense this offseason, stripping everything down and starting like it's year one all over again. Probably a great idea since year one was with Aaron Rodgers.

LaFleur claims he never had a direct conversation with Rich Bisaccia as to the reason he decided to leave. I'm having a hard time understanding how that never comes up when your "right hand man" you respect so much just decides to walk out on you. You don't ask why?

Brian Gutekunst had a few little tidbits for us. He revealed that the Packers have been trying to acquire Zaire Franklin for several years and that Benjamin St. Juste was a player he was hoping to draft.

Gutekunst again extolled his increased efforts towards addressing special teams over the last few years and he's not particularly wrong. It's definitely a mixed bag, but the parts that fans see the most, the returners and the kicker, have been the areas where they have had disappointments. 

What I was most surprised by was Gutekunst openly admitting that the Packers did not do Jordan Morgan any favors by playing him everywhere but the spot he was drafted to play. I mean we all know this is the case, but I just found it interesting that he basically admitted  publicly they hindered his development.

That's all I have folks. The hand is throbbing now, so I have to go ice it again. Don't let it ever be said that I won't play hurt!

Go Pack Go! 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (98)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
PackEyedOptimist's picture

April 01, 2026 at 06:30 am

I commiserate Al; I too have arthritis in my hands (and shoulders, and back, and elbows...)

The "mystery malcontents" keep being guessed at, but literally the FIRST name that came to my mind was Edgerrin Cooper. After an eye-catching rookie year, he basically was never allowed to rush the passer last year. All year, I kept thinking, "Boy, he must be annoyed at only being asked to cover."

Thanks for your painful diligence!

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

April 01, 2026 at 06:35 am

The whole O line was a disaster last year. Players in the wrong place, players playing where they didn't want to be (Jenkins, Morgan).

Even without any new additions the line should be better with Rhyan playing in what looks like his best position (Center) instead of Jenkins, who had a poor year. Morgan instead of Walker at LT (Walker had a bad year too, which must have cost him a great deal of money when he hit FA).

If Banks and Tom stay healthy this can be a much better O line in 2026 than it was in 2025. They just need to play together as a unit week on week.

As for players unhappy with their role, I'm guessing Morgan, Jenkins, Quay Walker, Hobbs, Doubs, Wicks, maybe Golden.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:20 am

I am looking for a very solid year from Sean Rhyan in 2026, not Pro Bowl, but a Top 15 NFL OC. Playing 1 position from the start of training camp will benefit him in a good way. He is already a decent run blocker, but will improve in Pass blocking this year strictly because he won't have to think so much. Pass blocking at OC should be easier than any other OL position.

Anthony Belton was the #1 O-lineman I wanted in the draft last year, but in the 3rd round, not the 2nd. That was a big overdraft of him when we needed a CB. Oh well, we got him and I think he is going to be a ggod one for us.

The 2 Draft OL I am enamored with are Trey Zuhn-Texas A&M who can play all 5 positions but was All SEC @ LT, and Diego Pounds-OLE Miss starting LT for 2 years who could also play OG. Both would be 5th round or later so we can fill our big needs CB & Edge earlier.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 01, 2026 at 06:41 am

Maybe I’ve been smoking too much crack with my grandma, but I’ve never equated how good a kicker is with the ST coach. I mean, does he really COACH the kicker?
I think of ST coaches more in terms of blocking for the kick attempts and returns, covering kicks and punts, and being relatively penalty free. To a lesser extent, I’ve also thought returns are more due to the returner than the blocking. A couple years ago when 25 was returning the bejeebers outta all those kicks, I figured it was because he was good rather than the blocking suddenly improving a thousandfold.
Ok, gotta run now. Grandma’s calling.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

April 01, 2026 at 06:54 am

I am not going to say all as I try not to do that but almost all if not all of the kickers and punters and possibly the LS have their own trainers that they work with. These guys specialize in what they are training the player on. I would say that the ST Coaches say little to these guys and during the game they tell them where to kick the ball. They might comment about the weather conditions and things to watch out for.

As for returners if I am tracking you right, the blocking is important. The key to any good return is hitting that first hole which the blockers create. Once through that hole the returner is basically on their own other than maybe a few blocks that are ad hoc blocks.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:11 am

Yeah, the blocking matters. But Nixon was so much better than…whoever it was returning kicks prior to him that I figured the success was more due to his talent than the suddenly improved blocking.

To a lesser extent I feel the same way about running backs. Give them the exact same blocking but the more gifted backs are going to gain more yards. Give them NOTHING and they’re all screwed, no matter who it is.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:34 am

Ok I agree with that. But isn't that the same with any position. There are some positions where it has more impact and returning is one of those positions.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:51 am

Yes, for sure.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:11 am

It’s not just who was put there, but who we will use from those available. We chose to use Reed and Doubs on punts and refused to activate Hardman for that. We refused to activate Hardman for kicks too, but more egregiously, refused to put a former all pro back there and instead stick with a guy with an injured foot in Williams.

