5 Takeaways From Saints 0 - 34 Packers: Green Bay Boasts Punishing Trio of Backs

Josh Jacobs, Emanuel Wilson and Chris Brooks left the Saints battered and bruised after Monday night's game.

Packers boast a punishing trio of running backs

Green Bay’s embarrassment of riches in the backfield was on full display Monday night, as Josh Jacobs, Emanuel Wilson took turns pummeling New Orleans.

Such was the comfortable lead the Packers amassed by half time, Jacobs was essentially stood down with well over a quarter to play. Green Bay’s lead horse only had to carry the ball 13 times, his fewest since week nine, but still managed 69 yards and a touchdown.

His 5.3 yards per carry versus New Orleans is also his highest mark since week nine, perhaps showing the benefits of giving him a breather every now and again, especially when Matt LaFleur has two other capable backs at his disposal.

Jacobs’ highlight of the night was a brutal stiff arm of Saints defender Tyrann Mathieu, sending the defensive back flying to the turf, and his understudies continued to run with aggression when given their opportunity.

Wilson carried the ball 11 times on the night for 52 yards, while Brooks tallied six carries for 23 yards. Both backs found the end zone, with Brooks’ score representing his first career touchdown.

The former BYU back, whom the Packers signed as a free agent after he was released by Miami with an injury, has seen his role grow over time as a reward for his proficiency in pass protection, and his touchdown was well deserved for all his hard work.

He also showed off his powerful running ability, with Brooks’ most impressive play coming when he shoved veteran linebacker Demario Davis off him, escaping what looked to be a secure tackle.

Third-round rookie MarShawn Lloyd has been limited to just six rush attempts on the season due to various injuries, and it has not mattered a bit for the Packers. They are extremely well stocked at running back, and this was shown to a national audience on Monday night.

Green Bay's defense dominates overmatched Saints offense

Regardless of the fact Green Bay was facing a massively depleted New Orleans offense, Jeff Hafley’s defense delivered a signature performance, forcing the first shutout by any NFL team this season.

The Saints never entered the red zone at any point in the game, and turned the ball over twice via a Keisean Nixon forced fumble and an interception by Zayne Anderson, who can now be officially confirmed as a real person.

New Orleans has a mountain of injuries, but it is important to remember Green Bay were also down four offensive starters. It did little to help Spencer Rattler and the Saints offense though, who failed to move the ball for most of the night.

Nixon was terrific, but Edgerrin Cooper was arguably the star of the show once again, racking up six solo tackles, at least double the number of anyone else on Green Bay’s defense. His presence is felt whenever he takes the field.

The Packers are now up to fourth in the NFL for expected points added on defense, a testament to the work Brian Gutekunst has done remodeling the defense, and Hafley for allowing them to be consistently competitive, regardless of who is or is not available.

His defense seems to be improving by the week, and that bodes well for the looming postseason.

Room for improvement for Jordan Love

Love did not have to do much heavy lifting in this game, which was essentially over before the end of the second quarter.

Green Bay’s quarterback played an extremely clean first half, taking what the Saints defense gave him, but there were also signs of room for growth for the second-year starter.

On the Packers’ third drive of the game, he successfully converted a fourth down with a throw to Tucker Kraft in the flat; a positive play overall, but Love passed up a deeper pass to Christian Watson, who was wide open for what would have been a walk-in touchdown.

It mattered not, as Green Bay ended up scoring on the drive, and taking the sure first down pass on fourth down was a smart call, but it is an example of the balance Love is still trying to strike of when to be conservative and when to push the envelope.

From the Packers’ final drive of the first half until Love was eventually rested for backup Malik Willis, he seemed to be looking for the ultimate kill shot every time he dropped back to pass, floating a couple of deep balls out of the reach of his receivers.

He also saw multiple passes deflected, and was fortunate not to throw an interception, which would have ended his pick-less streak before it could get to five games. Fortunately, Alontae Taylor stripped the ball out of his own teammates hands, letting it fall harmlessly to the ground.

Love did what the Packers needed him to do on Monday night, but a final stat line which included his worst completion percentage since week five, only 182 pass yards and a passer rating of 88.7, his lowest since week nine, shows there is still room for him to improve.

