5 Takeaways From Packers 27 - 23 Cardinals: Packers Show Their Resilience

The Packers found a way to overcome adversity and come from behind to earn their first road victory of the year.

Packers show their resilience

It was certainly not a pretty win on Sunday, and there are legitimate weaknesses on this Packers team, but every team has them, and expectations have simply become too high for what this Green Bay team “should be” doing to opponents every week in the minds of some fans.

The Cardinals are no pushovers. They have now lost five games by a combined 13 points. At 2-5 coming into the game, they were also a desperate team, fighting to essentially save their season.

Winning on the road is always tough, and should not be taken for granted, especially given the aforementioned context behind this Arizona team’s record, as well as the travel issues Green Bay encountered on their way out west.

This was really the first opportunity for the Packers to prove they can play from behind and overcome adversity to pull out a victory, and they did it.

It is another box ticked in terms of a way they have shown they can win, and it is a trait which will matter come playoff time.

Matt LaFleur deserves criticism for how his offense played in the first half, as well as some of his decision making on 3rd and short, but he also made two crucial calls which were huge in swinging the game his team’s way.

The decision to run a play at the end of the first half, with only seven seconds on the clock and one timeout, earned them three crucial points after Lucas Havrisik’s 61-yard field goal.

LaFleur could have been spooked by the ghosts of what happened at the end of the first half in Dallas, but he made the right call. If not for those three points, the Cardinals could have won the game with a field goal on their final drive.

His decision to put the offense back out on 4th and 2 late in the game took some gumption, and was rewarded. The Packers almost surely do not win the game without that choice being made.

Fans wanted to see this team show a killer instinct in the fourth quarter of games, and they did it Sunday, with the defense making a huge fourth-down stop, the offense scoring the go ahead touchdown, and the defense then holding the Cardinals out of the end zone.

There will be plenty of time to focus on the negatives after losses, but this team deserves credit for digging deep and finding a way to win.

A rough outing for Nate Hobbs

Speaking of negatives, the big concern from this game has to be the play of Green Bay’s corners, but mostly Hobbs, who had an ugly performance.

The Packers thought they knew better than the Raiders and that Hobbs could be useful as a boundary corner as well as in the slot. So far – and it is still early – they have not been proven correct.

Hobbs was not good as an outside corner in Las Vegas, and he has not been good for Green Bay. Carrington Valentine playing only two snaps in this game is hard to understand, and the Packers need to reevaluate the configuration of their cornerback lineup moving forward.

Micah Parsons is that guy

Parsons has been as advertised in every game he’s played for the Packers so far, but Sunday was by far his most impactful performance, and Green Bay really needed it.

It was the first three-sack game of his career, with the last of them knocking the Cardinals offense back on the final drive. They never recovered.

It is difficult to fathom why Arizona decided not to double team Parsons on that drive, and he absolutely made them pay. If the NFL had Wins Above Replacement (WAR) like in baseball, Parsons would have a full game credited to him after Sunday. He was game-changing.

Run blocking leaves much to be desired

After the Packers offense struggled to run the ball in the first half against the Bengals, LaFleur challenged his offensive line, telling them: “If they’re going to play 2-shell, and we’re getting two yards (per run), it’s going to be a long day for us”.

Green Bay similarly struggled to run the ball early in this game despite Arizona playing a soft style of defense, and the line’s lack of ability to dictate up front could be a real problem for this offense.

The injuries have not helped the group’s cohesion or chances to build up a rapport with each other early in the year, but run blocking has not been a strength of the offensive line in Green Bay for a while, and it needs to improve.

Josh Jacobs proves his worth again

Fortunately, the Packers have Josh Jacobs, who is capable of making his offensive linemen right even when the blocking in front of him is less than ideal.

Dealing with a calf injury entering the game, Jacobs was questionable to play, and it would have been easy for Green Bay to be overly cautious and sit him. They probably do not win the game if they do so.

He scored another two touchdowns on the day, and the run right before his second one – which turned out to be the game-winner – was a perfect example of what makes him special.

The blocking was not great, and there were multiple Cardinals in the backfield, but Jacobs somehow turned a potential negative play into a huge positive, taking the Packers down to the one-yard line. He is worth every penny and proved it once again on Sunday.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (20)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
T7Steve's picture

October 20, 2025 at 10:31 am

The Packers win with plenty of credit to Josh, Micah and a substitute kicker starting a new controversy.

Quay Walker had a game too. Do you think it was planned for him to rush the passer so much or was he just taking advantage of opportunities? We haven't seen those called all season so far, but a good LB needs to jump on those when he sees the chance just like a QB would alter a play if a receiver were left blatantly uncovered.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

October 20, 2025 at 01:27 pm

No controversy, just trade bait.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

October 20, 2025 at 02:04 pm

As a rule, I don't think players blitz unless the DC calls for it. It was good to see Hafley mixing in some more blitzes. They allowed more big pass plays than usual, but they also got six sacks, including one that resulted in a turnover.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

October 20, 2025 at 10:40 am

Both instances you point to showed a more aggressive nature by LaFleur, which was a change he needed to make for his Packers team. That Love pass to Doubs for 22 yds, and the GB Offense getting in position to clock it with 0:01 before the half was the kind of positive change many of us fans had hoped for from Matt LaFleur. Havrisik's record setting 61 yarder was HUGE.