There were pieces available to LaFleur that seemed at least better, but he refused to ensure that we used them. It not impossible that this was one factor in Bissacia parting ways. Now, I almost get the feel that Gute is campaigning for Moore to be used this year. It remains to be seen if LaFleur will activate him and perhaps that’s why.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:45 pm

Part of what Nixon was paid for was being a returner. Failure of coaching to let him stop.

0 points
0
0
Vachio's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:51 am

It's a lot like the pass rush vs. coverage continuum on defense. Great blocking can make a mediocre returner look good, just like a great returner can make mediocre blocking look good. Sometimes, you have absolute magic with both great blocking and a great returner. Like 1996, when Desmond Howard - an objectively great returner - had lanes so big you could drive a semi truck through them with room to spare.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:26 am

Good KRs have to be fearless, quick, and willing to take chances. Nixon was all of those things but I think he is a person that lets people get into his head and influence him. Like his agent maybe telling him how great he was, and Nixon should tell the Packers how to play him. At best he is an average to a slightly below average NFL CB. His biggest strength is that he can play both CB positions. His worst attribute is his mouth.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:24 am

"Good KRs have to be fearless, quick, and willing to take chances. "

Vision and anticipation, I'd argue those are key attributes for those guys who are magic with ball in hand. Those are things you just can't coach.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:36 am

“Good KRs have to be fearless, quick, and willing to take chances.” Returners, most especially punters returners are discovered not made. You can’t teach the reactions necessary to do it successfully. Some people just react well under that kind of physical as well as time pressure. Then one needs a good ability to track a spinning and swirling ball while being charged, good field awareness and, finally good hands and burst, speed and agility.

You also have to accept that there will be screwups no matter how good the returner. The best ever have had them. It’s a very small group that can do it reliably and and even smaller group that can produce real impact.

Is Moore worth more than a 4th TE or a 5th other WR active on game day (in a 2/3 WR offense)? I think so. I thought Hardman was last year. LaFleur however, clearly did not and thus keeping him became pointless. Now Gute seems to be making the case to do things differently. I hope he wins this particular argument, but LaFleur will continue to decide who is active in game day.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:49 pm

Or Gutey could show up with a baseball bat with spikes driven through the business end.

Barring that Policy could change the organizational structure to make Gutey an actual GM.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:16 am

"To a lesser extent, I’ve also thought returns are more due to the returner than the blocking."

Totally agree TK, yet the Packers will throw just about anyone back there I mean the put Matthew Golden back there and he wasn't a returner by any stretch. I don't believe Bisaccia put him back there. That was 100% Matt LaFleur IMO.

Big sigh...

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:53 am

Yikes. What a mess.
But the Skyy’s the limit in 2026!

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:37 am

I have read multiple articles the last 2 days about Skyy Moore and they all said the same thing, we shouldn't overlook his ability to contribute in other ways to our offense. Apparently he is a very good blocking WR which always endears a player to the coaching staff, making a strong effort blocking means you are team player not a WR "Diva."

The articles also explained his "demise" in KC came from being asked to do something he had never done, kick & punt returning. Several muffs led to him losing confidence in himself, both in catching kicks and as a WR. KC didn't give him as many opportunities to catch passes his first 2 years, only 43 catches for under 500 yards.

He missed all of 2024 with injuries and the Chiefs decided to give up on him and made a trade with the 49ers. The NFL writers were really surprised the 49ers didn't re-sign Moore but that's our gain and their loss. I think Skyy will have a good year both ways and be re-signed in 2027 when we can't afford Reed.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:15 am

Eagles didn't try to fly with Skyy...the trade was with the Niners.

Interested to see what he can do in the return game...but as an NFL WR, he hasn't displayed much value. He is not a lock to make the team...yet...however if he does well in camp and the offseason, I will be excited.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:44 am

Moore has been unimpressive as a WR. However, how much less so than our last active WR? That is the question in context.

Much as I liked the play of, say, Malik Heath, did he or any prior year equivalent really make enough of a statement as a WR to offset having a true returner? The answer is the stats unequivocally say no.

Did Savion Williams as a rookie (injured to boot)? Moore can run gadget plays (as could Hardman). He can also run some routes if needed due to injury. He’s not completely useless, he’s just never looked like a preferred starter in any WR role.

The reality is, the decrease in offensive value by swapping a genuine Returner/WR for the last active WR on game day would have been minimal at any point since at least 2021, and probably the entire LaFleur tenure.

In contrast, league comparatives have consistently suggested we could have benefitted from better field position from punt returns and, before Nixon and last year, on kick returns as well.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 01, 2026 at 11:25 am

We agree...yet Moore is not a lock to make the team if another player, on the roster...drafted...or signed FA shows return ability close to Moore's AND has more value at his "other" position on the depth chart. Just makes sense to me.