LaFleur issues positive injury updates

The Packers were always likely to win comfortably on Monday night, and getting out of the game healthy was the next highest priority. It appears they managed to have achieved this, dodging a bullet with the knee injury suffered by Christian Watson.

LaFleur said Monday that Watson just bruised his knee, and has a chance to play against Minnesota this week. Even if he cannot go, it is good news that Watson will not be out long term as the playoffs get closer.

Green Bay’s head coach also revealed Evan Williams might be out for a bit with the quad issue that kept him out on Monday, but expressed optimism he will return for the playoffs.

Having Watson and Williams for the showdown with the Vikings – which could have a big say in whether the Packers end up as the five, six or seven seed – would be nice, but getting them back for the postseason is the primary concern, given the Packers have now punched their ticket and cannot win the NFC North.

Brandon McManus continues to excel

It has somewhat gone under the radar that McManus essentially solved Green Bay’s kicker problem the second he stepped foot in the building.

Obviously, his presence on the team could be seen as controversial, but on the field, he has been everything the Packers could have asked for. He has missed just one of 17 field goal attempts since arriving in Green Bay, and has converted all his extra points.

Against the Saints on a frigid night at Lambeau Field, he knocked through two kicks, one from 46 and another from 55, with a minimum of fuss.

Packers fans should not take for granted the fact that they no longer have to hold their breath every time the kicker lines up to hit one.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (29)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
ricky's picture

December 24, 2024 at 04:35 pm

McManus has been money since the Packers signed him. But there is someone you overlooked when praising this team. The announcers Monday night were giving a lot of kudos to the person who built this team: Brian Gutekunst. Is he perfect? No. But look at the players on the field, and you have to give the guy credit for finding players who the team can develop. And this off-season, bringing in McKinney, Jacobs and McManus were terrific moves that have helped the team immediately. Add in Brooks, Melton and others, and suddenly, the defense is more effective, the offense is clicking, and we don't bite our fingernails or watch with bated breath as the FG team trots onto the field.
There will be some tough decisions to make in the near future. But right now, it seems that Gutekunst knows how to build and add to a team.

0 points
0
0
cdoemel's picture

December 24, 2024 at 08:13 pm

Absolutely! Right with you on that! Tha Alex Anthropolous of the North!

0 points
0
0
bjb2012sime's picture

December 24, 2024 at 08:08 pm

Jaire needs to be paid on a wage scale, not a salary. Install a time clock in the tunnel and he can punch in/out if he shows up to play.
Costly resigning mistake, ala Bahktiari; need to move on.

0 points
0
0
cdoemel's picture

December 24, 2024 at 08:11 pm

That’s funny and I’m coming around to that.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

December 25, 2024 at 07:39 am

Sometimes players get injured. It happens. Packers have been lucky with the relative lack of serious injuries so far this season. Alexander will play when he can.

0 points
0
0
cdoemel's picture

December 24, 2024 at 08:09 pm

“Asked Tuesday whether Watson could play this week after exiting Monday night's win over New Orleans, Head Coach Matt LaFleur responded, "Potentially."
A Saints defender landed awkwardly on Watson's leg out of bounds at the conclusion of a running play, and Watson tried to return to the game but ultimately couldn't.
"We got good news on him," LaFleur continued. "More just a bruise. You've still got to be able to function (in order to play), so we'll see how he practices this week and see where we're at."”

A bruise? There are some greats rolling over in their graves on that comment.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

December 25, 2024 at 07:40 am

Some bruises are worse than others. Josh Jacobs missed the last four games of the 2023 season with a severe thigh bruise.

0 points
0
0
DoubleJ's picture

December 25, 2024 at 10:15 am

Have you ever bruised a bone? It can take a couple months to heal and that entire time it hurts. Deep muscle bruises can be as bad as a strain and take as long to heal.

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

December 24, 2024 at 10:02 pm

Look we all know we didnt play the NO stars. Their slate of key players were missing so we played the b team. Next week we play one of the top teams in the NFL. That will be a true test. Dont know why Lefleur didnt get Muskgrave a lot of work to get in shape for next week. He did hear me screaming at the set to sit Jacobs up by 21 and let him rest and give the other backs some repts.
God that LeFluer is brain dead at times.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

December 24, 2024 at 10:27 pm

Getting a bit anxious about the Packers playing your purple team, huh?
You should be.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 24, 2024 at 10:16 pm

Yes, these backs do an amazing job behind 3/5 of an offensive line.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

December 24, 2024 at 10:29 pm

You sure are a delicate flower.
P.S. Meyers isn't good.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 25, 2024 at 09:12 am

He's good enough for what we've done so far.

