2018 Packers Defense: Get Off The Field

The 2018 Green Bay Packers are going to look a lot different than the 2017 version.  New offensive coordinator, new defensive coordinator and many new players.  

The offense, despite any new wrinkles with the return of new coordinator Joe Philbin, will still run through Aaron Rodgers.  There will be differences from years past, but the centerpoint remains the same.

On defense, new coordinator Mike Pettine has been tasked with finally getting the Packers defense to produce on a consistent basis.  Since winning a Super Bowl in 2010, Green Bay's defenses have peaked in the middle of the pack, or worse.  

One of the culprits of last year's defense was their inability to get off the field.  Part of that problem was that the offense struggled with Rodgers out and the defense spent more overall time on the field to begin with.  But the unit as a whole wasn't great.

According to Football Outsiders, the Packers were on the field for 167 total drives and only three teams had fewer (Atlanta, Dallas and Oakland). That's where the numbers stopped being on the Packers' side. 

They gave up 33.82 yards-per-drive (28th), 2.22 point-per-drive (32nd).  Opponents had an average starting field position of the 30.37 yard line (31st).  They gave up 6.21 plays-per-drive (27th) and allowed an average drive time of three minutes (32nd).

Put it all together and the Packers had a defensive success rate of .723 (31st).  That's the percentage of drive series that result in a first down or a touchdown.  Kneel-down drives are discarded from that stat.

This season, the Packers need to find a way to get off the field sooner.  It would obviously save them from early fatigue and naturally leads to better field positions and more possessions for the offense.

Green Bay added three defensive players with their first three picks in this year's draft.  Two of those picks were cornerbacks so the secondary is an area of emphasis.  Veterans Tramon Williams and Davon House were also returned.

The pass rush wasn't addressed in a pure sense until the seventh round, but Pettine's defenses create pressure from many areas outside of the conventional outside linebacker.  Green Bay has to limit the time that opposing quarterbacks have to sit in the pocket and find an open receiver.

Green Bay traded away Damarious Randall, who was the team's leader in takeaways last season.  The Packers will have to continue to find ways to take the ball away, something they were able to do last season, despite many of their shortcomings.  Between rookies Jaire Alexander and Josh Jackson along with the veterans, the Packers are hoping that they continue to see the ball going the other way.

It's not an earth-shattering idea that a defense needs to get off the field.  But with a new defensive mindset and several new faces, the Packers are hoping that a new approach will help them reach a level not seen for nearly eight seasons.

 

 

 

-------------------

Jason is a freelance writer on staff since 2012 and also co-hosts Cheesehead TV Live, Pulse of the Pack and Pack A Day podcasts.  You can follow him on Twitter here

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (123)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
PackEyedOptimist's picture

May 07, 2018 at 06:09 am

"The pass rush wasn't addressed in a pure sense until the seventh round" Mo Wilkerson? Vince Biegl? Montravious Adams?

0 points
0
0
BradHTX's picture

May 07, 2018 at 06:46 am

Well, in fairness, the author was specifically talking about this year's draft, not free agency or last year's draft. But yes, the fact that BG didn't address it in this year's draft indicates that the Packers brass is confident in Pettine's ability to create pressure with the players they have, including those three who are essentially all new. Throw in Reggie Gilbert, as well.

Personally, I'm excited to see this unit play with a new scheme, and hopefully new passion. I think we're going to be surprised at how well the same players can perform.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

May 07, 2018 at 06:53 am

Hey welcome back (I think) BradHTX. I can't remember seeing many posts from you lately. Always good to see your input here.

0 points
0
0
BradHTX's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:49 pm

Thanks, NP! Yeah, I haven't been posting on here as much. I read the articles by the authors I like, and scan the comments, but the drama phase a while back wore me out on posting.

0 points
0
0
jasonperone's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:19 am

I’m clearly talking about the draft this year with that phrase.

0 points
0
0
GBPDAN1's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:28 pm

I really hope Vince Biegel steps up in his second year. Missing the whole off season , training camp, preseason games and half of the regular season was devastating for him as a rookie and obviously hurt his performance.

However, even with these obstacles, I thought we'd see some flashes from him in the 9 games he played in. I didn't see anything that gave me a lot of hope. He was on the same level as Fackrel, which is not good. I'm holding out hope that a full off season of strength and conditioning along with a full training camp will produce better production from him. I know he'll be better this year, but will it be what we need?

I definitely would have felt better if we could have picked up a quality edge rusher this off season (easier said then done). The draft was weak at edge, but waiting until the 7th rd was discouraging. I do believe our D will be better this year than last year with the changes that were made. How much better?? We can only wait and see. The young CBs will need to get accustomed to the NFL, so will our new ILB and safety - Jones- is an unknown (hope he can play better away from the line this year).

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:39 pm

Beigel needed camp and the preseason to adjust to the speed and size in the NFL. He wasn’t eve able to train hard unitl mid season.

Almost every rookie says they are surprised how big and fast almost every player is at their positions in the NFL and it was their greatest adjustment.

For all intents and purposes, Vince is a rookie edge rusher/OLB. I saw Beigel is enough plays in college to know Pettine is gonna love getting him in situations to maximize his strengths....especially his non stop engine and relentless pursuit.

0 points
0
0
GBPDAN1's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:52 pm

I truly hope you're right, LambeauPlain. We need him to contribute. And my post did echo the same obstacles that Vince had to over come and Hope's for him that you have conveyed in your post . I realize how important missing off season work, training camp and 7 games is to a rookie. I know he's a home grown player and I hope he excels this year.

My problem was that he played in 9 games (121 snaps) and I just didn't see anything special at all regarding pass rush. Yes, the speed of the game is different, but he only had 3 pressures in 9 games where he rotated and no sacks? He looks like he needs more strength (21 reps bench) and athleticism. He doesn't pass the eye test to me so far. Physically and on tape. Looks average.