If no one better than Moore emerges in the return game...I hope he is on the 53.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 11:39 am

If we have a plausibly better option as a returner, particularly on punts, absolutely. Moore will make this team as a returner or not. The questions are whether we’ve had a last active WR who really contributed more overall to team success than a good returner? And, if so, whether, LaFleur will activate and utilize that returner on game days or not?

If he won’t, then it’s all a wasted exercise in terms of practice reps and and spot on the 90. Gute is indicating he’s in favor of having a specialist returner on game days, but it’s not his call: will LaFleur change past practices?

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:46 am

My mistake, thanks LP.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:51 pm

I really liked Skyy coming out of the draft. Hopefully he gets great coaching in GB ...

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

April 01, 2026 at 04:47 pm

No such thing as too much crack with grandma.. quality time is priceless, especially with our older loved ones.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:52 pm

Cue up Trevor Moore, Old Folks Home ;) ( it's a hoot)

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

April 01, 2026 at 06:51 am

an NFL offensive line scout said during an interview on NFL radio, if you draft a left tackle and you don't think he's ready to start there , he should start only at right tackle then assume left tackle the next season, never at guard or anywhere else.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:04 am

I am not going to disagree with the scout because the scout knows more than I do but I have read that it is not an easy transition to go from one tackle spot to the other. I would say it depends on the player. Has the player played significantly at both sides while in college. To switch requires the tackle to use totally different foot work. It is like trying to swing a golf club or a bat lefty when you are a righty.

The problem with Morgan is they drafted him to be a LT. He trained and was the RG and LG. Then they moved him over to RT and he did play some LT. All that was done in his first two years. That is too much food on a cheap paper plate. What you got was what most would consider as a mess for a 1st round pick.

I do not know enough about Morgan but it would have been better if they trained him at LT and RT or LT and LG.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:16 am

Bulaga said he (himself) was a terrible guard. But he did fairly well at tackle. 😉

OTOH if Morgan would have decisively beaten out 63 as a rookie in TC, the whole switching around wouldn’t have happened. But he didn’t, and when GB needed a guard they figured he was their best option.

I also want to see the “timeshare” business along the O-line disappear this season.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:23 am

"That is too much food on a cheap paper plate. "

I find it funny that we seem to assume that these guys just aren't smart enough to do it.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:24 am

Some players can switch sides relatively naturally, a classic example was Tom. Others struggle, but usually it just takes time and practice. The transition is usually seen as hardest on the edges.

However, we have a coaching staff that initially said Tom could not play at RT, preferring Newman and Jenkins (post injury). Nijman also couldn’t translate we were told leading to makeshift solutions. Yet last year, elsewhere and with practice time, he proved that he could.

I’d argue Morgan did too later in the season when, instead of being thrown in disastrously, as Nijman was before him, due to injury without any practice on that side. The difference being that he had finally spent time there on practice late in the season.

It’s generally much more of a transition to change between T and G, especially if switching sides at the same time. Butkus and Stenavich (since his promotion) are essentially a minority of one in the league in how that approach player preparation and movement.

One could say the same about sharing snaps in season. Almost all teams in any football price continuity and view the OL as a unit for which continuity as a unit makes the whole better and is highly prized. That was the mantra here too—until Stenavich became OC.

The results have never proved the vast majority or history wrong on this, either in overall performance or via individual development. The hard and empirical fact is, that a few individuals aside, our line play has gone backwards regardless of who has been on our roster. Yet Stenavich and Butkus remain even as personnel change.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:38 am

I still do not understand the in season musical chairs Stenovich claimed makes "both players better". If this belief was empirically true, wouldn't other NFL teams employ the tactic? Does anyone else besides the Packers?

Also, on going from one side of the line to the other side, I am reminded of Josh Sitton's crude, but descriptive analogy...saying it was like changing hands in the restroom. He was far more colorful in his description.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:53 pm

C'mon, you can have a LT play CB - MLF, probably

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:05 am

There is so much wrong @ Lombardi that what should be kept in-house is now leaking out. MLF cannot/will not admit to his own contributions to the Packer's decline. He cannot manage an entire game, he cannot 'get' clock management, he cannot manage a second half after an opposing DC changes direction. He has had 7 off-seasons to recognize recurring deficiencies and make real changes-one of these would be retaining an authentic offensive mind

He may also have lost the locker room by indirectly calling out players-(I don't think Romeo Doubs continued to be a 'problem', BTW.) Policy should be supervising MLF's recurrent weaknesses and holding him accountable. Since he isn't, who is holding Policy accountable?

I predict a continuing decline with the current leadership-after 4 more years, most fans will get it but it could have been prevented by Policy this year.

Gutekunst is equally to blame.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:17 am

I like this line "Policy should be supervising MLF's recurrent weaknesses and holding him accountable."

I was thinking that under the current structure where the HC answers to the President the GM has no power over the HC. The GM is responsible for building a team to make the HC successful. If the GM does not hire and does not control the HC does he have the same desire to work with him and build that team to be successful.

If the HC reports to the GM the GM will do everything he can to make the HC successful because his job and reputation depends on it.