I know you think that we should have above average players at every position, which, of course, is never going to happen. I know you think our offensive line isn't that good, it's just that Love, and Jacobs, (and everybody else) make the line LOOK better than it really is..

I don't agree with that. If that makes me a delicate flower, then I'll have to live with that. I've been called worse.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

December 25, 2024 at 11:43 am

brilliant scheming by an overmatched head coach...

the narrative has some kinks, but we anticipate working them out by the playoffs or the offseason.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

December 25, 2024 at 02:03 pm

Here are the two false narratives you present regularly:

---Some people (including me) are claiming the OL is bad or below average---

*I have stated that I believe they are over-rated. That's a function many fans claiming they're an elite unit- I include you in that group, who just the other day said you thought this OL is the best OL the Packers have had on the field in 20 years. "Over-Rated" is not synonymous with "bad", and I've never said the OL was "bad".
*Beyond never saying this unit is bad, I have stated I believe the OL is above average as a whole.
*I have provided data that supports my assertions that in the grand scheme of things, the pass blocking of this OL sits just outside of the top third of the league (that's above average, just in case you didn't know.)
*I have absolutely stated that I believe the RB production is making the run blocking of this unit look as though they are performing better than some believe they are (I take yards before contact as a good metric to confirm what my eyes see, as that is a representation of moving bodies out of lanes.)
* I have and will continue to assert that Meyers is not a quality starter at Center.

--- I think we should have above average players at every position ---

* I have never stated this. In fact, over the years, I've frequently defended average players that are being blasted by Packers fans for not being all-pro world beaters.
* That being said, I certainly believe the Packers should be attempting to have above average players at every positions, as every team in the NFL is always looking to improve over average or below average play at any given position. That is a fact of life in the NFL. It's hyper competitive. If your team is not trying to get better at every position, you will fall behind because every other team is trying to get better. The old football adage "If you're not getting better, you're getting worse" expresses this reality.
* The crime I apparently have committed is stating that I believe the Packers should be looking to upgrade over Josh Meyers, who I believe is a below-average starter at the Center position.
* Just for Bitternotsour, I have also committed the crime of of stating repeatedly that based on film of Malik Willis, he either refuses to or is incapable of going through his progressions, and that is a fundamental QB skill that is expected and required of a QB to be legitimately considered for a starting QB position in the NFL. I base that assessment strictly from watching film of Willis over his college and professional career. He's a 1st read or run with it QB, and yes, MLF has been absolutely masterful in putting Willis in position to take advantage of his strengths while hiding his fatal flaws.

I'm not the raving, angry-if-every-position-isn't-all-pro, the packers suck if they aren't crushing their opponents by three scores, constantly looking for flaws and unable to enjoy success type of fan you two are attempting to make me out to be. However, I do strive to be balanced in my assessments and when I see false or misleading statements being made- positive or negative- I tend to throw in my $0.02 worth.

I'm certainly not perfect in my player assessments, but over the last 17 years here at CHTV, I've hit on more than I've missed. That includes calling out the impending dominance of players like Cullen Jenkins, Davantae Adams, Aaron Rodgers, Jordan Love etc when a good deal if not majority of fans are calling them busts, or being (unfortunately) correct about a slew of back up QB's who Packers fans thought were the next coming and proved to not have what it takes to be a competent starter in the league (or even stay in the league). My biggest "miss" was without question David Bakhtiari, a player who, much like Josh Meyers, I thought was just a stop-gap after his 2nd or 3rd year, a player holding down a position I thought could be upgraded.. and I happily admitted my erroneous assessment when it was clear Bakh was indeed a great player- no one had to call me out on it- I volunteered I was wrong.