He looked more like this pre draft write up;

" Undersized, and it often shows up on tape. Needs to increase play strength and add more bulk to his frame. Gets jostled around by tackles if he loses with his hands. Poor contact balance to fight through redirect blocks and can get shoved to turf. Average three-step burst upfield. Duck-foot rusher missing twitch and athleticism to bend the edge. Attempts to activate spin counter, but he's missing footwork to bring it home. "Take-on" anchor and power versus lead blockers is below average. Quick to stack, slow to shuck.

Draft Projection
Rounds 5-6

Sources Tell Us
"Has to get stronger. He's got great makeup and is a great teammate and leader. Medicals with his foot are worrisome. Could be a flag for him." -- Midwest regional scout for NFC team

NFL Comparison
Frank Zombo

Bottom Line
Effort-based worker bee with edge-setting hands and attitude, but a lack of power that could lead to inconsistency in play. Biegel's football character is off-the-charts and he can be counted on to put the effort into improving in areas that need work. He lacks individual rush talent but could be a good fit for teams utilizing exotic rush packages. Average NFL ceiling but has the demeanor and traits of a potential special teams demon. "

Let's hope for the best. Let's hope he got stronger in the off season. Better yet, let's hope for CM3 and Perry not getting hurt much..... inhale

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

May 08, 2018 at 06:06 am

Exactly, Dan.

Let's not forget that while a weak edge class would have pushed Biegel up to round 3 or 2 in the 2018 draft, he IS a 4th round pick and therefore has about a 50/50 shot to become even an average starter at any point of his career.

Reggie White he is not. He is not going to save the day for us. We need to hope that CM3 and Perry stay healthy (rolls eyes) and Gilbert and Biegel can beat the odds and become decent role players.

We desperately needed help at OLB. Until we cut Randall, I would have argued we needed OLB help more than CB. And we didn't get it.

I'm hoping for a trade or an older free agent before training camp. Shane Ray might be available....

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 08, 2018 at 09:30 am

Well, other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play:-)?

Based on your post, Vince shouldn’t have even been a UDFA signing.

You apparantly did not watch many Badger games when he showed up BIG in BIG games against BIG TIME competition.

Last year, Larry the “Rock” had a take on Vince on Packers.com. He showed video of several plays where he DID show up on plays and closed off lanes to route the RB into the arms of his teammates for little or no gain.

Playing OLB is not just about sacks and QB hits...Vince is a football player.

0 points
0
0
Cheezdik's picture

July 16, 2018 at 06:15 am

Vince Biegel. Laugh. Have you seen M. Adams stats? They ha e one good libebacker and Matthews is old slow, and finished. Should ha e kept Jordy Nelson and dumped Matthews. Bit that's why McCarthy sucks at coaching. He is only interested in agreeing with everyone and keeping his job. Most overrated coach. Dude just admit it, Pwcjwrs def nse has sucked going on eight years now and as long as Murphy is CEO, the defense will stink. They still haven't gotten a clue that they need to draft an elite linebacker in the draft. Contats to bonehead Ted Thompson for padding on Pro Bowler Myles Jack to take crap defensive lineman Kenny Clark. Guy has less than six sacks in two years. Sad. Sure could use TJ Watt too.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

May 07, 2018 at 06:27 am

"They gave up 33.82 yards-per-drive (28th), 2.22 point-per-drive (32nd). Opponents had an average starting field position of the 30.37 yard line (31st). They gave up 6.21 plays-per-drive (27th) and allowed an average drive time of three minutes (32nd)."

Well the good news is they really can't go anywhere but UP. Had the Packers been able to move up 3 spots in the 2nd and land Herald Landry maybe the defense looks a little better. BUT I LOVE the Josh Jackson pick since the Packers were really lacking in the CB position last season.

Maybe the Green & Gold shades are on to tight but I LOVE the Packers secondary now. Having Williams around to help King, Alexander, and Jackson is invaluable. IMO they'll improve with each game and be a damn fine secondary for the last quarter of the season.

I'm not terribly concerned though the Packers didn't draft Landry. I think with the addition of Wilkerson, Clark's steady improvement, especially in the pass rush, and Mike Daniels that will be where a lot of the pressure will come from. I still wonder if they don't try some 4 man fronts with say Perry and Mo on the edge and Clark and Daniels inside. I think this has a chance to be a top 12 defense for the year and improving that rank even more by 2019. Top 12 is more than enough for Rodgers.

0 points
0
0
Lancer's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:10 am

i agree Nick Perry. Clark is on the path toward becoming a dominant must be accounted for every snap player. Combining that with a more aggressive and unpredictable defense and effective defending of the middle of the field is going to have the Packers D getting off the field promptly in 2018.

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:17 am

The Packers were a fair way apart from what I (and many others) thought they would do.

No Edge rusher in the first two rounds, no WR in the 2nd or 3rd, no TE at all.

But, when you look at who they did pick, it made sense. A starter-level outside CB, a starter-level slot CB, a coverage ILB. They are giving Pettine the tools he needs to create a good defense.

They got a WR in the 4th who might be pretty good. They went super-athletic all through the draft. they got some bigger receivers with speed. Finally they got an extra first rounder next year, that is huge.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:33 am

While they didn't get a TE in the draft they do still have a guy named Jimmy Graham. They also still have Lance Kendricks. Kendricks never really got a good chance with Rodgers last year as he was behind Bennett and then Rodgers got hurt.

I think the 3 WR's they got have a chance to make it. They all bring something a little different but all are big guys. Also they have some returning guys who could take a step. The WR competition this training camp/preseason is going to be really fun to watch.
Actually the WR/CB battle should be really fun to watch.

