They Still Have A Pro Bowl?

The Pro Bowl has become an afterthought in the sports world, an event of such insignificance we gloss over the selection of benched players without a second thought. Time to replace it with something else.

I remember the first time I tuned in for an NFL Pro Bowl.  It was after the 1982 Super Bowl, and a young CD was entranced by the Packers' high-flying offense that season. John Jefferson, Paul Coffman, and James Lofton made the Pro Bowl that year (along with Larry McCarren), and for the first time in my Packer fanhood, I really thought we were going to see some Green and Gold fireworks.

After all, in those days, the Packers were an afterthought on a national level. We were little more than a AAA farm club for the big teams sporting the "real" NFL players: Joe Theissman, Ed "Too Tall" Jones, Dan Fouts, Dony Dorsett, etc. Even though we couldn't come close to a playoff spot, this was the chance for the Packers to make their presence felt.

It was exciting to see the familiar mustard-yellow helmets bobbing back and forth on the field amidst all the familiar grey, blue, and crimson helmets the dominated the game for years.  But, the dreams of heroic plays by Packers on a national stage never really came to fruition. In the end, it was a low-scoring affair, 16-13 won in final seconds by the NFC with the usual suspects getting the headlines.

I don't know if I've ever sat through an entire Pro Bowl since. It's just not something that excites me, and I think I'm not the only one who feels that way. The Pro Bowl has, of course, degraded even further from those days, becoming something even the players avoid if the can, and play with 25% effort if they participate.

In fact, with so much on the line for players' health and contract negotiations, one could even make the point that it is counterintuitive to even have a Pro Bowl. Just look at the case of Javon Walker and the tumult that arose after he went to his first Pro Bowl in 2004 and had his head inflated by players who were shilling for Drew Rosenhaus.

But the very idea that people even want to watch a Pro Bowl is where the trouble lies. Most don't. It's an exhibition of individual talent in a team game, and it just doesn't translate like the NBA or Major League Baseball.  The All-Star Game in baseball has always been an attraction, simply because of the kind of game it is. While it is a team sport, players are easily interchangeable and each pitch is a one-on-one matchup of pitcher vs. batter.  The NBA All-Star game, of course, is a little more dependent on the team, but we all know the NBA has no problem becoming an individual's game (thank you, Michael Jordan).

So, the excitement of seeing your starting guard playing in his first Pro Bowl is, in the end, rather anticlimactic. Positions are so specialized that there's little time to showcase individual talents unless you're the quarterback.

So we end up with a game that few people really want to watch, and few players even want to play. Fans use the voting process as yet another "Click for Can" popularity contest, which has resulted in the somewhat embarrassing appointment of Packers center Jeff Saturday to the Pro Bowl roster...despite the fact he's had an average season (at best) and was just benched for the rest of the season.

Hey...I love having Packers make the Pro Bowl as much as anyone. But I can tell you how ticked I'd be if someone else's reserve player made it ahead of a deserving guy on my team.  This is what makes the whole process, from the selection to the game itself, a sham.

So, why do we have it? For the same reason we still suffer through the nightly Tebow report on ESPN: marketing and money. The NFL apparently still makes some dough on it, and they're going to ride this game into the ground.

So, what do we do?  If I'm making the big decision, I eliminate the game. Done. Goodbye.

But, we still select great players and send them to Hawaii. But instead of forcing them to play in a game they don't want to play in, we set up some of the old "Battle of the Network Stars" games. ESPN has done things like this on occasion, inviting stars to Florida to run them through some competition drills in April or so. Why not do something official and NFL-sanctioned where the wide receivers have to complete an obstancle course, or quarterbacks do some accuracy drills, or defenders run some interception drills. Make them big, colorful, and wild. Charge admission for the luxury boxes and the TV rights, and everyone makes some money. We get to watch an entertaining NFC vs AFC matchup that could go for several hours or over several days. Heck, it could be the sports world's answer to "Survivor". Or, at least "Wipeout".

Heck, just as many people tune in for the Home Run Derby and the Slam Dunk Contest as the actual All-Star Games.  And this way, every player could get a moment in the spotlight.

The time has come to euthanize something that has become an afterthought in the All-Star pantheon, something you wish would be good, but just isn't. Kind of like Packers in the 1982 Pro Bowl.

 

 

0 points
 

Comments (8)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Derek's picture

December 27, 2012 at 04:07 pm

The Pro Bowl sucks. I've never watched more than 10 mins. They could still award players for great seasons with a "Pro Bowl" award so they get their bonuses and recognition, but ax the game. A skills competition like the old days is better. Fastest runner, bench press, longest throw, etc are all cool to watch. Hell, I'd rather watch Ryan Pickett eat wings than the game.

0 points
0
0
packsmack25's picture

December 27, 2012 at 04:17 pm

CD is laughing at Brian, Jayme, Zach, John, and Garda for being lazy during the holidays while he just keeps pumping out original content.

0 points
0
0
Point Packer's picture

December 27, 2012 at 10:05 pm

Javon Walker....haven't thought about that guy in awhile. No idea the PB was where he picked up "T.O. Syndrome."

0 points
0
0
Lynn Dickey 12's picture

December 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm

Yeah, but the 1983 game actually was awesome, with Dallas' Danny White throwing a TD to our own John Jefferson in the game's final minute to give the NFC its margin of victory.

Both sides really did give good effort in the final quarter as the prize money of $10K to the winners and $5K to the losers was quite a motivator, given that each figure was doubled from the previous year.

Watched it all on our brand new 25" RCA...with remote FREAKING CONTROL, baby! Livin' large, I was.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

December 28, 2012 at 07:26 am

Everyone agrees that the Pro Bowl is a joke yet it still gets huge ratings. Go figure.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

December 28, 2012 at 10:44 am

Yeah, it fell compared to previous Pro Bowls, but it still beats most other major sports.

"But what’s really striking is the rating for the Pro Bowl, which drew 12.5 million viewers on NBC on January 29. Yes, that makes it the lowest-rated NFL broadcast of 2012, but that’s still an enormous TV audience. To put the ratings in perspective, the Pro Bowl drew more viewers than the Major League Baseball All-Star game, which is the highest-rated baseball game of the year so far. The Pro Bowl also got better ratings than any hockey game this year, better ratings than all of the NBA conference finals games except Game 7 between the Celtics and Heat, better ratings than the U.S. Olympic gymnastics trials, better ratings than the final round of the U.S. Open and better ratings than a great Sugar Bowl game between Michigan and Virginia Tech."

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/13/pro-bowl-ratings-show-wh...

0 points
0
0
Pkrbkr66's picture

December 28, 2012 at 12:02 pm

Completely agree! I haven't watched the Popularity Bowl in several years now and see no reason at all to resume. It is a joke.

0 points
0
0