Apparently, the two of you mistake being confident in what I see and sticking by my assessments as being miserable and expecting greatness or else. Well, you two got the wrong guy. I can't tell you the last time I raised my voice or got angry watching a Packers game. I don't get upset when I see a player I have vocally criticized play well, I never have and I never will (well, PACKERS players, at any rate.) I enjoy watching the team develop and grow. I actually learned during the 2011 season that I find steam-rolling dominance boring and prefer to watch a young struggling team start to figure it out, find their identity, and grow and improve. To do that, there needs to be growth and improvement.

So, go ahead an make me whatever monster you want to make me simply because I don't agree with whatever it is you hold dear. I just wish you would actually read exactly what it is I'm stating, and quit attempting to read further into it. I'm a person who says exactly what I mean. Please stop putting words in my mouth. When you say things like "I know you think that we should have above average players at every position", or, "I know you think our offensive line isn't that good", you are misrepresenting me. If you feel you are not misrepresenting me, feel free to directly quote my previous posts to back up your statements. I'd appreciate you go back and re-read my posts either way, and see for yourself if I've actually said the things that back up the statements you're making, or if you have reacted to my posts negatively because you felt challenged and your perceptions of my stance(s) are rooted more in your own emotional reaction than to the statements I have made.

Merry Christmas & GPG.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 26, 2024 at 11:38 am

I don't think you're a monster.

I've conflated your opinions with another, more extreme, poster. I am sorry about that.

Yes, we should replace Myers this offseason. Not now, not 4 weeks ago, not 8 weeks ago. His contract will expire and there's no reason to offer second contracts to offensive linemen unless they're truly exceptional. Is Myers the reason we've lost 4 games? Is Myers the reason we can't win a Super Bowl? Obviously, no.

I'll be interested to see who the whipping boys are next year. Who will be the weak link, the guy who just isn't good enough, the guy who needs to replaced? Rhyan, maybe? Or maybe the narrative will be that Jenkins is too old, like Kenny Clark?

Do you know what the difference is between wanting below average players replaced, and wanting above average players at every position? There is no difference.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

December 26, 2024 at 04:19 pm

The keyboard scouts will always have a player that isn't up to their evaluation standards, they'll always have a draft pick that was a mistake or chosen too early, and they'll always know better than position coaches and the professional scouting staff in how the team should be constituted. It just is and will continue to be. I guess everyone needs a hobby, mine is apparently drinking.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 26, 2024 at 05:01 pm

I would have draft Lamar Jackson instead of Alexander.
I would have taken Derrick Henry.
I would have taken Cooper DeJean this year.

Here's my bias: I was required to teach kids how to play football. Fat, skinny, fast, slow, stupid, smart.....whatever. I didn't get to just say "you're not good enough". One year, I had this really overweight Special Ed. kid who couldn't run, catch, throw, or do any of the things you'd want a football player to do. He could barely remember the snap count, so we told him not to move until the guy next to him did. And I played him at TE, and showed him how to block down, and that's what he did, every play he was in there. He would just collapse that corner like a semi rolling over a Prius. He was happy, his parents were happy, I was happy, everybody was happy.

So this bit about players in the NFL not being "good enough" just doesn't get very much traction with me.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

December 26, 2024 at 05:47 pm

Couple thoughts. I'm relieved you've finally moved on from wanting to draft Lamar Alexander, and that's a great coaching story on the Sped. Kid. Nice job!

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

December 27, 2024 at 08:49 am

I myself would have double-bagged it

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

December 27, 2024 at 08:50 am

Lamar!

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

December 26, 2024 at 06:19 pm

"and they'll always know better than position coaches and the professional scouting staff in how the team should be constituted. "

You really don't understand that the coaches and scouting staff have to play the hand they've got, do you?

Just because they don't have someone better on the roster, doesn't mean the player holding the starting position has the sterling approval of the organization.

Again, the implication of your reasoning would be that no team has ever replaced a starter for any reason except injury or being unable to secure a contract extension. You should consider putting down the bottle so you can think a bit more clearly.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

December 26, 2024 at 06:12 pm

"Do you know what the difference is between wanting below average players replaced, and wanting above average players at every position? There is no difference."

What you said was, "I know you think we should have above average players at every position". I don't think that's likely, and I don't get upset that's not the case. What I already clarified is that everyone should be attempting to fill every position with great players. That's the goal. That's what you are attempting to do. You look to improve the roster every year. And that's exactly what the Packers do, every season. You can't do it all at once, and you have to play the best you've got- but when you have the opportunity, you seek to improve the personnel.