I agree that what they did in the draft really makes sense, even though its probably not what they set out to do. IMO, they were going to take a WR or something else in the 2nd round (depending on who was available) but when Jackson was still available they had to take him. They probably had a 1st round grade on him and got him midway through the 2nd.

0 points
0
0
flackcatcher's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:30 am

Health for this team. No more 10 OL on the active roster please. That will build experience and depth for this team. (I still shudder watching josh Hawkins trip over his own feet at Minn.) For the first time in a long time, the Packers have quality at the boundary. Most sacks are coverage sacks thanks to the rules favoring offenses. Packers have a decent chance to have a good secondary if, if they stay healthy (in football terms).

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:41 pm

Pettine was asked if he will play a 3-4 or a 4-3.

He said “yes!”

0 points
0
0
4thand10's picture

May 07, 2018 at 05:03 pm

I'm glad you mentioned that NP. I've kinda been waiting FORVER to see a big 4 man front. I hope that's the direction that D his heading in.

0 points
0
0
Minniman's picture

May 08, 2018 at 03:54 am

I totally agree. looking at the personnel it suggests that the Packers are going to get quite inventive in the pass pressure\rushing role and 4 man fronts to engage the o-line coupled with pass rushers from the middle or secondary may be on the cards (among other variations).

That could explain why the additions to the D-line and secondary, but not a major injection of talent to the OLB group. Asymmetrical warfare.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:18 am

I would like to post this article link. I think it showed why Packers went to BD and not pass rushers:

https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2018/4/30/17302674/packers-investment...

Enjoy

P.S. I already posted that link, maybe month ago - with no response...

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:20 am

I meant DB, but edit do not allows me to change it...

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:27 am

Croat, I've noticed that when I post something with a link in it, it seems to be more difficult to edit the post. Anybody else notice that?

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:42 am

Yes. You need to remove the link and edit, post, then reinsert the link and repost. Otherwise it thinks you're spambot 2000.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:34 pm

Thank you for the work around, this has been a real bugaboo for me in the past!

0 points
0
0
MITM's picture

May 07, 2018 at 05:02 pm

Same

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:53 pm

dobber, THANK YOU! Never would have thought of that! I at least have gotten in the habit of copying my comments to the clipboard before sending. Just in case they go "to the Cloud", lol.
Appreciate the response and sure many will be using your method.

0 points
0
0
GBPDAN1's picture

May 08, 2018 at 12:04 am

I read this article, croat. I agree with the article. I'm looking forward to the new D scheme and the new DBs playing it.

0 points
0
0
CJ Bauckham's picture

May 07, 2018 at 10:11 am

Good article!

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 08, 2018 at 03:49 am

I'm old. Take that in consideration. To me, it looks like time passing by very,very quickly... At warp 18 at least! ;-)

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

May 09, 2018 at 02:01 am

Sorry Croat. I read that article and the 127 comments, and added two of my own to the story. I just didn't have more to say.

Some of the interesting comments included a discussion of how often teams play zone and/or allow free releases. While we are clamoring for more man coverage, it is normal for teams to play a lot of zone. As a whole, NFL teams average playing zone 59% of the time.

The biggest take in the article is that Capers tended to have his players play a zone that was much too soft. HHCD starts 20 yards downfield and treats just beyond the 25 (LOS is the 48) and we wonder why Dix never is able to provide actual help to the CB. Clearly this is easily fixable but it appears to me that Capers wanted him back that far. King also starts a full 10 yards off the receiver he is covering. Sure, he funnels the WR inside to his help, but his help is HHCD, who is miles away. Essentially King funnels the WR but there is no hope of any help. It is hard to tell due to the angles but it looks like neither King nor Dix ever gets within 3 yards of the WR. That an easy pitch and catch for a 21 yard gain. Though teams might average playing zone 59% of the time per football outsiders, there probably is a lot of variation in how much cushion they give.

Yikes.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-taking-a-closer-look-examining...

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:25 am

One of the things that really has stood out to me was listening to Wilde and Taush last week when they talked to Tramon Williams is that the change to Pettine will be a really good one.
He essentially said that the league caught up to Capers defense and he never adjusted. He said that Pettine is a really big addition. The new scheme is modern day defense. Pettine knows how to get to QB's and how to attack protections while keeping it simple for the defense.

This one move alone to me will be bigger then any draft pick or free agent signing.
Now they also went out and brought in 2 first round caliber CB's, to add to last years first pick in King. They also went out and got a veteran who played in Pettine's defense and resigned a veteran who played well when healthy last year but was hurt to much. They are adding a speedy LB who can cover to one of the leagues leaders in tackles (Martinez). They added Wilkerson who played for Pettine and are adding him to 2 pro bowl caliber players in Clark and Daniels.

All of these changes made I think will push the defense into the top 15 minimum.

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:40 am

If all those things happen, yes, they'll be in the top 15. Maybe even top 10. But with our defense since 2011, I've learned to hope for the best and expect the worst.

I'd personally be ok with top 20 this year. Not good. But ok. That just might give ARod enough to win some high scoring playoff games.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:55 am

I tend to agree, even if they end up looking much better on the field it will likely be mid-season and beyond. I think the first few weeks are going to be rocky for this defense: new system and DC, some new pieces and roles, there are going to be injuries and miscommunication early. If they start Alexander or Jackson and if Burks plays a lot of snaps from the get-go, there's going to be a maturation process there. I don't think the aggregate stats for 2018 will tell the whole picture, but it's my hope that they're a top half defense come December and January. We're going to have to be patient with this group.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:47 am

What I like about what they have done so far is they went out and got some veteran players, so it will allow the rookies and young players time to develop and not forces them to play before they are ready. Williams and House provide leadership and a veteran presence. The 2 rookies won't be forced to play before they are ready which will be a huge change from previous years.

We will have to be patient. My hope/expectations are that the defense in week 17 will be greatly better then it was in week 1.

