Steelers 23 Packers 19: Game Balls & Lame Calls

Next step is learning how to win.

The Green Bay Packers got better Sunday.  Not nearly good enough to win against a worthy opponent, but better.  The Pack once again had a number of opportunities to win this game.  They simply didn't know how. 

With 3:04 to play in the third quarter, Anders Carlson booted a 28 yard field goal to give the Packers a 19 to 17 lead.  But Green Bay would get the ball back four more times, and yet couldn’t manufacture another single point.  Jordan Love is improving.  He is going to be an okay quarterback in this league.  But he is going to need a dominant defense behind him in order to win at this level.  He doesn’t have that. 

This defense is, unsurprisingly, so-so.  Just as it has been every year of the Joe Barry era.  Time and time again they hold the other team within range, but they aren’t quite good enough to win it on their own.  They need a quarterback who can execute a last minute drive, and Love isn’t there yet.  Until one of these two factors change, either the defense becomes dominant, or Love becomes more clutch, the Packers will continue to lose close games. 

And yet it might not have been either the offense or defense most responsible for the loss.  When the Steelers blocked a point after attempt in the second quarter, it would eventually cost Green Bay the chance to at least take the game into overtime.  Jordan Love had taken the team far enough down the field in the final seconds to set up a chip shot field goal that would have tied the game.  So there you have it.  The Packers are getting more competitive.  This was a step forward.  But they are still not quite good enough in any of the three phases to beat a decent team.  Before this season is over, they will win games like this. 

GAME BALLS 

Jayden Reed 

The rookie caught all five of his targets for 84 yards and a touchdown.  He led the team in both categories.  On the scoring play he did a nice job of reaching back for the catch.  He made a veteran adjustment on a prayer thrown up by Love on the final drive and turned it into a 46 yard gain.  Is Reed slowly surpassing Romeo Doubs and Christian Watson as Love’s go-to guy? 

Zach Tom & Rasheed Walker 

All things considered, they held up pretty well against a talented pass rushing team.  They allowed just one sack by TJ Watt, and for the most part Love had a pretty clean pocket in which to operate.  They paved the way for 116 rushing yards, and occasionally blew open some gaping holes, as they did on AJ Dillon’s 40 yard run.  They surely weren’t perfect but overall they did their job. 

Corey Ballentine & Carrington Valentine 

The two young corners also held up reasonably well against some potentially dangerous Pittsburgh receivers.  They did not allow any receiver to catch more than three passes, and none had more than 45 receiving yards.  Green Bay was not beaten by the pass in this game.  Which is saying something, when you consider the secondary was missing Jaire Alexander, Eric Stokes, the departed Rasul Douglas and safety Darnell Savage. 

LAME CALLS 

Run Defense 

No, it wasn’t pass defense, it was that old bugaboo, stopping the run, that haunted the green and gold once again.  The front seven was gouged for 205 yards on the ground.  Especially deficient was run defense in the red zone, as the Packers allowed Najee Harris to stroll into the end zone untouched from four yards out, and then the same for Jaylen Warren from sixteen yards away. 

The lateral that wasn’t 

In a game where one play could have made all the difference, the Packers got a tough break when a throw by Kenny Pickett to Warren, which clearly appeared on replay to be backwards, was instead ruled an incomplete forward pass.  The Packers had recovered the ball and should have had it inside the red zone.  Hard to understand how officials could examine that video and not see conclusive evidence of a lateral. 

THREE AND OUT 

-- Jordan Love continued his nasty habit of under throwing on critical passes.  He had Doubs wide open twenty yards down the field, but Doubs had to fall to the ground to make the catch and lost the chance for several YAC yards.  Once again Love had Watson with a step in the end zone, but under threw him, allowing corner Patrick Peterson to tip the pass to teammate Keanu Neal for the Interception.  And on the final play, he failed to get the ball over the head of defensive back Damontae Kazee, and give Watson a chance to win the game in the back of the end zone.  Even the touchdown toss to Reed was a bit short, but Reed managed to adjust and secure it.  Love has it in him to correct this problem.  That first TD throw to Doubs was perfect.

-- I guess I should be careful what I wish for.  Last week I praised Matt LaFleur and the offensive coaches for their creativity and asked for more of that.  Well, Green Bay’s attempt at a trick play against the Steelers failed miserably when Dontayvion Wicks tried to throw back to Jones who dropped the ball.  As a rule, the Packers have not executed trick plays very well.  Maybe the coaches were trying to get a little too cute.  Perhaps the razzle dazzle could wait until the offense gets the regular plays right. 

-- One of the really exciting things to see is successful throws down the seam to tight end Luke Musgrave.  Love hit him for gains of 36 and 28 yards.  That’s what we’ve been waiting for since the Oregon State star was drafted in the second round last April.  I have to admit I was having some Jermichael Finley flashbacks.     

 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Ken Lass is a former Green Bay television sports anchor and 43 year media veteran, a lifelong Packers fan, and a shareholder.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
6 points
 

Comments (136)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
stockholder's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:16 am

I'm Thinking their Over -achieving?.
Players might take longer than expected.

1 points
4
3
jannes bjornson's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:16 am

What about the coaches? Pittsburgh ran the ball down their throats for over 200 yards and Barry is presenting light fronts worried about Pickett? This is a prelude to the 70's Show, unless, the failures who designed the Six Year Plan are removed.

10 points
11
1
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:35 am

Why would you worry about Pickett. He’s thrown over 240 yards thrice in his career. They did run for 160 plus yards on the ground in their last game. That might have been a clue. Barry is inept tactically. Strategically, leaving Ford on the PS again was equally unwise. When coaches make problems worse before games then that coach is the problem. Myers and Runyon suggest it’s not merely Barry, but he certainly is a repeat culprit.

5 points
5
0
Packerpasty's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:30 am

exactly...criminal not sell out on the run and make a QB like Pickett beat you...he's not good at all...make him throw and int's would have came...

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:37 am

If he drops back to pass, you have two guys getting megabucks who are supposed to sack him. Three bigs minimum up front, four better. How is Clark effective if he's locked by Dbl teams?

4 points
4
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 04:52 pm

Yep...why are you playing 2 high safety against Pickett, that doesn't make sense.

0 points
0
0
Packers2020's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:59 am

Bingo and spot on, Jannes.

Barry is a huge part of the problem on defense. Not that we couldn't use more talent but he just doesn't get it.

4 points
4
0
PeteK's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:45 am

I was zeroing in on our ILBs, while they have tkls , they are not quick enough filling the running lanes nor getting off blks. Also, too many times we had penetration and the defender followed the QB instead of the ball carrier. When given the choice tackle the RB especially when they are chewing us up and Picket has 37 yds rushing this year.

3 points
3
0
Minniman's picture

November 13, 2023 at 01:24 pm

Agree, you can pummel the RB and not get flagged.

PIckett is no Lamar Jackson - maybe the Packers still have Colin Kaepernick nightmares!

