A Nice Contract For A Top Cornerback - How Alexander's Deal Stacks Up

Comparing Jaire's deal to those of other top cornerbacks, the Packers should count their blessings.

Adam Shefter reported that the Packers have re-signed Jaire Alexander.  The details are up on Overthecap, which did not credit Shefter, so I infer that they have different sources.  The extension reduces Alexander's cap number from $13.294 million to $7.076 million, thereby generating a cap savings of $6.218 million.

There are no surprises in the terms.  Many people, including me, predicted that Alexander would get $21 or $22 million per year plus the $13.29 million he was due in 2022 on his fifth year option for a 5-year deal in the area of $97.3 to $102.3 million.  Alexander will earn $98.076 million over the next five years.  That is $21 million per year in new money.  The average over five years is $19.615 million if Alexander plays out the full term of the contract.  As is normal in the NFL, the Packers did not rip up the fifth-year extension term; instead the team just tacked four years onto it.

The structure is the same as the Packers normally use.  There is a $30 million signing bonus (a record for a defensive back) paired with a $1.076 million base salary, which is almost the minimum.  [No, I don't know why the base was not the actual minimum of $1.035 million.]  However, the signing bonus is the only fully guaranteed money.  Other top cornerbacks have been able to secure larger amounts of fully guaranteed money plus partially guaranteed money.  That said, that has been the modus operandi of the Packers for many years.  Let's look to see pros and cons of this structure.



YR Alexander Howard Lattimore Ramsey Ward
1 $31.07M/31.68% $18.25M/20.27% $17.74M/16.45% $26.29M/23.1% $21.03M/18.26%
2 $45.07M/45.96% $36.5M/40.55% $41.85M/38.80% $43.79M/38.48% $44.07M/38.47%
3 $61.07M/62.27% $55.0M/61.1% $56.35M/52.25% $58.79M/51.66% $60.07M/52.43%
4 $78.57M/79.61% $71.75M/79.72% $71.35M/66.16% $75.79M/66.61% $74.07M/64.65%
5 $98.07M/100% $90.0M/100% $89.35M/82.85% $94.79M/83.30% $94.07M/82.11%
6     $104.85M/100% $113.79M/100% $114.57M/100%


The cash flow is always good in year one for the Packers since they use such large signing bonuses.  The only good comparison is with Howard (not on the dollar amount so much as on the percentages) because Howard's deal is also paid out over five years.  Alexander's deal is strong as usual through year two, but then settles into the standard percentages for year three and beyond.

I previously wrote an article about cash flow (Extending Adams).  In that article, I showed the cash flow percentages for my proposed extension of Davante Adams at $20.959 million per year ($22M AAV in new money).  As it happens, that deal proposed reducing Adams' base of $13.25 million to the minimum, which is similar to reducing Alexander's fifth year option of $13.294 million to the minimum.  The proposed cash flow for Adams was $13%, 47%, 61.6%, 79.6%, and 100%.  The dollar amounts were very similar and other than year one, the cash flow were very similar to the deal Alexander just signed.  


Guaranteed Money:

I also previously wrote an article (Avoiding The Albatross) in which I discussed the high signing bonuses used by the Packers in comparison to the Bears, Vikings and Lions while simultaneously fully guaranteeing less as a percent of the total contract value than those teams.  The Packers fully guaranteed 30.59% for Alexander.  Here is that table reprinted below (SB% = the signing bonus as a percentage of the total value of the contract; FG = Fully Guaranteed Percentage):


Player SB %   Player SB % FG% Player SB % FG %
Rodgers 37.87   Fuller 32.14 GB Cousins 100 100
Graham 36.66   Goldman 26.19 26.19 Kendricks 21.00 23.28
Bakh 33.33   Mack 24.11 42.55 Hunter 20.83 23.47
Williams 32.50   Burton 21.87 56.25 Diggs 20.83 23.47
Linsley 31.37   Trevathan 26.86 48.21 Smith 19.51 29.81
Perry 31.09   Hicks 15.62 45.83 Reiff 18.72 44.77
Adams 31.03   Gabriel 15.38 53.85 Rudolph 17.81 34.63
Taylor 30.30   Robinson 14.29 42.86 Rhodes 17.12 28.56
Daniels 29.26   Leno 12.16 37.02 Joseph 12.00 22.30
Bulaga 23.70   Amukama 11.11 66.67 Griffen 03.45 32.41

[To refresh memories, the Packers' signing bonus is the same as the percentage that is fully guaranteed (except for Rodgers).  For Chicago, Fuller signed an offer sheet submitted by Green Bay, so his deal used the Packers' structure under which the signing bonus equaled the fully guaranteed percentage.  The Vikings generally did not fully guarantee much more than the Packers did (except for Cousins and Reiff), but they do use smaller signing while guaranteeing either a roster bonus or some of all of a base salary in year 2.  Chicago uses smaller signing bonuses but tended to guarantee significant amounts in year two by using guaranteed roster bonuses or base salaries.]