0 points
0
0
worztik's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:14 pm

I’m looking at a serious improvement with the defensive additions we’ve made! I have a bit different feeling, however, based on where the defense ends up being ranked. I believe that the D will look much better overall, and be able to exit the field quicker, with ARod back under center! The gum chewer had our whole team in dire straits with his inability to sustain anything resembling an NFL offensive drive. Give the D the added ammo (players) and more time between on field stints with longer time of possession and they should be a force to be reckoned with! I can’t put all the pressure on the O to help the D but, given how pathetic our QB play was last year, we should have an improved D ranking by just getting ARod back... just sayin’...

0 points
0
0
GBPDAN1's picture

May 08, 2018 at 12:08 am

Great post, Dobber

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:36 am

The biggest thing that we all have to remember is this year is we have different people running the defense. We have a coordinator who adjusts his schemes based on the players he has. That will be one of the biggest changes from Capers. Capers ran his scheme no matter who the players were. Well those players didn't always fit.

Changes are made. We don't know if it will be better but based one Pettine's track record, we have to believe it will be. And honestly it can't be much worse from last year based on communication.

The other thing to remember is they essentially have 2 redshirt rookies coming back this year. Adams and Biegel. They essentially redshirted their rookie years due to injury. So they are adding those players to the rookies and newcomers.
They will have Josh Jones who will hopefully be able to learn 1 position and focus on that.

To me all of these reasons make the defense a lot better.

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:31 am

^^^^This^^^^
"And honestly it can't be much worse from last year based on communication."

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

May 07, 2018 at 04:09 pm

The argument that "it can't get worse from what it was last year" isn't true. Green Bay was a bad defense last year. Actually, with the exception of 4 games, they have been a bad defense since 2011. But they have not been a legendarily bad defense.

Now, I do think it's likely that they will improve from last year. I just want to point out the above is possible too.

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

May 08, 2018 at 04:16 pm

Bearmeat's Phan, I was strictly commenting on RC saying the "communication" can't be worse. Whether the defense will be better is yet to be determined. However, I think that given that Pettine's defense is supposed to be simple for the players to learn and Caper's was reputed to be difficult the odds are the D should be better. There shouldn't be players looking at each other after a botched play with that, "Oh, that was supposed to be MY guy?" look on their faces, lol.

0 points
0
0
Lare's picture

May 07, 2018 at 05:52 pm

Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of Dom Capers and job he did as DC. But I also think he's being used as something of a scapegoat for the Packers defensive deficiencies the last few years.

Capers had a boss (McCarthy) who's job it was to give him capable assistant coaches and make sure he was doing whatever was necessary to field a proficient defense. He had another boss (Thompson) who's job it was to get him adequate talent to field a proficient defense.

Frankly, I think all three were equally responsible for the Packers defensive problems.

0 points
0
0
holmesmd's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:56 pm

In all fairness, the defense was ranked in the top 10 last season thru 5 games before guys started dropping like flies and #12 got wiped out. The talent on this defense is suddenly undeniable IMO. IF it all comes together, this unit could be a top 5 defense! BIG IF, but I really believe the talent and the new DC provides all of the required ingredients! Can’t wait to see the defense BALL!

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

May 09, 2018 at 02:20 am

In 2016, Gunter played 861 defensive snaps for GB. In 2017, he played 2 for GB, got cut and went to Carolina, where he played ZERO defensive snaps. Gunter did play 37 ST snaps for Carolina, and did make a play when they got into the playoffs. Apparently the Carolina fans do see him as a serviceable depth player. In GB, he was the #1 CB.

0 points
0
0
gr7070's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:29 am

"the Packers were on the field for 167 total drives and only three teams had fewer (Atlanta, Dallas and Oakland). That's where the numbers stopped being on the Packers' side.”

That number is *not* on the Packers side! The lower that number is the fewer scoring drives the Packers had and the longer/more plays the defense was on the field.

We actually want more defensive series for the Packers per game. That's a good thing for the D. Means the D is getting off the field quickly - giving up fewer scores, fewer 1st down, fewer defensive plays! Also means the O is scoring a lot.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:45 am

True, but that "number of drives" stat can skew a bunch of different ways that has little to do with the quality of the defense itself. In this case, more defensive drives can mean you have a big play offense that scores quickly (as you state)...or it could mean you have a Brett Hundley offense that struggles to move the ball...or a Deshone Kizer offense that turns the ball over like pancakes.

0 points
0
0
Johnblood27's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:20 am

As a former South Bend resident and lifelong Notre Dame fan, I watched a lot of Kizer at ND.

I nicknamed him "The Pastry Chef" because he was responsible for so many turnovers.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

May 07, 2018 at 10:26 am

I remember your post on that before, so I stayed away from your "intellectual property" (i.e. "The Pastry Chef"). ;)

0 points
0
0
holmesmd's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:01 pm

Lol

0 points
0
0
MITM's picture

May 07, 2018 at 10:49 pm

What do you think of Martini?

0 points
0
0
gr7070's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:05 am

Yep number of drivers is a context stat.

The greater point is the author didn't know what it even related to.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:00 am

That's quite the twisted logic you've got going on there.

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:30 am

Sorry for the false start!

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:29 am

The biggest need is depth on those rush OLB positions. Perry and Matthews are very good when healthy, but w/o any back-ups the rush becomes very non-existent. Enter Biegel, Gilbert and Frack Man....and all of a sudden this year may prove to be different then in years past, however are they enough? I don't think the Packers will leave this to chance, they need additional depth and may even try to get a vet through FA.

0 points
0
0
Packer_Fan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:30 am

I like this article. The facts from Football outsiders was very interesting. It supports the notion of how bad the defense was. And how bad the offense was without AR and all of the three and outs there were.

It was obvious that there was something wrong. The data shows that. The results show it. How the players showed it. And it just seemed like every offense knew how the defense was going to play and had the right play called. Capers had become outmoded.