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:13 am

I have always said the 3-4-4 is a dinosaur.
And are Inside Linebackers couldn't fill the lanes.
Crowd the LOS and they'll pass.
That the OLbs would just get pushed out.
And their aggressiveness would be neutralized.
Leaving No containment.
Just Double team the Nt with either guard per direction.
And so far that is true.
Regardless 4 DL is the way to go. Barry is wrong.
Most teams are playing a 4-2-5. or NB.

I don't believe this team will ever be a successful
Defense again, as long as they want De's to be LB.
The space they have to cover and still tackle
just doesn't add up.
unless your P. Smith who started at OLB.

5 points
6
1
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 04:55 pm

SH, remember Ted drafting all those Def. ends and converting them to linebackers...lol

That was painful to watch.
*************
I remember us talking on another site years back after Capers was let go, that the Packers should go back to a 4-3...never happened.

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

November 13, 2023 at 05:28 pm

IMO- they wrecked Datone Jones with the weight Lost.
His injuries not only hurt him. But he was too slow.
Another injury guy was =
Nick Perry - When CM3 had to play ILB; so Perry could
play over LT. It Showed Perry was a one trick pony.
And then Julius Peppers was their answer to Kampman,
and the others that left in 2010. All-pro!
And that is their search now.

But if I had this Defense. - Van Ess and Gary would be Des.
With Gary playing Kampman or Peppers roll.
Wyatt and Clarke the DTs.
The OLbs would be Walker and P. Smith.
And my draft choice would be Dallas Turner AL.
That way all the pieces could rotate per injuries.
But if I was going to draft a Lb this year.
Turner fits my scheme.
Fast DEs- Fast DTs, Fast OLBs.
And squeeze Turner and Walker
for the 4-2-5

1 points
1
0
CanPackFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:35 am

Good old Joe. Our Forest Gump. As per his 2 down linemen "Stupid is, as Stupid does"!

Steelers fans have Matt Canada. GB fans have Joe Barry around our necks.

1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:19 am

The Packers are learning how to play and they are improving, very slowly but they are improving. Hopefully the current trend will continue and maybe by the end. of this season they will begin to learn how to win. Bottom line is that they still have a long way to go.

Game Balls: Jayden Reed, Luke Musgrave, Kenny Clark, and Rudy Ford.

Lame Calls: Dropped passes, Jordan Love with only a 52.5% completion ratio and 2 picks the end zone. Trick play. Officiating on what was a lateral by the Steelers.

Next 3 games, Chargers, Lions and Chiefs will indicate where the Packers stand against some of the league leaders. Go Pack Go! Thanks, Since '61

8 points
8
0
crayzpackfan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:50 am

61- Kenny Clark? Must have been a typo? I actually think Kenny Clark is having a subpar year for how he is paid and what is expected of him. Yesterday I was underwhelmed with him again. Just curious how he earned a game ball in your eyes. Much respect. Have a good week sir.

5 points
6
1
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:16 am

Yea...The return on investment sadly...just isn't there.

2 points
3
1
Packerpasty's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:31 am

well he played pretty good on an injured shoulder...

3 points
3
0
Since'61's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:58 am

I appreciate the feedback crazypackfan. I watched Clark make some solid plays against running plays. He may not deserve a game but he played better than anyone else I observed against the Steelers ground game. Thanks, Since '61

2 points
3
1
stockholder's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:21 am

Yes - he did. And when they moved him to the right.
He played better than Daniels.

1 points
1
0
crayzpackfan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:42 am

61- Fair enough

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:55 am

...Next 3 games, Chargers, Lions and Chiefs will indicate where the Packers stand against some of the league leaders...

Arrrgh! All my Lions friends are looking forward to licking Packer blood off their drumsticks on Thanksgiving. I only need this team to play hard and be competitive down this stretch. More than anything this will tell me how good the coaches are.

3 points
3
0
Untylu1968's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:24 am

Lions fans in the U.P. are the best! They cheer harder against the Packers every week than they do for their kitty cats. It's nice to see so many of them with new Lions gear and giving their poor old Barry Sanders jersey a break.. Every dog has its day, but we'll be back on top before you know it. GPG!!

2 points
2
0
Packerpasty's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:33 am

Sure are a whole lot of Honolulu silver and blue being worn in the U.P. this year...out of the closet they came!! Gotta feel good for my Lion fan friends and relatives though...and im jealous that we dont have a coach like they do...

0 points
0
0
CanPackFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:42 am

Really Razer? You need another 8 games to evaluate this coaching staff? They can't teach, they can't evaluate and they can't make meaningful in-game decisions. Don't get lulled into the ever-too-patient MLF style. They wasted Rodgers. Now they're going to waste/ruin some good young talent.

2 points
2
0
Razer's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:58 am

Don't get me wrong, I am not a fan of this coaching staff. BUT - I do think that Matt got thrown into a youth clusterf#ck by his GM and this FO. If this team plays hard and improves through to the end of season then LaFleur earns another season to take the boys to men.

-3 points
0
3
mnbadger's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:07 pm

Sorry Razer, but I think there's ample material on film to tell us how good our coaches are.
Next three weeks are going to be tough. I hope the players stick together through this period.
GPG!

2 points
2
0
Packers1985's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:46 pm

Against Chargers is somewhat winnable as this is happening in Lambeau and with injured Finger Herbert will have some issues. Their defense hasn't been great as well so it all starts with winning against them this weekend.

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:48 am

Jones would still be running if he caught that trick play pass.

1 points
1
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 05:11 pm

I think i know where the Packers stand before they play those 3 teams.

As i said in another post.

They need to learn how to run their offense before they learn how to win.
Which you could parse to mean the same thing i reckon.

'61....
It's true, we'll see where they are at the end of the season.

Should we see improvement? Well...we damn well better see something positive after week 18, right?
****************
Here's why everyone is losing their chit......

It isn't that Packer fans expected them to win the NFC North, (i'd like to think they are smarter than that).

They are losing their chit because they just look lost, too often.
There is nothing 'smooooth' about the Packers offense.
Yes, we see some nice plays here and there.
Three passes to Watson that come to mind.
Some nice connections with Musgrave like that catch down the seam.
Doubs scoring a handful of times showed improvement from last season.
Wicks and Reed occasionally.

But those plays are here 'n there.
There is nothing consistent, it's a hodgepodge offense, a play here, a play there, with this guy, that guy, and then some other guy.
There is no identity.

Ultimately....Packer fans are upset, because the offense isn't further along in their development than they are right now.

That is just my opinion, my .02

-1 points
0
1
Savage57's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:24 am

Young teams need to learn an entitlement mentality and how to capitalize on opportunity.

The benefits of the Packers splash plays were stillborn by their inability to sustain execution, especially in the red zone, where going 1-5 usually leads to a bad outcome. There's a remarkable difference in the passing accuracy of the former and current QB1's. You'd think that's a coachable thing, but maybe not.

And the run D giving up ground at a six-yards-per-carry clip didn't help the cause, either.