  Alexander Howard Lattimore Ramsey Ward
SB% 30.59% 19.02% 7.1% 17.59% 17.46%
FG% 30.59% 40.33% 41.9% 38.4% 38.84%
PG% 30.59% 44.78% 64.57% 62.62% 62.19%
AAV $21.0M $18.0M $19.4M $20.0M $20M
Per YR 19.615M $16.09M $17.641M $18.95M 19.1M
Total: $98.076M $96.56M $105.84M $113.7M $114.57M

Xavien Howard received a $17.115 million signing bonus, and his year one and two base salaries were fully guaranteed, bringing the amount fully guaranteed to $36.3 million.  $4 million of his year three salary becomes fully guaranteed if he is on the roster in March of 2024 (2024 is year 3).  That factor plus a $3 million roster bonus also due in March of 2024 means the team must decide his roster status that year quickly.  Alexander's deal has no such triggers for guaranteeing salary 6 months before the season starts.  Like DeAndre Hopkins, Howard had three years remaining on his deal (so, $25 million per year in new money in agent-speak) but it is clear that the two sides ripped that old contract up and started fresh.

Lattimore received a $7.5 million signing bonus plus $9.254 million roster bonus that was treated as a signing bonus.  Some base salaries in year two were fully guaranteed and more was guaranteed for injury-only at signing.  Lattimore had $12 million in 2023 base salary that became fully guaranteed in 2022, and another $12 million of his base salary in 2024 that became fully guaranteed in 2023 (what I call rolling guarantees).  Rolling guarantees are a great perquisite for a player, but there is nothing like that in Alexander's deal.  Lattimore signed in September of 2021.

Ramsey received $43 million fully guaranteed at signing and more $27.5M guaranteed for injury-only.  Ramsey also has rolling guarantees under which if he is on the roster in year two, $7.5 million of his year 3 salary becomes fully guaranteed.  This is repeated in year 3 for year 4, and again in year 4 for year 5.  Those rolling guarantees convert $27.5 million in un-guaranteed salary to guaranteed salary.  Ramsay signed in September of 2020.

Ward signed last month.  He received $44.5 million fully guaranteed, $71.5 partially guaranteed, but he also has rolling guarantees in large amounts.  If he is on the roster in 2023, $15 million of his 2024 salary will be fully guaranteed.  If on the roster in 2024, $12 million of his 2025 salary will be fully guaranteed.


Some readers are leery of paying another Packer the most money at his position.  While that is true by several measures with regard to Jaire Alexander, I think the best contract from the player's perspective is Ward's deal.  In fact, I would suggest that of the other contracts cited above, overall all of them are superior to the one Alexander just signed.  Guaranteed money is king in the NFL: injury-only guarantees are significant, and rolling guarantees definitely are very attractive features for a player.

It is also possible that I have been projecting my own anxieties onto the Packers.  I thought the market for top cornerbacks was extraordinarily well-defined, and wondered why there was a delay in signing Alexander.  It is possible that a lot of wrangling went on, obviously.  I wanted the Packers to generate some cap space by extending Alexander so they could acquire a veteran wide receiver, plus some help on the defensive line and in the secondary.  I looked enviously at New England when they signed Devante Parker, but I cannot say that Parker would be more productive in Green Bay than Sammy Watkins, and Watkins has a lower cap number and did not cost a draft pick. 

Finally, I have suggested that the Packers, even if they had no salary cap issues, would have extended Alexander using terms that generated at least $5 to $7M in cap savings.  I do not think the structure or terms of this contract were driven by salary cap concerns.  




NFL Categories: 
4 points

Comments (14)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Coldworld's picture

May 18, 2022 at 07:55 pm

So you are saying that the standard Packers structure just happens to be cap efficient under the current circumstances?

You may be right, or at least make a good case for that. Certainly it’s useful to have a little more cushion for dealing with developments between now and the end of the season.

4 points
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

May 18, 2022 at 10:46 pm

Yes, I think this is how the Packers would have structured a contract for the best or one of the best CBs in the NFL in 2008, 2015, or 2022.