The BoDs holds Policy accountable but the win/loss record of the team is a minor goal of the organization. The main goal of the organization is to be financially healthy and growing.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:55 am

Policy is a sports property lawyer. He should not be evaluating or scrutinizing any football aspect at that level. He should, if that need exists (and I fear it may), have a competent GM in place overseeing the Head Coach and performing that task. These are football determinations, not enterprise management.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:42 am

Maybe GB should hire the "Bobs" from the movie Office Space to come in and interview the Packers coaching staff to find out just exactly what they do. Ha Ha.

0 points
0
0
OldpackerfanScott's picture

April 01, 2026 at 01:10 pm

"That would be great."

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:59 pm

Could somebody please draft and develop around here?

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 01, 2026 at 05:19 pm

I bet they’d find my dang Swingline!

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:09 am

If Bisaccia was MLF right-hand man and I am assuming a friend and they were close you would thing the professional thing for Bisaccia to do is to talk to MLF and tell him why he was leaving. To me it appears that they might have had a falling out and their relationship was rocky. This reminds me of when Bielema left Wisconsin but different cercumstances. Bielema acceptted the Razorbacks HC job and called Alvarez while he was driving to Arkansas.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:01 am

Who knows? It takes two to talk. Perhaps Bissacia had similar frustrations to some of the players? Pure speculation, but perhaps things aren’t as rosy as they seem within Lambeau and Bissacia opted out?

LaFleur’s rating wasn’t good, but Stenavich’s was the worst. Yet he’s back. Now Gute is openly expressing frustration or at least disappointment with the handling of Morgan (and perhaps others such as Belton). It is starting to seem like they aren’t always on the same page at least from a talent/fit evaluation perspective. It certainly doesn’t seem like concerted action has been taken to address the root causes in terms of the coaching personnel (unless forced by poaching departures).

However, LaFleur is extended and Policy seems baffled that anyone might find that even questionable despite the collapse and the now admitted personnel dissatisfaction and some level of disagreement over player preparation and usage between coaches and the FO as well as apparently with some players.

Perhaps Policy is right, but, after years of being involved with solving organizational problems, my gut keeps telling me that things are not all sunshine and roses and that Policy may be out of his depth on terms of organizational feel and leadership at this level. When one sees signals of this type emerging it generally signifies ingrained problems are smoldering beneath the veneer.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:16 am

For Gute to publicly criticize the development of Morgan certainly feels like a shot across LaFleur's bow. Given Stenovich's "C" grade from the players, LaFleur has an obvious scapegoat if he wants one but so far he has stood by his OC (although he made Getsy the passing game coordinator over his existing OC which was odd). There may be a power struggle brewing at 1265 Lombardi Ave. I wonder if Policy is up to handling it? IDK.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 11:00 am

If such conflict is indeed developing, Policy may well have taken the one completely untenable path by not only retaining both but keeping the Murphy-made silos and himself as the arbiter.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:30 am

Policy doesn't talk to the fans, the press/public very much. I hope he is talking frequently with his direct reports, especially LaFleur.

My fear is both men, both Packer leaders, are timid when it comes to discussing difficult personnel issues that may require firing a staffer or benching a starter.

Do they hope the issues resolve organically? They rarely do...to the contrary, they often fester and become more difficult later.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:24 am

Considering that Jeff Hafley got an A- in the NFLPA grades, while Matt LaFleur got a B- and offensive coordinator Adam Stenavich got a C, I would guess that the discontent was almost entirely coming from offensive players. LaFleur got an A- the year before and a B+ the year before that, so I hope this was a one-year phenomenon rather than the beginning of a downward trend.

The team chemistry seemed a little off at times. That is mostly LaFleur's responsibility, but it is on the players as well, and maybe the GM created some unnecessary challenges by acquiring a glut of WRs and drafting an LT in the first round when the team already had an established LT with two years left on his contract.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:38 am

I noticed the same dichotomy in grades between the offense and defense too, but I still believe the biggest single issue was on the defensive side - Rashan Gary. In 2024 Gary was hustling all over the field and had become a force against the run and was okay rushing the passer. He earned pro bowl honors that year and looked like a player who was finally reaching his potential. In 2025 he started out okay but I noticed he didn't seem to be hustling as hard pursuing plays. By mid-season, Gary just disappeared almost completely and wasn't hustling at all. Now he is gone for a fourth rounder and some cap relief.

Clearly something happened and it appeared Gary just switched off. Was it Parsons, was it the coaches, was it something else? Would love to know what caused him to implode after a decent 2024 season. And maybe I am making too much of this and he just reverted to pre-2024 form.....IDK.

0 points
0
0
JerseyAl's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:49 am

Here's my totally speculative opinion. At some point in the season, Gary came to understand he would not be coming back next year. Either through his agents or some other manner, he knew the Packers weren't going to pay him next year so "F them." Again, total speculation and guesswork on my part.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:01 am

Fair points Al. It fits the picture since he did start the season decently and then disappeared around mid-season after speculation about the Packers not keeping his contract had ramped up. Pretty unprofessional of a guy earning millions annually but certainly possible. Thanks.