I keep thinking about the defense the last two years. How had MM and TT missed this? what were the position coaches saying that was not heard or not said. And even what was said by the scouts when TT took Randall and Rollins and some other picks. It is now painfully obvious that CB is not the best position for them. I keep thinking about what Murphy said about chimneys. This works in large companies with lots of management. But the Packer organization is very small and contained in just one office. The business had passed TT and Capers. Chimneys only can occur with poor leaders MM better show something this year, for he had something to do with the past situation too.

BG appears different to me. I like the addition of Pettine and Philbin (MM had also become stale). I like the free agent signings that compliment the draft. And I don't think he is done. And I bet Thompson will be leaving the organization after the season is over. Having him there is like a bad apple making the rest of them bad. Hopefully at the draft he was there only to get coffee and donuts.

0 points
0
0
gr7070's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:08 am

No one "missed this".

I don't even think it was Capers' fault. Our secondary was horrible the last few years, especially the CBs.

We played long stretches of games with 1 CB! Go look at the snap counts. This during 2017 NFL, a passing league. It's impossible to play well with one CB, and that lone CB wasn't all that good either.

We were playing nickel D with 1 CB and 4 safeties! Not even playing dime at times when we needed to. And folks are upset we drafted two CBs?!

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:07 am

If Capers wasn't a BIG part of the problem, he'd still be here. Ponder that for a moment.

Teams weren't exactly clamoring to sign him up to fix their defense. Last I heard, he's still unemployed.

0 points
0
0
gr7070's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:07 am

"If Capers wasn't a BIG part of the problem, he'd still be here. Ponder that for a moment."

Someone has poor logic.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:10 pm

Someone has poor reading comprehension?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:37 pm

If Tramon Williams is saying that Capers’ D was out of date and had long been figured out by opposing teams I think you can say that he views Capers to have been a big part of the problem.

Given Williams’ experience, I give a lot of credence to his words.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:54 pm

Never let FACTS get in the way of a good argument.

After all, it's more about the hyperbolic polemic, and less about being right or wrong. (sarcasm)

0 points
0
0
gr7070's picture

May 07, 2018 at 01:26 pm

The fact Capers was fired is not proof that he was part of the problem.

It's just that simple. Your logic is poor.

You *might* be correct, but it's not actually proof. Sorry, it's just that simple.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 07, 2018 at 04:30 pm

My sister once had a roommate who was polemic.

0 points
0
0
holmesmd's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:07 pm

Hahahaha

0 points
0
0
holmesmd's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:06 pm

Isn’t he like 70 yrs old?! I for one pretty much figured he retired from the NFL. I don’t think he’s cold calling NFL teams for a gig. Now perhaps he eases down into a nice D3 college situation for a few years but I don’t really think there was much desire to grind in the NFL.

0 points
0
0
Cubbygold's picture

May 07, 2018 at 02:23 pm

"i dont even think it was capers fault"

**ducks for cover**

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:05 am

Get off the field sooner? Just leave after second down and send the offense onto the field.
The opponents might become so confused that they make a mistake.

0 points
0
0
MITM's picture

May 08, 2018 at 04:07 am

How do you get half a dislike

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 08, 2018 at 05:57 am

Indecisiveness?

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

May 09, 2018 at 02:24 am

Because no one can completely dislike TK!

0 points
0
0
Andrew Lloyd Peth's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:11 am

A big key for me this year will be the usage of Josh Jones.

Capers was maddening in his reluctance to blitz this bolt of lightning. Granted, injuries forced Jones to play more in the secondary, but that's clearly NOT where he belongs. Jones is the new breed of coverage/blitz LB, not someone you want wandering around in center field.

If Green Bay plays Jones up front, covering TE's and RB's and blitzing several downs each game, we'll see a big improvement throughout the entire defense.

0 points
0
0
Bedrock's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:19 am

I’d be happy no matter how this defense improves. If we improve the number of three and outs, red zone, coverage, pressure, take-aways...I don’t care. All of those were pretty weak.

0 points
0
0
Archie's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:27 am

There are five reasons the Pack sucked last year:

(1) Ted Thompson;

(2) Dom Capers;

(3) Mike McCarthy;

(4) Mark Murphy; and,

(5) Arod's injury.

Three of these problems have been fixed. I believe the 4th will be fixed after the 2018 season, namely MM. That will leave just Mark Murphy. Maybe he has seen the light and can help fix the problem he allowed to go on for way too long or maybe his lack of leadership is the final problem.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:43 am

I would say that the 5 reasons why they sucked were...

1) Rodgers injury

2) Rodgers injury

3) Rodgers injury

4) Hundley sucked

5a) Capers
5b) Thompson

Rodgers injury changed the team completely. Basically it forced changed to the coaches, players, and personnel staff.

We will see in the near future if the changes made were the right ones or not.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:03 am

RC I agree completely. The Packers were 4-1 before Rodgers was injured. After that everything went down hill quickly. We went from the GOAT at QB to a QB who could not complete a pass. With that the team gradually played to avoid career ending injuries rather than winning the games.

Only Archie knows how Murphy or MM could have saved last season. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:11 am

The win against the Cowboys was an amazing win. The following week we lose Rodgers and the season was lost.

Had Hundley been even an average QB I don't know if we would have seen as many changes made.

As far as McCarthy I guess we could blame him for Hundley, but I'm sure Hundley looked great in practice. Also you never know how good or bad a player is until they start playing games. Hundley's failures though is his own. Coaching can only go so far with some players.

0 points
0
0
worztik's picture

May 07, 2018 at 05:18 pm

The thing I can’t understand is why Hundley is still on the roster? Trade bait? Who would want someone that can’t even complete a pass? Oh ya, he did complete a few but, who cares? The rest of the team had no confidence in him... only MM! MM should be gone as we’ll know that I think more about it! He is in as bad of a rut as Crappers was...