11 points
13
2
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:07 am

Well, F'n A 🤔......

If you are 1-5 in the red zone....
If you throw 2 picks in the last 4 minutes of the game....
If your 8first round picks on defense can't keep another team under 200 yards rushing....

You may lose the game.

Some view this game as some kind of moral victory.

I view this team as....

BROKEN

1 points
5
4
Savage57's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:32 am

It's Monday, so angst-laden overreactions are allowed.

1 points
1
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:46 am

Meh......

No angst is needed.

I think my post was/is correct and accurate.
If that is an overreaction....oh well 🤷‍♂️, it's reality.
********************
Anyone disagree with what i said?
Have anything to say?

No?

I didn't think so....shocking right? 😲

-1 points
1
2
PeteK's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:58 am

And after all of that, we were still very close to a win. Yes, losing is never good, but the Steelers have wins against the Browns and Ravens. So for the youngest team with beat up veterans, I'll draw some positives.

1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:10 am

Great post Savage57. We should some improvement in the passing accuracy and the run defense by now. I'm beginning to believe that it is a combination of mediocre coaching and over rated draft selections. The GM should held as accountable as the coaching staff.

We'll have better answers at the end of the season. Thanks, Since '61

4 points
4
0
HawkPacker's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:28 am

'He is going to be an okay quarterback in this league. But he is going to need a dominant defense behind him in order to win at this level. He doesn’t have that.'

I have been saying for quite awhile that the most important thing we can learn this year is Jordan Love our QB of the future. This is, without question, the most important position in the game today. I believe it best that we need a top 5 QB to succeed or at least a top 10. I know Love won't be the next AR, but he was a generational talent and it is not expected that Love would be as good as him. However, we need that postion to be outstanding for us. For Ken to state that he is going to be an 'okay' QB is not good enough.

I was not able to see the game yesterday as it was not on TV in our area. I drove to a local sports bar and the parking lot was so packed that I did not even go inside.

From what I have read thus far, it looks like Love had a very good game except for the 2 INT's. I see that he threw for a lot of yards but what is disturbing to me, outside of the INT's is that he completed just over 50% of his passes.

Can I get some thoughts here on whether or not he had a really good game or not as it appears that it was just OK?

7 points
7
0
Turophile's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:56 am

Quote from HawkPacker.
"I know Love won't be the next AR, but he was a generational talent and it is not expected that Love would be as good as him. However, we need that postion to be outstanding for us. For Ken to state that he is going to be an 'okay' QB is not good enough."

Unfortunately, saying this is not good enough, does not address the problem of trying to find someone who IS. You could easily draft three first round picks at QB over the next few years and have them all fail, which will also really weaken the rest of your team since top picks keep being used for a QB that is both expensive and doesn't pan out.

The success rate of QBs taken in round one, especially success to the level you want, is low. For every success story there there are several failures, both absolute failures and the failures where the QB bumps along but isn't very good (for example, Fields).

The best we can look forward to is one of two divergent answers:

1) Love keeps improving to be a top 10 QB
2) Love doesn't get better, but the Packers strike gold on their first attempt at getting a new QB.

Both scenarios require a lot of luck, though I would argue that option 1 has the better chance of success. After watching QB school on his passes and decisions, I have real hope he can be 'the guy'. Maybe not Rodgers level, but good.

2 points
3
1
PeteK's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:09 am

3rd choice, draft and sign some players that make us competitive again. We did it a few years ago and Jacksonville is also an example.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 13, 2023 at 11:57 am

"The success rate of QBs taken in round one, especially success to the level you want, is low."

Unfortunately, the success rate of QBs taken AFTER R1 is even lower.

3 points
3
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:11 am

'He is going to be an okay quarterback in this league. But he is going to need a dominant defense behind him in order to win at this level. He doesn’t have that.'

Translation......
If Love has a strong defense he can be a good game manager QB
**********************
You are correct...even with 8 first round picks on defense, he doesn't have that.

Here's the other thing, has Love proven he's even a good Game Manager?

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:38 am

Love is not being used to game manage, quite the opposite. He’s being called on to kick start the O. So much for the idea that we need to win with him this year not ask him to win for us.

3 points
3
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:37 am

Maybe he should be.
****************
I don't think it's a secret that Gute wanted to build a team with a dominant defense and a strong running game.

I think he wanted to get away from having to rely on the QB.
.02

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:56 am

It wouldn’t have been a bad strategy with a new QB.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 04:36 pm

He drafted Dillon, and a bunch of first round defensive players.

It hasn't been for a lack of trying, i'll give him credit for trying anyway.

Still say they 'should have' won that game.

But i don't play the 'IF' game.

You win or you lose, that's all the standings will tell you.

0 points
0
0
CanPackFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:56 am

Good observation Coldworld. He's being forced to push the ball more downfield because our running game has been subpar IMO. And our running game is subpar because our Oline is not as advertised which was supposed to be our strength. To be as kind as I can, strange decision making by coaches on Oline personnel choices here.

Let's face it - we have a "strange" coaching staff - from a HC who can't hire competent people, to coordinators that can't judge the talent they have, to position coaches who can't teach. The perfect storm!

5 points
5
0
mnbadger's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:11 pm

Coaching - a perfect F-5 if tornado or Category 5 if a hurricane.
A blizzard seeing how we're about to face winter.
Not good.
GPG!

1 points
1
0
HammertimeSince’89's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:13 pm

Both first half TD were throws that top 10 QB’s make…not game managers…and as far as managing the innumerable mistakes the OLine and WR have made all year Love appears unfazed…although unable to overcome those mistakes. If he overcomes this teams self sabatoge he would have to play at a star level QB which he hasn’t shown to be…but with 3 wins with this team and coaching staff he’s proven he can manage..while also showing flashes of potential for more

2 points
3
1
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 05:26 pm

He's a traded up for 1st round pick.

After 3 seasons of learning, i would hope he'd be showing some flashes in his 4th year.

But being a good starter in the NFL takes more than occasional flashes.

We'll see how this thing plays out Hammer.

1 points
1
0
Packers2020's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:13 am

Hawk,

I thought Love played a very good first half. Threw for 90 yards and 2 TDs and no INTs. I thought ML could have run the ball more in this game especially with Dillion. Dillion averaged over 7 yards per carry but only touched the ball 9 times.

The o-line was once again putrid in the interior and at LT. Walker was consistently getting shoved backward into Love and Runyan is just not good right now. Meyers is well Meyers.

Watson is another issue. He does not compete for the ball and does not get open consistently. Wicks, Doubs, and Reed should all be getting more opportunities then him right now. We have no #1 WR or a veteran WR that can help these young guys,

What Love needs to work on is his deep accuracy and not wanting to go for the TD all the time at the 15-20 yard line in the red zone. He tends to want to throw it in the end zone all the time instead of checking it down or throwing underneath so we can get inside the 5 yard line and make it easier.

Personally, I believe if Love fixes the deep accuracy, we draft two or three o-lineman next year, and we get a veteran WR this offense is a ton different. JMHO.