BTW, I have my own issues with arthritis and I understand and appreciate your working through the pain. Not easy!

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:18 am

Would that extend to Rasheed Walker? Were there others less visible? If so, that’s not generally a reaction that comes on a team with a good atmosphere and cohesion otherwise. Those symptoms tend to result when things are already discordant and disgruntlement is wider. There are signs all is not as collegiate under the surface. Signs are not definitive proof, but more are emerging.

0 points
0
0
JerseyAl's picture

April 01, 2026 at 01:06 pm

Cold, Yes, Walker also. I've had that polluted thought before...

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:53 am

Gary is a classic pro player who has all the tools to be great, but as Crash Davis pointed out, " he has a 10 cent head."

My Michigan friends warned me about GB selecting Gary in the draft because he never made the effort. He probably ended up a slightly better than average NFL player in GB but playing across from Parsons was a big chance for him to shine and he blew it.

Al, what do you take from the Browns not signing A J Epenesa after being uncomfortable with his physical. Is it a great opportunity to make an Enagbare upgrade for Vet minimum after the Browns turned him away? He had some very solid years in Buffalo and averaged 6 sacks for 3 years and was never playing across from anyone close to Parsons talent level. I think he could be a steal and also fits our cheaper FA approach this year.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

April 01, 2026 at 04:53 pm

I really think he fell off because he was no longer the show pony. It was a horrible look. He didn’t seem fond of having to play second fiddle to parsons. Saw it on his face in post game locker room clips and pressers even before the season started.

Damn shame, he was a better player than many gave him credit for, and he really sullied the resume he put on film the last many years of having a non stop motor and putting in the work.

Won’t be surprised if he puts up a big year in Dallas.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:03 pm

Players say nobody ever does that though? Film is forever.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:45 am

I suspect that some of the candidates for being malcontents were likely players on expiring contracts who were not getting the love from Packers' brass for a new deal. And, yes, I agree that the offense in particular seemed to struggle--I'm looking at guys like Jenkins and Walker, in particular. I expect the most problematic of those players have likely been moved out.

0 points
0
0
cben67's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:33 am

Al
Appreciate all your hard work on the Draft Guide. Looking forward to purchasing it again this year. It's always an interesting and insightful read.

0 points
0
0
JerseyAl's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:47 am

thank you!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:05 pm

Soldier on! Have you ever tried Devil's Claw? Herbal pain reliever, without the problems associated with NSAIDS.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:37 am

Al do you get a free copy of the Draft Guide? Asking for a friend.

0 points
0
0
JerseyAl's picture

April 01, 2026 at 01:06 pm

every day.

0 points
0
0
From the Jungle Room's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:23 am

The big one here is Gutey's comments about his disappointment in how Jordan Morgan's role on this team was handled. For MLF and staff to move this guy to every position except the one he was drafted to play has to be a GM's nightmare. To compound that, you have an exiting LT who's play had been in decline for weeks that should have been pulled out of the Bears playoff game and replaced by Morgan......instead they kept him in and he floundered.

IMO, for Gutey to openly talk to the media(!) about his personal disappointment regarding the mishandling of the Morgan situation is a major call out on MLF and staff.....in other words, shot fired. Although the "silo" management approach is still in place, Gutey has made it clear that he's providing this team with quality players but the coaches are failing to properly deploy these assets. Maybe it's me, but his statement just feels/sounds different than before. This isn't the unified Gutey/MLF front that we've seen before....rather it's Gutey not being afraid to say what he feels about some of the HC decisions....and I happen to agree with him on that.....

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:11 am

Keep in mind that in the Bears game, Tom was out and Morgan was playing on the right side (and, if I recall, was playing pretty well). That means they either shift Morgan to the left side and insert Kinnard--who's a pretty significant step down--juggle 2-3 front line guys (Morgan to LT, Belton to RT, Kinnard to RG?) or continue to play what they have. I'd argue it's as much the lack of depth as anything else that was exposed here.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:07 pm

A million percent, yes. I don't see how anyone can evaluate a GM with a mismatch like this ...

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:38 am

All of them have contributed to the Packer's decline--Murphy, Policy, Gutekunst, MLF and Ball.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:42 am

Thanks for playing hurt, Al, much appreciated. It really is all in the wrist. I too am fighting the battle with arthritis and it's not my favorite.

I'm going with the theory that Gannon is locked in a closet. MLF already implementing innovative motivational techniques.

Speaking of words, I just finished reading The Professor and the Madman: A Tale of Murder, Insanity, and the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary by Simon Winchester. Sounds silly, but it's a very interesting read.

GPG

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:55 am

my ex got the oxford in the divorce, the magnifying glass too.

a sad thing the dictionary going the way of the rotary phone. now I just ask alexa...