0 points
0
0
worztik's picture

May 07, 2018 at 05:19 pm

Now!!!

0 points
0
0
worztik's picture

May 07, 2018 at 05:20 pm

Not know!!!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

May 07, 2018 at 10:28 am

I would argue that if Capers were truly 5a, he'd still be running the defense.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:27 am

In reality the reason they sucked was because Rodgers got hurt. Simple as that. If Rodgers doesn't get hurt they make the playoffs and who knows what happens there.

In reality Thompson/Capers would be 2a/2b. Which was it between Thompson not getting Capers the players he needed, or Capers not taking the players he had and fitting them in better? This is the chicken before the egg kind of thing...
There is a case made for each, that's why I put them together.
Thompson did make some moves to help, but unfortunately 3 of is 4 draft picks basically lost their rookie year to injury. No ones fault.

As we saw this offseason, Gutekunst went out and signed Wilkerson, Williams to help. Also resigned House. Moves I really don't know if Thompson would have made. Pettine is known for taking players and adjusting his scheme to work.
I think they made the right decision this offseason.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:13 pm

So if Rodgers wouldn't have been hurt, the defense would have been top 10.

Got it - thanks for clearing that up. You have great potential to be a future writer on Cheesheadtv.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:48 pm

yup, that's exactly what I said....
Thanks for summing it up for me.

Thanks, I may send my resume in.

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 02:09 pm

A review of RC's comment shows that AR is only mentioned in the first paragraph. That paragraph contains no mention of a correlation between AR's availability and having a top 10 defense. In fact, the phrase "top 10" appears nowhere in the comment.

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

May 07, 2018 at 02:30 pm

So what?
Use of hyperbole to emphasize a point. Don't like it, don't read it.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

May 07, 2018 at 04:11 pm

But how can It knowss if I likess it or notss, if It doesn't readss it?

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 07, 2018 at 04:31 pm

My Precioussss!!!

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 08, 2018 at 04:00 am

RCP - Ted did some FA signings... I know for sure I approved one (and I was wrong, deadly wrong) - MARTELLUS (he hate his name!) "F***ing stupid" Bennett... And added some more FA, e. g. Davon House, Lance Kendricks, RJF, Jahri Evans, Ahmad Brooks, Quinton Dial. Justin McCray and signed Vogel (he helped Packers a little!) etc. (total of 7 FA that play substantial number of games for Packers..).

People, do not play that game - "I forget the past!"...

0 points
0
0
holmesmd's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:10 pm

MM ain’t going anywhere unless they miss the playoffs in 2018. Not happening. SMH

0 points
0
0
fthisJack's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:38 am

What drove me crazy was Capers rushing 2 or 3 guys on third and long. the QB sat back with no pressure and most of the time got the first down. I believe we may have had at least one more SB if he had been sent packing 5 years ago!

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

May 07, 2018 at 10:22 am

Mind boggling level of insanity. And MM was talking about pad level and justifiably poor tackling. Unjustifiable was his lack of doing anything about it as HC.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:41 pm

What got me was the inevitable open receiver over the middle on third down.

0 points
0
0
Chuck Farley's picture

May 07, 2018 at 06:54 pm

What got me was him rushing five and nothing happening.

0 points
0
0
NoNonsense's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:46 am

In Pettine's defenses he likes to use the ILB's to attack the A gaps a lot to get after the QB so don't be surprised if Burks, Martinez and Matthews end up with more than a few sacks and pressures this year from the middle.

I know most of us see Burks athletic profile and immediately think coverage LBer but history suggests Pettine sees a guy who can get downhill in a hurry, get skinny through the holes created by the DL and get that quick inside pressure that most QBs hate.

Pettine understands that getting pressure on the QB is critical and will use any means necessary to get that pressure. He knows there's more than one way to skin a cat. He doesn't simply rely on edge rushers or DL players to get that pressure. Look for him to use a variety of blitzes as well, from both CBs and safeties.

I feel very confident that opposing QBs will be under siege more often this year than we been used to the last couple years of the Dom Capers era. Hopefully that leads to a whole lot more turnovers in the secondary, especially now that we have a few guys with great ball skills back there to capitalize on any bad throws or poor decisions those QBs are forced to make.

Can't wait to see how it all unfolds, should be fun to watch.

0 points
0
0
Andrew Lloyd Peth's picture

May 07, 2018 at 01:03 pm

I would add Jones to that group. He's a human missile, and will shock any QB if coming on a stunt.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 07, 2018 at 01:09 pm

Pettine will rush from the inside, outside, stunts, double blitzes in the same gap (AKA Badger Defense), from the slot, Safety and even with boundry CBs.

His first objective for his guys pre snap is to confuse the QB into making reads, assumptions that are fakes and diversions. Pettine says once you get the QB off balance and questoning what they are seeing it tilts the field heavily in your favor.

Capers D’s made journeyman QBs look like all pros. Some had career days against the Pack. His decades thick playbook was in every opposing O coordinator’s hands as he game planned tendencies, down/distance, where to attack him specific situations. In short, Capers exotic packages did not confuse his opponent...just confused his own guys.

0 points
0
0
Cubbygold's picture

May 07, 2018 at 02:30 pm

Its funny, as much as we hear about how complicated capers system was, it seemed like clay ran the same play over and over again. Easy to gameplan against that.

Will be nice to see that success build on itself and various guys grow more confident in their abilities as the year goes on

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

May 07, 2018 at 08:48 am

So far 2018 has been about adding better players, especially on defense through the draft and free agency and of course replacing Capers with Pettine. I expect 2019 will be the same, get better pieces in place.