4 points
6
2
Packerpasty's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:42 am

what was Love and the coaches working on the last three years if it wasn't his footwork and accuracy and the ability to read the field, not lock onto one guy?? Poor coaching I guess...and all that spring practice he was doing with the WR's out in Cali that everyone bragged up..."Rodgers never did that"....

2 points
2
0
Minniman's picture

November 13, 2023 at 01:59 pm

"What Love needs to work on is his deep accuracy and not wanting to go for the TD all the time at the 15-20 yard line in the red zone."

Love typically underthrows deep ball attempts, then when he tries to correct it, he overthrows.

His mantra on a deep ball should be "the deeper, the better" - always.

At the moment, his receivers aren't sure if a ball is going to be under or over thrown, so throttle back whilst looking for the ball.

Love needs to help his guys by having them trust that it's always going to be out in front of them. Watson has 4.36 speed, if he gets a step on a CB, no-one's running him down....... the only "bad" thing that can happen then is a dropped or missed catch (or a deep cover 2 safety...... but that's another post).

WR's - Get the Jugs out boys - and warm up those hammies, there's work to be done...... lot's of work.

QB - book a few massages this week and warm up that shoulder and those hips, it's deep ball week.

P.S - Anyone here who plays golf understands that you want to go with your tendencies and eliminate one of your misses. If you slice, fine, aim left-of-left and at least know that the ball is going right.

0 points
0
0
Minniman's picture

November 13, 2023 at 02:06 pm

Personally, for the time being, I'd like to see Watson doing more crosser routes and work the center of the field - then earn a deep ball attempt.

When I see a Jordan Love deep ball, I see a lot of instances where there are 2 DB's in the frame. That means that there's space in the middle of the field to attack.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

November 13, 2023 at 02:49 pm

He needed to go for a TD in the 4th quarter because Degaura couldn’t be bothered to block Patrick Peterson on that missed PAT.

1 points
1
0
coolhand's picture

November 13, 2023 at 05:59 pm

That was a true OLE attempt by DeGuara and for me would have resulted in a benching. Absolutely no effort to block that guy, and when you are not on the field much you would expect 100% effort.

0 points
0
0
HammertimeSince’89's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:02 pm

For the first half, in my opinion, Love passed the eye test. The numbers were there, but also his movement in the pocket, the touch on the TD, and his control of the game finally passed my admittedly subjective eye test. On the drives with the interceptions he made throws that for us down the field to be in position to score. Both interceptions were Watson targets with the first one a mix of slightly off target and Watson making zero play on the ball and the second interception being basically a short Hail Mary…I conclude he played his best game yet to my eyes while I also learned Watson as WR1 might be hurting him and the consistent 4-5 dropped passes and lack of going up and getting it are to blame for the completion % I hate losing but this one feels different

1 points
2
1
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:35 am

GAME BALLS

Love -
It is always easy to give a QB a game ball. And his stat line won't be impressive. But he looked really damn good. His stats were 21 of 40 for 289 yards, 2 TD's, 2 INT's. Not impressive by any means. But his throws were. The 2 TD passes were definitely wow passes. He hit guys down field a ton. He had a few drops as well. He looked very comfortable in the pocket. This to me was one of his best games. He is doing things to escape the rush, to get the ball out that don't go on the stat sheets. The left handed pass to avoid a sack was a brilliant play.

Reed -
Right now Reed maybe our #1. He just makes plays. He had 5 targets, caught 5 passes for 84 yards and a TD.

Wicks -
If Reed is the #1, Wicks is 1B, or 2. He has such a good feel for the game. He knows how to get open and makes great plays. He had the one "drop", which the throw was off a bit. But he had 4 targets caught 3 for 51 yards.

Musgrave -
He is going to be a huge threat once he learns how to play. Which it appears he is learning. he caught 2 deep passes. One for 36 yards another for 28.

Tom/Walker -
I don't know what the stats will show for pressures/sacks given up to these guys, but damn did they do a great job against one of the leagues best Edge duo's.

LAME CALLS

Missed opportunities - Way to many missed opportunities in this game.
-Nixon has a chance to intercept the ball but doesn't get a 2nd foot down. Later on that drive the Steelers score a TD. Nixon gets that foot down they don't score.
-Campbell lets a potential Pick-6 go through his hands. Steelers then kick a FG and go up 23-19.
-Ballentine also had a chance for an interception that he dropped.
-Deguara does a poor job on the blocked FG. That blocked FG cost them a chance from kicking the FG at the end to tie it up.

Joe Barry -
I think Barry will likely be a mainstay here until he leaves GB. How many times do we have to see 2 DL on the field in key situations where there shouldn't be. Situations like 3rd and 1. First and goal at the 4.

Lateral -
I don't know how in the hell the refs ruled this a forward pass. What in the absolute fuck did they look at? I get not catching it live because of angles that they are standing. But they had it reviewed, and had all the angles. It was clearly a backwards pass, in which GB recovered an actually scored. They blew it dead, so it would have been GB's ball at whatever yard line, but that cost the Packers 7 points and at least the ball inside their 10. I just don't get how the Packers can get screwed by the refs so damn much. In a game that we lost by 4 points, these 7 points could have won us the game.

THREE AND OUT

" Jordan Love continued his nasty habit of under throwing on critical passes."
While Love was really good hitting guys downfield this is a problem. But I feel like he was much improved in this game. IMO he shouldn't have made the throw to Watson in the endzone. The DB had leverage. if he Makes that throw it has to be in the corner of the endzone where only Watson can get it.

- Jones should be in the lame calls, but he is so damn vital to our team so I didn't put him there. I had to add him here though. He had 2 very costly plays in this game. First was his drop from Wicks. that play was setup beautifully and he flat out dropped it. If he catches it, there is a very good chance he gets a first down. It was 3rd and 11, and it was blocked extremely well. Also, the final drive he did not get out of bounds. The play is at 51 seconds left. The next play started at 28 seconds. That cost them way too much time, when he could have gotten out of bounds.

- Watson, I have seen so much hate towards him. Can we stop the hate. Lets not forget that 8 years ago we had a 2nd year WR who struggled some, and people wanted him gone. He only became the best WR in the league. Yes Adams had a very down 2nd year. We have to have patience with young players. Watson has the skills. The one big difference with Adams and Watson is that Adams had a HOF QB throwing to him. Watson has a guy just starting his career. But give these guys time to develop. Have patience and stop the hate!

6 points
10
4
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:37 am

The 2 TD passes were 'WOW' passes.

Here's reality......
Love's WOW passes are routinely thrown every Sunday by various QB's.

Sometimes i think we over credit, because he has flashes here and there of looking like a good starting QB in this league, and then.......Jordan Love happens.

I don't have hate with Watson, Doubs, Love, etc, or anyone for that matter.
I keep asking...where is this 2nd year leap with Watson and Doubs, but the only reply i get are thumbs down for an answer, with no comment from the lettuce head crowd.