I never petitioned for the Packers to release Meyers in the middle of a season. So, that feels again like a false argument. You really need to learn to read what I post and peel away this layer of false interpretation you apply.

Maybe I need to let Vince Lombardi explain what I'm talking about in his own words:

“Gentlemen, we will chase perfection, and we will chase it relentlessly, knowing all the while we can never attain it. But along the way, we shall catch excellence.”

If you refuse to chase perfection, and chase it relentlessly, you will never catch excellence. These aren't children playing football who we are charged with teaching the fundamentals and instilling a love of the game in; they are paid professionals in perhaps the most competitive athletic sport in the world.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

December 27, 2024 at 08:46 am

To me you aren't chasing perfection, you're bitching about the product.

that said, you do it with passion and I respect your dedication. our respective world views are opposite, and it just is so.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

December 25, 2024 at 12:11 am

To anyone who thinks little of the packers dominant win against an NFL team, and thinking teams just are inherently "toothless".... and were incapable of scoring whether or not GB trots out a defense. Well, the highly rated, and MVP leader led Buffalo barely won against a "toothless" Patriots. It was a defensive score late in the game that secured the win for the vaunted Bills. The lowly pats apparently "gummed" the bills while their dentures were still soaking in polident. Gosh...if only the pats still had a few intact incisors.

Most games this year, we (me included) said; well the real barometer of the team comes when GB plays (fill in the blank). So far, the scoreboard and the 11-4 record are good standard instruments that say this is a pretty good team. When GB kicks the vikings ass this sunday, we'll say the same thing yet again: well, the real test is whether GB can win its wildcard road game, then...the real test is whether they can win the division champion finally..., then....blah...blah...we all know: the real test is whether the win the Superbowl, with a shut out, and Love has a passer rating above 120, and, and, and. So that is how The NFL works, and keeps us all glued to its business proposition. Some enjoy the games played and won....and not just get consumed with something in the future.

Merry Christmas to all, and extend to all a moment, day or season of goodwill, peace, grace. Football is fun, and so is this site to banter.

how about all likes for everybody, and no dislikes today....christmas cheer as good as it gets among gritty fans.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

December 25, 2024 at 06:57 am

A separate comment on the play of Love. Monday night, he didn't play with as much swagger or confidence as he had shown the rest of the season. He threw the ball away numerous times, and played very conservatively. The most glaring example was when he chose the checkdown throw to Kraft for a sure first down, and a shorter pass, rather than winging it to Watson for what could/should have been an easy TD. It was as if someone told Love that the running game was going to be the emphasis, and that he should not risk anything, and be very conservative in his throws. The win was great, it worked. Hopefully, we'll see a few more shots down the field, and Watson can once again display his ability to catch contested passes; Doubs and Kraft can move the chains, and Reed and Wicks can find some space.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

December 25, 2024 at 07:48 am

On that throw to Kraft when Watson was open for what would have been a TD: Maybe Love went for the shorter throw because he was moving to his left, and it would have been harder to make the deep throw with accuracy. If Love had his feet underneath him, he would have made the deep throw for sure.

The Packers defense has now crept up to 6th in points allowed, and they are only 13 points behind the league leader. They are 7th in yards and tied for 3rd in turnovers. This is really beginning to look like something.

0 points
0
0
Cheddarhed's picture

December 25, 2024 at 09:49 am

They keep saying Jordon Love had a not so good game but hey he didn't cost the team either. But I will say it was a great team effort over all. If your game hinges on the play of one man you don't have much of chance. Some teams don't have great QB play and rely solely on their defense. When he's on that's great but if not it's good to see the rest of the team step up.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

December 26, 2024 at 05:06 pm

Bart Starr, many years after he retired, was being interviewed and he said very emphatically that he just "didn't want to do anything that would hurt the team"

That really resonated with me, especially since at the time we had a QB who routinely hurt the team because he was "trying to make a play".

Most games are not won, they are lost. Often, you can win with an average QB if you just don't turn it over. Ask Malik Willis. If you have a better than average QB who doesn't hurt the team, you're in business, and since the break, we've been in business.

0 points
0
0