LaFleur showed improved clock management and gametime awareness there. Previously, he had been wasting those opportunities for reasons I could never understand.

His switching out of the FG in Q4 to run the conversion on 4th & 2 to Kraft was another game changer.

GOOD!

LaFleur's team fighting back after being down for the road win, also GOOD!

Big players stepped up to make it happen, along with some great calls by LaFleur and his staff. Huge positive moving forward this year to bring this young team together to chase a ring. That's how it's done.

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

October 20, 2025 at 10:42 am

I wish Love would go to Golden more seems like he forgets about him, still no touchdowns

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

October 20, 2025 at 11:16 am

I am going to rewatch the game to see if Golden is purposely being overlooked or if he simply is not getting open or his routes develop more slowly as Love goes through his reads and sees the rookie covered. Doubs, with his quick feet, separates at the snap and gets open quickly. Kraft leverages his strength for separation and gets open quickly too.

More targets will come to the rookie as he learns how to run routes against NFL talent. His hands and long speed is too special to be overlooked...I am not sure he is being ignored now.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

October 20, 2025 at 12:18 pm

Not worried about Golden. He's under contract for several more years and he'll continue to improve as long as he stays healthy enough to practice.

We're a running team. We run to set up the play action. Our WRs are never going to get big numbers because we don't throw that many passes. 176 attempts, so far, is 6th fewest in the league. 4 of the teams with fewer passes all have winning records....Pittsburgh, Seattle, Baltimore, Detroit.

If you can score points without throwing 40 passes, that's a good thing. Incomplete passes are negative plays. So are sacks. For example, yesterday AZ threw 36 passes. They had 11 incompletes and 6 sacks. That's 17 negative plays,right there. 17 out of 64 plays....over 25% of their plays had a negative result.

Look, I'm all for scoring points, because points win games. And you score more points throwing than you do running. But if you can run it, it keeps your offense on the field, you'll have fewer negative plays, and it will open up the play action passing game, which is where the Packers earn their lunch.

0 points
0
0
21Savage's picture

October 21, 2025 at 11:08 am

Individual player TDs only matter for fantasy and gambling. If he's out there executing his job well, it's fine for the team and their goals.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

October 20, 2025 at 10:55 am

The author has correctly hit on the Packers 2 biggest concerns. First the OL which continues to struggle in the run game. This need to change and quickly. Plus they need to cut down on the number of penalties. Second are the DBs especially their cornerbacks. They can't face Aaron Rodgers this week and continue to play as poorly as they have been plying. Rodgers will cut them to pieces.

On the positive side we have Josh Jacobs and our receiving corps. Jordan Love has become clutch late in games. On defense Parsons and Walker are consistently making plays and except for secondary the defense has been solid.

Hopefully the Packers can stack another road win against the Steelers. GPG! Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

October 20, 2025 at 11:13 am

Hey, Since'61. Always great seeing you here, bro! Agree. Hobbs is not a boundary CB. His strength is slot, where he should be. I'd like to see them working more reps for Valentine, and possibly Kamal Hadden. LaFleur & Hafley should be committed to getting both players up to speed, playing their best ball in Hafley's system.

The pre-snap penalties point directly to coaching, and this has got to improve. How many times have the Packers shot themselves in the foot, at the cost of opportunity & momentum in games this year with the penalties? Enough already, Packers! - Accountability.

GB could/should be undefeated if not for drive killing/momentum stealing, self-inflicted pre-snap penalties.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

October 20, 2025 at 11:32 am

Totally agree greengold especially on Hobbs and the pre-snap penalties. Always good to see you here as well.
Take good care. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

October 20, 2025 at 11:35 am

The Packers always have one of the longest weekly injury lists in the NFL. Most guys on the list don't practice all week or very little.

Penalties are coaching/lack of practice time/discipline mistakes. Maybe too simplistic a thought...but the Packers decisions to start injury list players is based on if they can suit up and play...not so much if they are READY to play and win snaps.

The OL is not a consistent, cohesive, or well drilled unit. There are just too many individual breakdowns. 4 may get their opponent blocked but the 5th guy then stumbles. Unlike Bakhtiari, you just expect Walker to have a few really bad plays every game. Morgan runs hot one game and cold another. Jenkins is getting back to his stout self but not moving guys like he normally does. Banks is starting to earn his paycheck but is not looking to be the dominant guard expected...especially in the run game. Tom is an ironman gutting through the oblique injury...but he's not 100%.

I don't know if Stenovich and Butkus can fix this. The OL and DB rooms are both repair shops approaching midseason. Lots of coaching work needed, some health, and actually practicing starters together during the week during the installs. Lots of variables...maybe too many.