I read many many times....that this offense was going to take off when Love starts and runs MLF's offense......"the way he wants it run".
Ok, is that what i'm watching, or does Love need another year or two?

Didn't the BOSS (Murphy) say they'd know what they had in Love halfway through the season?
Well, we're more than halfway.
********************
The only angst i have is the way this team has been mismanaged and why Gute and MLF got fat contract extensions.

With Murphy leaving in 2025, was he taking care of his boys?

The Packers GM no longer has full authority of the team in Green Bay.
When they did have full authority, 2 Championship rosters were built and 2 Super Bowls were won.

Don't fix, what isn't broke.

Too late 🤷‍♂️....Don't let the door hit ya on the way out Ginger Gap

0 points
4
4
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:47 am

"I keep asking...where is this 2nd year leap with Watson and Doubs, but the only reply i get are thumbs down for an answer, with no comment from the lettuce head crowd."

Here is my question. Is their 2nd year jump slowed by having a brand new starting QB? Where would they be this year had they played with Rodgers for a 2nd year?

This is not bashing Love or anything. I am just wondering where they would be at with a QB who isn't starting for the first time.

-1 points
1
2
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:59 am

Until Watson does more, Doubs is the guy teams key on. That’s asking a lot of any receiver and Doubs is still a guy in his second season. Watson seems to have coasted through the off season to me. He wasn’t standing out in camp before injury and he doesn’t seem to have progressed. That’s a big problem unless you have a peak Adams and veteran QB.

Reed in the slot helps a bit, but he’s still inconsistent. If Watson stepped up, I think they all shine more brightly. I’m wondering if, actually, Watson shouldn’t sit a while for Wicks, but that would mean giving up LaFleur’s beloved isolation go routes (not that they work).

2 points
3
1
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:15 am

The part I am wondering about Watson, is that he has gotten steps on DB's to only have Love throw the ball short. Does Rodgers throw those short? I don't think so. His whole perception changes if he isn't underthrown an many of these throws. Love is learning just like the young WR's. And a lot of this game is a learning thing with reps. The more reps together the better they will be.

I do wonder if they need to rotate the WR's more. Wicks and Reed definitely need more playing time and/or targets.

0 points
3
3
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:03 am

Rodgers had a lot of misses with Watson. This is where route timing comes in to the equation. Watson seems to slow at times, is that planned? He fade catches often, even when covered, is that technique?

Watson didn’t have the QBs in college to throw comparable go route balls. It’s was not his strength technically last year. At some point I can’t get away from the feeling that, if you have a plus athlete (assuming he’s fully fit), a wise coach finds a way to use him to his current strengths and build from there. I thought we learned that last year, but apparently not. Help him to help himself and the team.

1 points
3
2
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:28 am

He did. But also Watson was a rookie, and then Rodgers broke his thumb so he was off also. Once they started hitting in week 10 last year, they clicked.

Let me ask this about Watson. Does he look healthy to you? There just looks to be something off with him. I don't know what it is.

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 03:31 pm

No. He doesn’t seem right. Presumably that’s health.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 05:19 pm

Watson looks frail RC, the same thing i said after the draft about Kevin King.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 13, 2023 at 05:41 pm

King is why they have to watch Alexander.
The injuries are piling up.

0 points
0
0
Packers2020's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:21 am

Agreed Cold.

The other thing to remember is Doubs is a 4th rounder. He most likely will be a #2 or #3 WR and not a #1. Mid to late rounders do not generally become #1 WR's.

I also agree with you on Wicks. If ML had any balls at all, he would give Wicks Watson's opportunities to light some fire under Watson and hold him accountable.

That is my biggest issue with ML. He does not hold any of these players accountable for their play or his coaches for that matter. It is a big issue.

3 points
3
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 05:21 pm

Agreed Packers2020.....

But i think this team has had an accountability issue for a long, long, long time.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:33 am

Well RC, ....

I'm of the mindset that i don't care who the QB is, this is the NFL, Love has been studying for 3 years, has been in 2 off seasons with Watson and Doubs....
I want to see improvement.
Right now i'm see regression with Watson from last season.
I see improvement with Doubs i guess, especially scoring.
Part of that may be due to being healthier than last season.
********************
"I am just wondering where they would be at with a QB who isn't starting for the first time."

This is what i wonder RC....
I wonder where a first year QB would be without so many first year pass catchers, or 2nd year players not yet fully developed.

-1 points
0
1
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:47 am

I just chalk it up as they are learning and growing together.

That is kind of my point with it all. Love is learning with young WR's. The young WR's are learning with a young QB. Its a learning growing year.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 04:41 pm

I get that RC.....

That is exactly why i call this season a 17 game training camp for the offense.

I'll be making a 'list' of various excuses used for this team this season that i'm sure won't make me all that popular....lol

Oh well, as everything i write, it will contain truth. 🙂

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:23 am

I find positives in Loves 16 generated TDs because that is a good barometer of a QB's ability. Unfortunately, it 's off set by too many INTs, but I see the glass half full.

0 points
0
0
HammertimeSince’89's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:48 pm

Watching the games I wonder if timing is different with Watson being so tall and athletic that it’s going to come along slower because of Love could learn to put it where Watson is the only one who can get it…their ceiling together is what we should be excited about if he’s too passive I’m for making him the Z and drafting Keon Coleman (saw this on another page suggested not an original idea)

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:42 am

Walker played well on Live viewing. Myers and Runyon did not for a half. Tom surrendered one sack but was otherwise excellent. I can’t help thinking that this team is better if (health permitting), Walker, Nijman and Tom all play. It wouldn’t hurt to see Rhyan and yesterday seems like it would have been a good opportunity. I’ve no faith in the OL decision making and nothing seems to abate that as weeks pass.

4 points
6
2
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:49 am

Overall I thought Myers was fine. I know he allowed 1 pressure for sure off the top of my head. Runyan however just struggles. The one screen pass in the redzone, Runyan whiffs on the block, which if he blocks him they have a very good chance to get a first down. It is time to see what Rhyan can to at RG.

1 points
3
2
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:04 am

Even charitably, Myers is the Dean Lowry of the OL and was in that game.

1 points
4
3
HammertimeSince’89's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:30 pm

I’m not into calling for jobs but Stenovich and Butkus promotions coincide with the fall off in play, usage, and development I would really like to see us start to target hog mollies and people movers even if it costs a little in the pass blocking area A little nasty on the OLine could even bleed over to the run defense…a fan can dream can’t he?

3 points
3
0
coolhand's picture

November 13, 2023 at 06:06 pm

I really think MLF needs to clean house with his coaches, there are only a couple worth keeping.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:45 am

I don't see Watson as a problem.
He's still getting Double Teamed.
And this offense couldn't move without him.
(per past loses)

The truth is Love can't force the ball to him.
Watson should always be his first look.

Then go to Tes.
Brett Favre knew when to go to the TEs
And Love has to do that same thing.