As for 2018 it may take some time for this defense to gel and hopefully they will come together as a solid unit in time for a deep playoff run. However, one area that would immediately improve the defense's 2017 numbers provided by Jason would be better tackling. It's a cliche but football is still about blocking and tackling. That alone would probably improve this defense into a mid-20s level defense. Add in a more effective pass rush and we're probably looking at a top 20 defense.

That might be enough for Rodgers and the offense to handle the rest. It should also be noted that the offense can help the defense out by staying the field via the ground game and that means solid play by the OL. The right side of the OL remains a concern, at least for me, and hopefully we'll see that resolved during TC.

Getting back to the defense, I do think that they are headed in the right direction. The primary issue is will they stay healthy enough so that everyone becomes familiar with their roles in Pettine's defense. Injuries can cause that process to take much more time. Secondly, how long will it take for our rookies to become effective contributors.

Next is the issue of attitude, defense is also about attitude, nasty attitude in particular. Make the offense pay for every yard with solid, hard hitting tackling and an aggressive "make the QB uncomfortable" pass rush. The Packers defense has been too soft both in their play and in their attitude. Find a legitimate leader on the field, a play maker the defense can rally around. Maybe one of the younger players can emerge into that role. These are intangibles but they matter.

Tackle, pass rush, cover, with nasty attitude and some leadership and we'll be OK. How long it takes to get there only time will tell. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

May 07, 2018 at 04:43 pm

I think you are mostly right. I'm guessing 2019 will be more about offense than defense, though.

There is likely to be a pass rusher early since starter-quality guys have been neglected for too long there, but they could also go OL early, they may even go WR early. TE as well (maybe round 3). Just like this year, there are a lot of places the Packers could use starter-level help (thank goodness for the extra 2019 first round pick).

The Packers may have finally turned the corner with this defense. there will be growing pains, but I think the talent is finally (almost) there, along with someone (Pettine) who can make it all work well.

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:24 am

"defensive success rate"

That's an interesting metric Jason. Any chance you want to track it over the season? I'd be interested...

0 points
0
0
jasonperone's picture

May 07, 2018 at 10:44 am

That’s Football Outsiders’ metric and they will. Stats available post 2018 season.

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:23 am

Cool, thanks

0 points
0
0
Qoojo's picture

May 07, 2018 at 10:37 am

Most common thing overhead in the packers new defense classroom, "You mean it's legal to limit an offense to 3 plays and punt?"

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:40 am

I would say the most common question is; “when was tackling made legal? Thanks, Since ‘61

0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:15 pm

They don't teach tackling anymore....it's "throw your body at the player with a running start, using helmet or shoulder pads, and no hands to wrap up".

"Then hope he goes down".

Tackling in the NFL today is a joke. Lombardi's rolling over in his grave.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 07, 2018 at 01:07 pm

Martinez, Clark, Big Mike are excellent tacklers.

So was Burnett. HHCD used to be and hopefully Pettine can rekindle what he did in his pro bowl year.

0 points
0
0
Lare's picture

May 07, 2018 at 11:26 am

Lots more unknowns for the Packers this season than we've seen in quite some time. New schemes, new coordinators, new coaches, new veteran players, new rookie players, players coming back from injury, players under new contracts, players in the last year of their contracts, etc.

It's making it a much more interesting offseason, should also make for an interesting season.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:44 pm

At least there is some speed now on the 90 on both sides of the ball.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 07, 2018 at 01:23 pm

I like the unknowns.

For the last 7 years the “known” was Capers Ds would again be a liability for the upcoming season.

The only reason we won the SB in after 2010 season was while his D was soft, they got turnovers in buckets. Especially with Woodson and Collins prowling and CMIII and Raji causing havoc up front.

In 2011 the O was even better...much better...but the D was incredibly soft and gave up points in buckets.

0 points
0
0
worztik's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:19 pm

It’s hard to post here without reading ALL of the comments because, as I just discovered, if you do too soon, ya end up sounding like a parrot!!! Oh well... plagiarism must be my middle name.

0 points
0
0
worztik's picture

May 07, 2018 at 12:24 pm

I watched an NFL Network top 10 fastest and Darrel Green, CB, Redskins was #1... I only say this because his highlights also showed his tackling prowess, too!!! He caught E Dickerson from behind and made a great tackle around his legs... pure art form of a tackle!!! Dropped him in his tracks!!!

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 07, 2018 at 01:16 pm

In one of his first interviews Pettine said his guys will focus heavily every day in practice on 3rd downs, red zone and goal line defense.

Capers Ds were usually NFL bottom dwellers in all three situations.

Pettine’s teams are usually top ten in all 3.

His reasoning? While he said 1st and 2nd downs are important and will be practiced too...the other three situations are the difference between winning and losing and it isn’t even a close call. Win the majority of those 3 and you will most likely win the game.

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

May 07, 2018 at 03:53 pm

Imagine a world where a Packers defense gets off the field multiple times in a game on third down and puts the ball back in Rodgers hands. What a wonderful world it could be!

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 08, 2018 at 04:37 am

I just need to remember not so far away 2014., especially first half of the NFCCG - opponent (Seattle) had just 2 first downs, both in one possession in the second Q. First Q stats for Seattle was 0 1st downs, 1 interception, 1 sack, 1 FF (ST) 6 plays, total 3 yards and only 1 punt! Add 2 INT in the 2nd quarter and you'll got amazing stat made by Packers D!

No so long ago...

What say this - that it was not the problem with Packers roster's quality or level of talent, but more about attitude, planning and coaching...

I never saw any D, not even Seattle or Denver to have that kind of stats under the newest CBA, when you take in consideration competitive teams on the field (the closest was Denver play against Packers during, I think 2015 at Denver).