I believe they have most of the right players on the bus, but not certain all are in the right seats.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

October 20, 2025 at 12:20 pm

Despite the fact that the Oline is not consistent, cohesive, or well drilled,we've scored at least 27 points in 5 out of 6 games. Nothing good happens on offense unless people get blocked, so obviously the Oline is doing a good enough job for us to score 27 points.....which will win most games.

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

October 20, 2025 at 12:40 pm

27 points wins every Packer game so far this year!! They've won 4 times with a final score of 27. That's crazy!

0 points
0
0
Strat's picture

October 20, 2025 at 01:14 pm

Nobody expected Banks to be dominant...especially the 49ers.

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

October 20, 2025 at 12:38 pm

After watching some of the video discussions here on CHTV where Love's RPO use of the "CAN" to go to a different play after seeing what the defense was doing I spent quite a bit of the game rewinding when Love put his hands to his head and tapping to change the play. I think the video discussions mentioned that Love typically got plus 5 yards on the alternate Canned play. I gained some new respect for Love watching him do that in this game. HIs head nods on some of the plays where he is silently getting some of the offence guys to move positions were especially interesting. If you rewatch the game pay attention to that! In one case he is literally twitching his helmet to the left multiple times to get a guy on the right side to move to the left of the line after "Canning" the play and then Love hands off to Jacobs who finds a nice big hole where that guy would have been if Love hadn't moved him. With all the noise in the stadium the silent work Love was doing with head nods, gestures, etc. was really fun to watch. Anyone who claims Love has a "low football IQ" sure doesn't know what they are talking about. I really loved the play (and play call by MLF) where Love gives an absolutely awesome fake to Jacobs (who does a great job of running into the line w/o the ball to keep up the ruse) and then throws the ball to Kraft who leaks out to the right. If I remember right that was one of the TD's.

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

October 20, 2025 at 01:00 pm

The one moment you knew the game wasn't going to be easy: The camera crew focuses in on Hafley after the defense had just had three good plays and then Hobbs allows the 35 yard "explosive" play. You didn't need to be much of a lip reader to read Hafley's, "God Damn It!" while pulling off his headphones. The very next play Hobbs can't make the tackle (admittedly a tough task) on the TE who scores the touch down. Ouch.

0 points
0
0
Rhah's picture

October 20, 2025 at 07:49 pm

Hobbs needs to see the bench. I don't understand how he is starting over Valentine.

0 points
0
0
nagawicka's picture

October 20, 2025 at 11:24 pm

There are TWO takeaways from the Cards game:
1.) Packers playing to their true selves pays off: some play stellar, some reliably solid, a few have off-days but enough play in character & up to the moment and we win.
2.) Best thing is, with so many excellent stories & players, there's no need to look for thingss to cry about
3, ok this is #2.) What does Romeo Doubs have to do to *not* be erased from the historical record? as though our beat writers are Stalin's historians? Against the Cards Doubs led all receivers with 6 receptions, 72 yards, 22 long-- & gets a bare mention. Like enough of a mention--ONLY a mention--to indicate the *entire* erasure of Doubs' storyline. His name is there; but only as a potemkin portrayal of the reality of the contribution. But why. Recognizing Doubs' game-in, game-out consistency takes nothing away, for example, from Kraft's gamebreaking plays. A week prior -- and You wouldn't know it from any Packerswire coverage -- you'd have to watch the game to learn Romeo Doubs led all wide receivers w/ 5 catches vs the Bengals, basically tying Josh Jacobs statistically, who also had 5. Fortunately, Packers fans get their 2 or 3 or 5 takeaways by watching the game. Now, Golden rightly drew focus for hitting his stride w 3 spectacular catches for big gains. Still -- and unavoidably -- consistently omitting mention of the most consistent producer around is a red flag, a dead giveaway. To be clear: my own pet peeve is the media's habit of continually drowning the same player in the same story for eternity -- so I'm not lobbying for attention forDoubs. All these other stories are valid. They should take precedence when/because they are the breaking story; they new. However. There's no honor or journalistic objectivity in behaving as though Romeo Doubs doesn't exist. I mean, invent a justification for operating as though none of his snaps happened at all. I mean, continue on as best you can, as you have been . .. --if you think you can.

0 points
0
0
CanPackFan's picture

October 21, 2025 at 09:43 am

Hard to disagree with anything Mark has said in this article. It's no coincidence that since Hobbs has returned from injury that the GB defensive backfield looks porous. We need another CB badly. For the interim, Valentine would be worlds better than Hobbs. I hate to keep saying it, but Hobbs reminds me of Kevin King...

The other encouraging thing I saw in ARI was possible growth in LaFleur. His clock management at the end of the first half was good. Then he had the confidence to let the rookie kicker try a long field goal. His gutsy call in the 4th qtr to go for it on 4th and 2 seemed out of place for him given his recent conservative behavior. My biggest concern with LaFleur has always been inability to learn from his mistakes. This game shows that he may be learning, just as he asks his players to do.

0 points
0
0