4 points
4
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:57 am

Where was the hook & post-up to any of the TEs on the Final Play? Even with a HOF QB, LaFleur is weak with red zone play design. Has Degura been cut yet? Not putting my marbles on Alt for the LT. No bend.

0 points
0
0
Minniman's picture

November 13, 2023 at 02:12 pm

Walker was a contributor to that failed PAT.

He didn't number up, and left Deguara with 2 DB's to cover.

Rick B needs to sort that out - how did these guys not see a stacked left-hand side and not communicate to slide (or number up from the) left?

They gifted Damontae Kazee (23) a blocked punt, then an interception. It's the wrong fan site, but GB gifted an NFL journeyman a career game. Game ball to Kazee!

1 points
1
0
egbertsouse's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:36 am

I’ll just get this out of the way: It was the refs’ fault!!! Booo-hoo-hoo! Waaaaaaaaa-waaaaaaa!

Now we can move on to other things.

-2 points
5
7
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:55 am

Even you Edgertsouse can admit that the Lateral was a horrible call and should have given the Packers a TD.

Even you can admit that right?

6 points
6
0
Packers0808's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:00 am

It may not be the refs fault, but they did with the missed call completely change the complexity of the game and the way it would have moved forward.

3 points
4
1
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:02 am

That call was dreadful. Had it been given correctly, we likely score. Even a field goal changes the game dramatically.

That said, we dug our own hole and hiding behind mistakes of others does nothing for us moving forward. It’s a distraction not an excuse.

2 points
2
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:25 am

Had it been called correctly and allowed the play to continue as they should have, we did score. Gary recovered it and scored.
But at the very least with the challenge it should have been our ball. That play changed the game in a bad way for us.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:10 am

The game is one thing. How we played it is more significant. Hence I acknowledge the bad call as significant to the game but not the overall picture.

I do note that the whistle had gone, so at the very least, no score on that play would have counted.

1 points
1
0
Razer's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:51 am

Every game is going to have bad calls or missed calls. My only problem with this particular bad call is that we have a review that can clearly see the play. The NFL review process is a sham working to support the generally sub par referee system. Apparently it is easier to hide the truth rather fix it.

1 points
1
0
Packers0808's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:36 am

Agreed!

1 points
1
0
Packers0808's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:38 am

For sure, blind man can see it was a lateral or backward pass. Not an excuse for losing, but damn make the right calls especially after a review show clearly what everyone else saw!

1 points
1
0
packerbackerjim's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:36 am

Game: Reed, Wicks, Musgrave on offense. Ballantine and Johnson on defense, though the learning curve will steepen the next several weeks against very good QBs.

Lame: what else, run defense. The only reason it wasn’t more atrocious was the Steelers didn’t go heavy run in the second half. No wonder Steeler fans don’t like Matt Canada.

8 points
8
0
coolhand's picture

November 13, 2023 at 06:08 pm

Well I thought the D played better run D in the second half, more aggressive. But why did it take so long for barry to make a change?

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:47 am

Love doesn't have to have a shutdown defense. Pittsburg isn't one but they had some good stops and got some turnovers. There are a bunch of Ds that are just good enough because the get some turnovers.

There were MVP caliber QBs yesterday that threw interceptions and even pick 6s. It happens all the time. Some of those teams went on to win their games. Go figure? The Packers just need to be a complete team. That might require good coaching, I think. What do I know?

8 points
8
0
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:45 am

When both your O line and D are porous for a half, the chances are the day or season doesn’t end well no matter who is at QB.

2 points
3
1
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:55 am

Ironically, the Steelers and the Packers give up the same average points per game at 20.2 which isn't bad.
They are tied for tenth in Def. scoring.
What that means is, the Packers offense isn't getting it done.
They don't score enough to win unless they are playing bottom defenses like the Bears.

Another difference being that the Steelers feast on turnovers, they are tied for first in turnovers with the Bengals at +10.

Yes, everyone throws interceptions, but 2 things come to mind Steve.....
1) Some teams are good enough to overcome them.
2) Timing.....2 interceptions in the last 4 minutes of a one score game is unacceptable (on any team).
A QB has to be wiser at that juncture.

4 points
5
1
CanPackFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 11:06 am

T7, I think u know a heck of a lot more than this incestuous coaching staff does! Love will turn out alright IF a more complete team is assembled around him. And just as importantly, if even a mediocre coaching staff is assembled.

2 points
2
0
Razer's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:47 am

Overall, the better average team won. The lesser QB won in most part due to a solid run game.

A statement by Bill Cowher, former Steeler's coach and now CBS analyst played out in this game. He made a comment about Detroit's rebuild saying that he likes how they have "built their team from the inside out". Meaning, the Lions started by retooling their O and D lines. I watched the the Lions run at will and Goff throw from a clean pocket all day. We are making this season out to be about youth, Love, Joe Barry and our HC but this season will be defined by a below average O-line and "B" grade D-line.

7 points
8
1
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 07:54 am

"With 3:04 to play in the third quarter, Anders Carlson booted a 28 yard field goal to give the Packers a 19 to 17 lead. But Green Bay would get the ball back four more times, and yet couldn’t manufacture another single point. "

It has to be deflating to the offense when they take the ball score, take the lead, to have the defense give up points immediately after. And this is in the 4th quarter. Packers take the lead, and the defense gives up 28 yards on first down, finally shut them down, but they give up the FG to lose the lead 20-19.
This isn't the first time that this has happened this year already.

-Against the Broncos they are down 16-10. We have a long drive. 11 plays 76 yards get the TD to go up 17-16. The drive immediately after the Broncos have a 9 play 41 yards, and kicks a FG to go up 19-17.

-Against the Raiders the Packers were tied at 10. They kick a FG to go up 13-10. Only to have the defense give up a 10 play 75 yard drive for a TD immediately after.

-Against the Lions while they never took the lead, they were down 27-3 in this game. They get a TD and is 27-17 with basically the whole 4th quarter left. They give up a 14 play 75 yard drive, that took up 8:52. and allowed a TD. Not saying they come back, but if the defense gets a stop there they have the whole 4th quarter to do something with it.

11 points
11
0
Razer's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:14 am

The simple answer is that our defense is bad. Yes, Joe Barry is a weak coach but he is just one in a long line of weak DCs. Coincidence eh? Every team in the league can and will run on this defense because our D-line is weak. And, despite our investment in edge rushers we don't really get to the QB enough. At some point we will fire Barry and the next guy will inherit a line that teams run threw or get stymied by a good O-line.

3 points
3
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:28 am

I agree about the defense and the DC.

I feel like most of our issues are schematic more. Playing 2 DL as much as they do is not a good thing. Especially when our DT's aren't big time run stuffers.

I feel like a simple scheme change would improve a lot of things. Putting players in the best position to succeed will be a good start.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:50 am

Clark isn’t a DT in my eyes since his slim down. He’s a bigger DE. We do not have two true DTs active that are of a size to hold up in a heavy run scenario. Too often all we do is wear down Slaton and waste Clark the threat pretending he’s still the body type he was when he entered the league.