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:56 am

Gute and MLF have been together in their roles for 7 seasons since 2019. Except for reaching the NFCCG in 2019 and 2020 they really don't have much to show in terms of results for the Packers. In fact if not for the expanded playoff format the Packers would have been out of the playoffs for the last 3 seasons.

Now either because of their recent extensions or because of the heat they are feeling from their disappointing results, or both, they are beginning to point fingers at each other. I have often posted here that maybe Gute is building a different team than what MLF would prefer to coach, especially when you consider the players that have been in the trenches for the Packers for the last 2-3 seasons.

It just seems to me that there is a disconnect between Gute and MLF. I keep wondering if Gute would have hired MLF if he had the opportunity to hire his own HC instead of Murphy deciding to hire MLF after one 2 hour interview. That is a terrible hiring practice particularly when hiring the 2nd most important role in the football organization or any organization. Maybe the 7 year itch has hit Gute and MLF, maybe not but we'll see. It would be interesting to see the results of a 360 peer review from Gute and MLF if the Packers even conduct them.

In any case 2026 should be a prove it season for Gute and MLF and for the current organization structure. Maybe Policy will go back to the GM in charge of all football operations and have the HC report to the GM as it should be, especially if the Packers have another disappointing season. Time will tell. Until then we can hope.
AL I appreciate all of your excellent, hard work on the draft guide and your on going efforts with your weekly column. Take care of your wrist, get some rest and be well. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:43 am

" especially when you consider the players that have been in the trenches for the Packers for the last 2-3 seasons."

In general that OL depth chart has really atrophied since about 2021...that's shortly after Milt Hendrickson was brought on board from the Ravens as a supposed OL scouting guru. I'll note also that since Hendrickson came on board, the Packers have used exactly four of 26 possible day 1or 2 picks on OL (Jenkins, Rhyan, Morgan, Belton). Alongside that, 3 of 26 possible day 1 or 2 picks have been used on DL (depending on how you group in LVN and Gary).

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:58 am

"In general that OL depth chart has really atrophied since about 2021...that's shortly after Milt Hendrickson was brought on board from the Ravens as a supposed OL scouting guru."

I didn't know that we got him from the Ravens Dobber. The Ravens were one of the best talent drafting teams while Ozzie Newsome was running things.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:55 am

As a "unit", the OL is the most important on field "group". All 11 are important, but the need for the OL to play cohesively, knowing not just their assignments, but those of their wingman is the key and unlike any other position group.

OL Communication is essential and it grows and is established by frequent snaps together in practice and on game days.

If this is true, my belief is every year, as long as they have 7 selections or more, the Packers should be drafting an OL during day one or two of the draft and another on the third day. But at least one quality OL prospect every draft.

0 points
0
0
lou's picture

April 01, 2026 at 12:58 pm

Not changing the structure back to what was so successful with the Head Coach reporting to the General Manager when Policy took over was puzzling to me. The only reasoning I could assume is that if the next two seasons continue with the same results or regress Policy can use going back to that structure to buy more time for the contract extensions he approved.

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:20 am

If I were in MLF's shoes I would be concerned about the late year swan and failures during the playoffs verses the grades the players give you. In fact, Gutsey coming out and discussing his disappointment in Morgan is huge. Matches his statement last year about no more excuses because they had a young team. Think that was after the Micah trade. Anyway, there certainly is a disconnect between HC and GM and it's Murphy's fault and now Policy's fault. I'm not saying the club needs a mass firing, what I would like to see is focus, more focus during games. I still think that a major problem is how they practice. Hearing how Mason talked about practices being very inconsistent in their focus seems to have some legs in their performances.
Hope it all gets sorted out!
JMHO

0 points
0
0
sugarbair's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:27 am

Now I'm a senile old man. My confidence in the current leadership is pretty low. But it went even lower with the comments from Policy, Gute and MLF. So I have a roster with holes in it and lacking depth. A head coach riding a 5 game losing streak. Sounds like 25% or so of the starters are disgruntled. A president who (screw the fans) thinks everything is just fine. So what's the solution to the Packers problems. Fire the players.(Let them walk in FA, cut them, trade them) Oh boy what could go wrong. Now I'm going to cheer just as loud as everyone else. But if this thing goes south will the executive board have the gonads to make the change.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:11 am

I am encouaged by the free agency and trade moves GB has made so far. I think with 3/4 more tweaks/acquisitions, coupled with a solid draft that fills the actual holes we have, can make GB a more complete and dangerous team in 2026. The Packers have woefully underperformed for years now when so many "NFL Gurus" were saying we were the best thing since sliced bread.

It's time to put up or shut up for the Packers, the window isn't opening wider, it's slowly closing. Dobber made a very interesting comment yesterday that has also crossed my mind. That was if the Packers continue to languish and underperform, we both could see GB moving Parsons for a kings ransom draft haul in 2028 like no one has ever seen before. Possibly Love as well, especially if we have backups that GB has confidence in to take over. Both of their contracts will be particularly obese at that time.