Looking at an ESPN article on re-signing Shields, he got $12.5 SB on a $39M deal (32%). Cash flow was 38.5%, 53.8%, and 76.9% by the end of year 3. Of course, that was a four-year deal whereas Alexander got 5 years. Shields played the prior year (2013) on a $2.03M RFA tende. IIRC, GB was unsure about Shields still and offered him $6M AAV prior to the 2013 season, good money at the time but not the $9.75M he got.

I have in the past suggested moving to giving some guaranteed money in a roster bonus in year two more often. In Jaire's case, that meant giving for example a $20M signing bonus and a $10M guaranteed roster bonus in 2023. After 2 seasons, $14M in dead money is off the books ($4M proration plus the $10M roster bonus, versus $8M - two $4M prorations). GB can still convert the 2023 guaranteed roster bonus to a signing bonus if that seems best (which has been the case recently, but less so when AR was young and sustainability was desirable).

2 points
Oppy's picture

May 18, 2022 at 09:31 pm

Jaire shows all signs he's worth the money, and ultimately, I'm fairly confident this contract will look extremely team-friendly compared to the going price of top tier CBs by the time the 2024 season rolls around.

3 points
croatpackfan's picture

May 19, 2022 at 07:29 am

Thanks TGR for clearing what this signing means for Packers SC now and in the future.

While I agree that JA is the best CB Packers has at the moment, I would like to wait till season starts and hopefuly JA will justify the money he will receive through this contract...

0 points
PatrickGB's picture

May 19, 2022 at 07:51 am

I do not understand the “cap”. To me it’s like Monopoly money. Yet I think we just bought Park Place. All the anxiety I had about the cap seems to be abating. Good job! If our team may be short a premier WR, we now have the makings of a great defense.

0 points
Josh's picture

May 19, 2022 at 08:32 am

Great move by the Pack - shows commitment to winning with great defense.

1 points
Pantz_Burp's picture

May 19, 2022 at 09:19 am

Thanks for the article TGR. Just a couple observations; awesome pic shows J-Alex fuming from the back end (time to pull into the pit stop and check under the hood?)

Also, if you look to the left of J-Alex...that is me in the front row in the stands, with my shirt off and a lady on each side...the other lass accompanying me went to grab an oat soda. (my reality :)


-2 points
PeteK's picture

May 19, 2022 at 11:18 am

Hmmm, there seems to be a discrepancy in 2 pics. LOL

0 points
Pantz_Burp's picture

May 19, 2022 at 12:02 pm

Pete, you son of a ________ . 💪😁👍

1 points
Since'61's picture

May 19, 2022 at 08:50 am

We needed to get Jaire's contract done. Unless we cut a player or two after June 1st we at least now know what we are dealing with in terms of remaining cap space.

I'm not sure if this was the best contract for Jaire but I am sure that this is the best contract for his agent. Those guys rarely miss a trick.
Now I am just hoping that Jaire is fully recovered from his injury and will return to his All-Pro potentially HOF level of play.

Thanks, Since '61

0 points
LambeauPlain's picture

May 19, 2022 at 09:00 am

This deal also shows Alexander the Great must be fully healthy. The Packers would not offer this blockbuster if his shoulder joint was not 100% healed.

1 points
Leatherhead's picture

May 19, 2022 at 10:19 am

Contracts are mutually agreeable. Both parties say "This is fine, I'll sign".

Alexander has played real well since he got here, starting right away and getting better as he gained experience. Assuming there are no ill-effects of his injury, he'll be a very good starter for us for several years. I hope he remembers he's a cover corner, not a blow-up tackling safety. Maybe he could take a lesson from Tramon Williams, who had a long career but didn't try to make crushing hits. Even the Bears commented after a game once that they were going at Tramon because they didn't think he wanted contact. Which was kind of true, but that didn't mean he didn't tackle people. You can wrap and drag them to the ground.

Jerome Bettis, in an interview, once stated that he realized early on that he wasn't going to have a very long career if he kept exposing himself to hard hits. It's football, it's a physical game, but you can do things to protect yourself. CBs are the smallest guys on the field and they need to remember that.

1 points
dobber's picture

May 19, 2022 at 10:37 am

"Maybe he could take a lesson from Tramon Williams, who had a long career but didn't try to make crushing hits."

TWill learned this the hard way, too, in that he had that ongoing shoulder issue earlier in his career.

"Jerome Bettis, in an interview, once stated that he realized early on that he wasn't going to have a very long career if he kept exposing himself to hard hits"

Dillon needs to learn this, too.

1 points
PeteK's picture

May 19, 2022 at 11:28 am

Franco Harris thinking, when he was surrounded by tacklers unless in reach of a first down that extra yard or two is not worth it in the long run. Scooting out of bounds can also get a late hit penalty.

2 points