2 points
2
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:53 am

I honestly think Clark is at his best playing NT. He uses his quickness to burn C more often then not. But we need 2 guys next to him. Brooks and Wooden right now are better pass rusher types. Wyatt is also more of a DE. When they have Clark and Wyatt together they are pretty light in the box.
If they would go with 3 DL, 2 Edge, and go with 1 ILB, it would do more to help the run game out

1 points
1
0
Razer's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:08 am

...Playing 2 DL as much as they do is not a good thing. Especially when our DT's aren't big time run stuffers...

Yeah, I don't know why we run with the two down linemen so much other than our DCs basically try to play a 4-3 using the two OLBers as defensive ends. Either way, we don't have enough talent on the D-line to play with the big O-lines and the 4th-7th rounders that we draft are not good enough.

2 points
2
0
Swisch's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:31 am

It seems we do have good players on the defensive line and at edge rusher.
I'm wondering if it's Barry that's holding them back.
With about half a season left, a significant stretch of time, perhaps it's time to sack Barry and see if a new defensive coordinator can get more out of our defenders.

1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:53 am

We have penetration types and Slaton. We don’t have (and Barry doesn’t like to use) multiple bigger guys. That’s been a failure for him as it was for Pettine before him. There are times when one needs to. We cut ourselves off from that option. We’ve regularly paid a high price for it.

2 points
3
1
Swisch's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:30 am

Can a team compensate for having defensive linemen who are smaller by the types of schemes or the use of surrounding personnel?
Can lighter and quicker defensive linemen be turned into a plus overall, and even in stopping the run against big offensive linemen?

0 points
0
0
Swisch's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:19 am

Great stuff, RC, in terms of providing much needed perspective on the defense.
Yesterday, after the Packers had come back from a big deficit to take the lead in the second half, it was frustrating to have our defense gashed by the Steelers running game.
There was also that scramble by the Steelers QB on third down late in the game to pick up a first down -- which was the reason our offense didn't get the ball back until there was under a minute to go, and with no timeouts.
***
It seems the defense plays just good enough to lose.
Yet, it seems there is a lot of talent on defense.
It seems Barry will never be a top defensive coordinator -- perhaps especially because of an inability to make adjustments during a game to put our defenders in position to make key stops.
It seems we should get a new defensive coordinator as of today.

-1 points
0
1
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:33 am

I really think changing the DC is the most important move to be made in the offseason. I know LaFleur won't make the move in season.

3 games this year we have taken the lead in the 4th quarter only to lose the lead on the very next series. And the Lions game they had a chance until they gave up the long drive and TD.
If we hold onto those leads we are 6-3. Crazy to think that.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:07 am

That was last year. This year the need is to remove LaFleur and his whole gaggle of second raters. Change the mindset, approach and process. Otherwise there will be new Barry’s and Butkus’ and more if the same.

4 points
5
1
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:54 am

I disagree about LaFleur.

There has been growth on offense. We have seen that. The team continues to fight. That is on the HC. There are tons of signs of that.
Packers were down 17-0 against the Saints and won 18-17. Packers were down 27-3 Against the Lions. They got to within 10 (27-17) with a full quarter left. Defense gave up an almost 9 minute drive and TD to put the game out of reach. They took 4th quarter leads in 3 games only to have the Defense give up the lead. This game they had a chance at the end of the game. They have had chances in other games. The point is they are fighting and outside of the Lions game, they were in every game.

I will blame LaFleur for keeping Barry on staff. That is his biggest flaw as a HC.

Position coaches I have no clue to tell if they are good or bad. To many times people look at the players and if that player is a star the position coach is automatically good. If the player sucks its automatically the position coach.

I know you want LaFleur gone. I disagree with it, but whatever. No point in going back and forth on it over and over.

0 points
1
1
Swisch's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:49 am

It's possible LaFleur would be a good offensive coordinator on another team, and Barry would be a good position coach on another team.
With regard to LaFleur, even if the offense is improving, it seems overall the Packers are too undisciplined and disoriented -- and that's on the head coach.
It doesn't seem as though either of these two guys are long-term answers as high-level coaches, so why continue with them?
***
We need coaches who will discern which of our players are long-term answers by putting our guys in positions to maximize their potential.
If it was my call, I'd put in Bisaccia as interim head coach today.
There are still so many games left, about half a season, which is not to be wasted.
Look at what the Vikings are doing.
Remember what the Packers did last year late in the season by winning four straight.
Let's maximize the final eight games of 2023 to at least better set us up for 2024 as a winning team.

1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 11:05 am

" it seems overall the Packers are too undisciplined and disoriented "

Some of that is due to being the youngest team in the league. I don't see them being overly disoriented though. Most of it is just players aren't making plays, whether its the QB missing throws or WR's dropping passes, or OL missing blocks. Those are the physical things that coaches can't really help much.

I keep going back to this, but LaFleur turned GB around in 2019. They had 3 13 win seasons. And if it was purely Rodgers, then why was it that he only had 1 13+ win season before LaFleur? Last year the QB played hurt, and this year they are starting a new QB and all new weapons. This is a development year. We need to have patience!

0 points
1
1
Swisch's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:42 pm

Maybe your right, RC, and it's good to get different takes from different fans.
Actually, that's the fun of Cheesehead TV, or so it seems to me.
In agreement and disagreement, we can have good camaraderie talking Packers.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:16 am

Lame call to Joe Barry. The packers averaged 2.18 D-linemen per play yesterday against a team that was running the ball down their throats. I believe they even played two D-linemen on the goal line play where the Pittsburgh running back almost walked into the end zone. How does Barry not make an in-game adjustment and start playing three D-linemen when he is getting crushed by the Pittsburgh rushing attack?

The Packers will never have a decent defense with this guy as DC.

10 points
10
0
Swisch's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:25 am

Thumbs up, Guam.
This strategy by Barry to hinder our run defense seems especially poor because the Steelers don't appear to have the most potent passing attack.
After the Packers took the lead in the second half, it seems the Steelers gashed the Packers defense with three or more runs of more than ten yards. Deflating.

1 points
2
1
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:36 am

"I believe they even played two D-linemen on the goal line play where the Pittsburgh running back almost walked into the end zone."

Correct. It was 1st and goal at the 4, and they had 2 DL.
This was after they gave up runs of 5 yards, 0 yards, 7 yards, 12 yards, 6 yards, 6 yards. Also gave up a 6 yards pass to Warren.

-1 points
1
2
RCPackerFan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:33 am

Whoever downvoted this. I absolutely agree. I don't like these facts either.

-1 points
0
1
LambeauPlain's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:21 pm

I have been saying this for 2 1/2 years. At least MLF is achieving his objective in keeping the hapless Barry...consistency. Barry is consistently bad at his job.

1 points
1
0
Aldo's picture

November 13, 2023 at 08:49 am

Until there is a change in attitude regarding accountability, starting with Joe Barry as defensive coordinator, this team is going nowhere.