It's something to consider especially if we continue to limp into the playoffs and exit early the next 2 years. Or maybe not even make it in to post season. Lets finish free agency strong with a couple solid vet leaders that upgrade the team, and knock the draft out of the park this year. GPG!!!!!!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 01, 2026 at 12:24 pm

Thanks for the shoutout, but I don't even think he sticks if they're playing well: in a couple years, Micah Parsons' cap hit balloons to almost $75M ($24M dead money). He'll be about to turn 30 and the Packers will need to decide whether to extend him well into his 30s, cut him, or trade him. I know what I would probably try to do. I think the Love decision would be more performance and outlook driven--if the team is struggling or is excessively cash-strapped?

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 01, 2026 at 01:24 pm

Parsons maybe, but I don't see it happening with Love at all. You don't draft a QB in the first round and patiently develop him into a very good QB and then trade him away when he is still in his prime. Really good QBs are hard to find, and I don't think it's likely they would have a backup who could replace Love without a huge drop-off in quality.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 01, 2026 at 03:43 pm

The only time you do that is a tear down, which typically means a change of coach and perhaps GM coupled with a need to clear out significant cap and poor contracts.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

April 01, 2026 at 10:35 am

Not a Peep from Gannon -
If you don’t understand his silence
(It’s don't spill anything before the draft)

I’ll settle for any player new role.
Just keep their agents and Gute out of it.
A contract is a contract! They signed it.

Count Rich Bisaccia with the unhappy players.

Why do you believe Gute on ILB?
Jake Ryan or oren Burks were the future.
Then Antonio Morrison was the plug.
Remember DeV. Campbell being the 5 year plan.
So now it’s Zaire Franklin. Whats the point?
The argument is we still need a ILB.

I’m sure Gute is tired of his special Team accomplishments.
To bad he didn’t focus on them whenRodgers was QB.

Next- Admiiting Jordan Morgan shouldn’t have been drafted.

No respect for MLF? This world of pretend; is destroying trust
and damaging relationships. The Inconsistent long term drafting
Strategy has been disappointing.
If we continue to draft projects, and Over-rely on other means.
The decline will be obvious, as we will continue to lose impact players.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 01, 2026 at 12:30 pm

"Jack Ryan"

Hey, anyone who could bring home a soviet-era ballistic missile sub has gotta be a quality tackler... ;)

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

April 01, 2026 at 03:24 pm

It is April fools day isn't it

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 01, 2026 at 03:23 pm

4th and One, on your own 35 yard line and not punting the ball away...Both of these guys should have seen the door, leaving Chicago. If this guy wanted an ILB, Devin Lloyd was staring him in the face. Watson at #22 and the guy keeps the two picks with one going to Tre McBride, the best TE in that particular draft. So, both Problems remain unsolved, retaining these fellows.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 03:57 pm

Just a quick reply on Franklin stock. You do know he had 173 tackles in 2024, and 179 in 2023. and 169 in 2022. As well as 125 last year. He has missed 4 games in 8 years as well. I will also bet he won't make bone headed plays like Walker made over the years. Don't be such a hater. Franklin is only on a 2 year contract and it would be easy to get out of next year. Even being older he is easily an upgrade on Walker. He is also a leader and we need some of those.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

April 01, 2026 at 04:09 pm

Yes,
and Blake Martinez was a good tackler too.
Sorry, but I'm a speed guy, when it comes to ILB.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:47 pm

Speed doesn't do any good if the player can't read the play. That's Walker in a nut shell. We will draft a LB in 2027. Franklin is a very good bridge until then and he won't hurt us. He is an upgrade over Walker.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

April 01, 2026 at 08:20 pm

Walker was an outside /edge guy in college.
With Parsons - and Cooper.
Size is No longer a must have.
Forcing guys to play out of position.
Makes them a project.
And most will fail in the long run.
I doubt Franklin is a impact player.
Upgrade isn't what they needed.
What they needed was a DL.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 02, 2026 at 07:38 am

There is still plenty of time to get a DL either in Free Agency or the draft. GB isn't done with the roster yet. Also Stock, you are the only person calling for GB to draft Stukes and the dude from Navy. Either you are a savant or you are out in the left field bleachers.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

April 02, 2026 at 07:53 am

I get Stukes and Robinson
aren't your pretend fantasy picks.
But stukes fills the need at slot.
(Because Javon Bullard is a Free-agent/Depth)
Nixon is staying outside. Period.

And Robinson will stop the tush push.
Low pads work.
I picked Clark years ago because of his
pad level.
Jersey Al and I debated why on clark.
And I'll debate you on Robinson.
Especially after his test results are terrific.
But the packers won't get him.
He's going to go to the Cinn Bengals.
(before 120)

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 02, 2026 at 10:25 am

We don't "Need" a slot CB, we "Need" another boundary CB. We also don't need a 6'1 290 lb NT.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 01, 2026 at 11:10 am

Al, you stated exactly what I was thinking when LaFleur's "right hand man" up and left and his boss didn't ask why...or conduct an exit interview. I simply do not understand it unless is what I believe: LaFleur avoids difficult discussions with difficult personnel decisions and did not want to hear Bisaccia's reasons.