0 points
0
0
JohnnyLogan's picture

May 07, 2018 at 05:25 pm

Reggie Gilbert. I've written a number of times that last year I attended a few early practices and he stood out. If you didn't know anything about who was out there you'd think he was the star. I couldn't believe that Capers barely let him sniff the field until the last couple games when it was obvious we weren't able to get to the passer. Now McCarthy comes out praising Gilbert. Did he suddenly get better during the offseason? McCarthy hasn't the faintest idea of what a good defense is and left it all to Capers. That was his first mistake. And his second and third.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 08, 2018 at 04:40 am

I think the utmost important is that you have the clue or the faintest idea what good defense is. Maybe to call Murphy and apply for McCarthy's job?

0 points
0
0
Chuck Farley's picture

May 07, 2018 at 06:36 pm

Petine has his work cut out for him. One dback has shoulders injuries, Two haven't proven much in two years, our top safety is a piece of work, one new guy is a poor tackler, the other may be too slow to keep up and then we have two oldie but goodies
His pass rush will rely on three guys in their 30`s, and he has a linebacker Corp of under achievers. Pretty much what Dom had to work with.
Petine will have an eye opening experience to be sure.

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

May 07, 2018 at 07:56 pm

OK, a different perspective....Capers had Collins, Woodson, Shields, great dline players, Bishop and Hawk as run stopers for the top defense in league.
How many years did he keep them together?
1 and done....and couldn't recover the magic.
Collins/Shields/Bishop all left due to injury.
Woodson was good for 2 more years, dline had to be rebuilt, and took 4 years to find another good safety.

So yeah, Capers was one and done for being the league's tough guy on defense, but it seems to me TT needed to share in that fiasco.

0 points
0
0
Bure9620's picture

May 07, 2018 at 09:06 pm

I continue to hear on here and from many other packers fans their concern about the pass rush. I am much less concerned for a few reasons

1) Last years pass rush was not as bad as many think when you factor in pressures and hurries. In fact the packers were above average in many metrics, even including sacks (the most overated stat in football.)

2) The coverage on the back end was so bad, it made the PR look worse than it was, there was no press at all many times at the LOS allowing for a free release for many opposing WRs. As a result there were quick reads for QBs negating a rush.

3) Gilbert and Biegel. These 2 guys are key pieces this year. Gilbert was terrific in the last 2 games, look for his role to increase significantly. Biegel has the athleticism and tools for success and I think he flashes this year, he's healthy and with a full training camp he adds a piece for Pettine.

4) Mo Wilk. When motivated hes a pro bowler, period. He can consistently create havoc in a backfield. The 5 technique is relyed upon to create rush in Pettine's scheme, which he can do. They focus on advantageous matchups on the LOS. Wilkerson will also command double teams freeing up Daniels or Clark. This is also freeing up the LBs as well. You can't double all 3 of them up front. He will add to Clark and Daniels effectiveness.

5) Interior rush. Not all pass rush is from the EDGE, if you can collpase the pocket from the interior and not allow a QB to step in the pocket, this can be more effective than an Edge rush. It also can also force under throws and potential turnovers. I like this D-line. Bottom line is pass rush is genrated by the entire defense.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

May 08, 2018 at 06:11 am

I agree with what you say, especially #4. BUT the thing, the ONE thing that concerns me about Bib Mo is those two words.."When Motivated"... Wilkerson had an $18 MILLION dollar cap hit last season...$18 million... When someone is paying you $18 million and that person isn't motivated, well that's just scary. I understand the Jets went into the 2017 season looking to "Tank it", or so it seemed with some of their moves prior to week one. But Wilkerson is a Professional and should handle himself that way. DON'T get a Haynesworth jacket!!!

Now I don't think Mo will need to be motivated THIS season and that's why I have such high hopes for him. Making a paltry $5 million this season should be plenty of motivation.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

May 08, 2018 at 07:44 am

Sure, Biegel stepping up would be great, but what will that look like? He's a try-hard LB who really lacks what we think of as dynamic edge traits. IMO Gilbert is more of a base 4-3 DE who can set the edge and get after the passer some, but that even-front role is going to be filled by Wilkerson...so how much does he give this season aside from a few snaps while Wilkerson catches his breath?

My concern goes past this season where we constantly wonder about the health of #52 and #53, and wonder what kind of return the Packers will get out of Wilkerson, to 2019 where it's very possible they will be without CMIII and Wilkerson, and with precious few developmental pieces behind them. This was the big failing of this off-season, IMO: while we want the Packers to contend right now--and maybe they can with health and luck--the longer term didn't get attended to in a meaningful way, which means they'll be scrapping again next off-season to fill glaring holes on defense.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 08, 2018 at 10:06 am

Dobber, I think you underestimate how much better the D can play with Pettine at the helm.

Capers played an exotic, continous substitution defense that every O coordinator he faced was totally familiar with...while confusing his own increasingly younger players.

Third and long...rush 3 or 4 and play a soft zone. Ahead by 7 or 10 points...play prevent D and let the opponent go down the field and score.

With today’s analytics, it is so easy to predict tendencies and down & distance probabilities on a coach with decades of video and no willingness to change. Capers D last year was the same as it was 30 years ago...teams even said so.

John Gruden last year in primetime: “OK, 3rd and long for the Packers. The book on Capers says here he will rush only 4 and play a soft zone. Perfect time for a screen pass”. The play call? Screen pass and a 1st down.

I predict the Packer D under Pettine will be a strength for the first time in years.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

May 08, 2018 at 10:35 am

"Dobber, I think you underestimate how much better the D can play with Pettine at the helm."
"I predict the Packer D under Pettine will be a strength for the first time in years."

I pray you're right on both counts!!!

0 points
0
0
richard_kilroy's picture

August 22, 2020 at 10:49 am

Packers defensive line coach Jerry Montgomery talks about the line stepping up this year, Kenny Clark's new deal and his expectations for DL Montravius Adams.
https://EXPERTCOMPTABLECLERMONTFERRAND.com

0 points
0
0