7 points
8
1
Johnf's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:05 am

Your very right as long as bonehead Barry it there they will keep losing can win gave up that many yards every game they just eat the clock up

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:30 pm

No one is held accountable at 1265 Lombardi.

Murphy certainly is not...being allowed to play NFL owner for 5 years and counting.

The "football committee" certainly is not. All three direct reports to Acting GM Murphy are allowed to interfere in each other's sandboxes.

And the coaches certainly are not...the DC and OC are not good at their jobs. I don't even know what OC Stenovich's role is. Barry is a perennial bottom feeder of coaches. Bisaccia has taken a step backwards. And MLF is a glorified, highly paid OC and does not seem at all involved in the other two phases of the team.

And it is not going to change next season with Murphy entering his swan song.

1 points
1
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:04 am

I'm not sure i'm on board with Ken Lass's proclamation that the "Next step is learning how to win"

I think the next step is developing this young offense, that usually has to happen before the winning starts.

As i've stated before, time and again......

This is a season of development (17 game training camp) with a young, inexperienced offense (including Love).

I don't lay all the blame on the players or MLF.

How....can you give a first year starting QB such a young inexperienced offense, and expect any sort of success.
That's ludicrous.

But that is exactly what Murphy and Gute did.

You groom a QB for 3 long years, at least give him the tools to be successful.

That's almost like giving a carpenter a hammer and a tape measure and saying "go build me a house".

This is the NFL Mr. Mark Murphy, you don't hold training camp during the season.

BROKEN

5 points
5
0
Razer's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:46 am

...How....can you give a first year starting QB such a young inexperienced offense, and expect any ort of success. That's ludicrous. But that is exactly what Murphy and Gute did...

I agree. Moving on from Rodgers wasn't going to be easy but handcuffing yourself with contracts and inexperience isn't a reasonable transition strategy. I think the front office were hiding behind Rodgers for a long time hoping to hide poor drafts and a coaching mess. Handicapping Love makes this process unnecessarily difficult and perhaps fatal for the young QB.

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:54 am

You score a ten out of ten. They gave themselves Contract Extensions and this built-in excuse to justify going forward with this malfeasance.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

November 13, 2023 at 04:50 pm

Keep in mind, the offensive talent depletion started before Love was starting.

IMO, after drafting Love, this team has been mismanaged on various levels.

We still had Aaron Jones to keep the ship from listing too much, but were seeing cracks there now also.
Not sure what to make of that yet.

0 points
0
0
NWPackersfan's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:32 am

The Coaching staff is not helping Jordan at all. Personally I'd make him throw nothing but 20 plus yard throws all week at training.
My other concern is his QB IQ, as his decision making is as bad as his accuracy many times.
No creativity again on the offense and how can year in year out the defense be so bad at stopping the RUN!
Based on the Steelers QB they had to know that the RUN was where they would lean on not the PASS!
Really Poor Preparation in almost every game this year.

At this point let's see what our back-up QB's can do,,,it certainly couldn't hurt!

Go Pack Go

3 points
4
1
Razer's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:58 am

I wouldn't give up on Love so easily. To your point, the coaching staff isn't doing him many favors on numerous fronts. The next guy is going to get handicapped with the same bullshit coaching, inexperience and talent gaps. If we going go with an all-young offense then they can sink or swim together.

I would work on providing Love with better run blocking, better screen blocking and more short crosser routes. In other words, I would change what we are practicing and drill some simpler fundamentals. I'd probably sit Runyon if Ryhan can step up.

2 points
2
0
Packerpasty's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:38 am

Love, perhaps would be serviceable "if" he had a really strong team around him, a few all pro's, etc...the Packers dont have that...and now what was first being said about Love, "give him a half a season"....now its "give him another year"....well im sure they will just to save face but if they dont upgrade a few positions as in WR the results could be the same...and Jones seems to be showing his football age now too...Dillon is just meh despite his high stepping yesterday...there are a few true rookie QB's that are already showing more than Love has....I wont even bring up one of the names because for some reason everyone says "oh, thats not fair he's really good"....

4 points
4
0
Razer's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:11 am

Totally agree. Jared Goff looks like an All Pro behind a solid O-line and equipped with two stud RBs. At this rate, the likely script on Love will be that he didn't know where his WRs would be, his RBs kept running into the backs of the O-linemen being pushed into the backfield and the coaches kept doing the same thing.

If you were going to evaluate a QB prospect you wouldn't start with so many gaps of talent, inexperience and coaching gaffs.

2 points
2
0
TXCHEESE's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:12 am

The under throws particularly to Watson are just maddening. You have a 6-4 hyper-athletic receiver. Throw it high and let him go get it. The interception and the last play both should have been thrown high enough where only Watson can get it, even if he doesn't come down with it, there would be the possibility of PI being called. OK, who am I kidding, after the non-lateral call, it's probably a pipe dream that PI would be called with the game on the line against those darling little steelers.

I will say that the Packers did play much cleaner on the offensive side of the ball yesterday. Here's hoping they continue to grow.

4 points
4
0
CoachJV's picture

November 13, 2023 at 10:28 am

Nixon needs a Game ball for his great performances on ST.... He gave us great field position a couple of times.

3 points
3
0
cheesehead1's picture

November 13, 2023 at 11:11 am

Love was better, but still some head scratching plays. Watson looks to have taken a step back, way too inconsistent. As usual our D did not step up giving up 205 rushing yards, absolutely pathetic.

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 13, 2023 at 12:37 pm

This season is eerily similar to 2008 when Rodgers took over. He had to play with Bob Sanders Defense who constantly gave up game losing scores in the 4th quarter. You just knew if O got a lead the D would give it back.

Barry Ball is the same Sword of Damocles hanging over this team. Just no confidence in the man to make a positive difference. When the D has a good game, it is mostly a huge surprise. But it never continues.

At least I have Badger Foot...I mean Basketball to look forward to.

2 points
2
0
lpirlot's picture

November 13, 2023 at 01:18 pm

New York couldn't admit that the ref blew the whistle too soon because he wrongly assumed a forward pass instead of a lateral/backward pass.

0 points
0
0
SweetPotatoGB's picture

November 13, 2023 at 01:36 pm

I think the team is trending in the right direction overall, and even though it isn't exciting to look at the Packers record it is exciting to see the growth and imagine what the future may hold. I'm not sure how they can fix their issues with tackling, and I really would like to see more turnovers from the defense...but, I still believe their offense has a lot of upside and potential once they really get dialed in as a unit. On to the next game, GO PACK GO!

0 points
0
0
White92's picture

November 13, 2023 at 06:06 pm

What does Deguara do to justify a roster spot? He was supposed to be this genius Swiss army knife pick. Turns out he isn't good at anything

-1 points
0
1
RandyNPRFL's picture

November 13, 2023 at 09:14 pm

I agree Carrington Valentine had a good game defending the pass, but watch him on Jaylen Warren's 16yd TD run, he looks like a QB faking a handoff trying to take the ball away making no effort to tackle, that has to improve.

0 points
0
0