I would also think Ed called Matt to ask about Rich's sudden departure, didn't he? It would be really weird if he did not or if he accepted Matt's speculation "I think he just wants to spend more time with family." Both are uneasy situations.

Then two weeks later, Bisaccia is back in a full time job, not spending more time with family. That is another follow up question from Ed to Matt. "Why did he just take another ST coordinator job? Was he unhappy here?"

I recall "cracks in communication" were what caused Murphy to establish the Football Committee in late 2017. Is it an effective NFL football team management structure?

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:56 pm

ST Coach always needed more Starters in it's operation to work well.....(whoever made those decisions fault.)

ST not having crucial players/ returners on the team when every team has minimal personnel specialists (GUTE).

ST bringing back Kicker from injury too soon with a good one working presently.....(? BADDDD.... Decision)

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

April 01, 2026 at 02:53 pm

How could Gutekunst play Morgan out of his natural position? Since LaFleur doesn't report to him, why would he be involved with how players are used? Gutekunst is on the record as saying Morgan had beaten out Walker to be the starting LT. It was then said, Walker couldn't play RG and Morgan was needed there. When Morgan failed to keep the RG position, why wasn't he put at LT? Either Gutekunst is lying about making decisions on what roles the players will have or he's incompetent. Probably both. Lafleur would, in all likelihood, be the one controlling where the players are positioned. LaFleur would be proving his incompetence by putting players in position to not succeed. To take this to its logical conclusion.....by extending Gutekunst and LaFleur, with a probable pay raise, Policy is proving his incompetence.
It is the time of year when hope springs eternal. The Pack is back and Super Bowl bound until such time as it's proven they're not. Maybe, in spite of the unholy triumvirate.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 01, 2026 at 03:30 pm

Morgan should have been the LT chair and Walker the swing guy, or traded. The Money going to Tom, in my opinion, was questionable. Gutedkunst has to hit on a couple guys for the O-line just to have a viable backup for Tom and an Inside guy who has the ability to pull. LaFleur tries to play a power game without a Fullback ?
Policy is basically a desk weight.

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

April 01, 2026 at 04:33 pm

Gutekunst needs to hope that Morgan can play LT at least adequately, Banks can stay relatively healthy and play at an adequate level, Rhyan to play at least adequately, Belton to play at least adequately and Tom to enjoy decent health. The o-line is a huge question mark concerning both starters and backups.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:20 pm

"Either Gutekunst is lying about making decisions on what roles the players will have"

When has Gutey said anything about that?!?

That's the HC's job.

0 points
0
0
TheKanataThrilla's picture

April 01, 2026 at 07:15 pm

No "load management" for Al. Good job.

It is all speculation, but I guess those who were most upset with Matt probably were people with money on the line this year. Most of us want the player to be all about the team, but players on contract years want to be able to put out good film which is flashy to ensure a big payday.

I could also see the OL being upset as they appeared to be an absolute mess last season with more shuffle than the 1984 Chicago Bears.

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

April 01, 2026 at 09:37 pm

I'm still pretty Pissy ML rushed back our Kicker from Injury aka...Mcmissalot when we had a Kicker doing a great job. Sorry folks...I don't like NON....SENSE. I really do not get ML for a Huge amount of reasons....Our 1st round WR drops only 1 pass all season and we cannot seem to get more out of him after....YEARS...of WR drops....then Golden EXPLODES in the final Bears playoff game and all of the moves were him willing himself into the end-zone.....GRRR. Starting Musgrave and preferring him over Kraft at first ....You name it.....I'm sure we have a better Edge rusher than Gary on the team....if he's allowed to participate. I will also say moving Jenkins from LG to Center was a huge fail by Gute when all we needed was a top Center in the draft....Just like last time Gute....Yea, it just doesn't stop in GB...These things are why the Pack is so dysfunctional on the field....It's in the DNA of the operation...Packers need a leader to kick some butts around and right the ship....Or just make solid decisions that any normal person would agree with.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

April 03, 2026 at 07:56 am

"Or just make solid decisions that any normal person would agree with." Yeah Phantom, and that applies to the draft and free agent pickups too.

Multiple, multiple, multiple times in the last 6-7 years GB has had opportunities to snatch players at PON in the draft, and someone in the draft room had a way better idea and picked someone else. Or they ignored the need altogether. All this did was push the same need to the next year.

The Hobbs FA signing will go down as 1 of the biggest FA failures ever in GB. Gute owns that one.

0 points
0
0
bjb2012sime's picture

April 01, 2026 at 11:24 pm

MLF and Jon Scheyer should attend counseling sessions together; neither one can close in a big spot.
Policy should have fired the Flower and moved on from the stench of failed seasons past.

0 points
0
0